Interaction between APOE4 status and lifestyle on brain and cognitive outcomes in cognitively unimpaired older adults
=====================================================================================================================

* Francesca Felisatti
* Léa Chauveau
* Natalie L Marchant
* Fabienne Collette
* Harriet Demnitz-King
* Tim Whitfield
* Florence Requier
* Florence Mézenge
* Brigitte Landeau
* Cassandre Palix
* Sacha Haudry
* Marion Delarue
* Vincent de la Sayette
* Denis Vivien
* Géraldine Poisnel
* Robin de Flores
* Gaël Chételat
* Julie Gonneaud
* MEDIT-AGEING Research Group

## Abstract

**INTRODUCTION** *APOE4* genotype and lifestyle have been associated with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) risk, but how they interact on neuroimaging and cognitive markers of aging and AD remains unclear.

**METHODS** In 135 cognitively unimpaired older adults from the baseline Age-Well trial, we investigated the interaction between *APOE*4 status and cognitive activity, diet and physical activity on cognition and neuroimaging markers of neurodegeneration and amyloid.

**RESULTS** Higher cognitive activity correlated with lower medial temporal lobe (MTL) volume and perfusion in *APOE4*-carriers, but increased cognitive performance irrespective of *APOE4* status. Higher adherence to the Mediterranean diet correlated with higher MTL metabolism and attention scores in *APOE4-*carriers. Conversely, physical activity correlated with higher MTL perfusion and lower amyloid in *APOE4*-non-carriers only.

**DISCUSSION** Genetics and lifestyle factors act through different mechanisms to help *APOE4*-carriers resist or cope with brain alterations and postpone cognitive decline. Our results support the need of personalized lifestyle-based interventions for AD.

**Trial Registration Information** EudraCT: 2016-002441-36; IDRCB: 2016-A01767-44; [ClinicalTrials.gov](http://ClinicalTrials.gov) Identifier: [NCT02977819](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT02977819&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F07%2F17%2F2023.07.17.23292755.atom).

KEYWORDS
*   Reserve
*   aging
*   Alzheimer’s disease
*   multimodal neuroimaging
*   cognition

## INTRODUCTION

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is characterized by the accumulation of amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles, accompanied by various structural and functional brain alterations. AD development and progression is likely influenced by a combination of genetic and environmental risk factors.1 Among those, the apolipoprotein E allele χ4 (*APOE4*) is the major genetic risk factor for sporadic AD.2 Associations between *APOE4* status and brain integrity in cognitively unimpaired individuals have been inconsistent. Robust associations were found for amyloid load, showing increased amyloid deposition in *APOE4*-carriers compared to non-carriers,3, 4 while studies on gray matter volume (GMvol), glucose metabolism and perfusion are more discordant, showing either greater alterations,5, 6 greater integrity in *APOE4*-carriers,7–9 or no differences between groups.3, 10, 11

Beyond genetics, increasing evidence highlights the importance of lifestyle factors in brain integrity and cognitive performance. Cognitive activity,12–14 adherence to the Mediterranean diet15–17 and physical activity14,18,19for review have been associated with greater cognition and brain integrity in cognitively unimpaired older adults, although contradictory findings exist.20 Interestingly, *APOE4* genotype and lifestyle factors might interact on cerebral and cognitive markers of ageing and AD. More specifically, a healthy and stimulating lifestyle could particularly benefit *APOE4*-carriers.21 For instance, previous studies highlighted an interaction between *APOE4* status and cognitive activity on amyloid and cognition, such that higher cognitive activity was associated with lower amyloid deposition22 and higher cognitive scores23 in *APOE4*-carriers when compared to non-carriers. *APOE4*-carriers with higher adherence to the Mediterranean diet also demonstrated increased cognitive functions.24 Additionally, physical activity was more strongly related to increased hippocampal volume,25 reduced amyloid deposition26for review and cognitive decline27 in *APOE4*-carriers compared to non-carriers. However, negative findings have also been reported with no interactive effects or greater effect in *APOE*4-non-carriers for cognitive activity,27, 28 adherence to the Mediterranean diet15, 29, 30 and physical activity.28, 31, 32 Notably, one study found that with higher cognitive activity, *APOE4*-carriers had smaller hippocampal volumes than non-carriers.28 While such negative association might suggest a detrimental effect of cognitive engagement in *APOE4*-carriers, it could alternatively indicate the existence of compensation mechanisms, helping these individuals to remain cognitively normal despite brain alterations (i.e., *resilience*). The paucity of cognitive and neuroimaging outcomes concurrently prevents from interpreting the results in terms of underlying reserve mechanisms and notably to differentiate these two opposite possible interpretations.

In that context, the aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive assessment of the interplay between *APOE4* genotype and various lifestyle factors (i.e., cognitive activity, adherence to the Mediterranean diet and physical activity) on multimodal neuroimaging markers and cognition in cognitively unimpaired older adults. By combining multimodal neuroimaging and cognition, we aim to better understand the mechanisms by which lifestyle could mitigate the effect of *APOE4*. For neuroimaging, we focused on AD-sensitive markers including neocortical amyloid burden, as well as GMvol, perfusion and glucose metabolism in the Medial Temporal Lobe (MTL), known to be the first site of neurodegeneration in the course of AD33 and to be frequently affected in *APOE4*-carriers.34

Based on the existing resistance/resilience framework,35 we hypothesized three distinct scenarios (Figure 1). In these scenarios, *APOE4*-non-carriers are an optimal reference for healthy ageing (i.e., optimal brain and cognitive outcomes), in whom lifestyle is associated with mild to moderate increase in brain integrity and cognition. First, lifestyle could confer *resistance* to *APOE4*-carriers, allowing them to maintain brain integrity and avoid pathology. In this case, we expect healthier lifestyles in *APOE4*-carriers to be associated with greater brain integrity and cognitive function (i.e., *Resistance;* Figure 1A). Second, lifestyle could allow *APOE4*-carriers to better cope with brain aging and pathology. In this scenario, healthier lifestyles would be associated with equal or improved cognition in *APOE4*-carriers despite reduced brain integrity and/or greater pathology (i.e. *Resilience;* Figure 1B). A third hypothesis would be that lifestyle can be equally beneficial in carriers and non-carriers or cannot counteract the deleterious effect of *APOE4* carriage. In this case, no interactions between *APOE4* status and lifestyle would be evidenced in terms of both brain and cognitive outcomes (Figure 1C).

![Figure 1](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2023/07/17/2023.07.17.23292755/F1.medium.gif)

[Figure 1](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/07/17/2023.07.17.23292755/F1)

Figure 1 Potential mechanisms for the interaction between *APOE4* and lifestyle factors.
(A) Resistance in *APOE4* carriers: lifestyle counteracts the deleterious effect of *APOE4* genotype, such that *APOE4* carriers with more active lifestyle would show higher brain integrity and cognition. (B) Resilience in *APOE4* carriers: lifestyle helps *APOE4* carriers to compensate for the presence of brain alterations and remain cognitively healthy. (C) No *APOE4* x lifestyle interaction: lifestyle does not counteract the deleterious effect of *APOE4* on brain and/or cognition. The y-axis represents brain integrity or cognition. The x-axis represents the degree of engagement in lifestyle factors. Abbreviations: APOE, apolipoprotein E gene.

## METHODS

### Participants

We included 135 cognitively unimpaired older adults from the baseline visit of the Age-Well randomized clinical trial (RCT; Medit-Ageing European Project;36 see Flow diagram-eFigure S1). Individuals over 65 years were recruited from the general population from November 2016 to March 2018. Participants were native French speakers, retired for at least 1 year, with at least 7 years of education, and performed within the normal range on standardized cognitive evaluation. Exclusion criteria included i) history of cerebrovascular disease, ii) presence of a chronic disease or acute unstable illness, iii) evidence of major neurological or psychiatric disorders (including drug or alcohol abuse), and iv) recent or current medication use that may interfere with cognitive functioning. Baseline data were collected between November 2016 and April 2018. Participants completed lifestyle questionnaires, and underwent *APOE4* genotyping, cognitive assessments, and multimodal neuroimaging.

### Standard Protocol Approvals, Registrations, and Patient Consents

The Age-Well RCT was approved by local ethics committee (Comité de Protection des Personnes Nord-Ouest III, Caen, France; registration number: EudraCT: 2016-002441-36; IDRCB: 2016-A01767-44; [ClinicalTrials.gov](http://ClinicalTrials.gov) Identifier: [NCT02977819](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT02977819&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F07%2F17%2F2023.07.17.23292755.atom)) and a written informed consent was obtained from each participant prior to examinations.

### Neuroimaging acquisitions

All participants were assessed on the same magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; Philips Achievia 3.0T scanner) and positron emission tomography (PET; Discovery RX VCT 64 PET-CT scanner, General Electric Healthcare) cameras in separate sessions at the Cyceron Center (Caen, France). A high-resolution T1-weighted structural image and a 3D fluid-attenuated inversion recovery image were acquired in all participants. FDG- and Florbetapir-PET scans were acquired on two separate days (n=92 and n=134, respectively). For Florbetapir-PET, each participant underwent a dual phase scan, an early acquisition beginning immediately after the injection, used as a proxy of brain perfusion (n=133), and a late acquisition (50-min post-injection) to obtain a measure of amyloid burden (n=134). Details on acquisition parameters and procedures are provided in eMethods.

### Neuroimaging processing

#### Gray matter volume, perfusion and metabolism of the Medial Temporal Lobe

The hippocampus (anterior and posterior), entorhinal, perirhinal (Brodmann areas 35 and 36) and parahippocampal cortices were automatically segmented from T1-weighted MRI with the Automatic Segmentation of Hippocampal Subfields (ASHS) software,37 using the ASHS-T1 atlas (ashsT1_atlas_upennpmc_07202018).38 For each participant, segmentation of each MTL sub-region was visually inspected. Failed segmentations were manually edited when possible, or excluded. After exclusion of failed segmentations, resulting number of participants for the GMvol of the perirhinal cortex was 131. The whole hippocampus volume was calculated as the sum of anterior and posterior hippocampus volumes while the perirhinal cortex volume was obtained by summing Brodmann areas 35 and 36 volumes. Finally, left and right volumes were averaged and normalized by the total intracranial volume (TIV, estimated using SPM12) to account for inter-individual variability in head size (normalized volume = raw volume x 1000 / TIV).

Early Florbetapir-PET was reconstructed from 1 to 6 min for a better approximation of brain perfusion. FDG and early Florbetapir-PET images were coregistered to each subject’s T1-weighted native space using rigid registration in Advanced Normalization Tools (ANTs) and then quantitatively normalized using the cerebellar cortex as a reference. ASHSs segmentations were used as regions-of-interest to extract MTL sub-regional glucose metabolism (FDG-PET) and perfusion (early Florbetapir-PET) standardized uptake value ratio (SUVr) in the resulting PET images.

#### Amyloid burden

Florbetapir-PET late acquisition images were processed as previously described, to obtain a global neocortical measure of amyloid burden.39 Briefly, T1-weighted MRI images were segmented using FLAIR images and spatially normalized to the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space using the Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM12) software’s multiple channels segmentation procedure ([http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/software/spm12](http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/software/spm12)). Florbetapir-PET data were coregistered onto their corresponding T1-weighted MRI and normalized to the MNI space using the parameters from the segmentation procedure. Resulting images were quantitatively normalized using the cerebellar gray matter uptake as a reference. Global neocortical amyloid SUVr was then extracted from these images using a predetermined neocortical mask including the entire gray matter, except the cerebellum, occipital and sensory motor cortices, hippocampi, amygdala and basal nuclei.40

#### APOE genotyping procedure

Fasting blood samples were obtained for all participants. *APOE* genotype was identified by restriction isotyping from genomic DNA extracted from frozen leucocytes, amplified by PCR, and restricted with Hhal.41 *APOE4*-carriers were defined as carriers of one or two ε4 alleles. Individuals with no ε4 allele were defined as *APOE4*-non-carriers.

### Lifestyle assessment

#### Cognitive and complex mental activities

Frequency of participation in leisure cognitive activities was assessed using an adapted and French translated version of the Cognitive Activities questionnaire (CAQ)42 and the Lifetime of Experiences Questionnaire (LEQ).43, 44 In this study we focused on current lifestyle. Therefore, while both questionnaires assessed lifetime activities, only the current period of the CAQ and the late-life sub-score of the LEQ were used.

The CAQ assesses the frequency of participation in cognitive activities involved in seeking or processing information (e.g., reading books or newspapers, writing letters or emails, playing games or going to the library), relatively common and with minimal demands or requirements to participation, across different age epochs: 6, 12, 18, 40 years and the current period.42 For each type of activity, participants are invited to report its frequency using a 5-point response scale (1-once a year or less, 2-several times a year, 3-several times a month, 4-several times a week, 5-every day). The CAQ current period sub-score was obtained by averaging the 5 items referring to the current period, with higher scores representing a greater engagement in cognitive activities.

The LEQ assesses complex mental activity through 3 life periods: young adulthood (13–30 years), mid-life (30–65 years), and late-life (from 65 years to present date). Each life period includes a specific (e.g., education, occupational complexity) and a non-specific (e.g., visits to family or friends, music practice, writing, reading, physical activities, travelling) components, which are summed up to obtain one global score per period. Late-life LEQ (specific + non-specific) was used in the present study, with higher scores representing greater engagement in complex mental activities.

#### Adherence to the Mediterranean diet

Adherence to the Mediterranean diet was measured using the self-administered Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS).45 This questionnaire includes 14 questions. (12 questions on food consumption frequency, and 2 questions on food intake habits) which are considered critical to assess adherence to the traditional Mediterranean diet (e.g., “do you use olive oil as the principal source of fat for cooking?”, “do you prefer to eat chicken, turkey or rabbit instead of beef, pork, hamburgers or sausages?”). One point was given to answers that were favorable to the Mediterranean diet, and 0 point to answers that were not favorable. The MEDAS score ranges from 0 to 14, with higher scores indicating higher adherence to the Mediterranean diet.

#### Physical activity

We assessed physical activity with the Modifiable Activity Questionnaire (MAQ),46 using the French version adapted to be self-administered.47 Briefly, the questionnaire evaluates the frequency and duration of leisure and work-related physical activities over the past 12 months. As all participants were retired, only the leisure activity score was considered. Participants had to select from a list all activities they did at least 10 times over the past 12 months (e.g. gardening, walking, hiking, jogging, biking), and estimate the amount of time they spent doing each activity (i.e., how many months per year, time per month and minutes each time). For each activity, the average number of hours of physical activity per week was obtained as follows: [(number of months per year) x (number of times per month) x (minutes per time) / 60 (min)] / 52 (week per year). These scores were then summed to derive a total score. The total physical activity score reflects the average hours per week of leisure-time physical activity over the past 12 months. MAQ data was missing for one participant.

#### Cognitive assessment

The neuropsychological evaluation included tests assessing global cognitive functioning, episodic memory, executive functions and attention. To obtain robust proxies of cognitive abilities and limit multiple statistical testing issues, composite scores were computed. The Preclinical Alzheimer’s Cognitive Composite 5 (PACC-5)48 was calculated as an index of global cognitive functioning, along with composite scores of episodic memory, executive functions and attention. Details for each score’s calculation are provided in eMethods and eTable 1.

#### Statistical analysis

First, *APOE4* carriers and non-carriers characteristics were compared using two-sample t-tests. General linear models were then used to assess i) the associations of *APOE4* and lifestyle factors separately with each neuroimaging and cognitive measure, and ii) the interactions between each lifestyle factor and *APOE4* on each neuroimaging and cognitive measure. All analyses were controlled for age, sex and education. In complementary analyses, the interactions between lifestyle factors and *APOE4* on neuroimaging or cognition were further controlled for the other lifestyle factors.

Analyses were conducted using the R software (R Core Team, 2019) and results considered significant at *p*<.05. Considering the exploratory nature of this work, no correction for multiple comparisons was applied.

The MAQ (physical activity) score was not normally distributed. Therefore, MAQ values were log-transformed after the addition of a constant of 1 to each score (as values of 0 cannot be directly log-transformed).

## RESULTS

### Participants’ characteristics

Participants’ characteristics are detailed in Table 1. The 36 *APOE4*-carriers did not differ from the 99 non-carriers in terms of age, education, female/male ratio or lifestyle.

View this table:
[Table 1](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/07/17/2023.07.17.23292755/T1)

Table 1 Demographics

Due to missing data (see Methods), sample size slightly varies across analysis. Final sample size per neuroimaging modality is summarized in eTable 2.

### Association of *APOE4* status with neuroimaging and cognition

*APOE4-*carriers had higher global amyloid burden compared to non-carriers (β=0.24, p=0.006). No associations were found between *APOE4* status and MTL subregions volume, metabolism, perfusion, nor with cognitive functions (all ps>0.05; eTable 3).

### Association of lifestyle factors with neuroimaging and cognition

Higher CAQ was associated with reduced GMvol in the parahippocampal cortex (β=-0.2, p=0.02). No associations were found between the CAQ and the other MTL subregions or neuroimaging modalities, nor between the LEQ, MAQ or MEDAS and neuroimaging measures (all ps>0.05; eTable 4).

Higher CAQ was associated with higher PACC-5 (β=0.23, p=0.004), executive function (β=0.24, p=0.003) and attention (β=0.25, p=0.002). Higher LEQ was associated with higher PACC-5 (β=0.2, p=0.01) and episodic memory (β=0.21, p=0.01). The MEDAS and MAQ were not associated with cognition (all ps>0.05; eTable 5).

### Interactions between *APOE4* status and lifestyle factors

Full statistics are reported in Table 2.

View this table:
[Table 2](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/07/17/2023.07.17.23292755/T2)

Table 2 Interactions of *APOE4* with lifestyle factors on neuroimaging values or cognitive scores

### Interactions between APOE4 status and cognitive activity

*CAQ:* An interaction between *APOE4* status and the CAQ was found for GMvol in the parahippocampal cortex (β=-1.01 p=0.02), and for perfusion in the entorhinal and perirhinal cortices (β=-1.08, p=0.02 and β=-1.08, p=0.02, respectively) such that, in *APOE4*-carriers higher CAQ was associated with lower GMvol and perfusion compared to non-carriers (Figure 2A). We found no interactions between *APOE4* status and the CAQ on cognition, suggesting that the better cognition associated with higher CAQ (see paragraph 3.3) did not differ between *APOE4*-carriers and non-carriers (Figure 2B).

![Figure 2](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2023/07/17/2023.07.17.23292755/F2.medium.gif)

[Figure 2](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/07/17/2023.07.17.23292755/F2)

Figure 2 Interactive effects of cognitive activity (CAQ, LEQ) and *APOE4* on neuroimaging (A) and cognitive (B) outcomes.
Statistics were obtained from general linear models controlling for age, sex and education. Raw values are plotted. Dotted lines represent confidence intervals (95%). Abbreviations: APOE, apolipoprotein E gene; CAQ, Cognitive Activities Questionnaire; LEQ, Lifetime of Experiences Questionnaire

*LEQ:* We found a significant interaction between *APOE4* status and the LEQ for perfusion in the parahippocampal cortex (β=-1.26, p=0.02), such that with higher LEQ, *APOE4*-carriers had lower perfusion compared to non-carriers (Figure 2A). A trend was found in the same direction for the parahippocampal cortex metabolism (β=-1.32, p=0.05). No interactions were found between *APOE4* status and the LEQ on cognition, suggesting that the positive association previously evidenced between the LEQ and cognition (see above) did not differ between *APOE4*-carriers and non-carriers (Figure 2B).

### Interactions between APOE4 status and adherence to the Mediterranean diet

We found an interaction between *APOE4* status and the MEDAS on hippocampal and entorhinal cortex metabolism (β=0.76, p=0.02 and β=0.93, p=0.006, respectively), such that, compared to non-carriers, *APOE4-*carriers showed a higher metabolism with higher MEDAS (Figure 3A). Similarly, an interaction between *APOE4* and the MEDAS was found on attention (β=0.52, p=0.05; Figure 3B), revealing better attention as a function of MEDAS in *APOE4*-carriers, compared to non-carriers. No interactions were found for the other neuroimaging or cognitive measures (Table 2 for details).

![Figure 3](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2023/07/17/2023.07.17.23292755/F3.medium.gif)

[Figure 3](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/07/17/2023.07.17.23292755/F3)

Figure 3 Interactive effects of Mediterranean diet adherence and *APOE4* on neuroimaging (A) and cognitive (B) outcomes.
Statistics were obtained from general linear models controlling for age, sex and education. Raw values are plotted. Dotted lines represent confidence intervals (95%). Abbreviations: APOE, apolipoprotein E gene.

### Interactions between APOE4 status and physical activity

An interaction between *APOE4* status and the MAQ was found on hippocampal perfusion (β=-0.51, p=0.04; Figure 4A) and amyloid deposition (β=0.53, p=0.03; Figure 4B). The interactions were such that, compared to *APOE4-*carriers, non*-*carriers with higher MAQ scores showed higher perfusion and lower amyloid deposition. No interactions were found on the other neuroimaging or cognitive measures (Table 2).

![Figure 4](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2023/07/17/2023.07.17.23292755/F4.medium.gif)

[Figure 4](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/07/17/2023.07.17.23292755/F4)

Figure 4 Interactive effects of physical activity and *APOE4* on neuroimaging (A) and cognitive (B) outcomes.
Statistics were obtained from general linear models controlling for age, sex and education. Raw values are plotted. Dotted lines represent confidence intervals (95%). Abbreviations: APOE, apolipoprotein E gene.

### Complementary analyses

Interaction analyses were replicated while controlling for the other lifestyle factors and results remained similar, except for the interaction between *APOE4* status and the LEQ on parahippocampal cortex metabolism that became significant (β=-1.56, p=0.026), while the interaction between *APOE4* status and the MEDAS on attention was attenuated (β=0.45, p=0.07) (eTable 6).

## DICUSSION

Our study provides insights on the complex interactive effects of genetics and lifestyle factors on complementary cerebral and cognitive outcomes in cognitively unimpaired older adults. Cognitive activity was associated with lower gray matter volume and perfusion within the MTL in *APOE4* carriers only, but higher cognitive performance in both *APOE4* carriers and non-carriers. Adherence to the Mediterranean diet showed a greater positive association with both cerebral glucose metabolism and cognition (i.e. attention scores) in *APOE4* carriers when compared to non-carriers. By contrast, physical activity was associated with higher MTL perfusion and lower global amyloid load in *APOE4* non-carriers only, with no effects on cognition.

In this study, *APOE4* carriage was associated with greater amyloid deposition. This finding is consistent with a large body of evidence showing increased amyloid burden in *APOE4*-carriers.3, 4 However, *APOE4* was not associated with GMvol, metabolism or perfusion of the MTL, or with cognition. While deleterious effects of the *APOE4* allele on these measures have been evidenced,5, 6, 49, 50 the literature provides mixed results.3, 9–11, 51, 52 These inconsistencies could reflect the fact that, except for amyloid deposition, effects of *APOE4* in cognitively unimpaired individuals are more subtle.3, 53 Differences in methodology and sample characteristics across studies, including differences in lifestyle and cognitive reserve, might also explain these discrepancies.

Concerning lifestyle factors, only cognitive activity was directly associated with differences in neuroimaging markers and cognition. More particularly, higher cognitive activity was associated with lower GMvol in the parahippocampal cortex, which contrasts with previous research showing positive associations between cognitive activity and GMvol, including in the MTL.14 On the other hand, cognitive activity was associated with greater cognitive performance (i.e., global cognition, episodic memory, executive function and attention), in line with existing literature.23, 54 The association between higher cognitive activity and greater atrophy, lower perfusion and higher cognitive performance could suggest the existence of compensation mechanisms. Specifically, compensation mechanisms may be promoted by a greater engagement in cognitive activities, reflecting a *resilience* mechanism (Figure 1B).35 The interaction between *APOE4* status and cognitive activity suggests that this effect was mainly driven by *APOE4-*carriers.

Previous literature has highlighted interactions between *APOE4* status and cognitive activity such that cognitive activity could limit the deleterious effect of *APOE4* on AD biomarkers.22, 55 Conversely, a study showed that with higher cognitive activity, *APOE4*-carriers had smaller hippocampal volume than non-carriers.28 According to the authors, this result could reflect the existence of compensatory mechanisms in *APOE4*-carriers allowing them to maintain levels of cognitive performance comparable to non-carriers. Our findings support this view showing an interaction between *APOE4* and cognitive activity on volume and perfusion of the MTL, such that with higher engagement in cognitive activity *APOE4*-carriers had lower GMvol and perfusion, but increased cognition, similar to non-carriers. This result suggests that higher cognitive activity could promote resilience and help *APOE4*-carriers to cope with brain alterations, possibly via greater efficiency of cognitive processes56 (Figure 1.B).

The same pattern of interactions was replicated using two different and complementary measures of cognitive engagement (i.e., the CAQ and the LEQ), even though they concerned partially different neurodegeneration markers and cognitive domains. Specifically, *APOE4* interacted with the CAQ on parahippocampal cortex volume, entorhinal and perirhinal cortices perfusion and with the LEQ on parahippocampal cortex perfusion (and metabolism, to a lesser extent). This suggests the existence of common mechanisms, supported by different types of cognitive activities that could influence complementary markers of cognitive and brain integrity.

In the current study, adherence to the Mediterranean diet was not directly associated with any of the neuroimaging or cognitive parameters considered, in contrast with most prior research.15–17 However, there was an interaction with *APOE4* status on hippocampal and entorhinal cortices metabolism and attention scores. More specifically, *APOE4*-carriers with higher adherence to the Mediterranean diet showed higher metabolism and cognitive performance compared to non-carriers. These results align with previous evidence suggesting that dietary adjustments could be of particular importance to mitigate the deleterious effects of *APOE4* on brain and cognition in carriers.57, 58 However, prior studies provide mixed results.15, 24, 29, 30, 59 Methodological differences between studies (e.g., sample size, mean age, sex ratio, design) might explain these discrepancies and would require further investigations. The association of a greater adherence to Mediterranean diet with both higher MTL metabolism and attention scores in *APOE4*-carriers (in the absence of negative associations with other brain outcomes that would suggest the existence of greater brain alterations) aligns with the hypothesis of a protective effect of lifestyle that would help to limit brain changes (here neurodegeneration), in line with the concept of *resistance* (Figure 1A).35 Therefore, the Mediterranean diet would promote reserve in *APOE4*-carriers through mechanisms that are different from those outlined for cognitive activity, potentially by supporting brain maintenance.

Lastly, we found an interaction between *APOE4* status and physical activity on hippocampal perfusion and global amyloid burden, such that higher levels of physical activity were associated with higher perfusion in the hippocampus and lower amyloid load in non-carriers only. While this finding is in agreement with another study showing more prominent effects of exercise on AD biomarkers in *APOE4*-non-carriers,60 most studies report greater effects in *APOE4*-carriers.26 for review Previous studies reporting a beneficial effect of physical activity on hippocampal cerebral blood volume61 and perfusion62 did not investigate the modulating role of *APOE4* on these associations. Our results suggest that such effects could be driven by *APOE4*-non-carriers, in whom physical activity would support mechanisms particularly efficient to promote brain integrity.

On the other hand, physical activity was not associated with cognition, nor interacted with *APOE4* on cognition. Previous results are mixed, showing greater beneficial effect of physical activity in *APOE4*-carriers,27 in non-carriers,31, 63 in both groups,64 no effect,65 or decreased cognitive abilities in *APOE4*-carriers.32 These contradictory findings need to be further explored in order to clarify the mechanisms involved. Our results suggest that, contrary to cognitive activity and diet, physical activity was not associated with higher reserve in *APOE*4-carriers (Figure 1C), but was specifically associated with greater brain outcomes in non-carriers.

The strengths of this study include the assessment of multiple lifestyle factors within the same individuals, allowing investigations into the relative effect of different lifestyle factors on brain and cognitive integrity. Multimodal neuroimaging, including state-of-the-art assessment of MTL structures, combined with cognitive assessments allows a better approach to studying the reserve mechanisms underlying the moderating effect of lifestyle on *APOE4*-related changes. This study also has some limitations, including a relatively modest sample size when splitting by *APOE4* status. The use of questionnaires to assess lifestyle factors only allows the estimation of lifestyle behaviors and can be biased by individuals’ perception and memory. Nevertheless, these questionnaires are widely used and their validity and reliability have been previously reported.42, 43, 45, 46 Moreover, only current lifestyle was evaluated in individuals without cognitive impairments, limiting the likelihood of major recollection biases. Due to the exploratory nature of the study, no corrections were made for multiple comparisons and further replication will be needed to address the robustness of these findings. Finally, the cross-sectional design prevents evaluating the reserve mechanisms’ dynamically in *APOE4*-carriers as brain alterations progress. Longitudinal studies, including interventional studies, would enhance our understanding of the complex interactions between *APOE4* status and lifestyle.

Overall, our study demonstrates that *APOE4* genotype interacts with lifestyle to influence brain integrity and cognition with different patterns of association depending on the lifestyle factor. Our results suggest that higher cognitive activity could promote *resilience,* while higher adherence to the Mediterranean diet might instead promote *resistance* in *APOE4-*carriers. On the other hand, physical activity had a beneficial effect only in *APOE4*-non-carriers. Our findings highlight a complex interplay between genetics and lifestyle, which differentially help *APOE4*-carriers to resist or cope with brain alterations and postpone cognitive decline. In the absence of a treatment for AD, these results may deepen our understanding of how lifestyle interacts with AD genetic risk to alter the pathological phenotype and help provide lifestyle recommendations for personalized interventions to prevent or delay AD.

## Supporting information

Supplementary Material [[supplements/292755_file03.pdf]](pending:yes)

## Data Availability

Data is available upon request following a formal data sharing agreement and approval by the consortium and executive committee. The data sharing request form can be downloaded online: silversantestudy.eu/2020/09/25/data-sharing/

[https://silversantestudy.eu/2020/09/25/data-sharing/](https://silversantestudy.eu/2020/09/25/data-sharing/) 

## Sources of Funding

The Age-Well randomized clinical trial is part of the Medit-Ageing project and is supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program (grant 667696), Région Normandie (Label d’Excellence), and Fondation d’Entreprise MMA des Entrepreneurs du Futur. Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (Inserm) is the sponsor. The funders and sponsor had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

## Disclosures

Dr. Chételat reported grants, personal fees, and non-financial support from Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (Inserm), grants from European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 667696 (PI), grants from Fondation d’entreprise MMA des Entrepreneurs du Futur, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Fondation Entrepreneurs MMA, grants and personal fees from Fondation Alzheimer, grants from Région Normandie, grants from Fondation Recherche Alzheimer, and grants from Association France Alzheimer, outside the submitted work. F. Felisatti was funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program (grant 667696) and the MMA IARD SA. Dr Gonneaud received funding from the Fondation Alzheimer & Fondation de France (Allocation Jeune Chercheur) and an award from the Rotary Club Lille la Madeleine. Dr Marchant reported funding from the EU Joint Programme-Neurodegenerative Disease Research (JPND) grant funded by the UK Medical Research Council (No. MR/TO46171/1) outside the submitted work. Dr. Collette reported grants form F.R.S-FNRS (Belgium), Fond pour la Recherche Alzheimer and King Baudouin Fundation (Belgium), grants from Liège University. Tim Whitfield was funded by The Dunhill Medical Trust (grant number RTF1806\45). Florence Requier is supported by SAO-FRA (Belgium, grant 2020/0026).

No other disclosures were reported.

View this table:
[Appendix:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/07/17/2023.07.17.23292755/T3)

Appendix: Collaborators - Medit-Ageing Research Group

## Acknowledgments

The authors thank all the Medit-Ageing Research Group members and the Cyceron MRI-PET staff members for their help with recruitment, data acquisition, or administrative support; the EUCLID team, the sponsor (INSERM) and the participants of the study for their contribution. The full Medit-Ageing Research Group is listed in the Appendix.

## Footnotes

*   † The full list of the Medit-Ageing Research Group is provided at the end of the manuscript in the Appendix

*   Received July 17, 2023.
*   Revision received July 17, 2023.
*   Accepted July 17, 2023.


*   © 2023, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

The copyright holder for this pre-print is the author. All rights reserved. The material may not be redistributed, re-used or adapted without the author's permission.

## References

1.  1.Chételat G. Alzheimer disease: Aβ-independent processes-rethinking preclinical AD. Nat Rev Neurol. 2013;9(3):123–124. doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2013.21
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/nrneurol.2013.21&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23399647&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F07%2F17%2F2023.07.17.23292755.atom) 

2.  2.Corder EH, Saunders AM, Strittmatter WJ, et al. Gene dose of apolipoprotein E type 4 allele and the risk of Alzheimer’s disease in late onset families. Science (80-). 1993;261(5123):921-923. doi:10.1126/science.8346443
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6Mzoic2NpIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEyOiIyNjEvNTEyMy85MjEiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo1MDoiL21lZHJ4aXYvZWFybHkvMjAyMy8wNy8xNy8yMDIzLjA3LjE3LjIzMjkyNzU1LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 

3.  3.Gonneaud J., Arenaza-Urquijo E., Fouquet M., et al. Relative effect of APOE e4 on neuroimaging biomarker changes across the lifespan. Neurology. 2016;87:1696–1703. [http://clinicaltrials.gov](http://clinicaltrials.gov)
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1212/WNL.0000000000003234&link_type=DOI) 

4.  4.Jansen WJ, Ossenkoppele R, Knol DL, et al. Prevalence of cerebral amyloid pathology in persons without dementia: A meta-analysis. JAMA-J Am Med Assoc. 2015;313(19):1924–1938. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.4668
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/jama.2015.4668&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25988462&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F07%2F17%2F2023.07.17.23292755.atom) 

5.  5.Honea RA, Vidoni E, Harsha A, Burns JM. Impact of APOE on the healthy aging brain: A voxel-based MRI and DTI study. J Alzheimer’s Dis. 2009;18(3):553–564. doi:10.3233/JAD-2009-1163
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3233/JAD-2009-1163&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19584447&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F07%2F17%2F2023.07.17.23292755.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000272860100008&link_type=ISI) 

6.  6.Didic M, Felician O, Gour N, et al. Rhinal hypometabolism on FDG PET in healthy APO-E4 carriers: impact on memory function and metabolic networks. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42(10):1512–1521. doi:10.1007/s00259-015-3057-y
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s00259-015-3057-y&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25900275&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F07%2F17%2F2023.07.17.23292755.atom) 

7.  7.Alexander GE, Bergfield KL, Chen K, et al. Gray matter network associated with risk for Alzheimer’s disease in young to middle-aged adults. Neurobiol Aging. 2012;33(12):2723–2732. doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.01.014
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.01.014&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22405043&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F07%2F17%2F2023.07.17.23292755.atom) 

8.  8.Yi D, Lee DY, Sohn BK, et al. Beta-amyloid associated differential effects of APOE ε4 on brain metabolism in cognitively normal elderly. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2014;22(10):961–970. doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2013.12.173
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.jagp.2013.12.173&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24495404&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F07%2F17%2F2023.07.17.23292755.atom) 

9.  9.Bangen KJ, Restom K, Liu TT, et al. Assessment of Alzheimer’s disease risk with functional magnetic resonance imaging: An arterial spin labeling study. J Alzheimer’s Dis. 2012;31():S59–S74. doi:10.3233/JAD-2012-120292
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3233/JAD-2012-120292&link_type=DOI) 

10. 10.Jack CR, Wiste HJ, Weigand SD, et al. Age, sex, and APOE ɛ4 effects on memory, brain structure, and β-Amyloid across the adult life Span. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72(5):511–519. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.4821
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.4821&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25775353&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F07%2F17%2F2023.07.17.23292755.atom) 

11. 11.Okonkwo OC, Xu G, Oh JM, et al. Cerebral blood flow is diminished in asymptomatic middle-aged adults with maternal history of alzheimer’s disease. Cereb Cortex. 2014;24(4):978–988. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs381
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/cercor/bhs381&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23236200&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F07%2F17%2F2023.07.17.23292755.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000333048200012&link_type=ISI) 

12. 12.Marseglia A, Darin-Mattsson A, Kalpouzos G, et al. Can active life mitigate the impact of diabetes on dementia and brain aging? Alzheimer’s Dement. 2020;16:1534–1543. doi:10.1002/alz.12142
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/alz.12142&link_type=DOI) 

13. 13.Lyons CE, Tudorascu D, Snitz BE, et al. The Relationship of Current Cognitive Activity to Brain Amyloid Burden and Glucose Metabolism. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018;26(9):977–984. doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2018.03.018
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.jagp.2018.03.018&link_type=DOI) 

14. 14.Arenaza-Urquijo EM, de Flores R, Gonneaud J, et al. Distinct effects of late adulthood cognitive and physical activities on gray matter volume. Brain Imaging Behav. 2017;11(2):346–356. doi:10.1007/s11682-016-9617-3
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s11682-016-9617-3&link_type=DOI) 

15. 15.Mosconi L, Murray J, Tsui WH, et al. Mediterranean Diet and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Assessed Brain Atrophy in Cognitively Normal Individuals at Risk for Alzheimer’s Disease. J Prev Alzheimer’s Dis. 2014;1(1):23–32.
    
    

16. 16.Berti V, Walters M, Sterling J, et al. Mediterranean diet and 3-year Alzheimer brain biomarker changes in middle-aged adults. Neurology. 2018;90(20):E1789–E1798. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000005527
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1212/WNL.0000000000005527&link_type=DOI) 

17. 17.Anastasiou CA, Yannakoulia M, Kosmidis MH, et al. Mediterranean diet and cognitive health: Initial results from the Hellenic Longitudinal Investigation of Ageing and Diet. PLoS One. 2017;12(8):1–18. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0182048
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1371/journal.pone.0179159&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=28957441&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F07%2F17%2F2023.07.17.23292755.atom) 

18. 18.Okonkwo OC, Schultz SA, Oh JM, et al. Physical activity attenuates age-related biomarker alterations in preclinical AD. Neurology. 2014;63:1753–1760.
    
    

19. 19.Erickson KI, Hillman C, Stillman CM, et al. Physical Activity, Cognition, and Brain Outcomes: A Review of the 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019;51(6):1242–1251. doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000001936
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1249/MSS.0000000000001936&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F07%2F17%2F2023.07.17.23292755.atom) 

20. 20.Vemuri P, Lesnick TG, Przybelski SA, et al. Effect of lifestyle activities on alzheimer disease biomarkers and cognition. Ann Neurol. 2012;72(5):730–738. doi:10.1002/ana.23665
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/ana.23665&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23280791&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F07%2F17%2F2023.07.17.23292755.atom) 

21. 21.Kivipelto M, Rovio S, Ngandu T, et al. Apolipoprotein E 4 magnifies lifestyle risks for dementia: a population-based study. J Cell Mol Med. 2008;12(6B):2762–2771. doi:10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.0296.x
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00296.x&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=18318693&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F07%2F17%2F2023.07.17.23292755.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000262311700019&link_type=ISI) 

22. 22.Wirth M, Villeneuve S, La Joie R, Marks SM, Jagust WJ. Gene-environment interactions: Lifetime cognitive activity, APOE genotype, and beta-amyloid burden. J Neurosci. 2014;34(25):8612–8617. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4612-13.2014
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6Njoiam5ldXJvIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEwOiIzNC8yNS84NjEyIjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjMvMDcvMTcvMjAyMy4wNy4xNy4yMzI5Mjc1NS5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

23. 23.Carlson MC, Helms MJ, Steffens DC, Burke JR, Potter GG, Plassman BL. Midlife activity predicts risk of dementia in older male twin pairs. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2008;4(5):324–331. doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2008.07.002
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.jalz.2008.07.002&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=18790459&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F07%2F17%2F2023.07.17.23292755.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000259383300002&link_type=ISI) 

24. 24.Gardener SL, Rainey-Smith SR, Barnes MB, et al. Dietary patterns and cognitive decline in an Australian study of ageing. Mol Psychiatry. 2014;20(7):860–866. doi:10.1038/mp.2014.79
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/mp.2014.79&link_type=DOI) 

25. 25.Smith JC, Nielson KA, Woodard JL, et al. Physical activity reduces hippocampal atrophy in elders at genetic risk for Alzheimer’s disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2014;6(61):1–7. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2014.00061
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3389/fnagi.2014.00190&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24478697&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F07%2F17%2F2023.07.17.23292755.atom) 

26. 26.Brown BM, Peiffer JJ, Martins RN. Multiple effects of physical activity on molecular and cognitive signs of brain aging: Can exercise slow neurodegeneration and delay Alzheimer’s disease? Mol Psychiatry. 2013;18(8):864–874. doi:10.1038/mp.2012.162
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/mp.2012.162&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23164816&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F07%2F17%2F2023.07.17.23292755.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000322448400007&link_type=ISI) 

27. 27.Woodard JL, Nielson KA, Sugarman MA, et al. Lifestyle and Genetic Contributions to Cognitive Decline and Hippocampal Integrity in Healthy Aging. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2012;9(4):436–446.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.2174/156720512800492477&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22272622&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F07%2F17%2F2023.07.17.23292755.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000304189200005&link_type=ISI) 

28. 28.Jeon SY, Byun MS, Yi D, et al. Midlife Lifestyle Activities Moderate APOE ε4 Effect on in vivo Alzheimer’s Disease Pathologies. Front Aging Neurosci. 2020;12(42):1–11. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2020.00042
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3389/fnagi.2020.00099&link_type=DOI) 

29. 29.Hill E, Szoeke C, Dennerstein L, Campbell S, Clifton P. Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet Is not Related to Beta-Amyloid Deposition: Data from the Women’s Healthy Ageing Project. J Prev Alzheimer’s Dis. 2018;5(2):1–5. doi:10.14283/jpad.2018.12
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.14283/jpad.2018.12&link_type=DOI) 

30. 30.Martínez-Lapiscina EH, Galbete C, Corella D, et al. Genotype patterns at CLU, CR1, PICALM and APOE, cognition and Mediterranean diet: The PREDIMED-NAVARRA trial. Genes Nutr. 2014;9(393):1-13. doi:10.1007/s12263-014-0393-7
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s12263-014-0393-7&link_type=DOI) 

31. 31.Tan ZS, Spartano NL, Beiser AS, et al. Physical Activity, Brain Volume, and Dementia Risk: The Framingham Study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2017;72(6):789–795. doi:10.1093/gerona/glw130
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/gerona/glw130&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F07%2F17%2F2023.07.17.23292755.atom) 

32. 32.Martin-Willett R, Morris B, Wilcox R, et al. The influence of a 16-week exercise program, APOE status, and age on executive function task performance: A randomized trial. Exp Gerontol. 2021;152:1–11. doi:10.1016/j.exger.2021.111431
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.exger.2021.111431&link_type=DOI) 

33. 33.Schöll M, Lockhart SN, Schonhaut DR, et al. PET Imaging of Tau Deposition in the Aging Human Brain. Neuron. 2016;89(5):971–982. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.01.028
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.neuron.2016.01.028&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=26938442&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F07%2F17%2F2023.07.17.23292755.atom) 

34. 34.Li G, Bien-Ly N, Andrews-Zwilling Y, et al. GABAergic Interneuron Dysfunction Impairs Hippocampal Neurogenesis in Adult Apolipoprotein E4 Knockin Mice. Cell Stem Cell. 2009;5(6):634–645. doi:10.1016/j.stem.2009.10.015
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.stem.2009.10.015&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19951691&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F07%2F17%2F2023.07.17.23292755.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000273616700011&link_type=ISI) 

35. 35.Arenaza-Urquijo EM, Vemuri P. Resistance vs resilience to Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2018;90(15):695–703. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000005303
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6OToibmV1cm9sb2d5IjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjk6IjkwLzE1LzY5NSI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDIzLzA3LzE3LzIwMjMuMDcuMTcuMjMyOTI3NTUuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 

36. 36.Poisnel G, Arenaza-Urquijo E, Collette F, et al. The Age-Well randomized controlled trial of the Medit-Ageing European project: Effect of meditation or foreign language training on brain and mental health in older adults. Alzheimer’s Dement Transl Res Clin Interv. 2018;4:714–723. doi:10.1016/j.trci.2018.10.011
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.trci.2018.10.011&link_type=DOI) 

37. 37.Yushkevich PA, Pluta JB, Wang H, et al. Automated volumetry and regional thickness analysis of hippocampal subfields and medial temporal cortical structures in mild cognitive impairment. Hum Brain Mapp. 2015;36(1):258–287. doi:10.1002/hbm.22627
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/hbm.22627&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25181316&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F07%2F17%2F2023.07.17.23292755.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000346190800019&link_type=ISI) 

38. 38.Xie L, Wisse LEM, Pluta J, et al. Automated segmentation of medial temporal lobe subregions on in vivo T1-weighted MRI in early stages of Alzheimer’s disease. Hum Brain Mapp. 2019;40(12):3431–3451. doi:10.1002/hbm.24607
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/hbm.24607&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=31034738&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F07%2F17%2F2023.07.17.23292755.atom) 

39. 39.André C, Rehel S, Kuhn E, et al. Association of Sleep-Disordered Breathing with Alzheimer Disease Biomarkers in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2020;77(6):716–724. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.0311
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.0311&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=32202593&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F07%2F17%2F2023.07.17.23292755.atom) 

40. 40.La Joie R, Perrotin A, De La Sayette V, et al. Hippocampal subfield volumetry in mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer’s disease and semantic dementia. NeuroImage Clin. 2013;3:155–162. doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2013.08.007
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.nicl.2013.08.007&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24179859&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F07%2F17%2F2023.07.17.23292755.atom) 

41. 41.Hixson J., Vernier DT. Restriction isotyping of human apolipoprotein E by gene amplification and cleavage with HhaI. J Lipid Res. 1990;31(3):545–548.
    
    [Abstract](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiamxyIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjg6IjMxLzMvNTQ1IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjMvMDcvMTcvMjAyMy4wNy4xNy4yMzI5Mjc1NS5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

42. 42.Wilson RS, Barnes LL, Bennett DA. Assessment of lifetime participation in cognitively stimulating activities. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2003;25(5):634–642. doi:10.1076/jcen.25.5.634.14572
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1076/jcen.25.5.634.14572&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=12815501&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F07%2F17%2F2023.07.17.23292755.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000183976200005&link_type=ISI) 

43. 43.Valenzuela MJ, Sachdev P. Assessment of complex mental activity across the lifespan: Development of the Lifetime of Experiences Questionnaire (LEQ). Psychol Med. 2007;37(7):1015–1025. doi:10.1017/S003329170600938X
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1017/S003329170600938X&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=17112402&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F07%2F17%2F2023.07.17.23292755.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000247984400011&link_type=ISI) 

44. 44.Ourry V, Marchant NL, Schild AK, et al. Harmonisation and Between-Country Differences of the Lifetime of Experiences Questionnaire in Older Adults. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021;13(740005):1–12. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2021.740005
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3389/fnagi.2021.747358&link_type=DOI) 

45. 45.Schröder H, Fitó M, Estruch R, et al. A Short screener is valid for assessing mediterranean diet adherence among older spanish men and women. J Nutr. 2011;141(6):1140–1145. doi:10.3945/jn.110.135566
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6OToibnV0cml0aW9uIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEwOiIxNDEvNi8xMTQwIjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjMvMDcvMTcvMjAyMy4wNy4xNy4yMzI5Mjc1NS5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

46. 46.Kriska AM, Knowler WC, Laporle RE, et al. Development of Questionnaire to Examine Relationship of Physical Activity and Diabetes in Pima Indians. Diabetes Care. 1990;13(4):401–412.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NzoiZGlhY2FyZSI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czo4OiIxMy80LzQwMSI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDIzLzA3LzE3LzIwMjMuMDcuMTcuMjMyOTI3NTUuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 

47. 47.Vuillemin A, Oppert J-M, Guillemin F, et al. Self-administered questionnaire compared with interview to assess past-year physical activity. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2000;32(6):1119–1124. [http://www.msse.org](http://www.msse.org)
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1097/00005768-200006000-00013&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10862539&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F07%2F17%2F2023.07.17.23292755.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000087576700013&link_type=ISI) 

48. 48.Papp KV, Rentz DM, Orlovsky I, Sperling RA, Mormino EC. Optimizing the preclinical Alzheimer’s cognitive composite with semantic processing: The PACC5. Alzheimer’s Dement Transl Res Clin Interv. 2017;3(4):668–677. doi:10.1016/j.trci.2017.10.004
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.trci.2017.10.004&link_type=DOI) 

49. 49.Zhang Y, Fu S, Ding D, Lutz MW, Zeng Y, Yao Y. Leisure Activities, APOE ε4, and Cognitive Decline: A Longitudinal Cohort Study. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021;13. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2021.736201
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3389/fnagi.2021.736201&link_type=DOI) 

50. 50.Dhana K, Aggarwal NT, Rajan KB, Barnes LL, Evans DA, Morris MC. Impact of the Apolipoprotein E ε4 Allele on the Relationship Between Healthy Lifestyle and Cognitive Decline: A Population-Based Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2021;190(7):1225–1233. doi:10.1093/aje/kwab033
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/aje/kwab033&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=33585904&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F07%2F17%2F2023.07.17.23292755.atom) 

51. 51.Samuraki M, Matsunari I, Chen WP, et al. Glucose metabolism and gray-matter concentration in apolipoprotein E ε4 positive normal subjects. Neurobiol Aging. 2012;33(10):2321–2323. doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.11.020
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.11.020&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22188720&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F07%2F17%2F2023.07.17.23292755.atom) 

52. 52.Small BJ, Graves AB, Mcevoy CL, Crawford FC, Mullan M, Mortimer JA. Is APOE-4 a risk factor for cognitive impairment in normal aging? Neurology. 2000;54:2082–2088.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6OToibmV1cm9sb2d5IjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEwOiI1NC8xMS8yMDgyIjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjMvMDcvMTcvMjAyMy4wNy4xNy4yMzI5Mjc1NS5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

53. 53.Fouquet M, Besson FL, Gonneaud J, La Joie R, Chételat G. Imaging Brain Effects of APOE4 in Cognitively Normal Individuals Across the Lifespan. Neuropsychol Rev. 2014;24(3):290–299. doi:10.1007/s11065-014-9263-8
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s11065-014-9263-8&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25146994&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F07%2F17%2F2023.07.17.23292755.atom) 

54. 54.Pellegrini-Laplagne M, Dupuy O, Sosner P, Bosquet L. Acute Effect of a Simultaneous Exercise and Cognitive Task on Executive Functions and Prefrontal Cortex Oxygenation in Healthy Older Adults. Brain Sci. 2022;12(4):455. doi:10.3390/brainsci12040455
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3390/brainsci12040455&link_type=DOI) 

55. 55.Arenaza-Urquijo E., Gonneaud J., Fouquet M., et al. Interaction between years of education andAPOEe4 status on frontal and temporalmetabolism. Neurology. 2015;85:1392–1399.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6OToibmV1cm9sb2d5IjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEwOiI4NS8xNi8xMzkyIjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjMvMDcvMTcvMjAyMy4wNy4xNy4yMzI5Mjc1NS5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

56. 56.Stern Y, Arenaza-Urquijo EM, Bartrés-Faz D, et al. Whitepaper: Defining and investigating cognitive reserve, brain reserve, and brain maintenance. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2020;16(9):1305–1311. doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2018.07.219
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.jalz.2018.07.219&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=30222945&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F07%2F17%2F2023.07.17.23292755.atom) 

57. 57.Yassine HN, Finch CE. APOE Alleles and Diet in Brain Aging and Alzheimer’s Disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2020;12(150):1–18. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2020.00150
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3389/fnagi.2020.00099&link_type=DOI) 

58. 58.Fote GM, Geller NR, Reyes-Ortiz AM, Thompson LM, Steffan JS, Grill JD. A Scoping Review of Dietary Factors Conferring Risk or Protection for Cognitive Decline in APOE ε4 Carriers. J Nutr Heal Aging. 2021;25(10):1167–1178. doi:10.1007/s12603-021-1705-4
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s12603-021-1705-4&link_type=DOI) 

59. 59.Cherbuin N, Anstey KJ. The mediterranean diet is not related to cognitive change in a large prospective investigation: The PATH through life study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2012;20(7):635–639. doi:10.1097/JGP.0b013e31823032a9
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1097/JGP.0b013e31823032a9&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21937919&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F07%2F17%2F2023.07.17.23292755.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000305809100011&link_type=ISI) 

60. 60.Liang KY, Mintun MA, Fagan AM, et al. Exercise and Alzheimer’s disease biomarkers in cognitively normal older adults. Ann Neurol. 2010;68(3):311–318. doi:10.1002/ana.22096
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/ana.22096&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20818789&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F07%2F17%2F2023.07.17.23292755.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000281421800011&link_type=ISI) 

61. 61.Pereira AC, Huddleston DE, Brickman AM, et al. An in vivo correlate of exercise-induced neurogenesis in the adult dentate gyrus. PNAS. 2007;104(13):5638–5643.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NDoicG5hcyI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czoxMToiMTA0LzEzLzU2MzgiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo1MDoiL21lZHJ4aXYvZWFybHkvMjAyMy8wNy8xNy8yMDIzLjA3LjE3LjIzMjkyNzU1LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 

62. 62.Burdette JH, Laurienti PJ, Espeland MA, et al. Using network science to evaluate exercise-associated brain changes in older adults. Front Aging Neurosci. 2010;2(23):1–10. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2010.00023
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3389/fnagi.2010.00032&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20552041&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F07%2F17%2F2023.07.17.23292755.atom) 

63. 63.Fenesi B, Fang H, Kovacevic A, Oremus M, Raina P, Heisz JJ. Physical exercise moderates the relationship of apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype and dementia risk: a population-based study. J Alzheimer’s Dis. 2017;56(1):297–303. doi:10.3233/JAD-160424
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3233/JAD-160424&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=27911292&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F07%2F17%2F2023.07.17.23292755.atom) 

64. 64.Etnier JL, Karper WB, Labban JD, et al. The physical activity and Alzheimer’s disease (PAAD) study: Cognitive outcomes. Ann Behav Med. 2018;52(2):175–185. doi:10.1093/abm/kax035
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/abm/kax035&link_type=DOI) 

65. 65.Folley S, Zhou A, Llewellyn DJ, Hyppönen E. Physical Activity, APOE Genotype, and Cognitive Decline: Exploring Gene-Environment Interactions in the UK Biobank. J Alzheimer’s Dis. 2019;71(3):741–750. doi:10.3233/JAD-181132
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3233/JAD-181132&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=31450492&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F07%2F17%2F2023.07.17.23292755.atom)