Abstract
Background Reported changes in antibiotic prescribing during the COVID-19 pandemic have focused on hospital prescribing or community population trends. Community antibiotic prescribing for individuals with COVID-19 are less well described.
Methods Data covering a complete geographic population (∼800,000) were utilised. SARS-CoV-2 virus test results from February 1, 2020-March 31, 2022 were included. Anonymised data were linked to prescription data +/-28 days of the test, GP data for high-risk comorbidities, and demographic data. Multivariate binary logistic regression examined associations between patient factors and the odds of antibiotic prescription.
Results Data included 768,206 tests for 184,954 individuals, identifying 16,240 COVID-19 episodes involving 16,025 individuals. There were 3,263 antibiotic prescriptions +/-28 days for 2,385 patients. 35.6% of patients had a prescription only before the test date, 52.5% of patients after, and 11.9% before and after. Antibiotic prescribing reduced over time: 20.4% of episodes in wave one, 17.7% in wave two, and 12.0% in wave three. In multivariate logistic regression, being female (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.19,1.45), older (OR 3.02, 95% CI 2.50, 3.68 75+ vs <25 years), having a high-risk comorbidity (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.31, 1.61), a hospital admission +/-28 days of an episode (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.42, 1.77), and health board region (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.03, 1.25, board B versus A) increased the odds of receiving an antibiotic.
Conclusion Community antibiotic prescriptions in COVID-19 episodes were uncommon in this population and likelihood was associated with patient factors. The reduction over pandemic waves may represent increased knowledge regarding COVID-19 treatment and/or evolving symptomatology.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
LC was funded by the Medical Research Foundation National PhD Training Programme in Antimicrobial Resistance Research (MRF-145-0004-TPG-AVISO)
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Health Informatics Centre at the University of Dundee has ethical and Caldicott Guardian approval for studies which follow their standard operating procedures (SOP). Ethical approval for individual studies is not required.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data from this study are not publically available but may be accessed by approved researchers via application to the Health Informatics Centre at the University of Dundee.
