ABSTRACT
Background Predict Breast (www.breast.predict.nhs.uk) is an online prognostication and treatment benefit tool for early invasive breast cancer. However, the most recent version of PREDICT Breast (v2.2) was based on data for breast cancer cases diagnosed from 1999 to 2003 and did not incorporate the benefits of radiotherapy or the harms associated with theray. Since then, there has been a substantial improvement in the outcomes for breast cancer cases. The aim of this study was to update PREDICT Breast to ensure that the underlying model is appropriate for contemporary patients.
Methods Data from 4,644 ER-negative and 30,830 ER-positive breast cancer cases diagnosed from 2000 to 2017 in the region served by the Eastern Cancer Registry were used for model development. Multivariable fractional polynomials in a Cox proportional hazards framework were used to estimate the prognostic effects of year of diagnosis, age at diagnosis, tumour size, tumour grade and number of positive nodes and to compute the baseline hazard functions. Separate models were developed for ER-positive and ER-negative disease. Data on 32,408 breast cancer patients from the West Midlands Cancer Registry and from 100,551 breast cancer cases from the other English Cancer Registries combined were used to determine the discriminative power, calibration, and reclassification of the new version of PREDICT Breast (v3.0).
Results The new model (v3.0) was well-calibrated; predicted numbers of 5-, 10- and 15-year breast cancer deaths were within 10 per cent of the observed number in both model development and model validation data sets. In contrast, PREDICT Breast v2.2 was found to substantially over-predict the number of deaths. Discrimination was also good: The AUC for 15-year breast cancer survival was 0. 824 in the model development data, 0.809 in the West Midlands data set and 0.846 in the data set for the other registries. There figures were slightly better than those for PREDICT Breast v2.2
Conclusion Incorporating the prognostic effect of year of diagnosis, updating the prognostic effects of all risk factors and amending the baseline hazard functions have led to an improvement of model performance of PREDICT Breast. The new model will be implemented in the online tool which should lead to more accurate absolute treatment benefit predictions for individual patients.
Competing Interest Statement
Gordon Wishart and Paul Pharoah each receive a share of the fees received by Cambridge Enterprise for the licensing of PREDICT Breast to commercial partners.
Funding Statement
Isabelle Grootes was funded by the Mark Foundation Institute for Integrated Cancer Medicine at the University of Cambridge.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The data used for these analyses are available on request from the England National Disease Registration Service at https://digital.nhs.uk/services/national-disease-registration-service#requests-for-access-to-ndrs-data.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Funding:
DATA AVAILABILITY
The data used for these analyses cannot be shared by the authors for reasons of confidentiality. They are available on request from the England National Disease Registration Service at https://digital.nhs.uk/services/national-disease-registration-service#requests-for-access-to-ndrs-data.
