PRIMARY HEALTH CARE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS MODEL IN A PERFORMANCE-BASED CAPITATION SCHEME TO MEASURE NATIONAL HEALTH INSURANCE HEALTH SERVICE EQUITY (PROTOCOL STUDY) ===================================================================================================================================================================== * Ari Dwi Aryani * Adang Bachtiar * Cicilya Candi ## Abstract The inequity of health services still occurs after the implementation of the National Health Insurance (JKN). Regular monitoring of the Performance of Primary Health Care is the key to reducing the inequity of health services as the main goal of JKN. The application of Performance-Based Capitation (KBK) with three indicators since 2016, shows an improvement in Primary Health Care’s performance in improving quality and efficiency in the first level of service in comparison. Primary Health Care performance is influenced by Primary Health Care capacity and has an impact on the output of primary service performance (Health Service Equity). This study aims to develop a model of performance indicators, Primary Health Care capacity and equity indicators, in order to measure healthcare equity. The research design used an exploratory sequential-mixed method. The research is divided into three stages. Phase one is a systematic review to identify indicators that can be used in measuring the capacity, the performance of Primary Health Care and healthcare equity. Phase two is carried out with a qualitative approach with the Consensus Decision Making Group (CDMG) to determine indicators that can be used in measuring the capacity and performance of Primary Health Care as well as measuring health service equity with experts. Phase three is to develop a model of Primary Health Care performance indicators based on a capitation scheme that can measure the equity of healthcare access. This stage is carried out using Multilevel Structural Equation Modeling (MSEM) analysis. It is hoped that this model can be used by Social Security Administrator for Health (BPJS Kesehatan) and the Ministry of Health to measure the performance of Primary Health Care and health service equity. Keywords * Healthcare Equity * Healthcare Capacity * Primary Healthcare Performance ## Introduction Equity to access to healthcare is a challenge faced by many countries around the world. To achieve equitable access to health services, every country in the world is obliged to provide or bear the health insurance of its population in accordance with the main target of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) achieving Universal Health Coverage (UHC). This is in line with the implementation of the National Health Insurance (JKN) which is the state’s commitment to achieving UHC [1]. The principle of equity in the implementation of JKN according to the National Social Security System (SJSN) Law is the similarity of getting services according to medical needs regardless of how much contribution is paid. There has been an increase in access and utilization of health services since JKN began to be implemented in 2014. The utilization rate of health services reached 1.07 million per day, an increase of more than 100%. The utilization rate in Primary Health Care increased by 61.2 per cent to 140.47 per mile [2]. However, these achievements do not necessarily make JKN’s goal of achieving healthcare equity realized. BPJS Kesehatan implements performance-based capitation payments (KBK), which aim to improve Primary Health Care performance through monitoring Primary Health Care performance and linking it to monthly capitation payments. Of the three Primary Health Care KBK performance indicators, only non-specialist referral ratio figures indicators were achieved nationally. Contact Number is an indicator to determine the level of accessibility and utilization of primary services in Primary Health Care by participants. But this indicator is assessed without taking into account geographical conditions and population density. So an indicator is needed that takes into account geographical conditions and the ratio of Primary Health Care compared to participants. Another indicator is the Controlled Prolanis Participant Ratio, Prolanis is the abbreviation of ‘Program Pengelolaan Penyakit Kronis’ or Chronic Disease Management Program. This indicator is to measure the number of Prolanis DM and HT participants in Primary Health Care without taking into account the health condition of the participants and without strengthening promotional and preventive efforts. Currently, the preparation of new benefits of the JKN program is being carried out. The new benefit concept focuses on improving preventive efforts with increased health screening coverage. This concept is in line with the health transformation launched by the Ministry of Health. There was an increase in individual preventive services in the form of health screening for 14 catastrophic diseases. The new benefits in question are based on basic health needs with the aim of providing equitable and sustainable health services. So indicators are needed that can measure promotive and preventive efforts. Within the framework of Primary Health Care performance monitoring, there are three interconnected domains, namely capacity, performance and output (quality, efficiency and equity). The performance of the first level of services is influenced by the capacity of the Primary Health Care and the output is the result of the performance of the Primary Health Care [3]. Several studies using a qualitative approach show that the performance achievement of KBK is influenced by the capacity of Primary Health Care which includes the availability of human resources, the availability of infrastructure, governance and organization, the availability of information systems, and financing [4]. In order to be able to carry out comprehensive performance monitoring, an Primary Health Care capacity indicator is needed. The performance output in the KBK scheme shows an improvement in the quality of Primary Health Care, the quality index value achieved by Performance-based Primary Health Care is better than similar values in the Non-Performance-based Primary Health Care group. Although there is an increase in JKN’s first-level service performance nationally and has an impact on quality and efficiency, there are still differences in performance achievements between regions, per type of Primary Health Care and each Primary Health Care [1]. Therefore, it is necessary to assess the performance of Primary Health Care by region in order to measure equity. This research is to develop a model of Primary Health Care performance indicators in the KBK scheme that can be used to periodically measure and monitor performance. So that in the end, it can increase the equity of health services. **Research Question** * What are the Primary Health Care capacity and performance indicators? * What is the equity measurement indicator of Primary Health Care? * What is the Primary Health Care performance indicator model in the KBK scheme that can measure healthcare equity? ## Materials and Methods ### Conceptual Framework This research is expected to provide updates in the form of a KBK performance indicator model and the weight of assessing the calculation of performance achievements in accordance with the new JKN Program benefit policy based on basic health needs. This conceptual framework is structured in reference to the theoretical framework which is a modification between the research primary service monitoring framework of Erica Barbazza (2019), Dionne Kringos (2020) and Ebert (2017). The primary service monitoring framework that is compiled consists of 3 dimensions, namely Primary Health Care capacity, Primary Health Care performance and primary service results (Fig.1). ![Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2023/06/06/2023.06.06.23291020/F1.medium.gif) [Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/06/06/2023.06.06.23291020/F1) Figure 1. Conceptual Framework ### Research Design The research method used is mixed methods with qualitative methods and quantitative methods. There are several reasons to use mixed methods in health science research. Researchers can seek to look at problems from multiple perspectives to enhance and enrich the meaning of a single perspective. Researchers may also want to contextualise information, to take macro pictures of a system and additional information about individuals. Another reason to combine quantitative and qualitative data is to develop a complete understanding of a problem; develop complementary images; compare, validate, or triangulate results; provide context illustrations for trends; or to examine the process of shared experience (Plano Clark, 2010 in John W. Creswell, 2018). The research consists of 3 phases (Fig. 2) are described below (Table. 1). All the operational definitions are explained underneath (Table. 2). View this table: [Table 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/06/06/2023.06.06.23291020/T1) Table 1. Description of study View this table: [Table 2.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/06/06/2023.06.06.23291020/T2) Table 2. Operational definitions and measurement scale ![Figure 2.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2023/06/06/2023.06.06.23291020/F2.medium.gif) [Figure 2.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/06/06/2023.06.06.23291020/F2) Figure 2. Phase of The Study ### Ethical Research This research has been approved by the Research and Community Service Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Public Health, University of Indonesia (no. Ket-31/UN2.F10.D11/PPM.00.02/2023) From Jan 2023 – Feb 2023 ## Data Availability No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study. All relevant data from this study will be made available upon study completion. ## Author contributions **Conceptualization:** Ari Dwi Aryani, Adang Bachtiar **Funding acquisition:** Ari Dwi Aryani **Methodology:** Ari Dwi Aryani, Adang Bachtiar **Writing (original draft)**: Ari Dwi Aryani **Writing (review & editing)**: Adang Bachtiar, Cicilya Candi * Received June 6, 2023. * Revision received June 6, 2023. * Accepted June 6, 2023. * © 2023, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory This pre-print is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution 4.0 International), CC BY 4.0, as described at [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ## References 1. [1].WHO. 2022. Primary health care measurement framework and indicators: monitoring health systems through a primary health care lens 2. [2].Kementerian Kesehatan, BPJS Kesehatan. 2020. “Kajian Manfaat Jaminan Kesehatan Berbasis Kebutuhan Dasar Kesehatan. Jakarta. 3. [3].Barbazza E, Kringos D, Kruse I, Klazinga NS, Tello JE. 2019. “Creating performance intelligence for primary health care strengthening in Europe”. BMC Health Services Research (2019) 19:1006 [https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4853-z](https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4853-z). 4. [4].Dwi, A.(2022). Factors Affecting the Achievements of Performance-Based Capitation: A Scoping Review. Jurnal Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional (JJKN), 2(1). [https://doi.org/10.53756/jjkn.v2i1.52ISSN](https://doi.org/10.53756/jjkn.v2i1.52ISSN) 5. [5].Veillard J, Cowling K, Bitton B, Ratcliffe H, Kimball M, Barkley S, Mercereau L, Wong E, Taylor C, Hirschhorn LR, Wang H. 2017. “Better Measurement for Performance Improvement in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: The Primary Health Care Performance Initiative (PHCPI) Experience of Conceptual Framework Development and Indicator Selection”. The Milbank Quartely. [https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12301](https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12301) 6. [6].Kringos D, Nutib S, Anastasyc C, Barryd M, Murauskienee L, Sicilianif L, Maeseneerg JD. 2019. “Re-Thinking Performance Assessment For Primary Care: Opinion Of The Expert Panel On Effective Ways Of Investing In Health”. European Journal Of General Practice. Pp. 55–61. ISSN 1751-1402. [Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/13814788.2018.1546284](https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2018.1546284) 7. [7].Republik Indonesia. Peraturan BPJS Kesehatan No 7 Tahun 2019 tentang Petunjuk Pelaksanaan Pembayaran Kapitasi Berbasis Kinerja Pada Fasilitas Kesehatan Tingkat Pertama. 8. [8].Ebert ST, Pittet V, Cornuz J, Senn N, 2017. “Development Of A Monitoring Instrument To Assess The Performance Of The Swiss Primary Care System”. BMC Health Services Research (2017) 17:789 DOI 10.1186/s12913-017-2696-z [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/s12913-017-2696-z&link_type=DOI) 9. [9].Meier, R., Valeri, F., Senn, O., Rosemann, T., & Chmiel, C. (2020). Quality performance and associated factors in Swiss diabetes care – A cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE, 15(5). [https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232686](https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232686) 10. [10].Hysong, S. J., Arredondo, ;, Hughes, ;, Lester, ;, Oswald, ;, Petersen, ;, Woodard, ;, Post, ;, Deperalta, ;, Murphy, ;, Mcknight, ;, Nelson, ;, Haidet, ;, & Hysong, S. J. (2021). Essential Indicators of Quality in Primary Care Settings: An Evidence-Based, Structured, Expert Approach. [https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.13.21262970](https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.13.21262970) 11. [11].Takundwa, R., Jowett, S., McLeod, H., & Peñaloza-Ramos, M. C. (2017). The Effects of Environmental Factors on the Efficiency of Clinical Commissioning Groups in England: A Data Envelopment Analysis. Journal of Medical Systems, 41(6). [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-017-0740-5](https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-017-0740-5) 12. [12].Haj-ali, W., & Tchison, B. H. (2017). Establishing a Primary Care Performance Measurement Framework for Ontario Mise en place d’un cadre pour la mesure du rendement des soins primaires en Ontario Establishing a Primary Care Performance Measurement Framework for Ontario. In HEALTHCARE POLICY (Vol. 12, Issue 3).