ABSTRACT
Objectives To find predictive factors and to construct predictive models using epidemiological and clinical preoperative factors for the visual acuity change after intracorneal ring segment (ICRS) implantation in keratoconus patients.
Methods Medical records of 287 keratoconic eyes implanted with ICRS at Chula Refractive Surgery Centre of a tertiary university hospital (Bangkok, Thailand) between January 2012 and March 2022 were retrospectively reviewed for epidemiological and clinical preoperative variables, including those derived from Scheimpflug tomography. The correlation between these variables and postoperative uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity change (ΔUDVA and ΔCDVA; logMAR scale) at 6 months was explored. Two hundred forty eight eyes (excluding cases with unmeasurable refraction) were randomized into 2 groups: the equation group (198 eyes) and the validation group (50 eyes). Multiple linear regression analysis was used to develop the predictive model from the equation group.
Results Twenty preoperative variables were statistically correlated with ΔCDVA. Only the preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVAp) strongly correlated with ΔCDVA (R = - 0.746). ΔUDVA correlated with only preoperative visual acuity, corneal astigmatism, and maximum Ambrósio relational thickness (ARTmax). CDVAp, spherical power (SPH), and anterior minimum sagittal curvature (Rmin) were the best predictors of ΔCDVA. The proposed model, ΔCDVA = 0.589 - 0.713×CDVAp - 0.010×SPH - 0.082×Rmin, had an acceptable predictability (R2 = 53.4%). The prediction was correct in 82% of the eyes within 0.22 logMAR.
Conclusions Potential predictive factors and models for ICRS-induced changes in visual acuity were proposed as adjunctive tools for clinicians. Such tools could be used for case selection and during counseling before ICRS implantation to maximize surgical outcomes.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The authors received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Institutional Review Board of the Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand, has approved the following study which is to be carried out in compliance with the International guidelines for human research protection as Declaration of Helsinki, The Belmont Report, CIOMS Guideline and International Conference on Harmonization in Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP) Study Title : Factors predicting visual outcomes of intrastromal corneal ring segment for keratoconus Principal Investigator : Apisit Khanthik, M.D. Affiliation of Pl : Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University. Review Method : Expedited Continuing Report Document Reviewed : At least once annually or submit the final report if finished.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Declarations of interest: None of the authors had any financial or proprietary interest to declare.
Financial support None to disclose.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
