Abstract
Background Caring for someone with moderate to advanced dementia within a domestic home setting can be burdensome and time-consuming. To ensure the effectiveness of care planning and delivery, especially towards the end of life, understanding the nature and impact of such caregiving on the family carer is important. Synthesising existing research will allow greater insight into this experience.
Review question ‘How do family carers describe their experience of providing home-based care for people with moderate to advanced dementia?’
Design A narrative synthesis of qualitative research exploring the experiences of people with moderate to advanced dementia and their family carers was conducted. Databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsychINFO, Web of Science and Academic Search Complete) were searched from 1984 to 2020. Similarities and differences between papers were grouped using textual narrative synthesis.
Findings This paper reports findings from a PhD thesis (James, 2021). Included papers (n=17) incorporated those focused on caring for people with advanced dementia (n=8), and those with moderate dementia (n=9). Family carers reported an experience of loss, burden, and grief. Experiences of internal conflict also led to psychological distress. These experiences had a negative impact on the general health of the family carer. Improvement in the family carer’s inter-relationships and the feeling of being useful or having a sense of meaning were reported as positive aspects of caregiving.
Conclusion A complete description of family carers’ experiences may be inadequate in conveying an acknowledgement of dementia as an illness within the domestic home. Their justifications and determinants for balancing family carers’ challenges and distress to morals also remain unclear. Further research is required to ascertain how family carers may proportionally balance their personified loss with their personified value earlier in the disease trajectory.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
National Research Ethics Committee gave ethical approval for this work (Ref: 18/WM/0001).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
This version of the manuscript has been revised to update the tables and figure in line with the text to ensure clearer readability.
Data availability
Data supporting this review are included within the paper.
