The physical and mental health benefits of touch interventions: A comparative systematic review and multivariate meta-analysis

Julian Packheiser, Helena Hartmann, Kelly Fredriksen, Valeria Gazzola, Christian Keysers, Frédéric Michon
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.20.23291651

Abstract

Introduction: Receiving touch is of critical importance for human well-being. A number of studies have shown that touch promotes mental and physical health. However, effect sizes differ considerably across studies and potential moderators of touch interventions remain unknown to this day.

Methods We conducted a preregistered (CRD42022304281) systematic review and a large-scale multivariate multilevel meta-analysis encompassing 137 studies in healthy participants and patients (166 cohorts, 9617 participants and 643 effect sizes) in the meta-analysis and 75 additional studies as part of the systematic review to identify critical factors moderating touch intervention efficacy. Included studies always featured a touch vs. no touch control intervention with health outcomes as dependent variables.

Results We found comparable and medium-sized (Hedges’ g ∼ 0.5) effects of touch on both mental and physical health. Touch interventions were especially effective in regulating cortisol levels (0.78 [0.24;1.31]) and increasing weight (0.65 [0.37;0.94]) in newborns, as well as in reducing pain (0.69 [0.48;0.89]), feelings of depression (0.59 [0.40;0.78]) and state (0.64 [0.44;0.84]) or trait anxiety (0.59 [0.40;0.77]) for adults and children. Comparing touch interventions involving objects or robots with humans resulted in similar physical (0.56 [0.24;0.88] vs. 0.51 [0.38;0.64]) but lower mental health benefits (0.34 [0.19;0.49] vs. 0.58 [0.43;0.73]). Adult clinical cohorts profited stronger in mental health domains compared to healthy individuals (0.63 [0.46;0.80] vs. 0.37 [0.20;0.55]) but showed comparable physical health benefits (0.53 [0.38;0.69] vs. 0.47 [0.29;0.65]). We found no difference in children and adults comparing touch applied by a familiar person or a health professional (0.51 [0.29;0.73] vs. 0.50 [0.38;0.61]) but parental touch was more beneficial in newborns (0.69 [0.50;0.88] vs. 0.39 [0.18;0.61]). Intervention frequency positively correlated with increased health benefits in adults and children while session duration did not show significant effects.

Discussion Leveraging those factors that influence touch intervention efficacy will help maximize the benefits of future touch interventions and focus research in this field.

1. Introduction

The recent COVID-19 crisis has raised our awareness for the need to better understand the effects touch - and its reduction during social distancing - can have on our mental and physical well-being. Touch interventions, for example massages or kangaroo care, have been shown to have a wide range of both mental and physical health benefits over the lifespan, from facilitating growth and development to buffering against anxiety and stress in humans and animals alike (Ardiel & Rankin, 2010). Despite the substantial weight this literature gives to support the benefits of touch, it is also characterized by an immense variability in, for example, studied cohorts, type and duration of applied touch, measured health outcomes, and who actually applies the touch. While previous meta-analyses on this topic exist (e.g., Moyer et al., 2004), meaningful moderators could not yet be identified. However, understanding these variables is critical to tailor touch interventions, aiming to promote well-being both in healthy and clinical cohorts.

Here, we performed a pre-registered, large-scale systematic review and multi-level, multivariate meta-analysis to address this need with quantitative evidence for (a) the effect of touch interventions on physical and mental health and (b) which moderators influence the efficacy of the intervention. In particular, we ask whether and how strongly health outcomes depend on dynamics of the touching dyad (e.g., humans or robots/objects, familiarity, touch directionality), demographics (e.g., clinical status, age or sex), delivery means (e.g., type of touch intervention or touched body part) and procedure (e.g., duration or number of sessions). We did so separately for newborns and for children and adults, as the health outcomes in newborns differed substantially from those in the other age groups.

2. Materials and Methods

Open science practices

All data and code are accessible in the corresponding OSF project. The systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022304281) prior to the start of data collection. All deviations from the pre-registered plan can be found in the supplementary material.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

To be included in the systematic review, studies had to investigate the relationship between at least one health outcome (physical and/or mental) and a touch intervention, include explicit physical touch by another human, animal, or object as part of an intervention, and include an experimental and control condition/group that are differentiated by touch alone. The meta-analysis additionally required a between-subjects design (in order to clearly distinguish touch from no-touch effects). Studies that explicitly did not apply a randomized protocol were excluded prior to further analysis to reduce risk of bias (see Supplementary Methods for details).

Data collection

We used Google Scholar, PubMed and Web of Science for our literature search, with no limitations regarding the publication date and using pre-specified search queries (see Figure 1 for an overview and the Supplementary Methods for the exact keywords used). Articles were assessed in French, Dutch, German or English. The databases were searched from 2nd of December 2021 until the 01th of October 2022. Two independent coders checked each paper against our inclusion and exclusion criteria. Inconsistencies between coders were checked and resolved by JP and HH. Studies excluded/included for the review and meta-analysis can be found on the OSF project.

Figure 1.
Figure 1. PRISMA 2020 flowchart detailing the identification and screening of identified records for the systematic review and meta-analysis (Page et al., 2021).

MA = Meta-analysis. Animal outcomes refer to outcomes measured in non-human species which were solely considered as part of a systematic review.

Data extraction and preparation

Details for the data extraction process can be found in the supplementary material. From this data, Hedges’ g and its variance could be derived. Effect sizes were always computed between the experimental and the control group. Data extraction began on the 10th of October 2022 and was concluded on the 25th of February 2023. JP and HH oversaw the data collection process, and checked and resolved all inconsistencies between coders.

Health benefits of touch were always coded by positive summary effects whereas adverse health effects of touch were represented by negative summary effects. If multiple time points were measured for the same outcome on the same day after a single touch intervention, we extracted the peak effect size (in either the positive or negative direction). If the touch intervention occurred multiple times and health outcomes were assessed for each time point, we extracted data points separately. Measurements assessing long-term effects without explicit touch sessions in the breaks were excluded. In the case of multiple control groups, we always contrasted the touch group to the group that most closely matched the touch condition (e.g., relaxation therapy was preferred over standard medical care). A detailed data extraction guideline can be found on OSF. We extracted information from all moderators listed in the pre-registration (Table 1). A list of included and excluded health outcomes is presented in Supplementary Table S1. Authors of studies with possible effects but missing information to calculate those effects were contacted via email and asked to provide the missing data (response rate = 35.7%).

View this table:
Table 1.

Moderator description and coding specificities. Asterisks indicate that the moderator analyses can be found in the supplementary results.

Statistical analysis and risk of bias assessment

One meta-analysis was performed for adults, adolescents and children as outcomes were highly comparable. We will refer to this meta-analysis as the adult meta-analysis as children/adolescent cohorts were only targeted in a minority of studies. A separate meta-analysis was performed for newborns, as their health outcomes differed substantially from any other age group.

Data was analyzed using R (version 4.2.2) using the rma.mv function from the metafor package (Viechtbauer, 2010) in a multistep, multivariate and multilevel fashion (for details of random effects structure of the models, see Supplementary Analysis). We first looked at our primary moderators (mental vs. physical health) and how the effect sizes systematically varied as a function of our secondary moderators (e.g. human-human or human-object touch, duration, skin-to-skin presence, etc.).

Heterogeneity in the present study was assessed using Cochran’s Q, which determines whether the extracted effect sizes estimate a common population effect size. To assess small study bias, we visually inspected the funnel plot and used the variance as a moderator in the overarching meta-analyses. In the next step, we separately investigated all previously outlined moderators one-by-one. We also explored interaction effects of the primary moderators (mental and physical health) with all secondary moderators. Moderators were only investigated if sufficient power for the group analysis was present (see Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Figures S3 and S4, and Supplementary Table S1).

Post hoc tests were performed comparing mental and physical health benefits within each interacting moderator (e.g., mental vs. physical health benefits in cancer patients) and mental or physical health benefits across levels of the interacting moderator (e.g., mental health benefits in cancer vs. pain patients). Post hoc tests were uncorrected due to the pre-registered nature of the moderators. Data was visualized using forest plots and orchard plots (Nakagawa et al., 2021) for categorical moderators and scatter plots for continuous moderators.

Risk of bias was assessed for all studies included in both meta-analyses and the systematic review. A detailed description of assessed biases is outlined in the Supplementary Methods and an overview of the results is presented in Supplementary Figure S1).

Results

Touch interventions have a medium-sized effect on health for all ages

For adults, a total of n = 2841 and n = 2556 individuals in the touch and control groups, respectively, across 85 studies and 103 cohorts were included. The effect of touch overall was medium-sized (g = 0.52, Figure 2A). For newborns, we could include 63 cohorts across 52 studies comprising a total of n = 2134 and n = 2086 newborns in the touch and control groups, respectively, with an overall effect almost identical to the older age group (g = 0.56, Figure 2B) suggesting that, despite distinct health outcomes, touch interventions show comparable effects across newborns and adults. Sufficient power to detect such effect sizes was rare in individual studies (see Supplementary Figure S2 and S3). No individual effect size from either meta-analysis was overly influential (Cook’s D < 0.06). The benefits were similar for mental and physical outcomes (mental vs physical, adults: p = 0.432, Figure 2C, newborns: p = 0.284, Figure 2D). Results for studies that were only part of the systematic review mimicked the result pattern of the overall meta-analysis and can be found in the Supplementary Results (Section “Systematic Review”).

Figure 2.
Figure 2. Benefits of touch on physical and mental health.

(A) Orchard plot illustrating the overall benefits across all health outcomes for adults/children. (B) same as A for newborns. (C-D) same as (A-B) but separating the results for physical vs mental health benefits. Each dot reflects a measured effect and the number of effects (k) included in the analysis is depicted in the bottom left. Mean effects and 95% CIs are presented in the bottom right, the heterogeneity Q statistic is presented in the top left. Asterisks indicate the overall effect being significant from a null effect (*** p < .001, ** p < .01, * p < .05). Dot size reflects precision of each individual effect (larger = higher precision). Small study bias for the overall effect in the adult meta-analysis was significant (p < .001, see Figure S6) but did not reach significance for the newborn meta-analysis (p = .070, see Figure S7).

Based on the overall effect of both meta-analyses as well as their median sample sizes, the minimum number of studies necessary for subgroup analyses to achieve 80% power was k = 9 effects for adults and k = 8 effects for newborns (see Supplementary Figures S4 and S5). Assessing specific health outcomes with sufficient power in more detail in adults (Figure 3A) revealed smaller benefits to sleep and heart rate parameters, moderate benefits to positive and negative affect, diastolic blood and systolic blood pressure, mobility and reductions of the stress hormone cortisol, and larger benefits to trait and state anxiety, depression, fatigue and pain. Post hoc tests revealed stronger benefits for pain, state anxiety, depression and trait anxiety compared to respiratory, sleep and heart rate parameters (all ps < .05). Reductions in pain and state anxiety were increased compared to reductions in negative affect (both ps < .05). Benefits to pain symptoms were higher compared to benefits to positive affect (p = .030). Finally, touch resulted in larger benefits to cortisol release compared to heart rate and respiratory parameters (both ps < .05).

Figure 3.
Figure 3. Forest plot for all specific health outcomes with sufficient effects to warrant further analysis.

The type of health outcomes measured differed between adults (A) and newborns (B) and were thus analyzed separately. Numbers on the right represent the mean effect, its 95% CI in square brackets and the significance level estimating the likelihood that the effect is equal to zero. The F-value in the top right represents a test of the hypothesis that all effects within the subpanel are equal. The Q statistic represents heterogeneity. Asterisks indicate the overall effect being significant from a null effect (*** p < .001, ** p < .01, * p < .05). Physical outcomes are marked in red, mental outcomes are marked in blue.

In newborns, only physical health effects had sufficient data for further analysis. We found no benefits for digestion and heart rate parameters. All other health outcomes (cortisol, liver enzymes, respiration, temperature regulation and weight gain showed medium to large effects (Figure 3B). We found no significant differences among any specific health outcomes.

Non-human touch and skin-to-skin contact

In some situations, a fellow human is not readily available to provide affective touch, raising the question of the efficacy of touch delivered by objects and robots (Eckstein et al., 2020). Overall, we found humans engaging in touch with other humans or objects to have medium-sized health benefits in adults, without significant differences (p = .295, Figure 4A). However, differentiating physical vs mental health benefits revealed similar benefits for human and object touch on physical health outcomes, but larger benefits on mental outcomes when humans were touched by humans (p = .022, Figure 4B). It needs to be noted that object-touch still showed a significant effect (see also Supplementary Figure S8 for the corresponding Orchard plot).

Figure 4.
Figure 4. Influence of the touching dyad in adults.

(A) Forest plot comparing humans vs objects touching a human on health outcomes overall. (B) same as A, but separately for mental vs physical health outcomes. In C), we removed all object studies to identify if missing skin-to-skin contact is the relevant mediator of higher mental health effects in human-human interactions. Numbers on the right represent the mean effect, its 95% CI in square brackets and the significance level estimating the likelihood that the effect is equal to zero. The F-value in the top right represents a test of the hypothesis that all effects within the subpanel are equal. The Q statistic represents heterogeneity. Asterisks indicate the overall effect being significant from a null effect (*** p < .001, ** p < .01, * p < .05). Physical outcomes are marked in red, mental outcomes are marked in blue.

We considered the possibility that this effect is due to missing skin-to-skin contact in human-object interactions. Thus, we investigated human-human interactions with and without skin-to-skin contact (Figure 4C). In line with the hypothesis that skin-to-skin contact is highly relevant, we again found stronger mental health benefits in presence of skin-to-skin contact that however did not achieve nominal significance (p = .055), likely because skin-to-skin contact was rarely absent in human-human interactions leading to a decrease in power for the analysis. Results for skin-to-skin contact as moderator can be found in Supplementary Figure S9.

Influences of type of touch

The large majority of touch interventions comprise massage therapy in adults and kangaroo care in newborns. However, comparing the different types of touch explored across studies did not reveal significant differences in effect sizes based on touch-type, be it on overall health benefits (adults, p = .916; newborns p = .361, Figure 5A,B) or comparing different forms of touch separately for physical or for mental health benefits (pairwise comparisons p > .325, Figure 5C/D; see also Supplementary Figure S10/11 for the corresponding Orchard plots). This suggests that touch types may be flexibly adapted to the setting of every touch intervention.

Figure 5.
Figure 5. Effect of type of touch:

(A) Forest plot of health benefits comparing massage therapy vs. other forms of touch in adult cohorts. (B) Forest plot of health benefits comparing massage therapy, kangaroo care and other forms of touch for newborns. (C) same as (A) separating mental and physical health benefits. (D) same as B but separating mental and physical health outcomes where possible. Note that an insufficient number of studies assessed mental health benefits of massage therapy or other forms of touch to be included. Numbers on the right represent the mean effect, its 95% CI in square brackets and the significance level estimating the likelihood that the effect is equal to zero. The F-value in the top right represents a test of the hypothesis that all effects within the subpanel are equal. The Q statistic represents heterogeneity. Asterisks indicate the overall effect being significant from a null effect (*** p < .001, ** p < .01, * p < .05). Physical outcomes are marked in red, mental outcomes are marked in blue.

The role of clinical status

Most research on touch interventions has focused on clinical samples, but are benefits restricted to clinical cohorts? We found health benefits to be significant in clinical and healthy populations (Figure 6), whether all outcomes are considered (Figure 6A,B), or physical and mental outcomes are separated (Figure 6C/D, see Supplementary Figure S12/13 for the corresponding Orchard plots). In adults, however, we found higher mental health benefits for clinical populations compared to healthy ones (Figure 7C; p = .037).

Figure 6.
Figure 6. Comparing health benefits for clinical vs. healthy cohorts.

(A) health benefits for clinical cohorts of adults vs. healthy cohorts of adults. (B) same as A for newborn cohorts. (C) same as A, but separating mental vs physical health benefits. (D) same as B but separating mental vs physical health benefits. Numbers on the right represent the mean effect, its 95% CI in square brackets and the significance level estimating the likelihood that the effect is equal to zero. The F-value in the top right represents a test of the hypothesis that all effects within the subpanel are equal. The Q statistic represents heterogeneity. Asterisks indicate the overall effect being significant from a null effect (*** p < .001, ** p < .01, * p < .05). Physical outcomes are marked in red, mental outcomes are marked in blue.

Figure 7.
Figure 7. Comparing health benefits for familiar vs unfamiliar touchers.

(A) health benefits for being touched by a familiar (e.g. partners, family members or friends) vs unfamiliar toucher (health professional). (B) same as A for newborn cohorts. (C) same as A, but separating mental vs physical health benefits. (D) same as B but separating mental vs physical health benefits. Numbers on the right represent the mean effect, its 95% CI in square brackets and the significance level estimating the likelihood that the effect is equal to zero. The F-value in the top right represents a test of the hypothesis that all effects within the subpanel are equal. The Q statistic represents heterogeneity. Asterisks indicate the overall effect being significant from a null effect (*** p < .001, ** p < .01, * p < .05). Physical outcomes are marked in red, mental outcomes are marked in blue.

A more detailed analysis of specific clinical conditions revealed positive mental and physical health benefits for almost all assessed clinical disorders. Differences between disorders were not found with the exception of increased effectiveness of touch interventions in neurological disorders (see Supplementary Figure S14).

Familiarity of the touching dyad

Touch interventions can either be performed by familiar touchers (partners, family members or friends) or by unfamiliar touchers (health care professionals). In adults, we did not find an impact of familiarity of the toucher (p = .905; see Figure 7 and Supplementary Figure S15/16 for the corresponding Orchard plots). Similarly, investigating the impact on mental and physical health benefits specifically, no significant differences could be detected suggesting that familiarity is irrelevant in adults.

In contrast, touch applied by the parents, almost exclusively the mother, was significantly more beneficial compared to unfamiliar touch (p = .041) for newborns. Investigating mental and physical health benefits specifically revealed no significant differences.

Frequency and duration of touch interventions

How often and for how long should touch be delivered? For adults, the median touch duration across studies was 20 minutes and the median number of touch interventions was four sessions with an average time interval of 2.3 days in between each session. For newborns, the median touch duration across studies was 17.5 minutes and the median number of touch interventions was seven sessions with an average time interval of 1.3 days in between each session.

Delivering more touch sessions increased benefits in adults, whether overall, physical or mental benefits were measured (all ps < .008, Figure 8A). A closer look at specific outcomes for which sufficient data was available revealed that positive associations between the number of sessions and outcomes were found for trait anxiety, depression and pain (all ps < .001), indicating a need for repeated sessions to improve these adverse health outcomes. Neither increasing the number of sessions for newborns, nor increasing the duration of touch per session in adults or newborns increased health benefits, be they physical or mental (Figure 8, B-D). For continuous moderators in adults, we also looked at specific health outcomes as sufficient data was generally available for further analysis. Surprisingly, we found significant negative associations between touch duration and reductions of cortisol (p = .012) and heart rate parameters (p = .029).

Figure 8.
Figure 8. Effect of the number of sessions and their duration on health outcomes.

(A) Meta-regression analysis examining the association between the number of sessions applied and the effect size in adults, either on overall health benefits (A1), or for physical (A2) or mental benefits (A3) separately. (B) same as A for newborns. (C,D) same as A,B but for the duration of the individual sessions. Each dot represents an effect size, its size indicates the precision of the study (larger = better). The asterisks in each panel represent the result of a regression analysis testing the hypothesis that the slope of the relationship is equal to zero. *** = p < 0.001. The shaded area around the regression line represents the 95% CI.

Demographic influences of sex, age and regional background

We used the ratio between women and men in the sample as a proxy for sex-specific effects. Sex ratios were heavily skewed towards larger numbers of women in each cohort (median = 83% women) and we could not find significant associations between sex ratio and overall, mental or physical health benefits (all ps > .587). For specific outcomes that could be further analyzed, we found a significant positive association of sex ratio with reductions in cortisol secretion (p = .033) suggesting stronger benefits in women. In contrast to adults, sex ratios were balanced in newborns samples (median = 53% girls).There was no significant association with overall and physical health benefits of touch (all ps > .359). Mental health benefits did not provide sufficient data for further analysis.

The median age in the adult meta-analysis was 42.6 years (range: 4.5 - 88.4). There was no association between age and the overall, mental and physical health benefits of touch (all ps > .745). Looking at specific health outcomes, we found significant positive associations between mean age and improved positive affect (p = .030) as well as systolic blood pressure (p = .036).

Discussion

The key aim of the present study was twofold: to provide an estimate of the effect size of touch interventions, and to disambiguate moderating factors to tailor future interventions more precisely. Overall, touch interventions were beneficial for both physical and mental health with a medium effect size. Our work illustrates that touch interventions are best suited for reducing pain, depression, and anxiety in adults and children, as well as for increasing weight gain in newborns. In general, both massages (Field, 2016; Moyer et al., 2004) and other types of touch, such as gentle touch, kangaroo care or acupressure, were equally beneficial.

While it seems to be less critical which touch intervention is applied, the frequency of interventions seem to matter. More sessions were positively associated with the improvement of trait outcomes such as depression and anxiety but also pain reductions in adults. In contrast to session number, increasing the duration of individual sessions did not improve health effects. In fact, we found some indications of negative relationships in adults for cortisol and blood pressure. This could be due to habituating effects of touch on the sympathetic nervous system and HPA-axis, ultimately resulting in diminished effects with longer exposure, or decreased pleasantness ratings of affective touch with increasing duration (Bendas et al., 2021). For newborns, we could not support previous notions that the duration of the touch intervention is linked to benefits in weight gain (Charpak et al., 2021). Thus, an ideal intervention protocol does not seem to have to be excessively long.

A critical issue highlighted in the pandemic is the lack of touch due to social restrictions (Packheiser et al., 2023). To accommodate the need for touch in individuals with small social networks (e.g., institutionalized or isolated individuals), touch interventions using objects/robots have been explored in the past (for review, see Eckstein et al., 2020). We show here that touch interactions outside of the human-human domain are beneficial for mental and physical health outcomes. Importantly, object/robot touch was not as effective in improving mental health as human-applied touch. A sub-analysis of missing skin-to-skin contact among humans indicated that mental health effects of touch might be mediated by the presence of skin-to-skin contact. Thus, it seems profitable to include skin-to-skin contact in future touch interventions in line with previous findings in newborns (Whitelaw et al., 1988). In robots, recent advancements in synthetic skin (Yogeswaran et al., 2015) should be investigated further in that regard.

Touch was beneficial for both healthy and clinical cohorts. This data is critical as most previous meta-analytic research has focused on individuals diagnosed with clinical disorders (citations). For mental health outcomes, we found larger effects in clinical cohorts. A possible reason could relate to increased touch wanting (Durkin et al., 2021) in patients: For example, loneliness often co-occurs with chronic illnesses (Rokach et al., 2006), which is linked to depressed mood and feelings of anxiety (Palgi et al., 2020). Touch can be used to counteract this negative development (Heatley-Tejada et al., 2020, Packheiser et al., 2022). In adults and children, knowing the toucher did not influence health benefits. In contrast, familiarity affected overall health benefits in newborns, with parental touch being more beneficial than touch applied by medical staff. Previous studies have suggested that early skin-to-skin contact and exposure to maternal odor is critical for a newborn’s ability to adapt to a new environment (Porter, 2007), supporting the notion that parental care is difficult to substitute in this time period. Research on sex differences in touch processing and benefits is sparse (but see Russo et al., 2020). Our results suggest that at least buffering effects against physiological stress are stronger in women. This is in line with increased buffering effects of hugs in women compared to men (Berretz et al., 2021). The female biased samples, however, beg for more research in men or non-binary individuals. Our data further suggests that increasing age was related to a higher benefit through touch, but only for cortisol and systolic blood pressure. These findings could potentially be attributed to higher basal cortisol levels (Seeman et al., 2001) and blood pressure (Hawkley et al., 2006) with increasing age, allowing for a stronger modulation of these parameters. Our results offer many promising avenues to improve future touch interventions, but they also need to be discussed in light of their limitations. For one, an important prerequisite for touch to be beneficial is its perceived pleasantness which could not be accounted for in our meta-analysis. The level of pleasantness associated with being touched is modulated by several parameters (Saarinen et al., 2021) including cultural acceptability (Burleson et al., 2019), perceived humanness (Wijaya et al., 2020), or a need for touch (Golaya, 2021), which could explain the observed differences for certain moderators, such as human-human vs. robot-human interaction. Moreover, the fact that secondary categorical moderators could not be investigated with respect to specific health outcomes, due to the lack of data points, limits the specificity of our conclusions. It thus remains unclear whether, for example, a decreased mental health benefit in the absence of skin-to-skin contact is linked mostly to decreased anxiolytic effects, changes in positive/negative affect or something else. Since these health outcomes are however highly correlated (Ng et al., 2019), it is likely that such effects are driven by multiple health outcomes. Finally, it needs to be noted that blinding towards the experimental condition is essentially impossible in touch interventions. Although we compared the touch intervention to other interventions, such as relaxation therapy, as control whenever possible, contributions of placebo effects cannot be ruled out.

In conclusion, we show clear evidence that touch interventions are beneficial across a large number of both physical and mental health outcomes, both for healthy and clinical cohorts, and for all ages. These benefits, while influenced in their magnitude by study cohorts and intervention characteristics, were robustly present promoting the conclusion that touch interventions can be systematically employed across the population to preserve and improve our health.

Data Availability

All data are available under the following link: https://osf.io/c8rvw/?view_only=6298307ead2e423eb20f9675f843de0d

https://osf.io/c8rvw/?view_only=6298307ead2e423eb20f9675f843de0d

Author contributions

JP: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Investigation, Data Curation, Writing - Original Draft, Writing - Review & Editing, Visualization, Supervision, Project administration. HH: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Investigation, Data Curation, Writing - Original Draft, Writing - Review & Editing, Visualization, Supervision, Project administration. KF: Investigation, Data Curation, Writing - Review & Editing. CK: Writing - Review & Editing, Conceptualization. VG: Writing - Review & Editing, Conceptualization. FM: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing - Original Draft, Writing - Review & Editing.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding

JP was supported by the German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina (LPDS 2021-05). HH was supported by the Marietta-Blau scholarship of the Austrian Agency for Education and Internationalisation (OeAD) and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation - Project-ID 422744262 - TRR 289). CK received funding from OCENW.XL21.XL21.069, VG from the European Research Council (ERC) under European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program, grant ‘HelpUS’ (758703), and from the Dutch Research Council (NWO) grant OCENW.XL21.XL21.069. None of the funders had any role in study design, data collection and analysis, interpretation, writing or decision to publish.

Acknowledgements

We thank Aline Frick and Eva Chris for supporting the initial literature search and coding. We also thank Aljoscha Dreisoerner, Tiffany Field, Sander Koole, Cynthia Kuhn, Maria Henricson, Laura Frey Law, Joy Fraser, Marianne Cumella Reddan, and Jacqui Stringer who kindly responded to our data requests and provided additional information or data with respect to single studies.

Footnotes

  • ↵+ Shared first authorship

  • We added a risk of bias analysis.

References

  1. Abdel Fattah, M., & Hamdy, B. (2011). Pulmonary Functions of Children with Asthma Improve Following Massage Therapy. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 17(11), 1065– 1068. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2010.0758
    OpenUrl
  2. Ahles, T. A., Tope, D. M., Pinkson, B., Walch, S., Hann, D., Whedon, M., Dain, B., Weiss, J. E., Mills, L., & Silberfarb, P. M. (1999). Massage Therapy for Patients Undergoing Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 18(3), 157–163.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. Albert, N. M., Gillinov, A. M., Lytle, B. W., Feng, J., Cwynar, R., & Blackstone, E. H. (2009). A randomized trial of massage therapy after heart surgery. Heart & Lung, 38(6), 480–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2009.03.001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. Ang, J. Y., Lua, J. L., Mathur, A., Thomas, R., Asmar, B. I., Savasan, S., Buck, S., Long, M., & Shankaran, S. (2012). A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Massage Therapy on the Immune System of Preterm Infants. Pediatrics, 130(6), e1549–e1558. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-0196
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    Ardiel, E. L., & Rankin, C. H. (2010). The importance of touch in development. Paediatrics & Child Health, 15(3), 153–156. https://doi.org/10.1093/pch/15.3.153
    OpenUrl
  6. Arditi, H., Feldman, R., & Eidelman, A. I. (2006). Effects of human contact and vagal regulation on pain reactivity and visual attention in newborns. Developmental Psychobiology, 48(7), 561–573. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.20150
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. Arora, J., Kumar, A., & Ramji, S. (2005). Effect of Oil Massage on Growth and Neurobehavior in Very Low Birth Weight Preterm Neonates. Indian Pediatrics, 42.
  8. Asadollahi, M., Jabraeili, M., Mahallei, M., Asgari Jafarabadi, M., & Ebrahimi, S. (2016). Effects of Gentle Human Touch and Field Massage on Urine Cortisol Level in Premature Infants: A Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial. Journal of Caring Sciences, 5(3), 187–194. https://doi.org/10.15171/jcs.2016.020
    OpenUrl
  9. Basiri-Moghadam, M., Basiri-Moghadam, K., Kianmehr, M., & Jani, S. (2015). The effect of massage on neonatal jaundice in stable preterm newborn infants: A randomized controlled trial. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 65(6), 602–606.
    OpenUrl
  10. Bauer, B. A., Cutshall, S. M., Wentworth, L. J., Engen, D., Messner, P. K., Wood, C. M., Brekke, K. M., Kelly, R. F., & Sundt, T. M. (2010). Effect of massage therapy on pain, anxiety, and tension after cardiac surgery: A randomized study. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, 16(2), 70–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2009.06.012
    OpenUrl
  11. Baumgartner, J. N., Quintana, D., Leija, L., Schuster, N. M., Bruno, K. A., Castellanos, J. P., & Case, L. K. (2022). Widespread Pressure Delivered by a Weighted Blanket Reduces Chronic Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial. The Journal of Pain, 23(1), 156–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2021.07.009
    OpenUrl
  12. Becklund, A. L., Rapp-McCall, L., & Nudo, J. (2021). Using weighted blankets in an inpatient mental health hospital to decrease anxiety. Journal of Integrative Medicine, 19(2), 129–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joim.2020.11.004
    OpenUrl
  13. Beijers, R., Cillessen, L., & Zijlmans, M. A. C. (2016). An experimental study on mother-infant skin-to-skin contact in full-terms. Infant Behavior and Development, 43, 58–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2016.01.001
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    Bendas, J., Ree, A., Pabel, L., Sailer, U., & Croy, I. (2021). Dynamics of Affective Habituation to Touch Differ on the Group and Individual Level. Neuroscience, 464, 44–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.12.024
    OpenUrl
  15. Bennett, S., Bennett, M. J., Chatchawan, U., Jenjaiwit, P., Pantumethakul, R., Kunhasura, S., & Eungpinichpong, W. (2016). Acute effects of traditional Thai massage on cortisol levels, arterial blood pressure and stress perception in academic stress condition: A single blind randomised controlled trial. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 20(2), 286–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2015.10.005
    OpenUrl
  16. Bergman, N., Linley, L., & Fawcus, S. (2004). Randomized controlled trial of skin-to-skin contact from birth versus conventional incubator for physiological stabilization in 1200-to 2199-gram newborns. Acta Paediatrica, 93(6), 779–785. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2004.tb03018.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. Berretz, G., Cebula, C., Wortelmann, B. M., Papadopoulou, P., Wolf, O. T., Ocklenburg, S., & Packheiser, J. (2022). Romantic partner embraces reduce cortisol release after acute stress induction in women but not in men. PLOS ONE, 17(5), e0266887. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266887
    OpenUrl
  18. Bigelow, A., Power, M., MacLellan-Peters, J., Alex, M., & McDonald, C. (2012). Effect of Mother/Infant Skin-to-Skin Contact on Postpartum Depressive Symptoms and Maternal Physiological Stress. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 41(3), 369–382. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6909.2012.01350.x
    OpenUrl
  19. Billhult, A., Bergbom, I., & Stener-Victorin, E. (2007). Massage Relieves Nausea in Women with Breast Cancer Who Are Undergoing Chemotherapy. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 13(1), 53–57. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2006.6049
    OpenUrl
  20. Billhult, A., Lindholm, C., Gunnarsson, R., & Stener-Victorin, E. (2008). The effect of massage on cellular immunity, endocrine and psychological factors in women with breast cancer—A randomized controlled clinical trial. Autonomic Neuroscience, 140(1–2), 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autneu.2008.03.006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. Billhult, A., Lindholm, C., Gunnarsson, R., & Stener-Victorin, E. (2009). The effect of massage on immune function and stress in women with breast cancer—A randomized controlled trial. Autonomic Neuroscience, 150(1–2), 111–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autneu.2009.03.010
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. Boccia, M. L., Reite, M., & Laudenslager, M. (1989). Brief Communciation: On the Physiology of Grooming in a Pigtail Macaque. Physiology & Behavior, 45, 667–670.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. Braun, L. A., Stanguts, C., Casanelia, L., Spitzer, O., Paul, E., Vardaxis, N. J., & Rosenfeldt, F. (2012). Massage therapy for cardiac surgery patients—A randomized trial. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 144(6), 1453–1459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.04.027
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Burleson, M. H., Roberts, N. A., Coon, D. W., & Soto, J. A. (2019). Perceived cultural acceptability and comfort with affectionate touch: Differences between Mexican Americans and European Americans. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(3), 1000–1022. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517750005
    OpenUrl
  25. Cabibihan, J.-J., & Chauhan, S. S. (2017). Physiological Responses to Affective Tele-Touch during Induced Emotional Stimuli. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 8(1), 108–118. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAFFC.2015.2509985
    OpenUrl
  26. Campeau, M.-P., Gaboriault, R., Drapeau, M., Van Nguyen, T., Roy, I., Fortin, B., Marois, M., & Nguyen-Tân, P. F. (2007). Impact of Massage Therapy on Anxiety Levels in Patients Undergoing Radiation Therapy: Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of the Society for Integrative Oncology, 05(04), 133– 138. https://doi.org/10.2310/7200.2007.018
    OpenUrl
  27. Can, Ş., & Kaya, H. (2021). The effects of yakson or gentle human touch training given to mothers with preterm babies on attachment levels and the responses of the baby: A randomized controlled trial. Health Care for Women International, 43(5), 479–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2021.1958817
    OpenUrl
  28. Carfoot, S., Williamson, P., & Dickson, R. (2005). A randomised controlled trial in the north of England examining the effects of skin-to-skin care on breast feeding. Midwifery, 21(1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2004.09.002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. Castral, T. C., Warnock, F., Leite, A. M., Haas, V. J., & Scochi, C. G. S. (2008). The effects of skin-to-skin contact during acute pain in preterm newborns. European Journal of Pain, 12(4), 464–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpain.2007.07.012
    OpenUrl
  30. Cattaneo, A., Davanzo, R., Worku, B., Surjono, A., Echeverria, M., Bedri, A., Haksari, E., Osorno, L., Gudetta, B., Setyowireni, D., Quintero, S., & Tamburlini, G. (1998). Kangaroo mother care for low birthweight infants: A randomized controlled trial in different settings. Acta Paediatrica, 87, 976–985.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. Charpak, N., Ruiz-Peláez, J. G., & Charpak, Y. (1994). Rey-Martinez Kangaroo Mother Program: An Alternative Way of Caring for Low Birth Weight Infants? One Year Mortality in a Two Cohort Study. Pediatrics, 94(6), 804–810.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  32. ↵
    Charpak, N., Montealegre-Pomar, A., & Bohorquez, A. (2021). Systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that the duration of Kangaroo mother care has a direct impact on neonatal growth. Acta Paediatrica, 110(1), 45–59.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  33. Chermont, A. G., Falcão, L. F. M., de Souza Silva, E. H. L., de Cássia Xavier Balda, R., & Guinsburg, R. (2009). Skin-to-Skin Contact and/or Oral 25% Dextrose for Procedural Pain Relief for Term Newborn Infants. Pediatrics, 124(6), e1101–e1107. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-0993
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. Chi Luong, K., Long Nguyen, T., Huynh Thi, D. H., Carrara, H. P. O., & Bergman, N. J. (2016). Newly born low birthweight infants stabilise better in skin-to-skin contact than when separated from their mothers: A randomised controlled trial. Acta Paediatrica, 105, 381–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.13164
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. Cho, E.-S., Kim, S.-J., Kwon, M. S., Cho, H., Kim, E. H., Jun, E. M., & Lee, S. (2016). The Effects of Kangaroo Care in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit on the Physiological Functions of Preterm Infants, Maternal–Infant Attachment, and Maternal Stress. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 31(4), 430–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2016.02.007
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  36. Choi, H., Kim, S.-J., Oh, J., Lee, M.-N., Kim, S., & Kang, K.-A. (2016). The effects of massage therapy on physical growth and gastrointestinal function in premature infants: A pilot study. Journal of Child Health Care, 20(3), 394–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367493515598647
    OpenUrl
  37. Choudhary, M., Dogiyal, H., Sharma, D., Datt Gupta, B., Madabhavi, I., Choudhary, J. S., & Choudhary, S. K. (2016). To study the effect of Kangaroo Mother Care on pain response in preterm neonates and to determine the behavioral and physiological responses to painful stimuli in preterm neonates: A study from western Rajasthan. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 29(5), 826–831. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2015.1020419
    OpenUrl
  38. Christensson, K., Siles, C., Moreno, L., Belaustequi, A., De La Fuente, P., Lagercrantz, H., Puyol, P., & Winberg, J. (1992). Temperature, metabolic adaptation and crying in healthy full-term newborns cared for skin-to-skin or in a cot. Acta Paediatrica, 81, 488–493.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  39. Cloutier, S., & Newberry, R. C. (2008). Use of a conditioning technique to reduce stress associated with repeated intra-peritoneal injections in laboratory rats. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 112(1– 2), 158–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2007.07.003
    OpenUrl
  40. Cloutier, S., Wahl, K., Baker, C., & Newberry, R. C. (2014). The Social Buffering Effect of Playful Handling on Responses to Repeated Intraperitoneal Injections in Laboratory Rats. Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science, 53(2), 168–173.
    OpenUrl
  41. Cloutier, S., Wahl, K. L., Panksepp, J., & Newberry, R. C. (2015). Playful handling of laboratory rats is more beneficial when applied before than after routine injections. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 164, 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2014.12.012
    OpenUrl
  42. Cong, X., Cusson, R. M., Walsh, S., Hussain, N., Ludington-Hoe, S. M., & Zhang, D. (2012). Effects of Skin-to-Skin Contact on Autonomic Pain Responses in Preterm Infants. The Journal of Pain, 13(7), 636–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2012.02.008
    OpenUrl
  43. Cong, X., Ludington-Hoe, S. M., McCain, G., & Fu, P. (2009). Kangaroo Care modifies preterm infant heart rate variability in response to heel stick pain: Pilot study. Early Human Development, 85(9), 561–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2009.05.012
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  44. Cong, X., Ludington-Hoe, S. M., & Walsh, S. (2011). Randomized Crossover Trial of Kangaroo Care to Reduce Biobehavioral Pain Responses in Preterm Infants: A Pilot Study. Biological Research For Nursing, 13(2), 204–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1099800410385839
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. Cook, R. D. (2011). Cook’s Distance. In M. Lovric (Hrsg.), International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science (S. 301–302). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04898-2_189
  46. Costa, R., Tamascia, M. L., Sanches, A., Moreira, R. P., Cunha, T. S., Nogueira, M. D., Casarini, D. E., & Marcondes, F. K. (2020). Tactile stimulation of adult rats modulates hormonal responses, depression-like behaviors, and memory impairment induced by chronic mild stress: Role of angiotensin II. Behavioural Brain Research, 379, 112250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2019.112250
    OpenUrl
  47. Coulon, M., Nowak, R., Peyrat, J., Chandèze, H., Boissy, A., & Boivin, X. (2015). Do Lambs Perceive Regular Human Stroking as Pleasant? Behavior and Heart Rate Variability Analyses. PLOS ONE, 10(2), e0118617. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118617
    OpenUrl
  48. Cutshall, S. M., Wentworth, L. J., Engen, D., Sundt, T. M., Kelly, R. F., & Bauer, B. A. (2010). Effect of massage therapy on pain, anxiety, and tension in cardiac surgical patients: A pilot study. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, 16(2), 92–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2009.10.006
    OpenUrl
  49. Dalili, H., Sheikhi, S., Shariat, M., & Haghnazarian, E. (2016). Effects of baby massage on neonatal jaundice in healthy Iranian infants: A pilot study. Infant Behavior and Development, 42, 22–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2015.10.009
    OpenUrl
  50. Diego, M. A., Field, T., & Hernandez-Reif, M. (2005). Vagal Activity, Gastric Motility, and Weight Gain in Massaged Preterm Neonates. The Journal of Pediatrics, 147(1), 50–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.02.023
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  51. Diego, M. A., Field, T., & Hernandez-Reif, M. (2007). Temperature increases in preterm infants during massage therapy. Infant Behavior and Development, 31(1), 149–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2007.07.002
    OpenUrl
  52. Diego, M. A., Field, T., Hernandez-Reif, M., Deeds, O., Ascencio, A., & Begert, G. (2007). Preterm infant massage elicits consistent increases in vagal activity and gastric motility that are associated with greater weight gain. Acta Paediatrica, 96(11), 1588–1591. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2007.00476.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  53. Diego, M. A., Field, T., Hernandez-Reif, M., Hart, S., Brucker, B., Field, T., & Burman, I. (2002). SPINAL CORD PATIENTS BENEFIT FROM MASSAGE THERAPY. International Journal of Neuroscience, 112(2), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207450212023
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  54. Diego, M. A., Field, T., Hernandez-Reif, M., Shaw, J. A., Rothe, E. M., Castellanos, D., & Mesner, L. (2002). Aggressive adolescents benefit from massage therapy. Adolescence, 37(147), 597–607.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  55. Diego, M. A., Field, T., Hernandez-Reif, M., Shaw, K., Friedman, L., & Ironson, G. (2001). HIV ADOLESCENTS SHOW IMPROVED IMMUNE FUNCTION FOLLOWING MASSAGE THERAPY. International Journal of Neuroscience, 106, 35–45.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  56. Dieter, J. N. I., Field, T., Hernandez-Reif, M., Emory, E. K., & Redzepi. (2003). Stable Preterm Infants Gain More Weight and Sleep Less after Five Days of Massage Therapy. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 28(6), 403–411. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsg030
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  57. Ditzen, B., Neumann, I. D., Bodenmann, G., von Dawans, B., Turner, R. A., Ehlert, U., & Heinrichs, M. (2007). Effects of different kinds of couple interaction on cortisol and heart rate responses to stress in women. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 32(5), 565–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2007.03.011
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  58. Dreisoerner, A., Junker, N. M., Schlotz, W., Heimrich, J., Bloemeke, S., Ditzen, B., & van Dick, R. (2021). Self-soothing touch and being hugged reduce cortisol responses to stress: A randomized controlled trial on stress, physical touch, and social identity. Comprehensive Psychoneuroendocrinology, 8, 100091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpnec.2021.100091
    OpenUrl
  59. ↵
    Durkin, J., Jackson, D., & Usher, K. (2021). Touch in times of COVID-19: Touch hunger hurts. Journal of Clinical Nursing.
  60. Eaton, M., Mitchell-Bonair, I. L., & Friedmann, E. (1986). The Effect of Touch on Nutritional Intake of Chronic Organic Brain Syndrome Patients. Journal of Gerontology, 41(5), 611–616.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  61. Edens, J. L., Larkin, K. T., & Abel, J. L. (1992). THE EFFECT OF SOCIAL SUPPORT AND PHYSICAL TOUCH ON CARDIOVASCULAR REACTIONS TO MENTAL STRESS. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 36(4), 371–382.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  62. ↵
    Eckstein, M., Mamaev, I., Ditzen, B., & Sailer, U. (2020). Calming effects of touch in human, animal, and robotic interaction—scientific state-of-the-art and technical advances. Frontiers in psychiatry, 11, 555058.
    OpenUrl
  63. Ekholm, B., Spulber, S., & Adler, M. (2020). A randomized controlled study of weighted chain blankets for insomnia in psychiatric disorders. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 16(9), 1567–1577. https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.8636
    OpenUrl
  64. El-Farrash, R. A., Shinkar, D. M., Ragab, D. A., Salem, R. M., Saad, W. E., Farag, A. S., Salama, D. H., & Sakr, M. F. (2019). Longer duration of kangaroo care improves neurobehavioral performance and feeding in preterm infants: A randomized controlled trial. Pediatric Research, 87(4), 683–688. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-019-0558-6
    OpenUrl
  65. Erlandsson, K., Dsilna, A., Fagerberg, I., & Christensson, K. (2007). Skin-to-Skin Care with the Father after Cesarean Birth and Its Effect on Newborn Crying and Prefeeding Behavior. Birth, 34(2), 105–114.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  66. Escalona, A., Field, T., Singer-Strunck, R., Cullen, C., & Hartshorn, K. (2001). Brief Report: Improvements in the Behavior of Children With Autism Following Massage Therapy. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31(5), 513–516.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  67. Feldman, R., & Eidelman, A. I. (2003). Skin-to-skin contact (Kangaroo Care) accelerates autonomic and neurobehavioural maturation in preterm infants. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 45(04), 274–281. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012162203000525
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  68. Feldman, R., Eidelman, A. I., Sirota, L., & Weller, A. (2002). Comparison of Skin-to-Skin (Kangaroo) and Traditional Care: Parenting Outcomes and Preterm Infant Development. Pediatrics, 110(1), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.110.1.16
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  69. Feldman, R., Singer, M., & Zagoory, O. (2010). Touch attenuates infants’ physiological reactivity to stress. Developmental Science, 13(2), 271–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00890.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  70. Feldman, R., Weller, A., Sirota, L., & Eidelman, A. I. (2003). Testing a family intervention hypothesis: The contribution of mother-infant skin-to-skin contact (kangaroo care) to family interaction, proximity, and touch. Journal of Family Psychology, 17(1), 94–107. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.17.1.94
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  71. Ferber, S. G., Kuint, J., Weller, A., Feldman, R., Dollberg, S., Arbel, E., & Kohelet, D. (2001). Massage therapy by mothers and trained professionals enhances weight gain in preterm infants. Early Human Development, 67, 37–45.
    OpenUrl
  72. Ferber, S. G., & Makhoul, I. R. (2004). The Effect of Skin-to-Skin Contact (Kangaroo Care) Shortly After Birth on the Neurobehavioral Responses of the Term Newborn: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. Pediatrics, 113(4), 858–865. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.113.4.858
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  73. Ferreira, A. M., & Bergamasco, N. H. P. (2010). Behavioral analysis of preterm neonates included in a tactile and kinesthetic stimulation program during hospitalization. Revista Brasileira de Fisioterapia, 14(2), 141–148.
    OpenUrl
  74. Fidanza, F., Polimeni, E., Pierangeli, V., & Martini, M. (2021). A Better Touch: C-tactile Fibers Related Activity is Associated to Pain Reduction During Temporal Summation of Second Pain. The Journal of Pain, 22(5), 567–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2021.01.001
    OpenUrl
  75. Field, T., Cullen, C., Diego, M., Hernandez-Reif, M., Sprinz, P., Beebe, K., Kissell, B., & Bango-Sanchez, V. (2001). Leukemia immune changes following massage therapy. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 5(4), 271–274. https://doi.org/10.1054/jbmt.2001.0228
    OpenUrl
  76. Field, T., Deeds, O., Diego, M., Hernandez-Reif, M., Gauler, A., Sullivan, S., Wilson, D., & Nearing, G. (2009). Benefits of combining massage therapy with group interpersonal psychotherapy in prenatally depressed women. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 13(4), 297–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2008.10.002
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  77. Field, T., Delage, J., & Hernandez-Reif, M. (2003). Movement and massage therapy reduce fibromyalgia pain. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 7(1), 49–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1360-8592(02)00078-5
    OpenUrl
  78. Field, T., Diego, M., Cullen, C., Hernandez-Reif, M., Sunshine, W., & Douglas, S. (2002). Fibromyalgia Pain and Substance P Decrease and Sleep Improves After Massage Therapy. Journal of Clinical Rheumatology, 8(2), 72–76.
    OpenUrl
  79. Field, T., Diego, M., Gonzalez, G., & Funk, C. G. (2014). Neck arthritis pain is reduced and range of motion is increased by massage therapy. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, 20, 219–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2014.09.001
    OpenUrl
  80. Field, T., Diego, M., Hernandez-Reif, M., Deeds, O., & Figueiredo, B. (2009). Pregnancy massage reduces prematurity, low birthweight and postpartum depression. Infant Behavior and Development, 32(4), 454–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2009.07.001
    OpenUrl
  81. Field, T., Diego, M., Hernandez-Reif, M., Dieter, J. N. I., Kumar, A. M., Schanberg, S., & Kuhn, C. (2008). Insulin and Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 Increased in Preterm Neonates Following Massage Therapy. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 29(6), 463–466. https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0b013e3181856d3b
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  82. Field, T., Diego, M., Hernandez-Reif, M., Medina, L., Delgado, J., & Hernandez, A. (2012). Yoga and massage therapy reduce prenatal depression and prematurity. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 16(2), 204–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2011.08.002
    OpenUrl
  83. Field, T., Diego, M., Hernandez-Reif, M., Schanberg, S., & Kuhn, C. (2004). Massage therapy effects on depressed pregnant women. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, 25(2), 115–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/01674820412331282231
    OpenUrl
  84. Field, T., Diego, M., Hernandez-Reif, M., & Shea, J. (2007). Hand arthritis pain is reduced by massage therapy. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 11(1), 21–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2006.09.002
    OpenUrl
  85. Field, T., Gonzalez, G., Diego, M., & Mindell, J. (2016). Mothers massaging their newborns with lotion versus no lotion enhances mothers’ and newborns’ sleep. Infant Behavior and Development, 45, 31– 37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2016.08.004
    OpenUrl
  86. Field, T., Henteleff, T., Hernandez-Reif, M., Martinez, E., Mavunda, K., Kuhn, C., & Schanber, S. (1998). Children with asthma have improved pulmonary functions after massage therapy. The Journal of Pediatrics, 132(5), 854–858.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  87. Field, T., Hernandez-Reif, M., Diego, M., & Fraser, M. (2007). Lower back pain and sleep disturbance are reduced following massage therapy. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 11(2), 141– 145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2006.03.001
    OpenUrl
  88. Field, T., Hernandez-Reif, M., Hart, S., Quintino, O., Drose, L. A., Field, T., Kuhn, C., & Schanberg, S. (1997). Effects of sexual abuse are lessened by massage therapy. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 1(2), 65–69.
    OpenUrl
  89. Field, T., Hernandez-Reif, M., Hart, S., Theakston, H., Schanberg, S., & Kuhn, C. (1999). Pregnant women benefit from massage therapy. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, 20, 31–38.
    OpenUrl
  90. Field, T., Hernandez-Reif, M., Seligman, S., Krasnegor, J., Sunshine, W., Rivas-Chacon, R., Schanberg, S., & Kuhn, C. (1997). Juvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis: Benefits from Massage Therapy. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 22(5), 607–617.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  91. Field, T., Hernandez-Reif, M., Taylor, S., Quintino, O., & Burman, I. (1997). Labor pain is reduced by massage therapy. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, 18, 286–291.
    OpenUrl
  92. Field, T., Ironson, G., Scafidi, F., Nawrocki, T., Goncalves, A., Burman, I., Pickens, J., Fox, N., Schanberg, S., & Kuhn, C. (1996). Massage Therapy Reduces Anxiety and Enhances Eeg Pattern of Alertness and Math Computations. International Journal of Neuroscience, 86(3–4), 197–205. https://doi.org/10.3109/00207459608986710
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  93. Field, T., Lasko, D., Mundy, P., Henteleff, T., Kabat, S., Talpins, S., & Dowling, M. (1997). Brief Report: Autistic Children’s Attentiveness and Responsivity Improve After Touch Therapy. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 27(3), 333–338.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  94. Field, T. M., Schanberg, S. M., Scafidi, F., Bauer, C. R., Vega-Lahr, N., Garcia, R., Nystrom, J., & Kuhn, C. M. (1986). Tactile/Kinesthetic Stimulation Effects on Preterm Neonates. Pediatrics, 77(5), 654–658. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.77.5.654
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  95. Field, T., Morrow, C., Valdeon, C., Larson, S., Kuhn, C., & Schanberg, S. (1992). Massage Reduces Anxiety in Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Patients. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 31(1), 125–131.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  96. ↵
    Field, T. (2016). Massage therapy research review. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, 24, 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2016.04.005
    OpenUrl
  97. Field, T., Peck, M., Krugman, S., Tuchel, T., Schanberg, S., Kuhn, C., & Burman, I. (1998). Burn Injuries Benefit from Massage Therapy. Journal of Burn Care & Research, 19(3), 241–244.
    OpenUrl
  98. Fischer, C. B., Sontheimer, D., Scheffer, F., Bauer, J., & Linderkamp, O. (1998). Cardiorespiratory stability of premature boys and girls during kangaroo care. Early Human Development, 52, 145–153.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  99. Forward, J. B., Greuter, N. E., Crisall, S. J., & Lester, H. F. (2015). Effect of Structured Touch and Guided Imagery for Pain and Anxiety in Elective Joint Replacement Patients—A Randomized Controlled Trial: M-TIJRP. The Permanente Journal, 19(4), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/14-236
    OpenUrl
  100. Fraser, J., & Ross Kerr, J. (1993). Psychophysiological effects of back massage on elderly institutionalized patients. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 18, 238–245.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  101. Frey Law, L. A., Evans, S., Knudtson, J., Nus, S., Scholl, K., & Sluka, K. A. (2008). Massage Reduces Pain Perception and Hyperalgesia in Experimental Muscle Pain: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. The Journal of Pain, 9(8), 714–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2008.03.009
    OpenUrl
  102. Gao, H., Xu, G., Gao, H., Dong, R., Fu, H., Wang, D., Zhang, H., & Zhang, H. (2015). Effect of repeated Kangaroo Mother Care on repeated procedural pain in preterm infants: A randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 52(7), 1157–1165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.04.006
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  103. Garner, B., Phillips, L. J., Schmidt, H.-M., Markulev, C., O’Connor, J., Wood, S. J., Berger, G. E., Burnett, P., & McGorry, P. D. (2008). Pilot Study Evaluating the Effect of Massage Therapy on Stress, Anxiety and Aggression in a Young Adult Psychiatric Inpatient Unit. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 42(5), 414–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048670801961131
    OpenUrl
  104. Gathwala, G., Singh, B., & Singh, J. (2010). Effect of Kangaroo Mother Care on physical growth, breastfeeding and its acceptability. Tropical Doctor, 40(4), 199–202. https://doi.org/10.1258/td.2010.090513
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  105. Geva, N., Uzefovsky, F., & Levy-Tzedek, S. (2020). Touching the social robot PARO reduces pain perception and salivary oxytocin levels. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 9814. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66982-y
    OpenUrl
  106. Gitau, R., Modi, N., Gianakoulopoulos, X., Bond, C., Glover, V., & Stevenson, J. (2002). Acute effects of maternal skin-to-skin contact and massage on saliva cortisol in preterm babies. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 20(2), 83–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646830220134595
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  107. Givi, M. (2013). Durability of Effect of Massage Therapy on Blood Pressure. International Journal of Preventive Medicine, 4(5), 511–516.
    OpenUrl
  108. Glover, V., Onozawa, K., & Hodgkinson, A. (2002). Benefits of infant massage for mothers with postnatal depression. Seminars in Neonatology, 7(6), 495–500. https://doi.org/10.1053/siny.2002.0154
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  109. ↵
    Golaya, S. (2021). Touch-Hunger: An Unexplored Consequence of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 43(4), 362–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/02537176211014469
    OpenUrl
  110. Gonzalez, A., Vasquez-Mendoza, G., García-Vela, A., Guzmán-Ramirez, A., Salazar-Torres, M., & Romero-Gutierrez, G. (2008). Weight Gain in Preterm Infants following Parent-Administered Vimala Massage: A Randomized Controlled Trial. American Journal of Perinatology, 26(04), 247–252. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1103151
    OpenUrl
  111. Gourkow, N., Hamon, S. C., & Phillips, C. J. C. (2014). Effect of gentle stroking and vocalization on behaviour, mucosal immunity and upper respiratory disease in anxious shelter cats. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 117(1), 266–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.06.005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  112. Gray, L., Watt, L., & Blass, E. M. (2000). Skin-to-Skin Contact Is Analgesic in Healthy Newborns. Pediatrics, 105(1), e14. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.105.1.e14
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  113. Grewen, K. M., Anderson, B. J., Girdler, S. S., & Light, K. C. (2003). Warm Partner Contact Is Related to Lower Cardiovascular Reactivity. Behavioral Medicine, 29(3), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/08964280309596065
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  114. Groër, M. W., Hill, J., Wilkinson, J. E., & Stuart, A. (2002). Effects of Separation and Separation with Supplemental Stroking in BALB/c Infant Mice. Biological Research For Nursing, 3(3), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1099800402003003002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  115. Haley, S., Beachy, J., Ivaska, K. K., Slater, H., Smith, S., & Moyer-Mileur, L. J. (2012). Tactile/kinesthetic stimulation (TKS) increases tibial speed of sound and urinary osteocalcin (U-MidOC and unOC) in premature infants (29–32 weeks PMA). Bone, 51(4), 661–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2012.07.016
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  116. Harris, M., Richards, K. C., & Grando, V. T. (2012). The Effects of Slow-Stroke Back Massage on Minutes of Nighttime Sleep in Persons With Dementia and Sleep Disturbances in the Nursing Home: A Pilot Study. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 30(4), 255–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898010112455948
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  117. Hart, S., Field, T., Hernandez-Reif, M., Nearing, G., Shaw, S., Schanberg, S., & Kuhn, C. (2001). Anorexia Nervosa Symptoms are Reduced by Massage Therapy. Eating Disorders, 9(4), 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/106402601753454868
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  118. Hattan, J., King, L., & Griffiths, P. (2002). The impact of foot massage and guided relaxation following cardiac surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Issues and Innovations in Nursing Practice, 37(2), 199– 207.
    OpenUrl
  119. ↵
    Hawkley, L. C., Masi, C. M., Berry, J. D., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2006). Loneliness is a unique predictor of age-related differences in systolic blood pressure. Psychology and Aging, 21, 152–164. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.21.1.152
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  120. Haynes, A. C., Lywood, A., Crowe, E. M., Fielding, J. L., Rossiter, J. M., & Kent, C. (2022). A calming hug: Design and validation of a tactile aid to ease anxiety. PLOS ONE, 17(3), e0259838. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259838
    OpenUrl
  121. ↵
    Heatley Tejada, A., Dunbar, R. I. M., & Montero, M. (2020). Physical contact and loneliness: being touched reduces perceptions of loneliness. Adaptive human behavior and physiology, 6, 292–306.
    OpenUrl
  122. Henricson, M., Ersson, A., Määttä, S., Segesten, K., & Berglund, A.-L. (2008). The outcome of tactile touch on stress parameters in intensive care: A randomized controlled trial. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, 14(4), 244–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2008.03.003
    OpenUrl
  123. Hernandez-Reif, M., Diego, M., & Field, T. (2007). Preterm infants show reduced stress behaviors and activity after 5 days of massage therapy. Infant Behavior and Development, 30(4), 557–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2007.04.002
    OpenUrl
  124. Hernandez-Reif, M., Dieter, J. N. I., Field, T., Swerdlow, B., & Diego, M. (o. J.). MIGRAINE HEADACHES ARE REDUCED BY MASSAGE THERAPY. International Journal of Neuroscience, 96, 1–11.
  125. Hernandez-Reif, M., Field, T., Ironson, G., Beutler, J., Vera, Y., Hurley, J., Fletcher, M. A., Schanberg, S., Kuhn, C., & Fraser, M. (2005). NATURAL KILLER CELLS AND LYMPHOCYTES INCREASE IN WOMEN WITH BREAST CANCER FOLLOWING MASSAGE THERAPY. International Journal of Neuroscience, 115(4), 495–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207450590523080
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  126. Hernandez-Reif, M., Field, T., Krasnegor, J., Martinez, E., Schwartzmann, M., & Mavunda, K. (1999). Children With Cystic Fibrosis Benefit From Massage Therapy. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 24(2), 175–181.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  127. Hernandez-Reif, M., Field, T., Krasnegor, J., & Theakston, H. (2001). LOWER BACK PAIN IS REDUCED AND RANGE OF MOTION INCREASED AFTER MASSAGE THERAPY. International Journal of Neuroscience, 106, 131–145.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  128. Hernandez-Reif, M., Field, T., Krasnegor, J., Theakston, H., Hossain, Z., & Burman, I. (2000). High blood pressure and associated symptoms were reduced by massage therapy. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 4(1), 31–38.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  129. Hernandez-Reif, M., Field, T., Largie, S., Cullen, C., Beutler, J., Sanders, C., Weiner, W., Rodriguez-Bateman, D., Zelaya, L., Schanber, S., & Kuhn, C. (2002). Parkinson’s disease symptoms are differentially affected by massage therapy vs. progressive muscle relaxation: A pilot study. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 6(3), 177–182. https://doi.org/10.1054/jbmt.2002.0282
    OpenUrl
  130. Hernandez-Reif, M., Field, T., & Theakston, H. (1998). Multiple sclerosis patients benefit from massage therapy. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 2(3), 168–174.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  131. Hernandez-Reif, M., Ironson, G., Field, T., Hurley, J., Katz, G., Diego, M., Weiss, S., Fletcher, M. A., Schanberg, S., Kuhn, C., & Burman, I. (2004). Breast cancer patients have improved immune and neuroendocrine functions following massage therapy. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 57(1), 45– 52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3999(03)00500-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  132. Hertsenstein, M. J., & Campos, J. J. (2001). Emotion Regulation Via Maternal Touch. Infancy, 2(4), 549–566.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  133. Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S., & Deeks, J. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ, 327(7414), Art. 7414. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
    OpenUrl
  134. Hinchcliffe, J. K., Mendl, M., & Robinson, E. S. J. (2020). Rat 50 kHz calls reflect graded tickling-induced positive emotion. Current Biology, 30(18), R1034–R1035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.08.038
    OpenUrl
  135. Hodgson, N. A., & Andersen, S. (2008). The Clinical Efficacy of Reflexology in Nursing Home Residents with Dementia. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 14(3), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2007.0577
    OpenUrl
  136. Hoffmann, L., & Krämer, N. C. (2021). The persuasive power of robot touch. Behavioral and evaluative consequences of non-functional touch from a robot. PLOS ONE, 16(5), e0249554. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249554
    OpenUrl
  137. Holst, S., Lund, I., Petersson, M., & Uvnäs-Moberg, K. (2005). Massage-like stroking influences plasma levels of gastrointestinal hormones, including insulin, and increases weight gain in male rats. Autonomic Neuroscience, 120(1–2), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autneu.2005.04.007
    OpenUrlPubMed
  138. Hori, M., Yamada, K., Ohnishi, J., Sakamoto, S., Furuie, H., Murakami, K., & Ichitani, Y. (2014). Tickling during adolescence alters fear-related and cognitive behaviors in rats after prolonged isolation. Physiology & Behavior, 131, 62–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.04.008
    OpenUrl
  139. Hori, M., Yamada, K., Ohnishi, J., Sakamoto, S., Takimoto-Ohnishi, E., Miyabe, S., Murakami, K., & Ichitani, Y. (2013). Effects of repeated tickling on conditioned fear and hormonal responses in socially isolated rats. Neuroscience Letters, 536, 85–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2012.12.054
    OpenUrl
  140. Hucklenbruch-Rother, E., Vohlen, C., Mehdiani, N., Keller, T., Roth, B., Kribs, A., & Mehler, K. (2020). Delivery room skin-to-skin contact in preterm infants affects long-term expression of stress response genes. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 122, 104883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2020.104883
    OpenUrl
  141. Ibe, O. E., Austin, T., Sullivan, K., Fabanwo, O., Disu, E., & Costello, A. M. de L. (2004). A comparison of kangaroo mother care and conventional incubator care for thermal regulation of infants < 2000 g in Nigeria using continuous ambulatory temperature monitoring. Annals of Tropical Paediatrics, 24(3), 245–251. https://doi.org/10.1179/027249304225019082
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  142. Im, H., & Kim, E. (2009). Effect of Yakson and Gentle Human Touch versus usual care on urine stress hormones and behaviors in preterm infants: A quasi-experimental study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46(4), 450–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.01.009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  143. Jain, S., Kumar, P., & McMillan, D. D. (2006). Prior leg massage decreases pain responses to heel stick in preterm babies. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 42(9), 505–508. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1754.2006.00912.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  144. Jane, S.-W., Chen, S.-L., Wilkie, D. J., Lin, Y.-C., Foreman, S. W., Beaton, R. D., Fan, J.-Y., Lu, M.-Y., Wang, Y.-Y., Lin, Y.-H., & Liao, M.-N. (2011). Effects of massage on pain, mood status, relaxation, and sleep in Taiwanese patients with metastatic bone pain: A randomized clinical trial. Pain, 152(10), 2432–2442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2011.06.021
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  145. Johnston, C. C., Filion, F., Campbell-Yeo, M., Goulet, C., Bell, L., McNaughton, K., Byron, J., Aita, M., Finley, G. A., & Walker, C.-D. (2008). Kangaroo mother care diminishes pain from heel lance in very preterm neonates: A crossover trial. BMC Pediatrics, 8(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-8-13
    OpenUrl
  146. Johnston, C. C., Stevens, B., Pinelli, J., Gibbins, S., Filion, F., Jack, A., Steele, S., Boyer, K., & Veilleux, A. (2003). Kangaroo Care Is Effective in Diminishing Pain Response in Preterm Neonates. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 157, 1084–1088.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  147. Jung, M. J., Shin, B.-C., Kim, Y.-S., Shin, Y.-I., & Lee, M. S. (2006). IS THERE ANY DIFFERENCE IN THE EFFECTS OF QI THERAPY (EXTERNAL QIGONG) WITH AND WITHOUT TOUCHING? A PILOT STUDY. International Journal of Neuroscience, 116(9), 1055–1064. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207450600575474
    OpenUrl
  148. Kapoor, Y., & Orr, R. (2017). Effect of therapeutic massage on pain in patients with dementia. Dementia, 16(1), 119–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301215583391
    OpenUrl
  149. Karagozoglu, S., & Kahve, E. (2013). Effects of back massage on chemotherapy-related fatigue and anxiety: Supportive care and therapeutic touch in cancer nursing. Applied Nursing Research, 26(4), 210–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2013.07.002
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  150. Karbasi, S. A., Golestan, M., Fallah, R., Golshan, M., & Dehghan, Z. (2013). Effect of body massage on increase of low birth weight neonates growth parameters: A randomized clinical trial. Iran Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 11(7), 583–588.
    OpenUrl
  151. Kashaninia, Z., Sajedi, F., Rahgozar, M., & Noghabi, F. A. (o. J.). The Effect of Kangaroo Care on Behavioral Responses to Pain of an Intramuscular Injection in Neonates.
  152. Kelling, C., Pitaro, D., & Rantala, J. (2016). Good vibes: The impact of haptic patterns on stress levels. Proceedings of the 20th International Academic Mindtrek Conference, 130–136. https://doi.org/10.1145/2994310.2994368
  153. Khilnani, S., Field, T., Hernandez-Reif, M., & Schanberg, S. (2003). Massage Therapy Improves Mood and Behavior of Students with Attention-Deficit/hyperactivity Disorder. Adolescence, 38(152).
    OpenUrl
  154. Kianmehr, M., Moslem, A., Basiri-Moghadam, K., Naghavi, M., Pasban-Noghabi, S., & Basiri-Moghadam, M. (2014). The Effect of Massage on Serum Bilirubin Levels in Term Neonates with Hyperbilirubinemia Undergoing Phototherapy. Nautilus, 128(1), 36–41.
    OpenUrl
  155. Kim, I.-H., Kim, T.-Y., & Ko, Y.-W. (2016). The effect of a scalp massage on stress hormone, blood pressure, and heart rate of healthy female. The Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 28(10), 2703– 2707.
    OpenUrl
  156. Kim, M. A., Kim, S.-J., & Cho, H. (2017). Effects of tactile stimulation by fathers on physiological responses and paternal attachment in infants in the NICU: A pilot study. Journal of Child Health Care, 21(1), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367493516666729
    OpenUrl
  157. Koole, S. L., Tjew A Sin, M., & Schneider, I. K. (2014). Embodied Terror Management: Interpersonal Touch Alleviates Existential Concerns Among Individuals With Low Self-Esteem. Psychological Science, 25(1), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613483478
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  158. Krohn, M., Listing, M., Tjahjono, G., Reisshauer, A., Peters, E., Klapp, B. F., & Rauchfuss, M. (2011). Depression, mood, stress, and Th1/Th2 immune balance in primary breast cancer patients undergoing classical massage therapy. Supportive Care in Cancer, 19(9), 1303–1311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-010-0946-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  159. Kuhn, C., Schanberg, S. M., Field, T., Symanski, R., Zimmerman, E., Scafidi, F., & Roberts, J. (1991). Tactile-kinesthetic stimulation effects sympathetic and adrenocortical function in preterm infants. The Journal of Pediatrics, 119(3), 434–440.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  160. Kumar, J., Upadhyay, A., Dwivedi, A. K., Gothwal, S., Jaiswal, V., & Aggarwal, S. (2013). Effect of Oil Massage on Growth in Preterm Neonates Less than 1800 g: A Randomized Control Trial. The Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 80(6), 465–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-012-0869-7
    OpenUrl
  161. Lamy Filho, F., de Sousa, S. H. C., Freitas, I. J. S., Lamy, Z. C., Simões, V. M. F., da Silva, A. A. M., & Barbieri, M. A. (2015). Effect of maternal skin-to-skin contact on decolonization of Methicillin-Oxacillin-Resistant Staphylococcus in neonatal intensive care units: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 15(63), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0496-1
    OpenUrl
  162. Lee, H.-K. (2006). The Effects of Infant Massage on Weight, Height, and Mother-Infant Interaction. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 36(8), 1331–1339.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  163. Leivadi, S., Hernandez-Reif, M., Field, T., O’Rourke, M., D’Arienzo, S., Lewis, D., del Pino, N., Schanberg, S., & Kuhn, C. (1999). Massage Therapy and Relaxation Effects on University Dance Students. Journal of Dance Medicine & Science, 3(3), 108–112.
    OpenUrl
  164. Lewejohann, L., Schwabe, K., Häger, C., & Jirkof, P. (2020). Impulse for animal welfare outside the experiment. 9 Seiten. https://doi.org/10.17169/REFUBIUM-26765
  165. Lin, C.-H., Yang, H.-C., Cheng, C.-S., & Yen, C.-E. (2015). Effects of infant massage on jaundiced neonates undergoing phototherapy. Italian Journal of Pediatrics, 41(1), 94. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-015-0202-y
    OpenUrl
  166. Lindgren, L., Lehtipalo, S., Winsö, O., Karlsson, M., Wiklund, U., & Brulin, C. (2013). Touch massage: A pilot study of a complex intervention. Nursing in Critical Care, 18(6), 269–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.12017
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  167. Lindgren, L., Rundgren, S., Winsö, O., Lehtipalo, S., Wiklund, U., Karlsson, M., Stenlund, H., Jacobsson, C., & Brulin, C. (2010). Physiological responses to touch massage in healthy volunteers. Autonomic Neuroscience: Basic and Clinical, 158(1–2), 105–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autneu.2010.06.011
    OpenUrl
  168. Listing, M., Reißhauer, A., Krohn, M., Voigt, B., Tjahono, G., Becker, J., Klapp, B. F., & RauchfuÃ, M. (2009). Massage therapy reduces physical discomfort and improves mood disturbances in women with breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 18(12), 1290–1299. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1508
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  169. Ludington-Hoe, S. M., Cranston Anderson, G., Swinth, J. Y., Thompson, C., & Hadeed, A. J. (2004). Randomized Controlled Trial of Kangaroo Care: Cardiorespiratory and Thermal Effects on Healthy Preterm Infants. Neonatal Network, 23(3), 39–48.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  170. Lund, I., Lundeberg, T., Carleson, J., Sönnerfors, H., Uhrlin, B., & Svensson, E. (2006). Corticotropin releasing factor in urine—A possible biochemical marker of fibromyalgia. Neuroscience Letters, 403(1–2), 166–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2006.04.038
    OpenUrlPubMed
  171. Ma, Y.-K., Zeng, P.-Y., Chu, Y.-H., Lee, C.-L., Cheng, C.-C., Chen, C.-H., Su, Y.-S., Lin, K.-T., & Kuo, T.-H. (2022). Lack of social touch alters anxiety-like and social behaviors in male mice. Stress, 25(1), 134– 144. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253890.2022.2047174
    OpenUrl
  172. Maier, M., Bartoš, F., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2022). Robust Bayesian meta-analysis: Addressing publication bias with model-averaging. Psychological Methods, No Pagination Specified-No Pagination Specified. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000405
  173. Massaro, A. N., Hammad, T. A., Jazzo, B., & Aly, H. (2009). Massage with kinesthetic stimulation improves weight gain in preterm infants. Journal of Perinatology, 29, 352–357.
    OpenUrl
  174. Mathai, S., Fernandez, A., Mondkar, J., & Kanbur, W. (2001). Effects of Tactile-Kinesthetic Stimulation in Preterms-A controlled Trial. Indian Pediatrics, 38, 1091–1098.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  175. Matsunaga, M., Sato, S., Isowa, T., Tsuboi, H., Konagaya, T., Kaneko, H., & Ohira, H. (2009). Profiling of serum proteins influenced by warm partner contact in healthy couples. Neuroenocrinology Letters, 30(2), 227–236.
    OpenUrl
  176. Mendes, E. W., & Procianoy, R. S. (2008). Massage therapy reduces hospital stay and occurrence of late-onset sepsis in very preterm neonates. Journal of Perinatology, 28, 815–820.
    OpenUrl
  177. Mirnia, K., Arshadi Bostanabad, M., Asadollahi, M., & Hamid Razzaghi, M. (2016). Paternal Skin-to-Skin Care and its Effect on Cortisol Levels of the Infants. Iranian Journal of Pediatrics, 27(1), e8151. https://doi.org/10.5812/ijp.8151
    OpenUrl
  178. Mitchell, A. J., Yates, C., Williams, K., & Hall, R. W. (2013). Effects of daily kangaroo care on cardiorespiratory parameters in preterm infants. Journal of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, 6(3), 243– 249. https://doi.org/10.3233/NPM-1370513
    OpenUrl
  179. Mitchinson, A. R., Myra Kim, H., Rosenberg, J. M., Geisser, M., Kirsh, M., Cikrit, D., & Hinshaw, D. B. (2007). Acute Postoperative Pain Management Using Massage as an Adjuvant Therapy: A Randomized Trial. The Archives of Surgery, 142(12), 1158–1167.
    OpenUrl
  180. Modrcin-Talbott, M. A., Harrison, L. L., Groer, M. W., & Younger, M. S. (2003). The Biobehavioral Effects of Gentle Human Touch on Preterm Infants. Nursing Science Quarterly, 16(1), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894318402239068
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  181. Mok, E., & Pang Woo, C. (2004). The effects of slow-stroke back massage on anxiety and shoulder pain in elderly stroke patients. Complementary Therapies in Nursing and Midwifery, 10(4), 209–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctnm.2004.05.006
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  182. Mokaberian, M., Noripour, S., Sheikh, M., & Mills, P. J. (2021). Examining the effectiveness of body massage on physical status of premature neonates and their mothers’ psychological status. Early Child Development and Care, 192(14), 2311–2325. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2021.2006194
    OpenUrl
  183. Mori, H., Ohsawa, H., Tanaka, T. H., Taniwaki, E., Leisman, G., & Nishijo, K. (2004). Effect of massage on blood flow and muscle fatigue following isometric lumbar exercise. Medical Science Monitor: International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research, 10(5), CR173–178.
    OpenUrl
  184. ↵
    Moyer, C. A., Rounds, J., & Hannum, J. W. (2004). A Meta-Analysis of Massage Therapy Research. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.1.3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  185. Moyer-Mileur, L. J., Haley, S., Slater, H., Beachy, J., & Smith, S. L. (2013). Massage Improves Growth Quality by Decreasing Body Fat Deposition in Male Preterm Infants. The Journal of Pediatrics, 162, 490–495.
    OpenUrl
  186. Moyle, W., Cooke, M. L., Beattie, E., Shum, D. H. K., O’Dwyer, S. T., Barrett, S., & Sung, B. (2014). Foot Massage and Physiological Stress in People with Dementia: A Randomized Controlled Trial. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 20(4), 305–311. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2013.0177
    OpenUrl
  187. Muntsant, A., Shrivastava, K., Recasens, M., & Giménez-Llort, L. (2019). Severe Perinatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Brain Injury Induces Long-Term Sensorimotor Deficits, Anxiety-Like Behaviors and Cognitive Impairment in a Sex-, Age- and Task-Selective Manner in C57BL/6 Mice but Can Be Modulated by Neonatal Handling. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 13, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00007
    OpenUrl
  188. ↵
    Nakagawa, S., Lagisz, M., O’Dea, R. E., Rutkowska, J., Yang, Y., Noble, D. W., & Senior, A. M. (2021). The orchard plot: cultivating a forest plot for use in ecology, evolution, and beyond. Research Synthesis Methods, 12(1), 4–12.
    OpenUrl
  189. Negahban, H., Rezaie, S., & Goharpey, S. (2013). Massage therapy and exercise therapy in patients with multiple sclerosis: A randomized controlled pilot study. Clinical Rehabilitation, 27(12), 1126– 1136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215513491586
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  190. Nelson, D., Heitman, R., & Jennings, C. (1986). Effects of Tactile Stimulation on Premature Infant Weight Gain. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 15(3), 262–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6909.1986.tb01395.x
    OpenUrl
  191. ↵
    Ng, T. W. H., Sorensen, K. L., Zhang, Y., & Yim, F. H. K. (2019). Anger, anxiety, depression, and negative affect: Convergent or divergent? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 110, 186–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.11.014
    OpenUrl
  192. Nguyen, P. H., Engel, S. M., & Herring, A. H. (2022). mpower: An R Package for Power Analysis via Simulation for Correlated Data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.08036.
    OpenUrl
  193. Nunes, G. S., Bender, P. U., de Menezes, F. S., Yamashitafuji, I., Vargas, V. Z., & Wageck, B. (2016). Massage therapy decreases pain and perceived fatigue after long-distance Ironman triathlon: A randomised trial. Journal of Physiotherapy, 62(2), 83–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2016.02.009
    OpenUrl
  194. Ohgi, S., Fukuda, M., Moriuchi, H., Kusumoto, T., Akiyama, T., Nugent, J. K., Brazelton, T. B., Arisawa, K., Takahashi, T., & Saitoh, H. (2002). Comparison of Kangaroo Care and Standard Care: Behavioral Organization, Development, and Temperament in Healthy, Low-Birth-Weight Infants Through 1 Year. Journal of Perinatology, 22(5), 374–379. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7210749
    OpenUrl
  195. OlllHiggins, M., St. James Roberts, I., & Glover, V. (2008). Postnatal depression and mother and infant outcomes after infant massage. Journal of Affective Disorders, 109(1–2), 189–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2007.10.027
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  196. Okan, F., Ozdil, A., Bulbul, A., Yapici, Z., & Nuhoglu, A. (2010). Analgesic effects of skin-to-skin contact and breastfeeding in procedural pain in healthy term neonates. Annals of Tropical Paediatrics, 30(2), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1179/146532810X12703902516121
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  197. Oliveira, D. S., Hachul, H., Goto, V., Tufik, S., & Bittencourt, L. R. A. (2012). Effect of therapeutic massage on insomnia and climacteric symptoms in postmenopausal women. Climacteric, 15(1), 21– 29. https://doi.org/10.3109/13697137.2011.587557
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  198. Oliveira, V. E. de M., Lukas, M., Wolf, H. N., Durante, E., Lorenz, A., Mayer, A.-L., Bludau, A., Bosch, O. J., Grinevich, V., Egger, V., de Jong, T. R., & Neumann, I. D. (2021). Oxytocin and vasopressin within the ventral and dorsal lateral septum modulate aggression in female rats. Nature Communications, 12(1), Art. 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23064-5
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  199. Olsson, E., Ahlsén, G., & Eriksson, M. (2016). Skin-to-skin contact reduces near-infrared spectroscopy pain responses in premature infants during blood sampling. Acta Paediatrica, 105(4), 376–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.13180
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  200. ↵
    Packheiser, J., Malek, I. M., Reichart, J. S., Katona, L., Luhmann, M., & Ocklenburg, S. (2022). The association of embracing with daily mood and general life satisfaction: An ecological momentary assessment study. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 46(4), 519–536.
    OpenUrl
  201. ↵
    Packheiser, J., Sommer, L., Wüllner, M., Malek, I. M., Reichart, J. S., Katona, L., & Ocklenburg, S. (2023). A comparison of hugging frequency and its association with momentary mood before and during COVID-19 using ecological momentary assessment. Health communication, 1-9.
  202. ↵
    Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10(1), Art. 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4
    OpenUrl
  203. ↵
    Palgi, Y., Shrira, A., Ring, L., Bodner, E., Avidor, S., Bergman, Y.,… & Hoffman, Y. (2020). The loneliness pandemic: Loneliness and other concomitants of depression, anxiety and their comorbidity during the COVID-19 outbreak. Journal of affective disorders, 275, 109–111.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  204. Parlak Gürol, A., Polat, S., & Nuran Akçay, M. (2010). Itching, Pain, and Anxiety Levels Are Reduced With Massage Therapy in Burned Adolescents: Journal of Burn Care & Research, 31(3), 429–432. https://doi.org/10.1097/BCR.0b013e3181db522c
    OpenUrl
  205. Pauk, J., Kuhn, C. M., Field, T. M., & Schanberg, S. M. (1986). Positive effects of tactile versus kinesthetic or vestibular stimulation on neuroendocrine and ODC activity in maternally-deprived rat pups. Life Sciences, 39(22), 2081–2087.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  206. Pinazo, D., Arahuete, L., & Correas, N. (2020). Hugging as a buffer against distal fear of death. Calidad de vida y salud, 13(2), 11–20.
    OpenUrl
  207. Pope, M. H., Philips, R. B., Haugh, L. D., Hsieh, C.-Y. J., MacDonald, L., & Haldeman, S. (1994). A Prospective Randomized Three-Week Trial of Spinal Manipulation, Transcutaneous Muscle Stimulation, Massage and Corset in the Treatment of Subacute Low Back Pain. SPINE, 19(22), 2571– 2577.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  208. ↵
    Porter, R. (2007). The biological significance of skin-to-skin contact and maternal odours. Acta Paediatrica, 93(12), 1560–1562. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2004.tb00843.x
    OpenUrl
  209. Preyde, M. (2000). Effectiveness of massage therapy for subacute low-back pain: A randomized controlled trial. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 162(13), 1815–1820.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  210. Ramanathan, K., Paul, V. K., Deorari, A. K., Taneja, U., & George, G. (2001). Kangaroo Mother Care in Very Low Birth Weight Infants. Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 68(11), 1019–1023.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  211. Pustejovsky, J. E., & Tipton, E. (2022). Meta-analysis with Robust Variance Estimation: Expanding the Range of Working Models. Prevention Science: The Official Journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 23(3), 425–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-021-01246-3
    OpenUrl
  212. Quintana, D. S. (2022). A guide for calculating study-level statistical power for meta-analyses [Preprint]. Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/js79t
  213. Rao, S. P. N., Udani, R., & Nanavati, R. (2008). Kangaroo Mother Care for Low Birth Weight Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Indian Pediatrics, 45, 17–23.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  214. Reddan, M. C., Young, H., Falkner, J., López-Solà, M., & Wager, T. D. (2020). Touch and social support influence interpersonal synchrony and pain. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 15(10), 1064–1075. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa048
    OpenUrl
  215. Rodríguez-Mansilla, J., González López-Arza, M. V., Varela-Donoso, E., Montanero-Fernández, J., González Sánchez, B., & Garrido-Ardila, E. M. (2015). The effects of ear acupressure, massage therapy and no therapy on symptoms of dementia: A randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation, 29(7), 683–693. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215514554240
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  216. ↵
    Rokach, A., Lechcier-Kimel, R., & Safarov, A. (2006). Loneliness of people with physical disabilities. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 34(6), 681–700.
    OpenUrl
  217. Rose, S. A., Schmidt, K., Riese, M. L., & Bridger, W. H. (416 n. Chr.). Effects of Prematurity and Early Intervention on Responsivity to Tactual Stimuli: A Comparison of Preterm and Full-Term Infants. Child Development, 51(2).
  218. ↵
    Russo, V., Ottaviani, C., & Spitoni, G. F. (2020). Affective touch: A meta-analysis on sex differences. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 108, 445–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.09.037
    OpenUrl
  219. ↵
    Saarinen, A., Harjunen, V., Jasinskaja-Lahti, I., Jääskeläinen, I. P., & Ravaja, N. (2021). Social touch experience in different contexts: A review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 131, 360–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.09.027
    OpenUrl
  220. Scafidi, F. A., Field, T. M., Schanberg, S. M., Bauer, C. R., Tucci, K., Roberts, J., Morrow, C., & Kuhn, C. M. (1990). Massage Stimulates Growth in Preterm Infants: A Replication. Infant Behavior and Development, 13, 167–188.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  221. Scafidi, F. A., Field, T. M., Schanberg, S. M., Bauer, C. R., Vega-Lahr, N., Garcia, R., Poirier, J., Nystrom, G., & Kuhn, C. M. (1986). Effects of Tactile /Kinesthetic Stimulation on the Clinical Course and Sleep/Wake Behavior of Preterm Neonates. Infant Behavior and Development, 9, 91–105.
    OpenUrl
  222. Scafidi, F., & Field, T. (1996). Massage Therapy Improves Behavior in Neonates Born to HIV-Positive Mothers. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 21(6), 889–897.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  223. Scarr-Salapatek, S., & Williams, M. L. (1972). A Stimulation Program for Low Birth Weight Infants. American Journal of Public Health, 62(5), 662–667.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  224. ↵
    Seeman, T. E., Singer, B., Wilkinson, C. W., & Bruce McEwen. (2001). Gender differences in age-related changes in HPA axis reactivity. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 26(3), 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4530(00)00043-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  225. Serrano, B., Baños, R. M., & Botella, C. (2016). Virtual reality and stimulation of touch and smell for inducing relaxation: A randomized controlled trial. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.007
    OpenUrl
  226. Seyyedrasooli, A., Valizadeh, L., Hosseini, M. B., Asgari Jafarabadi, M., & Mohammadzad, M. (2014). Effect of Vimala Massage on Physiological Jaundice in Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial [Text/html]. Journal of Caring Sciences; EISSN 2251–9920, 3(3), 165–173. https://doi.org/10.5681/JCS.2014.018
    OpenUrl
  227. Sharpe, P. A., Williams, H. G., Granner, M. L., & Hussey, J. R. (2007). A randomised study of the effects of massage therapy compared to guided relaxation on well-being and stress perception among older adults. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 15(3), 157–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2007.01.004
    OpenUrlPubMed
  228. Sherman, K. J., Cherkin, D. C., Hawkes, R. J., Miglioretti, D. L., & Deyo, R. A. (2009). Randomized Trial of Therapeutic Massage for Chronic Neck Pain. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 25(3), 233–238. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0b013e31818b7912
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  229. Shiloh, S., Sorek†, G., & Terkel, J. (2003). REDUCTION OF STATE-ANXIETY BY PETTING ANIMALS IN A CONTROLLED LABORATORY EXPERIMENT. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 16(4), 387–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/1061580031000091582
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  230. Shor-Posner, G., Hernandez-Reif, M., Miguez, M.-J., Fletcher, M. A., Quintero, N., Baez, J., Perez-Then, E., Soto, S., Mendoza, R., Castillo, R., & Zhang, G. (2006). Impact of a Massage Therapy Clinical Trial on Immune Status in Young Dominican Children Infected with HIV-1. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 12(6), 511–516.
    OpenUrl
  231. Simpson, E. A., Maylott, S. E., Lazo, R. J., Leonard, K. A., Kaburu, S. S. K., Suomi, S. J., Paukner, A., & Ferrari, P. F. (2019). Social touch alters newborn monkey behavior. Infant Behavior and Development, 57, 101368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2019.101368
    OpenUrl
  232. Smith, S. L., Haley, S., Slater, H., & Moyer-Mileur, L. J. (2013). Heart rate variability during caregiving and sleep after massage therapy in preterm infants. Early Human Development, 89(8), 525–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2013.01.004
    OpenUrl
  233. Smith, S. L., Lux, R., Haley, S., Slater, H., Beechy, J., & Moyer-Mileur, L. J. (2013). The effect of massage on heart rate variability in preterm infants. Journal of Perinatology, 33(1), 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2012.47
    OpenUrl
  234. Soares, M. C., Oliveira, R. F., Ros, A. F. H., Grutter, A. S., & Bshary, R. (2011). Tactile stimulation lowers stress in fish. Nature Communications, 2(1), 534. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1547
    OpenUrl
  235. Solkoff, N., & Matuszak, D. (1975). Tactile Stimulation and Behavioral Development among Low-Birthweight Infants. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 6(1), 3337.
    OpenUrl
  236. Soo Kim, M., Sook Cho, K., Woo, H.-M., & Kim, J. H. (2001). Effects of hand massage on anxiety in cataract surgery using local anesthesia. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 27, 884–890.
    OpenUrl
  237. Sørensen, J. T., Sandøe, P., & Halberg, N. (2001). Animal Welfare as One among Several Values to be Considered at Farm Level: The Idea of an Ethical Account for Livestock Farming. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A — Animal Science, 51(sup030), 11–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/090647001316922992
    OpenUrl
  238. Spielberger, C. D. (2012). State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Adults. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/t06496-000
  239. Srivastava, S., Gupta, A., Bhatnagar, A., & Dutta, S. (2014). Effect of very early skin to skin contact on success at breastfeeding and preventing early hypothermia in neonates. Indian Journal of Public Health, 58(1), 22–26. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-557X.128160
    OpenUrlPubMed
  240. Stringer, J., Swindell, R., & Dennis, M. (2008). Massage in patients undergoing intensive chemotherapy reduces serum cortisol and prolactin: Massage in oncology patients reduces serum cortisol. Psycho-Oncology, 17(10), 1024–1031. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1331
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  241. Sumioka, H., Kumazaki, H., Muramatsu, T., Yoshikawa, Y., Ishiguro, H., Higashida, H., Yuhi, T., & Mimura, M. (2021). A huggable device can reduce the stress of calling an unfamiliar person on the phone for individuals with ASD. PLOS ONE, 16(7), e0254675. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254675
    OpenUrl
  242. Sumioka, H., Nakae, A., Kanai, R., & Ishiguro, H. (2013). Huggable communication medium decreases cortisol levels. Scientific Reports, 3(1), 3034. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep03034
    OpenUrl
  243. Suzuki, M., Tatsumi, A., Otsuka, T., Kikuchi, K., Mizuta, A., Makino, K., Kimoto, A., Fujiwara, K., Abe, T., Nakagomi, T., Hayashi, T., & Saruhara, T. (2010). Physical and Psychological Effects of 6-Week Tactile Massage on Elderly Patients With Severe Dementia. American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease & Other Dementias, 25(8), 680–686. https://doi.org/10.1177/1533317510386215
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  244. Thomson, L. J. M., Ander, E. E., Menon, U., Lanceley, A., & Chatterjee, H. J. (2012). Quantitative evidence for wellbeing benefits from a heritage-in-health intervention with hospital patients. International Journal of Art Therapy, 17(2), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/17454832.2012.687750
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  245. Triplett, J. L., & Arneson, S. W. (1979). The Use of Verbal and Tactile Comfort to Alleviate Distress in Young Hospitalized Children. Research in Nursing & Health, 2(1), 17–23.
    OpenUrl
  246. Walach, H., Güthlin, C., & König, M. (2003). Efficacy of Massage Therapy in Chronic Pain: A Pragmatic Randomized Trial. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 9(6), 837–846.
    OpenUrl
  247. Verga, M., & Michelazzi, M. (2009). Companion animal welfare and possible implications on the human–pet relationship. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 8(sup1), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2009.s1.231
    OpenUrl
  248. ↵
    Viechtbauer, W. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), Art. 3. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03
    OpenUrl
  249. Walker, S. C., Cavieres, A., Peñaloza-Sancho, V., El-Deredy, W., McGlone, F. P., & Dagnino-Subiabre, A. (2022). C-low threshold mechanoafferent targeted dynamic touch modulates stress resilience in rats exposed to chronic mild stress. European Journal of Neuroscience, 55(9–10), 2925–2938. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.14951
    OpenUrl
  250. Weinrich, S. P., & Weinrich, M. C. (1990). The Effect of Massage on Pain in Cancer Patients. Applied Nursing Research, 3(4), 140–145.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  251. Wheeden, A., Scafidi, F. A., Field, T., Ironson, G., Valdeon, C., & Bandstra, E. (1993). Massage Effects on Cocaine-Exposed Preterm Neonates. Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 14(5), 318–322.
    OpenUrl
  252. White, J. L., & Labarba, R. C. (1976). The Effects of Tactile and Kinesthetic Stimulation on Neonatal Development in the Premature Infant. Developmental Psychobiology, 9(6), 569–577.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  253. ↵
    Whitelaw, A., Heisterkamp, G., Sleath, K., Acolet, D., & Richards, M. (1988). Skin to skin contact for very low birthweight infants and their mothers. Archives of disease in childhood, 63(11), 1377–1381.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  254. Wilkie, D. J., Kampbell, J., Cutshall, S., Halabisky, H., Harmon, H., Johnson, L. P., Weinacht, L., & Rake-Marona, M. (2000). Effects of Massage on Pain Intensity, Analgesics and Quality of Life in Patients with Cancer Pain: A Pilot Study of a Randomized Clinical Trial Conducted Within Hospice Care Delivery. The Hospice Journal, 15(3), 31–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/0742-969X.2000.11882956
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  255. Willemse, C. J. A. M., Toet, A., & van Erp, J. B. F. (2017). Affective and Behavioral Responses to Robot-Initiated Social Touch: Toward Understanding the Opportunities and Limitations of Physical Contact in Human–Robot Interaction. Frontiers in ICT, 4, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fict.2017.00012
    OpenUrl
  256. Willemse, C. J. A. M., & van Erp, J. B. F. (2019). Social Touch in Human–Robot Interaction: Robot-Initiated Touches can Induce Positive Responses without Extensive Prior Bonding. International Journal of Social Robotics, 11(2), 285–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-018-0500-9
    OpenUrl
  257. Wilson, J. H. (2001). Prolactin in rats is attenuated by conspecific touch in a novel environment. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 1(2), 199–205.
    OpenUrl
  258. ↵
    Wijaya, M., Lau, D., Horrocks, S., McGlone, F., Ling, H., & Schirmer, A. (2020). The human “feel” of touch contributes to its perceived pleasantness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 46, 155–171. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000705
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  259. Woods, D. L., Beck, C., & Sinha, K. (2009). The Effect of Therapeutic Touch on Behavioral Symptoms and Cortisol in Persons with Dementia. Forschende Komplementärmedizin / Research in Complementary Medicine, 16(3), 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1159/000220479
    OpenUrl
  260. Yamaguchi, M., Sekine, T., & Shetty, V. (2020). A Salivary Cytokine Panel Discriminates Moods States Following a Touch Massage Intervention. International Journal of Affective Engineering, 19(3), 189– 198. https://doi.org/10.5057/ijae.IJAE-D-20-00001
    OpenUrl
  261. Yamazaki, R., Christensen, L., Skov, K., Chang, C.-C., Damholdt, M. F., Sumioka, H., Nishio, S., & Ishiguro, H. (2016). Intimacy in Phone Conversations: Anxiety Reduction for Danish Seniors with Hugvie. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 537. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00537
    OpenUrl
  262. Yang, M.-H., Lin, L.-C., Wu, S.-C., Chiu, J.-H., Wang, P.-N., & Lin, J.-G. (2015). Comparison of the efficacy of aroma-acupressure and aromatherapy for the treatment of dementia-associated agitation. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 15(1), 93. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-015-0612-9
    OpenUrl
  263. Yates, C. C., Mitchell, A. J., Booth, M. Y., Williams, D. K., Lowe, L. M., & Whit Hall, R. (2014). The Effects of Massage Therapy to Induce Sleep in Infants Born Preterm. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 26(4), 405– 410. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0000000000000081
    OpenUrl
  264. ↵
    Yogeswaran, N., Dang, W., Navaraj, W. T., Shakthivel, D., Khan, S., Polat, E. O., & Dahiya, R. (2015). New materials and advances in making electronic skin for interactive robots. Advanced Robotics, 29(21), 1359–1373.
    OpenUrl
  265. Yu, H., Miao, W., Ji, E., Huang, S., Jin, S., Zhu, X., Liu, M.-Z., Sun, Y.-G., Xu, F., & Yu, X. (2022). Social touch-like tactile stimulation activates a tachykinin 1-oxytocin pathway to promote social interactions. Neuron, 110(6), 1051–1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2021.12.022
    OpenUrl
Back to top
Posted July 21, 2023.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email
The physical and mental health benefits of touch interventions: A comparative systematic review and multivariate meta-analysis
Julian Packheiser, Helena Hartmann, Kelly Fredriksen, Valeria Gazzola, Christian Keysers, Frédéric Michon
medRxiv 2023.06.20.23291651; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.20.23291651
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area