ABSTRACT
Introduction To improve healthcare provider knowledge of Tanzanian newborn care guidelines, we developed adaptive Essential and Sick Newborn Care (aESNC), an adaptive e-learning environment (AEE). The objectives of this study were to 1) assess implementation success with use of in-person support and nudging strategy and 2) describe baseline provider knowledge and metacognition.
Methods 6-month observational study at 1 zonal hospital and 3 health centers in Mwanza, Tanzania. To assess implementation success, we used the RE-AIM framework and to describe baseline provider knowledge and metacognition we used Howell’s conscious-competence model. Additionally, we explored provider characteristics associated with initial learning completion or persistent activity.
Results aESNC reached 85% (195/231) of providers: 75 medical, 53 nursing, and 21 clinical officers; 110 (56%) were at the zonal hospital and 85 (44%) at health centers. Median clinical experience was 4 years [IQR 1,9] and 45 (23%) had previous in-service training for both newborn essential and sick newborn care. Efficacy was 42% (SD±17%). Providers averaged 78% (SD±31%) completion of initial learning and 7%(SD±11%) of refresher assignments. 130 (67%) providers had ≥1 episode of inactivity >30 day, no episodes were due to lack of internet access. Baseline conscious-competence was 53% [IQR:38-63%], unconscious-incompetence 32% [IQR:23-42%], conscious-incompetence 7% [IQR:2-15%], and unconscious-competence 2% [IQR:0-3%]. Higher baseline conscious-competence (OR 31.6 [95%CI:5.8, 183.5) and being a nursing officer (aOR: 5.6 [95%CI:1.8, 18.1]), compared to medical officer) were associated with initial learning completion or persistent activity.
Conclusion aESNC reach was high in a population of frontline providers across diverse levels of care in Tanzania. Use of in-person support and nudging increased reach, initial learning, and refresher assignment completion, but refresher assignment completion remains low. Providers were often unaware of knowledge gaps, and lower baseline knowledge may decrease initial learning completion or activity. Further study to identify barriers to adaptive e-learning normalization is needed.
Key questions What is already known on this topic.
Summarize the state of scientific knowledge on this subject before you did your study and why this study needed to be done.
- In sub-Saharan Africa, gaps in care quality may contribute to its high neonatal mortality.
- Provider knowledge is a main driver of care quality, but current conventional in-service education methods are inadequate in adaptivity, reach, effectiveness, and refresher assignments.
- Hard copies of national guidelines have been disseminated to health facilities expectations are HCPs will learn and adhere to them.
- Adaptive eLearning, a subdomain of e-learning, holds the potential to overcome limitations to in-service medical education, but the optimal implementation strategy is unknown.
What this study adds.
Summarize what we now know because of this study that we did not know before.
- Baseline knowledge of essential and sick newborn care was low, mostly due to unconscious incompetence (providers thinking they were correct when they were incorrect).
- Initial learning completion increased significantly with the use of an in-person program manager and an escalating nudging strategy, and technical issues were not identified as a significant limitation to participation.
How this study might affect research, practice, or policy.
Summarize the implications of this study.
- Provider self-reporting may underestimate knowledge gaps as most gaps are not known by providers.
- Adaptive e-learning may be a feasible and acceptable way to disseminate guideline and improve quality of care if an implementation strategy can be identified to increase refresher assignment completion.
- Once the ideal implementation strategy is identified, effectiveness of adaptive e-learning at scale can be evaluated.
Competing Interest Statement
BR and MB are compensated by Area 9 Lyceum as Senior Learning Architect and Medical Director, respectively.
Funding Statement
1.This study was funded by the Laerdal Foundation for Acute Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine Maternal and Child Health Research Institute, Stanford Center for Innovation in Global Health, and the Stanford University School of Medicine Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. 2.Funding sources had no role in project design, data collection, analysis, or interpretation; reporting, or the decision to submit results for publication. 3.Stanford CTSA award number UL1 TR001085 from NIH/NCRR.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Institutional Review Board of the Tanzania National Institute of Medical Research (NIMR/HO/R.8a/Vol.IX/3990), Stanford University (60379), the ethics committee of the Catholic University of Health and Allied Science (no ID number given), and the Mwanza Regional Medical Officer (Ref. No. AG.52/290/01A/115) approved the study protocol including consent procedures. Data collection procedures were completed in compliance with the guidelines of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) to ensure subject confidentiality. Informed electronic consent was obtained through REDCap from all providers who participated in PACE.54 All providers who completed consent were included. All surveys and questionnaires were entered directly by providers into REDCap. This study is reported according to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) 2010 extension to randomized pilot and feasibility trials.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.