ABSTRACT
Introduction With increasing attention to models of transitional support delivered through multisectoral approaches, third sector organizations have supported community reintegration and independent living post hospitalization. This study aimed to identify core elements of these programs, facilitators and barriers to service implementation, and to understand the perspectives of providers and recipients.
Methods and Analysis A comparative case study was conducted, collecting data from two ‘Home from Hospital’ programs in the UK, and two transition support programs in Canada. An inductive thematic analysis generated rich descriptions of each program, and comparative analytical activities generated insights across the cases.
Results Programs provided a range of personalized support for older adults and address many post-discharge needs, including wellbeing assessments, support for instrumental activities of daily living, psychosocial support, and other individualized services directed by the needs and preferences of the service user. Results suggest that these types of programs can act as a ‘safety net’ and promote independent living. Skilled volunteers can positively impact older adults’ experience returning home.
Conclusions When the programs under study are considered in tandem with existing evidence, it facilitates a discussion of how TSO services could be made available more widely to support older adults in their transition experiences.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by an operational grant from Manulife Financial.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee/IRB of Sinai Health gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
We have added the word 'study' to the manuscript title
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study may be available upon reasonable request to the authors
