Whole genome analysis of plasma fibrinogen reveals population-differentiated genetic regulators with putative liver roles
=========================================================================================================================

* Jennifer E Huffman
* Jayna Nicolas
* Julie Hahn
* Adam S Heath
* Laura M Raffield
* Lisa R Yanek
* Jennifer A Brody
* Florian Thibord
* Laura Almasy
* Traci M Bartz
* Lawrence F. Bielak
* Russell P Bowler
* Germán D Carrasquilla
* Daniel I Chasman
* Ming-Huei Chen
* David B Emmert
* Mohsen Ghanbari
* Jeffery Haessle
* Jouke-Jan Hottenga
* Marcus E Kleber
* Ngoc-Quynh Le
* Jiwon Lee
* Joshua P Lewis
* Ruifang Li-Gao
* Jian’an Luan
* Anni Malmberg
* Massimo Mangino
* Riccardo E Marioni
* Angel Martinez-Perez
* Nathan Pankratz
* Ozren Polasek
* Anne Richmond
* Benjamin AT Rodriguez
* Jerome I Rotter
* Maristella Steri
* Pierre Suchon
* Stella Trompet
* Stefan Weiss
* Marjan Zare
* Paul Auer
* Michael H Cho
* Paraskevi Christofidou
* Gail Davies
* Eco de Geus
* Jean-François Deleuze
* Graciela E Delgado
* Lynette Ekunwe
* Nauder Faraday
* Martin Gögele
* Andreas Greinacher
* Gao He
* Tom Howard
* Peter K Joshi
* Tuomas O Kilpeläinen
* Jari Lahti
* Allan Linneberg
* Silvia Naitza
* Raymond Noordam
* Ferran Paüls-Vergés
* Stephen S Rich
* Frits R Rosendaal
* Igor Rudan
* Kathleen A Ryan
* Juan Carlos Souto
* Frank JA van Rooij
* Heming Wang
* Wei Zhao
* Lewis C Becker
* Andrew Beswick
* Michael R Brown
* Brian E Cade
* Harry Campbell
* Kelly Cho
* James D Crapo
* Joanne E Curran
* Moniek PM de Maat
* Margaret Doyle
* Paul Elliott
* James S Floyd
* Christian Fuchsberger
* Niels Grarup
* Xiuqing Guo
* Sarah E Harris
* Lifang Hou
* Ivana Kolcic
* Charles Kooperberg
* Cristina Menni
* Matthias Nauck
* Jeffrey R O’Connell
* Valeria Orrù
* Bruce M Psaty
* Katri Räikkönen
* Jennifer A Smith
* Jose Manuel Soria
* David J Stott
* Astrid van Hylckama Vlieg
* Hugh Watkins
* Gonneke Willemsen
* Peter Wilson
* Yoav Ben-Shlomo
* John Blangero
* Dorret Boomsma
* Simon R Cox
* Abbas Dehghan
* Johan G Eriksson
* Edoardo Fiorillo
* Myriam Fornage
* Torben Hansen
* Caroline Hayward
* M. Arfan Ikram
* J Wouter Jukema
* Sharon LR Kardia
* Leslie A Lange
* Winfried März
* Rasika A Mathias
* Braxton D Mitchell
* Dennis O Mook-Kanamori
* Pierre-Emmanuel Morange
* Oluf Pedersen
* Peter P Pramstaller
* Susan Redline
* Alexander Reiner
* Paul M Ridker
* Edwin K Silverman
* Tim D Spector
* Uwe Völker
* Nick Wareham
* James F Wilson
* Jie Yao
* VA Million Veteran Program
* NHLBI Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine (TOPMed) Consortium
* David-Alexandre Trégouët
* Andrew D Johnson
* Alisa S Wolberg
* Paul S de Vries
* Maria Sabater-Lleal
* Alanna C Morrison
* Nicholas L Smith

## Abstract

Genetic studies have identified numerous regions associated with plasma fibrinogen levels in Europeans, yet missing heritability and limited inclusion of non-Europeans necessitates further studies with improved power and sensitivity. Compared with array-based genotyping, whole genome sequencing (WGS) data provides better coverage of the genome and better representation of non-European variants. To better understand the genetic landscape regulating plasma fibrinogen levels, we meta-analyzed WGS data from the NHLBI’s Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine (TOPMed) program (n=32,572), with array-based genotype data from the Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology (CHARGE) Consortium (n=131,340) imputed to the TOPMed or Haplotype Reference Consortium panel. We identified 18 loci that have not been identified in prior genetic studies of fibrinogen. Of these, four are driven by common variants of small effect with reported MAF at least 10% higher in African populations. Three (*SERPINA1, ZFP36L2*, and *TLR10)* signals contain predicted deleterious missense variants. Two loci, *SOCS3* and *HPN*, each harbor two conditionally distinct, non-coding variants. The gene region encoding the protein chain subunits (*FGG;FGB;FGA*), contains 7 distinct signals, including one novel signal driven by rs28577061, a variant common (MAF=0.180) in African reference panels but extremely rare (MAF=0.008) in Europeans. Through phenome-wide association studies in the VA Million Veteran Program, we found associations between fibrinogen polygenic risk scores and thrombotic and inflammatory disease phenotypes, including an association with gout. Our findings demonstrate the utility of WGS to augment genetic discovery in diverse populations and offer new insights for putative mechanisms of fibrinogen regulation.

**Key Points**

*   Largest and most diverse genetic study of plasma fibrinogen identifies 54 regions (18 novel), housing 69 conditionally distinct variants (20 novel).

*   Sufficient power achieved to identify signal driven by African population variant. 

*   Links to (1) liver enzyme, blood cell and lipid genetic signals, (2) liver regulatory elements, and (3) thrombotic and inflammatory disease.

## Introduction

Fibrinogen is a critical coagulation factor and acute phase reactive protein. Under normal conditions, fibrinogen is abundant in circulation, yet during the acute phase inflammatory response, interleukin-(IL)-6 and IL-1 mediate transcriptional cascades which increase circulating fibrinogen levels up to 3-fold above baseline1,2. Fibrinogen measures are a clinical predictor of thrombotic diseases, including coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, venous thromboembolism, and ischemic stroke3,4. While animal models have shown a causative relationship between fibrinogen and thrombosis5,6, this has been difficult to confirm using Mendelian Randomization7–9.

Circulating fibrinogen levels are estimated to be 30-50% heritable10,11, and heterogeneous across diverse populations12–14. Individuals identifying as African American have higher reported baseline levels of fibrinogen12–14, with one study suggesting higher fibrinogen heritability in African ancestral populations (44%) compared with European and other populations (28%)15. While genome-wide and exome-wide sequencing studies have identified several loci associated with fibrinogen measures, these variants explain a maximum of 3.7% of variance in European populations7,16,17. Little is known regarding genetic regulation of fibrinogen across diverse populations.

Unlike genotyping arrays, which often have better coverage of variants common in European populations, whole genome sequencing (WGS) allows non-targeted genomic interrogation across all populations18. Deeper coverage provided by WGS increases confidence in minor allele calls, improving power to detect associations with rare and low frequency variants, and to distinguish multiple signals in the same region19,20. Furthermore, deep large-scale WGS-based reference panels improve imputation quality, increasing power derived from genotyped samples in meta-analysis19,20. Incorporating more sensitive genomic approaches, such as whole genome sequencing (WGS), in genetic analyses of fibrinogen may reveal additional genetic associations across a range of allele frequencies and effect sizes in diverse populations.

In this study, we performed genome-wide analyses integrating WGS data from NHLBI’s Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine (TOPMed) program21 and TOPMed-imputed genotyping data from the Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology (CHARGE) Consortium22 to identify new genetic variants associated with circulating fibrinogen. To determine putative regulatory mechanisms and prioritize potentially causal genes, we performed *in silico* annotation, colocalization analyses, a transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS), and TWAS fine-mapping. Additionally, we tested the hypothesis that polygenic risk scores (PRS) for fibrinogen are also associated with coagulation and inflammation-related phenotypes in European-ancestry and African-American participants from the VA Million Veteran Program (MVP)23.

## Results

### Baseline Characteristics

WGS and fibrinogen measures were available for 32,572 individuals across 13 TOPMed studies. Imputed genetic data and fibrinogen measures were available for 131,340 individuals and 39 additional studies (individuals without WGS from TOPMed studies, and CHARGE studies imputed to either the TOPMed or HRC reference panels). A total of 163,912 individuals were included in the multi-population meta-analysis (**Table 1**). The mean fibrinogen value within TOPMed studies was 3.25 g/L (SD=0.96). Mean values were slightly higher in African ancestry individuals compared to European ancestry individuals, but the confidence intervals overlapped [AFR=3.84 (0.98); EUR=3.26 (0.91)].

### Single Variant Analysis & Aggregate Tests

Multi-population, single-variant meta-analysis identified 54 genetic loci associated with fibrinogen levels (**Figure 2, Supplemental Table 1**). Among these, 18 loci have not been identified in prior genetic studies of fibrinogen (**Table 2**). The *TM6SF2* locus has been identified in a multi-phenotype analysis leveraging fibrinogen and coronary artery disease variants24, but not in a GWAS of fibrinogen alone. Approximate conditional analysis in GCTA revealed 6 loci harboring conditionally distinct lead variants **(Table 3; Supplemental Table 2**). At 4 loci with previously reported fibrinogen associations - *FGG, PDLIM4, RPL22L1*, and *RAB37* - we detected 7, 5, 3, and 2 distinct lead variants, respectively, exceeding the maximum at any prior report. The LD between conditionally distinct lead variants and previously published top SNPs is presented in **Supplemental Table 3**. Among newly associated loci, *SOCS3* and *HPN* were found to harbor distinct lead variants.

![Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2023/06/12/2023.06.07.23291095/F1.medium.gif)

[Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/06/12/2023.06.07.23291095/F1)

Figure 1. Study Design

![Figure 2.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2023/06/12/2023.06.07.23291095/F2.medium.gif)

[Figure 2.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/06/12/2023.06.07.23291095/F2)

Figure 2. 
Mega-Analysis Single Variant Results. Orange peaks are novel associated regions and are labelled with the names of genes in the region. Red line indicates genome-wide significance (p<5E-09) and blue line indicates suggestive association (p<1E-07).

![Figure 3.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2023/06/12/2023.06.07.23291095/F3.medium.gif)

[Figure 3.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/06/12/2023.06.07.23291095/F3)

Figure 3. Comparison of Mega-Analysis Single Variant Results to Previous Publications.

Among the 69 conditionally distinct lead variants associated with fibrinogen, 5 variants (rs10936662, rs28577061, rs11077357, rs7507218, rs1672981) have a minor allele at least 10% more frequent in African ancestral populations compared to European (**Supplemental Table 2**). At the *FGG* locus, GCTA identified a conditionally distinct lead variant (rs28577061), which has not been associated with fibrinogen in prior studies and is common in African (MAF= 0.1801) but extremely rare (MAF= 0.008 in EUR) or absent in other ancestral populations in TOPMed. At 4 loci - *RPL22L1, HPN, SOCS3*, and *SSPB4 -* the primary lead variants are common in all assessed populations, but increased frequency in African ancestry populations. Together, the 69 independent variants discovered explain 4.8% of the phenotypic variance for circulating fibrinogen across populations.

Aggregate tests using low-frequency and rare TOPMed WGS variants yielded associations in the fibrinogen gene cluster region – *FGG* was significant when aggregating (1) loss-of-function (LOF) variants, and (2) LOF and deleterious missense variants whereas *FGA* was only significant when aggregating LOF variants and *FGB* with LOF, deletions, and missense variants. No genes were significant when aggregating all low-frequency and rare variants in the coding, promoter, and enhancer regions (**Supplemental Table 4**).

### Variant annotation

To characterize each genetic signal associated with fibrinogen, we queried all conditionally distinct variants and their LD proxies (r2>0.8 in TOPMed-based European and/or African ancestry reference panels)21,25, in multiple publicly available datasets. The majority of signals (defined as the conditionally distinct variant and LD-proxies) we identified contain previously reported lead variants for liver-enzyme measures, lipid measures, and/or blood-cell traits. Notably, 23 signals contain a previously reported lead variant for C-Reactive Protein (CRP).

Variant effect prediction (VEP)26 shows that 18 signals contain at least one missense variant. Additionally, 13 signals contain variants with CADD PHRED scores exceeding 20, indicating variant status in the top 1% of predicted deleterious mutations. *SERPINA1, ZFP36L2*, and *TLR10*, stand out as newly associated loci in this category. We also observed that several signals overlap potential regulatory regions in liver. 52 signals (45 loci) contain at least 1 variant mapping to a “consensus” region of open chromatin in liver tissue samples. 42 signals overlap a GeneHancer regulatory element reported active in HepG2 hepatocytes. 5 signals harbor previously reported liver chromatin accessibility quantitative trait loci (QTL) variants, 6 signals hold GTEx liver expression QTL, and the primary signal at the *HPN* locus contains a GTEx liver splice QTL variant. A summary of these annotations for each signal can be found in **Supplemental Table 5**. Full results of this analysis are in **Supplemental Table 6**.

### Colocalization

Variant-level colocalization analysis in fastENLOC identified 153 variant-tissue pairs with evidence (SCP>0.1) for a shared genetic basis with GTEx expression QTLs for 93 distinct genes in aortic artery, tibial artery, coronary artery, liver, and/or whole blood (**Supplemental Table 7**). Regional analysis in the same set of tissues found 46 region-tissue pairs, implicated in regulation of 41 distinct genes, with evidence for statistical colocalization with fibrinogen regions (RCP>0.5) (**Supplemental Table 8**). We note that 5 of the 6 fibrinogen signals harboring sentinel GTEx liver eQTL variants statistically colocalize with the expression QTL signal in fastENLOC, while the *PLEC* eQTL signal was at the significance threshold (RCP = 0.5).

### Transcriptome-wide Association Study

Gene-tissue pairs across 5 tissues (aortic artery, coronary artery, tibial artery, whole blood, and liver) were included in MetaXcan TWAS analyses for fibrinogen. Genetically determined expressions of 64 gene-tissue pairs were significantly associated with fibrinogen levels after Bonferroni correction and filtering for models with at least 2 contributing SNPs (**Supplemental Table 9**). 15 gene-tissue pairs identified by TWAS were further prioritized via fine-mapping in FOCUS (**Supplemental Table 10**). *TNKS* was the only gene prioritized by both TWAS and fine-mapping in liver-analyses. Notably, this gene was further implicated in fibrinogen regulation through variant and region-based colocalization analysis using GTEx liver expression data (**Supplemental Table 8**). In whole blood analyses, TWAS and fine-mapping prioritized *AFT1, C5orf56, FGB, MS4A4E, SLC22A5*. Of these, *AFT1* was further supported by variant-level colocalization analysis (**Supplemental Table 7**).

### Phenomewide Association Study (PheWAS)

Three fibrinogen PRSs were tested for association with 1,426 ICD-based PheCodes in EUR and 1,061 PheCodes in AFR participants of the VA MVP **(Supplemental Table 11)**. Each score reached Bonferroni significance with multiple thrombotic and inflammatory disease phenotypes (nEUR=13 PheCodes, nAFR=1 PheCode; **Table 4**). Top associations included venous thromboembolism and gout.

To further assess which variants within the PRS may drive individual associations, we queried each variant against the significant PheCodes (**Supplemental Table 12**). As anticipated, for “Circulatory System” and “Hematopoietic” PheCodes, most of the signal came from variants in the fibrinogen gene cluster, whereas significant variants across the PRS were associated with gout and dermatologic traits. Sensitivity analyses with PRS removing variants either in the *FGG* gene region (associated with gamma prime fibrinogen) or in the full fibrinogen gene cluster did not substantially change the odds ratio, but did impact the significance (**Supplemental Table 13**). PheCodes relating to gout (phe\_274, phe\_274\_1) and superficial cellulitis and abscess (phe\_1089) became more significant, whereas PheCodes relating to coagulation defects and hypercoagulable state (phe\_286, phe_286_8, phe_286_81) became less significant.

## Discussion

Here, we used WGS and genotype data from diverse participants to identify 69 conditionally distinct genetic variants from 54 loci associated with circulating fibrinogen across populations. Our results corroborate previous reports that fibrinogen is highly polygenic and advance the field by identifying new variant associations, including rare variants and variants most prevalent in underrepresented populations. Based on results of *in silico* characterization, we suggest some of the new genetic regulators we identified may act directly to regulate coagulation factors (such as factor VII, factor XI), while some may impact fibrinogen broadly through pathways altering liver metabolism, inflammation, and immune function, as reflected in the broad overlap between fibrinogen associated signals and prior analyses for liver-related traits (such as lipids and CRP) and blood-cell and immune-cell counts.

### Population-differentiated variants among new associations

We identified several novel genetic associations driven by variants with higher allele frequencies in non-European populations, validating that our approach improved detection of putative genetic regulators which may be most common in underrepresented populations. To our knowledge, we identified the first common variant-fibrinogen association driven almost entirely by African ancestry participants at an intergenic region near *FGG*. Previous African ancestry driven variants were rare in African and not present in European populations17. Additionally, expanded representation of both African and European populations allowed us to detect 4 new signals of small effect, led by common variants substantially (>10%) more frequent in those with African ancestry. Detection of population-differentiated associations indicates that for variants with higher predicted effects, such as those within the fibrinogen gene cluster, expanded sample sizes are now reaching power to detect variant associations driven by underrepresented populations, although improved representation is still needed. We further identified 4 common European-driven signals that are rare or uncommon in African ancestry populations, suggesting that genomic signals for circulating fibrinogen are not saturated in any ancestral population27,28, as reflected by the relatively modest variance explained (4.8%) versus estimates of total fibrinogen heritability (28-44%)10,11,15. With improved representation of all ancestries, genomic studies will likely identify additional common and rare genetic signals across all populations.

### Newly identified potential coagulation pathway interactors

Three novel regions (*SERPINA1, ZFP36L2*, and *TLR10*) harbor deleterious missense variants in genes with plausible connections to coagulation and/or inflammation. In the *SERPINA1* gene, we identified a rare missense variant (rs17580) with a high CADD PHRED score (32). *SERPINA1* encodes alpha-1-antitrypsin, which protects other proteins and tissues from serine protease degradation via direct binding inhibition29. Like fibrinogen, alpha-1-antitrypsin is synthesized in hepatocytes in response to IL-6 and IL-1 inflammatory pathways30. Severe alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency is associated with liver dysfunction and fibrotic lung disease related to a lack of inhibition of neutrophil elastase31. The association of *SERPINA1* with fibrinogen levels may reflect SERPINA1 involvement in inflammatory pathways, or a more direct relationship between these proteins. While *in vitro* assays have suggested alpha-1-antitrypsin can bind to plasma fibrinogen and be incorporated into fibrin networks29, little is known about the functional implications of these interactions and whether it also influences fibrin(ogen) degradation.

ZFP36L2 and TLR10 are broadly linked to inflammatory pathways. Although ZFP36L2 is largely uncharacterized, the *ZFP36L2* missense variant we observed has previously been associated with blood cell traits32–35, and studies in mice show ZFP36L2 regulates blood cell development and adipogenesis36. Proteins of the ZFP36 family regulate transcript abundance through binding AU-rich elements to target transcripts for decay37. Notably, ZFP36 (tristetraprolin) family proteins are known to modulate transcript abundance of the inflammatory cytokine TNF-a38, which induces both the coagulation cascade and complement system39,40. *TLR10* encodes a toll-like receptor (TLR) protein. While TLR activation generally contributes to inflammation, immune responses, and activation of coagulation cascades, little is known about TLR10 specifically41. Although TLR10 may exert a protective effect against inflammation42,43, more work is needed to elucidate mechanistic links between this protein and coagulation.

### Putative fibrinogen regulatory signals

While the missense variants highlight intriguing new gene targets for future functional studies, most signals we identified are driven by common non-coding variants with small effect sizes. Many of these non-coding signals overlap HepG2-active regulatory regions, and a subset of signals overlap liver chromatin accessibility, expression, and/or splice QTL signals, suggesting these variants may exert subtle regulatory effects on circulating fibrinogen levels. Notably, at 2 newly associated loci, *HPN* and *SOCS3*, we identified 2 conditionally distinct variants, each with distinct functional annotations.

At the *HPN* locus, the primary signal, which maps to an intronic region of *HPN*, contains a liver splice QTL for *HPN. HPN* encodes hepsin, a type II transmembrane serine protease with “enhanced” expression in the liver (HPA), believed to function in macromolecular metabolism44. Interestingly, studies in zebrafish and mammalian cell lines suggest hepsin activates coagulation factor VII45,46. Although mouse studies have not conclusively demonstrated hepsin’s involvement in coagulation, these studies have established hepsin’s involvement in regulating liver metabolism via hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and Met signaling pathways44,47–49. The secondary signal at this locus maps to an intergenic region and contains a liver expression QTL for a nearby gene, *TMEM147. TMEM147*, which was also prioritized in liver, whole blood, and aortic artery TWAS analyses, encodes a widely-expressed endoplasmic reticulum transmembrane protein implicated in various metabolic processes, including calcium transport50.

Although it is unclear whether the two signals in this region influence fibrinogen through altered splicing and expression patterns of *HPN* and *TMEM147* in the liver, these signals provide a compelling starting point for future functional studies.

Similarly, among the two independent, common-variant signals in the *SOCS3*; *PGS1* locus on chromosome 17, the secondary signal houses a previously identified sentinel variant for altered chromatin accessibility in liver tissue. This variant is of particular interest given its proximity to *SOCS3*, a “Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling” known to act upstream of IL-6 in the acute-phase response pathway that induces fibrinogen2. It is possible that the secondary signal at this locus is capturing genetic variation which modulates the accessibility of the *SOCS3* gene, and potentially other nearby genes, in liver or other tissues, leading to downstream impacts on fibrinogen levels. *SOCS3* methylation was recently associated with circulating fibrinogen levels in an epigenomewide association study in the CHARGE consortium51 with the associated probe within 11kb of our best *SOCS3* GWAS SNP, reinforcing the idea that chromatin accessibility may be at play.

### PheWAS

Results of the PheWAS in MVP yielded expected associations with venous thromboembolism and several hematopoietic traits. However, the direction of the association within bleeding and thrombosis phenotypes was often opposite to the direction we expected given total fibrinogen’s procoagulant function (i.e., typically increased genetically-predicted fibrinogen is associated with decreased risk of bleeding and increased risk of thrombosis). Although surprising, this finding is in line with a previous Mendelian randomization study, which observed an inverse association between total fibrinogen levels with venous thromboembolism risk9. We tested the hypothesis that this inverse association in our PheWAS was driven by the alternatively-spliced gamma prime fibrinogen isoform, which has established anticoagulant properties52, but removing the *FGG* locus SNPs from the tested PRS did not alter the direction of effect we observed.

Another unexpected finding from the PheWAS was a positive association between genetically-predicted total fibrinogen and gout. Interestingly, this finding is in line with emerging literature, which has shown that patients with active gout have increased thrombin generation markers53,54. Given the extensive overlap between our signals and previously reported GWAS signals for phenotypes reflecting liver health and inflammation - such as liver enzyme, lipid measures, and CRP measure - we suggest that this association may be capturing variant impacts on broader liver metabolic pathways.

### Conclusion

In conclusion, we identified 18 novel loci, collectively harboring 20 distinct variants, associated with fibrinogen measure. We report the first African-variant driven fibrinogen association, and several additional associated variants with population-differentiated genetic architecture. Furthermore, we demonstrate overlap between these signals and liver regulatory elements, as well as GWAS phenotypes reflecting altered liver metabolism and inflammation. Future studies investigating co-regulation and epistatic effects will likely provide new insight on the shared genetic architecture, and biological interplay, of hemostasis and inflammation.

## Methods

### Design and Study Population

To investigate the genetic architecture of circulating fibrinogen, we performed a multi-population genome wide association study, followed by transcriptome-wide (TWAS) and phenome-wide association (PheWAS) studies. An overview of the study design is in **Figure 1**. These analyses were undertaken within the setting of NHLBI’s TOPMed Program and the CHARGE Consortium Hemostasis Working Group. In total, 161,643 participants contributed to primary genomic analyses, including 11,283 African-ancestry (AFR), 741 Asian-ancestry (ASN), 149,619 European-ancestry (EUR), and 2,061 Hispanic (HIS) participants. Assignment to 1 of these 4 groups was determined by each study internally.

Studies often used some combination of self-reported race or ethnicity data (which in many cases was used for stratification at the genotyping stage, making future pooled analysis challenging) and comparison of ancestry PCs to commonly used reference panels such as 1000G (often with exclusion of any extreme outliers). We acknowledge that this is not concordant with the most up to date standards for defining ancestry clusters based on similarity to reference panels55 but do not have access to individual level data for most participants and are thus reliant on these study assignments. Details of the 40 participating studies are in **Table 1** and the **Supplemental Data**.

### Phenotyping and Harmonization

Fibrinogen was measured in g/L. Most studies measured clottable fibrinogen using the Clauss method56, while the remaining 7 studies used a variety of approaches to measure fibrinogen antigen, including nephlometry and ELISA. Study-specific phenotyping methods can be found in **Table 1** and the **Supplemental Data**. Measures of plasma fibrinogen for TOPMed studies were harmonized to ensure they were in the same units (g/L) and did not have unexpected distributions or an excess of outliers. Data were then uploaded to Analysis Commons57 for centralized genetic analysis.

### Whole-genome Sequencing of TOPMed Participants

TOPMed WGS methods were described previously21. Briefly, WGS was conducted at six sequencing centers (mean depth >30X, Illumina HiSeq X Ten instruments). Joint variant discovery and genotype calling were conducted by the TOPMed Informatics Research Center (IRC) across all TOPMed studies using the GotCloud pipeline, resulting in a single genotype call set encompassing all of TOPMed (TOPMed Freeze 6). Variant quality control was also performed centrally by the TOPMed IRC. Sample quality control was performed by the TOPMed Data Coordinating Center (DCC). Further details are in the **Supplemental Data**.

### Genotype Imputation of non-TOPMed Studies

Genotype array data for CHARGE studies and for participants without WGS from TOPMed studies were imputed using standard methods to the densest available imputation panel. A total of 35 studies imputed to the TOPMed Freeze 5b reference panel21 and 4 to the Haplotype Reference Consortium (HRC) reference panel58.

### Genome-wide Association Analyses and Meta-analyses

TOPMed WGS genetic analyses were conducted using inverse normalized and rescaled residuals adjusting for age, sex, population group*study, TOPMed sequencing phase, study-specific parameters, 11 ancestry-informative principal components, and a kinship matrix. Single variant and aggregate gene-based tests were implemented using the SMMAT function of GENESIS on the Analysis Commons cloud computing platform57,59. Aggregate tests included only variants with minor allele frequency (MAF) <5% and minor allele count (MAC) ≥1 and used 3 strategies for variant selection: (1) loss of function (LOF), (2) LOF and deleterious missense (LDM), and (3) coding, enhancer, and promoter variants.

Studies without sequencing data undertook single variant analyses within each population group using their software of preference and the same model described for TOPMed genetic analyses. Summary statistics were provided for central meta-analysis. Quality control of the study-specific single variant GWAS summary statistics was undertaken using the EasyQC package60 for R. Variants were removed based on the following filtering criteria: estimated minor allele count (minor allele count x imputation quality; eMAC) < 6, absolute effect size (beta) > 5, standard error > 10, sample size < 30, or imputation quality < 0.30. Meta-analysis was completed using GWAMA61 with genomic control applied to each study individually but not to the meta-analysis results. Meta-analysis was completed (i) within each population group for just the studies with imputed data, (ii) just the TOPMed WGS studies, and then (iii) combined in a multi-population mega-analysis that included results from analysis of WGS and imputed data. Statistical significance was set at p<5.0E-0962.

### Conditional Analysis and Variant Explained

For all genome-wide significant regions from the multi-population mega-analysis, conditional analyses were undertaken using cojo-slct63 within GCTA64 using all TOPMed WGS samples that contributed to the GWAS as the linkage disequilibrium (LD) reference panel. Percent variance explained was estimated with summary level data reported by GCTA64 for the 69 conditionally independent variants from the mega-analysis, using the approximation derived by Shim et al65. See **Supplemental Methods** for more details.

### Functional Annotation of Fibrinogen-Associated Variants

#### Variant Effect Prediction

The Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor (VEP) ([https://useast.ensembl.org/Tools/VEP](https://useast.ensembl.org/Tools/VEP))26 was used to determine nearest gene and top predicted consequence for each of the 69 conditionally independent variants and their linkage-disequilibrium (LD) proxies (as determined by r2>0.8 in TOP-LD European and/or African ancestry reference panels21,25). VEP was also used to annotate CADD PHRED66,67 and LoFtool68-predicted impact scores. For coding variants, SIFT69, and PolyPhen70,71 scores were obtained through VEP. InterPro was used to determine amino acid substitution72.

#### Overlap of Fibrinogen Signals and GWAS Catalog Associations

The NHGRI-EBI GWAS catalog v1.0.2, containing lead, significant (5.0E-08) variants from each uploaded GWAS study was downloaded October 29, 2022 ([https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/downloads](https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/downloads)). The same set of variants used for VEP annotation were queried in the GWAS catalog by rsID. Mapped traits corresponding to related quantitative measures were manually cataloged to broad categories (ie “liver enzymes”, “blood cell traits”, “lipids” etc).

### Colocalization

We performed colocalization to support gene-trait associations using fastENLOC73,74. We took the pre-computed GTEx multiple-tissue eQTL annotations and fibrinogen GWAS PIP input to perform fastENLOC for each of the most relevant tissues: liver and whole blood. We considered RCP > 0.5 as strong evidence of colocalization.

### Transcription-wide Association Studies

A transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS) was performed using S-PrediXcan75 to identify associations between *cis*-genetic components of gene expression and plasma levels of fibrinogen in mechanistically related tissues, namely artery (aorta, coronary, or tibial), liver, and whole blood76. We used the prebuilt prediction models that were based on GTEx v8 multivariate adaptive shrinkage in R to estimate variants’ weight on gene expression levels in chosen tissues75–77. Since the reference models were created based on the European-ancestry population, we limited the analysis to GWAS results of European-ancestry individuals only. S-PrediXcan results of the tissues were evaluated using S-MultiXcan78. We determined significant TWAS signals using Bonferroni correction for the total number of genes across all models.

### Fine-mapping

To assist in the identification of the causal gene under the GWAS signal, we performed TWAS fine-mapping using FOCUS. FOCUS avoids false TWAS signals caused by co-regulation and pleiotropic effects of variants at GWAS risk loci79by modeling marginal TWAS z-scores of all genes in the same region considering variant LD correlations and tagged pleiotropic effects of variants on the trait. Given generated z-scores, posterior inclusion probability (PIP) for a gene to be causal is derived and then used to form a credible set of putative causal genes. In this analysis, we used GTEx v8 MASH-R models as the source of eQTL weights and the European-based PROCARDIS database as the reference for LD correlations. PIP ≥ 0.95 was used as the threshold to determine putative causal genes in FOCUS results.

### MVP PheWAS/Polygenic Risk Scores (PRS) analysis

Polygenic risk scores (PRS) were derived using the independent variants identified by the GCTA analysis described above. Three scores were derived, (i) weighting by the variant beta from the multi-population mega-analysis, (ii) weighting by the variant beta from the European (EUR)-only meta-analysis, and (iii) weighting by the variant beta from the African (AFR) -only meta-analysis. PRS were then standardized to standard deviation units. A phenome-wide association study (PheWAS) was performed for each of the 3 PRS within EUR and AFR participants of the VA Million Veteran Program23 (MVP), for ICD-based PheCodes80 with at least 500 cases. Logistic regression models were adjusted for age, sex, and the first 5 population-specific principal components and significance determined based on Bonferroni correction for the number of independent PheCodes. EUR had 1,426 PheCodes analyzed with an estimated 965 independent (pBonferroni = 0.05/965=5.18E-05) and AFR had 1,061 PheCodes with an estimated 690 independent (pBonferroni = 0.05/690=7.25E-05) (see **Supplemental Data**). Additional sensitivity analyses were completed by creating the PRS removing variants in the *FGG* gene region, or the fibrinogen gene cluster region.

## Supporting information

Main and Supplemental Tables [[supplements/291095_file03.xlsx]](pending:yes)

Supplemental Information, Methods, and Figures [[supplements/291095_file04.pdf]](pending:yes)

## Data Availability

Meta-analysis summary statistics will be available through the CHARGE dbGaP accession (phs000930) or upon request to the corresponding author. Individual-level data for TOPMed studies is available through their relevant dbGaP accessions as listed in the TOPMed Omics Support Table in the Supplemental Data.

## Conflict of Interest Disclosures

Laura Raffield is a consultant for the TOPMed Administrative Coordinating Center (through WeStat). Ruifang Li-Gao is a part-time consultant for Metabolon, Inc. Michael Cho has received grant support from Bayer. Bruce Psaty serves on the Steering Committee of the Yale Open Data Access Project funded by Johnson and Johnson. In the past three years, Edwin K. Silverman has received grant support from Bayer.

## Data Availability

Meta-analysis summary statistics are available through the CHARGE dbGaP accession (phs000930) or upon request to the corresponding author. Individual-level data for TOPMed studies is available through their relevant dbGaP accessions as listed in the TOPMed Omics Support Table in the **Supplemental Data**.

## Tables *(located with Supplementary Tables)*

Table 1 – Participating Studies

Table 2 – Novel Regions Associated with Fibrinogen in Single Variant Test

Table 3 – Regions with multiple SNPs selected by GCTA (cojo-slct) using TOPMed multi-population reference panel for LD

Table 4 – Association of TOPMed/CHARGE Fibrinogen Polygenic Risk Scores (PRS) with PheCodes in MVP

## Acknowledgements

Molecular data for the Trans-Omics in Precision Medicine (TOPMed) program was supported by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI). See the TOPMed Omics Support Table in the **Supplemental Data** for study specific omics support information. Core support including centralized genomic read mapping and genotype calling, along with variant quality metrics and filtering were provided by the TOPMed Informatics Research Center (3R01HL-117626-02S1; contract HHSN268201800002I). Core support including phenotype harmonization, data management, sample-identity QC, and general program coordination were provided by the TOPMed Data Coordinating Center (R01HL-120393; U01HL-120393; contract HHSN268201800001I). We gratefully acknowledge the studies and participants who provided biological samples and data for TOPMed.

CHARGE is supported by R01HL-105756 and the CHARGE and TOPMed Hemostasis Working Groups by R01HL-134894, R01HL-139553, and R01HL-141291.

This research is based on data from the Million Veteran Program, Office of Research and Development, Veterans Health Administration, and was supported by award I01-BX004821.

The study was supported by the Novo Nordisk Foundation (grant number NNF18CC0034900). D-A.T was supported by the EPIDEMIOM-VT Senior Chair of Excellence from the University of Bordeaux initiative of Excellence (IdEX). Additional study-specific funding and acknowledgements can be found in the **Supplemental Data**.

The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) Project was supported by the Common Fund of the Office of the Director of the National Institutes of Health, and by NCI, NHGRI, NHLBI, NIDA, NIMH, and NINDS.

This publication does not represent the views of the Department of Veteran Affairs, the US National Institutes of Health, the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, the US Department of Health and Human Service, or the United States Government.

## Footnotes

*   83 see Supplemental Data for a list of MVP contributors

*   Received June 7, 2023.
*   Revision received June 7, 2023.
*   Accepted June 12, 2023.


*   © 2023, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

The copyright holder for this pre-print is the author. All rights reserved. The material may not be redistributed, re-used or adapted without the author's permission.

## References

1.  1.Wolberg AS, Sang Y. Fibrinogen and factor XIII in venous thrombosis and thrombus stability. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2022;42(8):931–941.
    
    

2.  2.Pieters M, Wolberg AS. Fibrinogen and fibrin: An illustrated review. Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 2019;3(2):161–172.
    
    

3.  3.Vilar R, Fish RJ, Casini A, Neerman-Arbez M. Fibrin(ogen) in human disease: both friend and foe. Haematologica. 2020;105(2):284–296.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6ODoiaGFlbWF0b2wiO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6OToiMTA1LzIvMjg0IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjMvMDYvMTIvMjAyMy4wNi4wNy4yMzI5MTA5NS5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

4.  4. Fibrinogen Studies Collaboration, Danesh J, Lewington S, et al. Plasma fibrinogen level and the risk of major cardiovascular diseases and nonvascular mortality: an individual participant meta-analysis. JAMA. 2005;294(14):1799–1809.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/jama.294.14.1799&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=16219884&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F06%2F12%2F2023.06.07.23291095.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000232472000020&link_type=ISI) 

5.  5.Machlus KR, Cardenas JC, Church FC, Wolberg AS. Causal relationship between hyperfibrinogenemia, thrombosis, and resistance to thrombolysis in mice. Blood. 2011;117(18):4953–4963.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MTI6ImJsb29kam91cm5hbCI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czoxMToiMTE3LzE4LzQ5NTMiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo1MDoiL21lZHJ4aXYvZWFybHkvMjAyMy8wNi8xMi8yMDIzLjA2LjA3LjIzMjkxMDk1LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 

6.  6.Vilar R, Lukowski SW, Garieri M, et al. Chemical Modulators of Fibrinogen Production and Their Impact on Venous Thrombosis. Thromb Haemost. 2021;121(4):433–448.
    
    

7.  7.Sabater-Lleal M, Huang J, Chasman D, et al. Multiethnic meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies in >100 000 subjects identifies 23 fibrinogen-associated Loci but no strong evidence of a causal association between circulating fibrinogen and cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 2013;128(12):1310–1324.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MTQ6ImNpcmN1bGF0aW9uYWhhIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjExOiIxMjgvMTIvMTMxMCI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDIzLzA2LzEyLzIwMjMuMDYuMDcuMjMyOTEwOTUuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 

8.  8.Ward-Caviness CK, de Vries PS, Wiggins KL, et al. Mendelian randomization evaluation of causal effects of fibrinogen on incident coronary heart disease. PLoS One. 2019;14(5):e0216222.
    
    

9.  9.Maners J, Gill D, Pankratz N, et al. A Mendelian randomization of \gamma’ and total fibrinogen levels in relation to venous thromboembolism and ischemic stroke. Blood. 2020;136(26):3062–3069.
    
    

10. 10.Williams PT. Quantile-specific heritability of plasma fibrinogen concentrations. Plos One. 2022;17(1):e0262395.
    
    

11. 11.de Lange M, Snieder H, Ariëns RA, Spector TD, Grant PJ. The genetics of haemostasis: a twin study. The Lancet. 2001;357(9250):101–105.
    
    

12. 12.Collaboration FS, Kaptoge S, White IR, et al. Associations of plasma fibrinogen levels with established cardiovascular disease risk factors, inflammatory markers, and other characteristics: individual participant meta-analysis of 154,211 adults in 31 prospective studies: the fibrinogen studies collaboration. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2007;166(8):867–879.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/aje/kwm191&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=17785713&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F06%2F12%2F2023.06.07.23291095.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000250143200002&link_type=ISI) 

13. 13.Folsom AR, Qamhieh HT, Flack JM, et al. Plasma fibrinogen: levels and correlates in young adults. The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1993;138(12):1023–1036.
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=8266905&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F06%2F12%2F2023.06.07.23291095.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1993MP87300001&link_type=ISI) 

14. 14.Lutsey PL, Cushman M, Steffen LM, et al. Plasma hemostatic factors and endothelial markers in four racial/ethnic groups: the MESA study. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 2006;4(12):2629–2635.
    
    

15. 15.Ding K, Feng D, de Andrade M, et al. Genomic regions that influence plasma levels of inflammatory markers in hypertensive sibships. Journal of Human Hypertension. 2008;22(2):102–110.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/sj.jhh.1002297&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=17960170&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F06%2F12%2F2023.06.07.23291095.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000252426400006&link_type=ISI) 

16. 16.de Vries PS, Chasman DI, Sabater-Lleal M, et al. A meta-analysis of 120 246 individuals identifies 18 new loci for fibrinogen concentration. Hum Mol Genet. 2016;25(2):358–370.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/hmg/ddv454&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=26561523&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F06%2F12%2F2023.06.07.23291095.atom) 

17. 17.Huffman JE, de Vries PS, Morrison AC, et al. Rare and low-frequency variants and their association with plasma levels of fibrinogen, FVII, FVIII, and vWF. Blood. 2015;126(11):e19–29.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MTI6ImJsb29kam91cm5hbCI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czoxMDoiMTI2LzExL2UxOSI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDIzLzA2LzEyLzIwMjMuMDYuMDcuMjMyOTEwOTUuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 

18. 18.Wojcik GL, Fuchsberger C, Taliun D, et al. Imputation-Aware Tag SNP Selection To Improve Power for LargeScale, Multi-ethnic Association Studies. G3 (Bethesda, Md.). 2018;8(10):3255–3267.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiZ2dnIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjk6IjgvMTAvMzI1NSI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDIzLzA2LzEyLzIwMjMuMDYuMDcuMjMyOTEwOTUuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 

19. 19.Kowalski MH, Qian H, Hou Z, et al. Use of \textgreater100,000 NHLBI Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine (TOPMed) Consortium whole genome sequences improves imputation quality and detection of rare variant associations in admixed African and Hispanic/Latino populations. PLoS Genetics. 2019;15(12):e1008500.
    
    

20. 20.de Vries PS, Sabater-Lleal M, Chasman DI, et al. Comparison of HapMap and 1000 Genomes Reference Panels in a Large-Scale Genome-Wide Association Study. Plos One. 2017;12(1):e0167742.
    
    

21. 21.Taliun D, Harris DN, Kessler MD, et al. Sequencing of 53,831 diverse genomes from the NHLBI TOPMed Program. Nature. 2021;590(7845):290–299.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41586-021-03205-y&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=33568819&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F06%2F12%2F2023.06.07.23291095.atom) 

22. 22.Psaty BM, O’Donnell CJ, Gudnason V, et al. Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology (CHARGE) Consortium: Design of prospective meta-analyses of genome-wide association studies from 5 cohorts. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2009;2(1):73–80.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NzoiY2lyY2N2ZyI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czo2OiIyLzEvNzMiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo1MDoiL21lZHJ4aXYvZWFybHkvMjAyMy8wNi8xMi8yMDIzLjA2LjA3LjIzMjkxMDk1LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 

23. 23.Gaziano JM, Concato J, Brophy M, et al. Million Veteran Program: A mega-biobank to study genetic influences on health and disease. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;70:214–223.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.09.016&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=26441289&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F06%2F12%2F2023.06.07.23291095.atom) 

24. 24.Temprano-Sagrera G, Sitlani CM, Bone WP, et al. Multi-phenotype analyses of hemostatic traits with cardiovascular events reveal novel genetic associations. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 2022;20(6):1331–1349.
    
    

25. 25.Huang L, Rosen JD, Sun Q, et al. TOP-LD: A tool to explore linkage disequilibrium with TOPMed whole-genome sequence data. American Journal of Human Genetics. 2022;109(6):1175–1181.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.04.006&link_type=DOI) 

26. 26.McLaren W, Gil L, Hunt SE, et al. The ensembl variant effect predictor. Genome Biology. 2016;17(1):122.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/s13059-016-0974-4&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=27268795&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F06%2F12%2F2023.06.07.23291095.atom) 

27. 27.Yengo L, Sidorenko J, Kemper KE, et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for height and body mass index in ∼700000 individuals of European ancestry. Human Molecular Genetics. 2018;27(20):3641–3649.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/hmg/ddy271&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=30124842&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F06%2F12%2F2023.06.07.23291095.atom) 

28. 28.Yengo L, Vedantam S, Marouli E, et al. A saturated map of common genetic variants associated with human height. Nature. 2022;610(7933):704–712.
    
    

29. 29.Talens S, Malfliet JJMC, van Hal PTW, Leebeek FWG, Rijken DC. Identification and characterization of \alpha1 - antitrypsin in fibrin clots. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 2013;11(7):1319–1328.
    
    

30. 30.Ercetin E, Richtmann S, Delgado BM, et al. Clinical Significance of SERPINA1 Gene and Its Encoded Alpha1-antitrypsin Protein in NSCLC. Cancers. 2019;11(9):.
    
    

31. 31.Strnad P, McElvaney NG, Lomas DA. Alpha1-Antitrypsin Deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(15):1443–1455.
    
    

32. 32.Chen M-H, Raffield LM, Mousas A, et al. Trans-ethnic and Ancestry-Specific Blood-Cell Genetics in 746,667 Individuals from 5 Global Populations. Cell. 2020;182(5):1198-1213.e14.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.cell.2020.06.045&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=32888493&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F06%2F12%2F2023.06.07.23291095.atom) 

33. 33.Astle WJ, Elding H, Jiang T, et al. The Allelic Landscape of Human Blood Cell Trait Variation and Links to Common Complex Disease. Cell. 2016;167(5):1415-1429.e19.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.042&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=27863252&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F06%2F12%2F2023.06.07.23291095.atom) 

34. 34.Kichaev G, Bhatia G, Loh P-R, et al. Leveraging Polygenic Functional Enrichment to Improve GWAS Power. Am J Hum Genet. 2019;104(1):65–75.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.11.008&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F06%2F12%2F2023.06.07.23291095.atom) 

35. 35.Vuckovic D, Bao EL, Akbari P, et al. The Polygenic and Monogenic Basis of Blood Traits and Diseases. Cell. 2020;182(5):1214-1231.e11.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.cell.2020.08.008&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=32888494&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F06%2F12%2F2023.06.07.23291095.atom) 

36. 36.Zhang L, Prak L, Rayon-Estrada V, et al. ZFP36L2 is required for self-renewal of early burst-forming unit erythroid progenitors. Nature. 2013;499(7456):92–96.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/nature12215&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23748442&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F06%2F12%2F2023.06.07.23291095.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000321285600040&link_type=ISI) 

37. 37.Makita S, Takatori H, Nakajima H. Post-Transcriptional Regulation of Immune Responses and Inflammatory Diseases by RNA-Binding ZFP36 Family Proteins. Frontiers in Immunology. 2021;12:711633.
    
    

38. 38.Lai WS, Carballo E, Strum JR, et al. Evidence that tristetraprolin binds to AU-rich elements and promotes the deadenylation and destabilization of tumor necrosis factor alpha mRNA. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 1999;19(6):4311–4323.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoibWNiIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjk6IjE5LzYvNDMxMSI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDIzLzA2LzEyLzIwMjMuMDYuMDcuMjMyOTEwOTUuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 

39. 39.Page MJ, Bester J, Pretorius E. The inflammatory effects of TNF-α and complement component 3 on coagulation. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):1812.
    
    

40. 40.Makita S, Takatori H, Iwata A, et al. RNA-Binding Protein ZFP36L2 Downregulates Helios Expression and Suppresses the Function of Regulatory T Cells. Frontiers in Immunology. 2020;11:1291.
    
    

41. 41.Parra-Izquierdo I, Lakshmanan HHS, Melrose AR, et al. The Toll-Like Receptor 2 Ligand Pam2CSK4 Activates Platelet Nuclear Factor-\kappaB and Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase Signaling to Promote Platelet-Endothelial Cell Interactions. Frontiers in Immunology. 2021;12:729951.
    
    

42. 42.Fore F, Indriputri C, Mamutse J, Nugraha J. TLR10 and Its Unique Anti-Inflammatory Properties and Potential Use as a Target in Therapeutics. Immune network. 2020;20(3):e21.
    
    

43. 43.Oosting M, Cheng S-C, Bolscher JM, et al. Human TLR10 is an anti-inflammatory pattern-recognition receptor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2014;111(42):E4478–84.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NDoicG5hcyI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czoxMjoiMTExLzQyL0U0NDc4IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjMvMDYvMTIvMjAyMy4wNi4wNy4yMzI5MTA5NS5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

44. 44.Li S, Wang L, Sun S, Wu Q. Hepsin: a multifunctional transmembrane serine protease in pathobiology. The FEBS Journal. 2021;288(18):5252–5264.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/febs.15663&link_type=DOI) 

45. 45.Kazama Y, Hamamoto T, Foster DC, Kisiel W. Hepsin, a putative membrane-associated serine protease, activates human factor VII and initiates a pathway of blood coagulation on the cell surface leading to thrombin formation. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1995;270(1):66–72.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiamJjIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjg6IjI3MC8xLzY2IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjMvMDYvMTIvMjAyMy4wNi4wNy4yMzI5MTA5NS5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

46. 46.Khandekar G, Iyer N, Jagadeeswaran P. Prostasin and hepatocyte growth factor B in factor VIIa generation: Serine protease knockdowns in zebrafish. Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 2020;4(7):1150–1157.
    
    

47. 47.Li S, Peng J, Wang H, et al. Hepsin enhances liver metabolism and inhibits adipocyte browning in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117(22):12359–12367.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NDoicG5hcyI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czoxMjoiMTE3LzIyLzEyMzU5IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjMvMDYvMTIvMjAyMy4wNi4wNy4yMzI5MTA5NS5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

48. 48.Yu IS, Chen HJ, Lee YS, et al. Mice deficient in hepsin, a serine protease, exhibit normal embryogenesis and unchanged hepatocyte regeneration ability. Thromb Haemost. 2000;84(5):865–870.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1055/s-0037-1614129&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=11127869&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F06%2F12%2F2023.06.07.23291095.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000165403900023&link_type=ISI) 

49. 49.Wu Q, Yu D, Post J, et al. Generation and characterization of mice deficient in hepsin, a hepatic transmembrane serine protease. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 1998;101(2):321–326.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1172/JCI1617&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=9435303&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F06%2F12%2F2023.06.07.23291095.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000071668000006&link_type=ISI) 

50. 50.Maimaris G, Christodoulou A, Santama N, Lederer CW. Regulation of ER Composition and Extent, and Putative Action in Protein Networks by ER/NE Protein TMEM147. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(19):10231.
    
    

51. 51.Hahn J, Bressler J, Domingo-Relloso A, et al. DNA methylation analysis identifies novel genetic loci associated with circulating fibrinogen levels in blood. J Thromb Haemost. 2023;S1538-7836(23)00050–8.
    
    

52. 52.Uitte de Willige S, Standeven KF, Philippou H, Ariëns RAS. The pleiotropic role of the fibrinogen gamma’ chain in hemostasis. Blood. 2009;114(19):3994–4001.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MTI6ImJsb29kam91cm5hbCI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czoxMToiMTE0LzE5LzM5OTQiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo1MDoiL21lZHJ4aXYvZWFybHkvMjAyMy8wNi8xMi8yMDIzLjA2LjA3LjIzMjkxMDk1LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 

53. 53.Vedder D, Gerritsen M, Meijers JCM, Nurmohamed MT. Coagulation in gout: is there a link with disease activity? Clin Rheumatol. 2022;41(6):1809–1815.
    
    

54. 54.Wu Y, Chu C, Song P, et al. Plasma D-dimer is a Promising Indicator for the Treatment of Acute Gouty Attack. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2018;48(4):435–439.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NDoiYWNscyI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czo4OiI0OC80LzQzNSI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDIzLzA2LzEyLzIwMjMuMDYuMDcuMjMyOTEwOTUuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 

55. 55.Committee on the Use of Race, Ethnicity, and Ancestry as Population Descriptors in Genomics Research, Board on Health Sciences Policy, Committee on Population, et al. Using Population Descriptors in Genetics and Genomics Research: A New Framework for an Evolving Field. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2023.
    
    

56. 56.Clauss A. [Rapid physiological coagulation method in determination of fibrinogen]. Acta Haematol. 1957;17(4):237–246.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1159/000205234&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=13434757&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F06%2F12%2F2023.06.07.23291095.atom) 

57. 57.Brody JA, Morrison AC, Bis JC, et al. Analysis commons, a team approach to discovery in a big-data environment for genetic epidemiology. Nat Genet. 2017;49(11):1560–1563.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/ng.3968&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=29074945&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F06%2F12%2F2023.06.07.23291095.atom) 

58. 58.McCarthy S, Das S, Kretzschmar W, et al. A reference panel of 64,976 haplotypes for genotype imputation. Nat Genet. 2016;48(10):1279–1283.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/ng.3643&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=27548312&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F06%2F12%2F2023.06.07.23291095.atom) 

59. 59.Chen H, Huffman JE, Brody JA, et al. Efficient Variant Set Mixed Model Association Tests for Continuous and Binary Traits in Large-Scale Whole-Genome Sequencing Studies. Am J Hum Genet. 2019;104(2):260–274.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.12.012&link_type=DOI) 

60. 60.Winkler TW, Day FR, Croteau-Chonka DC, et al. Quality control and conduct of genome-wide association meta-analyses. Nat Protoc. 2014;9(5):1192–1212.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/nprot.2014.071&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24762786&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F06%2F12%2F2023.06.07.23291095.atom) 

61. 61.Mägi R, Morris AP. GWAMA: software for genome-wide association meta-analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11:288.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/1471-2105-11-288&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20509871&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F06%2F12%2F2023.06.07.23291095.atom) 

62. 62.Wu Y, Zheng Z, Visscher PM, Yang J. Quantifying the mapping precision of genome-wide association studies using whole-genome sequencing data. Genome Biol. 2017;18(1):86.
    
    

63. 63.Yang J, Ferreira T, Morris AP, et al. Conditional and joint multiple-SNP analysis of GWAS summary statistics identifies additional variants influencing complex traits. Nat Genet. 2012;44(4):369–375, S1-3.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/ng.2213&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22426310&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F06%2F12%2F2023.06.07.23291095.atom) 

64. 64.Yang J, Lee SH, Goddard ME, Visscher PM. GCTA: a tool for genome-wide complex trait analysis. Am J Hum Genet. 2011;88(1):76–82.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.11.011&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21167468&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F06%2F12%2F2023.06.07.23291095.atom) 

65. 65.Shim H, Chasman DI, Smith JD, et al. A multivariate genome-wide association analysis of 10 LDL subfractions, and their response to statin treatment, in 1868 Caucasians. Plos One. 2015;10(4):e0120758.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1371/journal.pone.0120758&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25898129&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F06%2F12%2F2023.06.07.23291095.atom) 

66. 66.Rentzsch P, Witten D, Cooper GM, Shendure J, Kircher M. CADD: predicting the deleteriousness of variants throughout the human genome. Nucleic Acids Research. 2019;47(D1):D886–D894.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/nar/gky1016&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F06%2F12%2F2023.06.07.23291095.atom) 

67. 67.Kircher M, Witten DM, Jain P, et al. A general framework for estimating the relative pathogenicity of human genetic variants. Nature Genetics. 2014;46(3):310–315.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/ng.2892&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24487276&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F06%2F12%2F2023.06.07.23291095.atom) 

68. 68.Fadista J, Oskolkov N, Hansson O, Groop L. LoFtool: a gene intolerance score based on loss-of-function variants in 60 706 individuals. Bioinformatics. 2017;33(4):471–474.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/bioinformatics/btv602&link_type=DOI) 

69. 69.Ng PC, Henikoff S. Predicting deleterious amino acid substitutions. Genome Res. 2001;11(5):863–874.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NjoiZ2Vub21lIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjg6IjExLzUvODYzIjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjMvMDYvMTIvMjAyMy4wNi4wNy4yMzI5MTA5NS5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

70. 70.Adzhubei IA, Schmidt S, Peshkin L, et al. A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nature Methods. 2010;7(4):248–249.
    
    

71. 71.Adzhubei I, Jordan DM, Sunyaev SR. Predicting functional effect of human missense mutations using PolyPhen-2. Current Protocols in Human Genetics. 2013;Chapter 7:Unit7.20.
    
    

72. 72.Paysan-Lafosse T, Blum M, Chuguransky S, et al. InterPro in 2022. Nucleic Acids Research. 2022;
    
    

73. 73.Pividori M, Rajagopal PS, Barbeira A, et al. PhenomeXcan: Mapping the genome to the phenome through the transcriptome. Sci Adv. 2020;6(37):eaba2083.
    
    [FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6MzoiUERGIjtzOjExOiJqb3VybmFsQ29kZSI7czo4OiJhZHZhbmNlcyI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czoxMzoiNi8zNy9lYWJhMjA4MyI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDIzLzA2LzEyLzIwMjMuMDYuMDcuMjMyOTEwOTUuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 

74. 74.Wen X, Pique-Regi R, Luca F. Integrating molecular QTL data into genome-wide genetic association analysis: Probabilistic assessment of enrichment and colocalization. PLoS Genet. 2017;13(3):e1006646.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006646&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=28278150&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F06%2F12%2F2023.06.07.23291095.atom) 

75. 75.Gamazon ER, Wheeler HE, Shah KP, et al. A gene-based association method for mapping traits using reference transcriptome data. Nature Genetics. 2015;47(9):1091–1098.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/ng.3367&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=26258848&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F06%2F12%2F2023.06.07.23291095.atom) 

76. 76.Barbeira AN, Dickinson SP, Bonazzola R, et al. Exploring the phenotypic consequences of tissue specific gene expression variation inferred from GWAS summary statistics. Nature Communications. 2018;9(1):1825.
    
    

77. 77.Barbeira AN, Bonazzola R, Gamazon ER, et al. Exploiting the GTEx resources to decipher the mechanisms at GWAS loci. Genome Biology. 2021;22(1):49.
    
    

78. 78.Barbeira AN, Pividori M, Zheng J, et al. Integrating predicted transcriptome from multiple tissues improves association detection. PLoS Genet. 2019;15(1):e1007889.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1371/journal.pgen.1007889&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=29739930&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F06%2F12%2F2023.06.07.23291095.atom) 

79. 79.Mancuso N, Freund MK, Johnson R, et al. Probabilistic fine-mapping of transcriptome-wide association studies. Nature Genetics. 2019;51(4):675–682.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41588-019-0367-1&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=30926970&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F06%2F12%2F2023.06.07.23291095.atom) 

80. 80.Denny JC, Ritchie MD, Basford MA, et al. PheWAS: demonstrating the feasibility of a phenome-wide scan to discover gene-disease associations. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(9):1205–1210.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/bioinformatics/btq126&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20335276&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F06%2F12%2F2023.06.07.23291095.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000277225400011&link_type=ISI)