Abstract
BACKGROUND Community-based support groups have been effective in facilitating access to and retention in the healthcare system for patients with HIV/AIDS, cancer, diabetes, and other communicable and non-communicable diseases. Given the high incidence of morbidity that results from traumatic injuries, and the barriers to reaching and accessing care for injured patients, community-based support groups may prove to be similarly effective in this population.
OBJECTIVES The objective of this review is to identify the extent and impact of community and peer support groups for injured patients.
ELIGIBILITY We included primary research on studies that evaluated community support groups that were solely based in the community. Hospital-based or healthcare-professional led groups were excluded.
EVIDENCE Sources were identified from a systematic search of Medline / PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science Core Collection.
CHARTING METHODS We utilized a narrative synthesis approach to data analysis.
RESULTS 4,989 references were retrieved from database search; 25 were included in final data extraction. There was a variety of methodologies represented, and the groups represented patients with spinal cord injury (N=2), traumatic brain or head injury (N=7), burns (N=4), intimate partner violence (IPV) (N=5), mixed injuries (N=5), torture (N=1), and brachial plexus injury (N=1). Multiple benefits were reported by support group participants; categorized as social, emotional, logistical, or educational benefits.
CONCLUSIONS community-based peer support groups can provide education, community, and may have implications for retention in care for injured patients.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was conducted as part of the Equi-Injury Study, funded by the UK National Institute of Health and Care Research, NIHR Global Health Groups Call 3, application 133135. Authors who received award are JD and KC. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
N/A
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Not Applicable
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Not Applicable
Footnotes
↵* Joint last authorship
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
