Abstract
Objective Ventilator dyssynchrony (VD) is potentially harmful to patients with or at risk for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). In addition to injury solely caused by the ventilator, ventilator-induced lung injury may be instigated and exacerbated by patient respiratory efforts. Automated detection of VD from ventilator waveforms is challenging, and efforts have been made on a human-guided ML algorithm to detect some types of VD. We currently lack a methodological ability to define sub-breath phenotypes of VD that quantify severity anchored to physiologic understanding that could be used to relate VD to damage and guide ventilator management.
Materials and Methods A mathematical model is developed that represents the pressure and volume waveform signals of a breath into several pathophysiological temporal features observed in ventilator waveforms and then deformation terms are added corresponding to hypothesized flow-limited (FL) dyssynchronous breaths. Model parameters are estimated at the resolution of a single breath using a deterministic, multivariate, constrained interior-point method to create a parametric representation of breaths. Differential estimates of different FL-VD breaths are used to create severity metrics for FL-VD breaths and their associations with the ventilator settings and healthcare interventions are analyzed.
Results A total of 93,007 breaths were analyzed from the raw ventilator waveform dataset of 13 intensive care unit patients who met inclusion criteria. A quantitative method was developed to determine the continuously varying FL-VD severity for each breath and was successfully applied to a cohort of patient-ventilator waveform data. Additionally, cross-validation, using a previously developed ML categorical VD identification algorithm, produced an area under the receiver operator curve of 0.97.
Discussion & Conclusion The VD-deformed lung ventilator (VD-DLV) model accurately detects FL-VD breaths and is able to quantify the severity of patient effort during patient-ventilator interaction. The presence and severity of deviations from normal are modeled in a way that is based on physiological hypotheses of lung damage and ventilator interactions. Therefore, the computed phenotypes have the predictive power to determine how the healthcare variables are associated with FL-VD breaths. This work paves the way for a large-scale study of VD causes and effects by identifying and quantifying VD breaths using the VD-DLV model.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health R01s LM012734 Mechanistic machine learning, LM006910 Discovering and applying knowledge in clinical databases, HL151630 Predicting and Preventing Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury along with R00 HL128944, and K24 HL069223.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board of University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, approved this study and waived the need for informed consent.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
