Abstract
Background Surgical services are scarce with persisting inequalities in access across populations and regions globally. As the world’s most populous county, India’s surgical need is high and delivery rates estimated to be sub-par to meet need. There is a dearth of evidence particularly sub-regional data on surgical provisioning and need to aid planning.
Aim and method This mixed methods study examines the state of surgical care in Northeast India, specifically health care system capacity and barriers to surgical delivery. It involved a facility based census and semi-structured interviews with surgeons and patients across four states in the region.
Results Abdominal conditions constituted a large portion of the overall surgeries across public and private facilities in the region. Workloads varied among surgical providers across facilities. Task-shifting occurred, involving non-specialist nursing staff assisting doctors on surgical procedures or surgeons’ taking on anaesthetic tasks. Structural factors dis-incentivised facility level investment in suitable infrastructure. Patients’ care pathways were shaped by facility level shortages as well as personal preferences influenced by cost and distance to facilities.
Discussion and conclusion skewed workloads across facilities and regions indicate uneven surgical delivery, with potentially variable care quality and provider efficiency. A systemic approach to referral coordination and human resource management are evident. Existing task shifting practices, along with incapacities induced by structural factors signal the direction of possible policy action.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
DJ, JB This research was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (16/137/44) using UK aid from the UK Government to support global health research. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval was obtained from Sigma Research and Consulting (India) and the University of Leeds School of Medicine Research Ethics Committee (U.K.).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Not Applicable
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Not Applicable
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
