Abstract
A precision medicine approach in type 2 diabetes (T2D) could enhance targeting specific glucose-lowering therapies to individual patients most likely to benefit. We utilised Bayesian non-parametric modelling to develop and validate an individualised treatment selection algorithm for two major T2D drug classes, SGLT2-inhibitors (SGLT2i) and GLP1-receptor agonists (GLP1-RA). The algorithm is designed to predict differences in 12-month glycaemic outcome (HbA1c) between the 2 therapies, based on routine clinical features of 46,394 people with T2D in England (27,319 for model development, 19,075 for hold-out validation), with additional external validation in 2,252 people with T2D from Scotland. Routine clinical features, including sex (with females markedly more responsive to GLP1-RA), were associated with differences in glycaemic outcomes. Our algorithm identifies clearly delineable subgroups with reproducible ≥5mmol/mol HbA1c benefits associated with each drug class. Moreover, we demonstrate that targeting the therapies based on predicted glycaemic response is associated with improvements in short-term tolerability and long-term risk of new-onset microvascular complications. These results show that precision medicine approaches to T2D can facilitate effective individualised treatment selection, and that use of routinely collected clinical features could support low-cost deployment in many countries.
Competing Interest Statement
APM declares previous research funding from Eli Lilly and Company, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca. BAM holds an honorary post at University College London for the purposes of carrying out independent research, and declares payments to their institution from the MRC, HDRUK and BHF. NS declares personal fees from Abbott Diagnostics, Afimmune, Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Hanmi Pharmaceuticals, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer and Sanofi and grants to his University from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis and Roche Diagnostics. RRH reports research support from AstraZeneca, Bayer and Merck Sharp & Dohme, and personal fees from Anji Pharmaceuticals, Bayer, Novartis and Novo Nordisk. JB is an employee of Novo Nordisk, outside of the submitted work. ERP has received honoraria for speaking from Lilly, Novo Nordisk and Illumina. AGJ has received research funding from the Novo Nordisk foundation. Representatives from GSK, Takeda, Janssen, Quintiles, AstraZeneca and Sanofi attend meetings as part of the industry group involved with the MASTERMIND consortium. No industry representatives were involved in the writing of the manuscript or analysis of data. For all authors these are outside the submitted work; there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Funding Statement
This research was funded by the Medical Research Council (UK) (MR/N00633X/1) and a BHF-Turing Cardiovascular Data Science Award (SP/19/6/34809).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Independent Scientific Advisory Committee of Clinical Practice Research Datalink PRD approved data access and the study protocol (eRAP protocol number: 22_002000).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵† Joint senior
Data availability statement
The UK routine clinical data analysed during the current study are available in the CPRD repository (CPRD; https://cprd.com/research-applications), but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. For re-using these data, an application must be made directly to CPRD. Data from Scotland are anonymized real-world medical records available by request through the Scottish Care Information-Diabetes Collaboration, Tayside & Fife, Scotland unit (https://www.sci-diabetes.scot.nhs.uk/). Clinical trial data are not publicly available, for access an application must be made directly to GSK and www.ClinicalStudyDataRequest.com
