Abstract
Background Job satisfaction of professionals affects health, advancement, performance, and development, as well as the institution, employer, or organization. Healthcare professionals who are satisfied with their job have a higher probability of delivering excellent healthcare. In Bangladesh, the challenges of public health highlight the importance of having a competent healthcare workforce to provide an improved quality healthcare service.
Objectives The objective of this study was to evaluate the degree of job satisfaction and identify the factors that contribute to it among healthcare providers employed in the BMT unit of DMCH.
Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted for the period of six months, from July to December 2014. The study population was all the healthcare professionals at the BMT unit of DMCH, Bangladesh. and consisted of doctors (n=20), nurses (n=15), and laboratory technicians (n=5). A semi structured self-administered questionnaire was used to collect the preliminary data. All ethical issues were maintained strictly.
Results Most (95.0%) of the study respondents were at or below the age of 40 years with a mean (±SD) of 30.1 (±7.92) years. Most of them were female (52.5%), and lab technician, nurse and doctors had a frequency of 12.5%, 37.5%, and 50.0% respectively. Among the study participants, 65.0% were satisfied with their jobs, 35% were dissatisfied. Statistically significant association was found between sex (p=0.011) and profession (p < 0.001) with level of job satisfaction among respondents.
Conclusion Job satisfaction is important for healthcare professionals, patients, and institutions. Satisfied professionals provide better care, while low job satisfaction leads to turnover and decreased access to care. Individual, job-related, and workplace factors influence job satisfaction. This study evaluated job satisfaction among healthcare providers in Bangladesh and identified contributing factors to inform interventions.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
An ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of NIPSOM (NIPSOM/IRB/2014/16).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
