Abstract
Aim To investigate whether polypharmacy and comorbidities conveyed more risk of adverse health outcomes following COVID-19 infection in people with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) or type 2 diabetes (T2DM).
Materials and methods The Greater Manchester Care Record (GMCR) is an integrated database of electronic health records containing data collected from 433 general practices in Greater Manchester. Baseline demographic information (age, BMI, gender, ethnicity, smoking status, deprivation index), hospital admission or death within 28 days of infection were extracted for adults (18+) diagnosed with either T1DM or T2DM.
Results For T2DM, 16 to 20 medications (p=0.01; OR [95% CI]=2.37 [1.31 to 4.32]) and > 20 medications (p=0; OR [95% CI]=3.14 [1.75 to 5.62]) were associated with increased risk of death following COVID-19 infection. Increased risk of hospital admissions in T2DM individuals was determined for 11 to 15 medications (p=0.01; OR [95% CI]=1.34 [1.06 to 1.69]) and above. This was independent of comorbidities, metabolic and demographic factors. For T1DM there was no association of polypharmacy with hospital admission. Respiratory, cardiovascular/cerebrovascular and gastrointestinal conditions were associated with increased risk of hospital admissions and deaths in T2DM (p>0.001).
Conclusion We have shown in T2DM an independent association of number of medications taken from 11 upwards with adverse health consequences following COVID-19 infection. We also found that individuals with diabetes develop comorbidities that were common across both T1DM and T2DM. This study has laid the foundation for future investigations into the way that complex pharmacological interactions may influence clinical outcomes in people with T2DM.
Introduction
Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) or COVID-19 is the pathogenic coronavirus that led to the 2020 pandemic. COVID-19 infections can lead to adverse outcomes, such as hospital admission or death, the risk of which are increased further for individuals diagnosed with either type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) 1,2. Increased risk of adverse health outcomes following COVID-19 infection have also been linked to other underlying medical conditions, which has raised concerns for chronic disease care 3–7. It has been showed that socially marginalised and psychiatrically vulnerable individuals are at higher risk of severe health outcomes following COVID-19 infection 8. McQueenie et al. (2020) investigated the UK Biobank data to determine the association between multi-morbidity (including polypharmacy as a proxy) and COVID-19 infection risk 9. McQueenie et al. (2020) reported that individuals diagnosed with ≥2 cardiometabolic conditions and increasing polypharmacy were associated with increased the risk of COVID-19 infection 9.
Previous studies of COVID-19 in individuals with T1DM and T2DM (in the Greater Manchester (GM) area) have shown that the prescribing of certain medications influenced the likelihood of hospitalisation or death following COVID-19 infection 10,11. Many individuals in this population are often prescribed, and are taking, multiple medications as they live with other long-term conditions. The definition of ‘polypharmacy’ has been shown to widely vary in the published literature 12. In addition to this term, Masnoon et al. (2017) summarised that the terms minor, moderate and major polypharmacy were used in literature to describe when between 2 to 11 or more medications are consumed. The most commonly reported number of medications across these ‘polypharmacy’ terms was greater than or equal to 5, as identified in the review 12.
It is widely accepted that the higher the number of medications prescribed and taken by an individual, the higher the risk of poor health outcomes. Recent reviews have reported a high prevalence of polypharmacy in older people diagnosed with diabetes and an association with several health-related outcomes, including falls, syncope, hospitalization, and death, as well as highlighting the need to reduce inappropriate prescribing 13–15. Several studies have also investigated the relationship between polypharmacy and severe COVID-19 health outcomes 16,17. However, there is little understanding of how polypharmacy in people with diabetes might affect their risk of severe health outcome post COVID-19 infection, other than the public health burden and impact of adverse drug-drug interactions in individuals 18.
Electronic health records (EHR) emerged as a useful tool for public health and COVID-19 research, as described by Madhavan et al. (2021) and Casey et al. (2016) 19,20. It is also useful for improving health service for example by identifying and understanding health inequalities 21,22.
To date, there are no studies that explore the associations between both polypharmacy and comorbidity with adverse health outcomes, such as hospital admission or death, post first infection of COVID-19 specifically in individuals with diabetes. This study aimed to investigate whether polypharmacy and comorbidities conveys more risk of adverse outcomes in people with diabetes when testing positive for COVID-19 infection in UK EHR data.
Materials and methods
Cohort data source
The Greater Manchester Care Record (GMCR) is an integrated database of primary care, secondary care and mental health trusts from across GM (https://gmwearebettertogether.com/research-and-planning/) for retrospective analyses covering a population of approximately 3 million people. Health and care data were collected from 433 of 435 (99.5%) general practices in GM. Data were de-identified at source and were extracted from the GMCR database. The inclusion criteria for this study were defined as individuals that are registered with a GM GP practice and with a diagnosis of T1DM or T2DM and age 18 or above. Individuals with a positive test for COVID-19 close to January 2020 were included in this study.
Variables and data cleaning
Baseline demographic information (age, BMI, gender, ethnicity, smoking status, deprivation index), hospital admission or death within 28 days of infection were extracted for adults (18+) diagnosed with either T1DM or T2DM (the codes applied are summarised in Appendix 1). Other rare forms of diabetes were not included.
Hospital admissions were recorded within 4 weeks after, or 2 weeks before a positive COVID-19 test (between Jan 2020 to May 2022). The exposure was defined as prescribed medications, which were recorded in the EHRs and mapped to the corresponding BNF (British National Formulary) chapters. For this study, medications were considered at a single point in time, the month closest to first COVID-19 infection date (January 2020 onwards). The BNF groups were not mutually exclusive, therefore medications that are grouped under more than one chapter were counted. History of comorbidity was collected before March 2020.
Individuals who were not assigned a gender were excluded. A total of 410 individuals having a code for both T1DM and T2DM were excluded. Data were checked for extreme outliers or inconsistent values and removed as appropriate.
Ethics
This project was reviewed, and ethical approval for COVID-19 research was overseen by Health Innovation Manchester and granted by the Greater Manchester Care Record (GMCR) review board (ref: IDCR-RQ-046). This research was performed with anonymised data, in line with the Health Research Authority’s Governance arrangements for research ethics committees.
Statistical methods
Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed on the T1DM and T2DM individuals, measuring exposure to number of medications and comorbidities, with either hospital admission or death after COVID-19 infection (within 28 days of COVID-19 diagnosis) as the outcome. The models were adjusted for age, BMI, ethnicity, smoking status, IMD, eGFR < 60, cholesterol, HBA1C and blood pressure. Analyses were performed in STATA v17.
This manuscript follows the reporting recommendation of RECORD-PE 23.
Results
The study cohort included patients diagnosed as T1DM and T2DM separately. Across the Greater Manchester Region a total of 145,907 individuals were diagnosed with T2DM and 9,705 were diagnosed with T1DM (Table 1; Table 2). The number of deaths in T1DM were too low (n=30) for further statistical analyses to explore the association with mortality.
A varying number of multiple medications were prescribed to individuals with T1DM or T2DM (Table 1). A large proportion of individuals were prescribed between 1 to 5 medications; the distribution of number of medications prescribed and BNF chapters can be seen in Figure S1 and Figure S2. In T2DM, after endocrine and cardiovascular medications, the largest number of multiple prescriptions were from the gastrointestinal (GI) BNF chapter.
Common comorbidities were grouped into broader categories (see Supplementary Information Table S1) and counts were collated for T1DM and T2DM. The top six modal comorbidity groups identified in T2DM were mental health conditions, hypertension, gastrointestinal or liver disease, pain, respiratory conditions (or sinus-related) and cardiovascular/cerebrovascular conditions (Table 2). Of the individuals diagnosed with T2DM, 69.9% were diagnosed with hypertension and 44.9% with mental health conditions (Table 2). The same six comorbidity groups were also identified in the individuals with T1DM (Table S2).
Logistic Regression Analysis
Odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) of the univariate regression are reported in the individuals with T1DM and T2DM respectively.
T1DM
An increased risk of adverse outcomes post-infection was observed for individuals with T1DM and GI/liver disorders (p=0; 3.45 [2.12 to 5.62]) and pain associated conditions (p=0.04; OR [95% CI] = 1.56 [1.02 to 2.37]) (Table 3). Age was significant. Other significant variables included eGFR < 60 (p= 0; OR [95% CI] = 2.79 [1.75 to 4.47]). There was no association with polypharmacy.
T2DM
In individuals with T2DM, an increased number of medications, from 11 upwards was associated with increased risk of hospital admission following COVID-19 infection (Table 4). Individuals diagnosed with co-morbidities in the following morbidity groups had an increased likelihood of hospital admission: mental health disorders (p=0; OR [95% CI] = 1.17 (1.05 to 1.29)); Gastro-intestinal/liver disorders (p=0; OR [95% CI] = 1.98 (1.74 to 2.25)]); pain (p=0; OR [95% CI] = 1.41 (1.27 to 1.56)]); respiratory/sinus conditions (p=0; OR [95% CI] = 1.24 (1.11 to 1.37)]) and cardiovascular/cerebrovascular conditions p=0; OR [95% CI] = 1.44 (1.29 to 1.61)]). People with T2DM and eGFR level <60 (p= 0; OR [95% CI] = 1.43 [1.27 to 1.61]) also had an increased risk of hospital admission, similarly HBA1C levels (p= 0.01; OR [95% CI] = 1 [1 to 1.01]) were also at increased risk (Table 4).
Males were more likely to be admitted to hospital after infection with COVID-19 (p=0; OR [95% CI] = 1.31 [1.18 to 1.46]). Extremes of BMI (too high or too low) was associated with a higher likelihood of adverse outcomes (hospitalisation & mortality) from COVID-19 (p=0; OR [95% CI] = 1.01 [1 to 1.02]). Age was protective of hospital admission; however the odds ratio was only slightly less than 1 (p=0.01; OR [95% CI] = 0.99 [0.99 to 1]). Individuals of Asian (p=0.01; OR [95% CI] = 1.21 [1.06 to 1.39]) or Black (p=0; OR [95% CI] = 1.44 [1.13 to 1.84]) ethnicities were also more likely to be admitted to hospital following infection (Table 4).
Individuals who identified as ‘current smokers’ were not identified as being at increased risk (p=0; OR [95% CI] = 0.51 [0.42 to 0.61]). However, individuals who lived in more deprived regions were statistically significant IMD 4 and 5 (p=0.02; OR [95% CI] = 1.28 [1.04 to 1.57]; p=0.03; OR [95% CI] = 1.24 [1.02 to 1.5]) (Table 4).
In individuals with T2DM, the number of deaths was 885 (0.6% of the total number of individuals diagnosed with T2DM) (Table 1). An increased number of medications, from 16 to 20 to > 20 was associated with increased risk of death following COVID-19 infection (p=0.01; OR [95% CI] = 2.37 [1.31 to 4.32] and p=0; OR [95% CI] = 3.14 [1.75 to 5.62] respectively) (Table 5).
People diagnosed with the following long-term conditions were at higher risk of death post-infection: mental health disorders (p=0; OR [95% CI] = 1.54 (1.22 to 1.95]); respiratory/sinus conditions (p=0; OR [95% CI] = 1.57 [1.24 to 1.99]) or cardiovascular/cerebrovascular conditions (p=0; OR [95% CI] = 1.69 [1.3 to 2.2]). A protective effect was observed for individuals living with GI/liver disorder (p=0; OR [95% CI] = 0.52 (0.4 to 0.67]) or pain (p=0; OR [95% CI] = 0.51 [0.4 to 0.66]) (Table 5).
As with hospital admission, the risk of death in males and with increased BMI was high (p=0.02; OR [95% CI] = 1.35 [1.05 to 1.73] and p=0; OR [95% CI] = 1.02 [1.01 to 1.04] respectively). Age was associated with an increased risk of mortality post COVID-19 infection (p=0; OR [95% CI] = 1.09 [1.08 to 1.11]) (Table 5).
Individuals with T2DM and living in the most deprived regions (IMD 5) were at higher risk of death following COVID-19 infection (p=0.02; OR [95% CI] = 1.68 [1.08 to 2.62]) or if their eGFR level measure was <60 (p=0.01; OR [95% CI] = 1.38 [1.08 to 1.77]) (Table 5).
Discussion
We found that the number of medications prescribed to an individual was associated with an increased risk of severe outcome from COVID-19 infection, particularly in people living with T2DM (Table 4; Table 5). Given the large proportion of individuals diagnosed with comorbidities, it was not unexpected that many of these individuals were prescribed multiple medications (Figure S1; Figure S2). However, the effect of multiple medications was independent of the presence of the most common comorbidities. This study uniquely explored the relationship between number of medications and adverse outcome from COVID-19 infection in individuals diagnosed with diabetes in the Greater Manchester population and is therefore distinct from our previous published studies in this area 10,11. We saw that polypharmacy, independent of other factors including major multimorbidity, was associated with an increased likelihood of hospital admission in people with T1DM and of hospitalisation and death in T2DM following COVID-19 infection. This has not been specifically reported previously, although it was described in older individuals 24. This is of relevance to the consequences following any serious viral infection in people with diabetes, while also highlighting the importance of regular medicine reviews in everyone with diabetes, where there may be an opportunity to reduce the prescribed medications 25.
The mean ages of individuals diagnosed with T1DM or T2DM are similar to the mean ages of a Swedish cohort investigated by 1. In our study we also identified several co-morbidities that increased the risk of adverse health outcome post COVID-19 infection. Similar co-morbidities were identified for both individuals with T1DM and T2DM. The increase in medications could be related to the co-morbidities that these individuals are diagnosed with and receiving medications for. The impact of this on an individual’s risk of suffering from severe health outcome post COVID-19 infection warrants further investigation. Notably, we also identified that there were a large proportion of diagnoses of mental health conditions in people with T2DM (Table 2), though the highest number of diagnoses was observed in people with T1DM (Table S2). The relationship between physical health conditions and poor mental health is an area that is not fully understood, in addition to this, the impact of polypharmacy is unknown.
Over-prescribing is an issue in the current healthcare system. Medication is routinely recorded, therefore in clinical practice there is the potential to flag the number of medications prescribed to clinicians to monitor. Thereby the number of prescriptions given to vulnerable individuals could be limited as appropriate and effective for the individual, though this does require both routine monitoring and structured reviews of the medications that people are taking. The UK healthcare system looks to improve the management of prescriptions, and the removal of unnecessary medications is key to reducing the burden of polypharmacy 26,27.
One of the limitations of this study is that a measure of ‘frailty’ was not included 28. However, a count of comorbidities is included which could possibly be used as a proxy for frailty. As the data from this study originated from electronic health records, it is also subject to the limitations of how information is coded when originally entered into the systems, such as missing data. Only 70% of individuals with T1DM were recorded with a prescription of insulin (Table 1), this could be due to lack of recording or unclear diagnosis, which highlights another issue with routinely collected data. Another issue is that medications are recorded in the health care records are not true reflections of medications that are concordant with the choices of the individual 29. A study in America demonstrated that EHR-related medication errors can occur at different stages including at ordering, preparation, dispensing, administering or monitoring stage, these can ultimately affect the data in EHRs 30. Inaccuracies of coding are inherent in any project that relies on primary coded data. Nevertheless, the large number of people included in the study means that such inaccuracies are unlikely materially to influence the results. Furthermore, medications can also be counted in more than one BNF chapter, making it difficult to determine unique counts. As this data was from one region in the UK, it is difficult to generalise to the rest of the population.
Future work would include investigating the modal medications prescribed in this cohort and explore possible drug-drug interactions between medications that could contribute to increasing the risk of adverse outcome post COVID-19 infection. The burden of mental health conditions on people with diabetes and how to effectively manage multiple long-term conditions, could also be explored. The knowledge gained would be useful for future pandemics and better prepare our healthcare system. In conclusion, we have identified that multiple medications were prescribed to many people living with diabetes and that this was associated with a higher risk of adverse health outcome following COVID-19 infection. We also found that individuals with diabetes also developed comorbidities that were common across both Type 1 and 2 diabetes. Our analysis confirmed the impact of higher levels of deprivation on increasing a person’s a risk of adverse outcome post COVID-19 infection. This study has laid the foundation for future investigations into the increased and complex treatments people living with diabetes who develop other clinical complications.
Author contributions
RR performed the data cleaning and data analyses. JG, WO and AHH conceived the study. JG prepared the figures and the manuscript. GT extracted the original dataset. DM WO and AHH contributed to all sections of the paper and DM provided expert input from a pharmacological perspective. All authors were involved in designing the study, interpreting results and the reviewing and editing of the manuscript.
Conflicts of interest
Authors declare no conflict of interest.
Data availability statement
The datasets generated during and analysed during the current study are not publicly available as all data access is subject to review by Health Innovation Manchester.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Turing-Manchester Feasibility Project Funding. The authors recognise the Greater Manchester Care Record (a partnership of Greater Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership, Health Innovation Manchester and Graphnet Health, on behalf of Greater Manchester localities) in the provision of data required to undertake this work. This work uses data provided by patients and collected by the NHS as part of their care and support. GT was funded by the NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR203308) for this work. DMA is supported by the NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Research Collaboration (PSRC). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.
References
