Association of Long COVID with housing insecurity in the United States, 2022-2023
=================================================================================

* Samuel E. Packard
* Ezra Susser

## ABSTRACT

**Objectives** To assess the association of Long COVID with housing insecurity in the United States.

**Methods** To compare the prevalence of 3 binary indicators of housing insecurity between people with Long COVID (symptoms > 3 months) and COVID-19 survivors who don’t report long-term symptoms, we used survey-weighted regression models on 203,807 responses from the Household Pulse Survey, a representative survey of US households collected September 2022 – April 2023. Among people with Long COVID, we assessed whether functional impairment, current COVID-19 related symptoms, and symptom impact on day-to-day life were associated with a higher prevalence of housing insecurity.

**Results** During the study period, 54,446 (27.2%) respondents with COVID-19 experienced symptoms lasting 3 months or longer, representing an estimated 27 million US adults. People with Long COVID were nearly twice as likely to experience significant difficulty with household expenses (Prevalence ratio [PR] 1.85, 95% CI 1.74-1.96), be behind on housing payments (PR 1.76, 95% CI 1.57-1.99), and face likely eviction or foreclosure (PR 2.12, 95% CI 1.58-2.86). Functional limitation and current symptoms which impact day-to-day life were associated with higher prevalence of housing insecurity.

**Conclusions** Compared with COVID-19 survivors who don’t experience long-term symptoms, people with Long COVID are more likely to report indicators housing insecurity, particularly those with functional limitations and long-term COVID-19 related symptoms impacting day-to-day life. Policies are needed to support people living with chronic illnesses following SARS-CoV-2 infection.

## INTRODUCTION

The determinants and consequences of access to housing are central to public health. Not only can illness and disability adversely impact one’s ability to acquire and maintain adequate housing, but a secure and healthy living environment has numerous influences on physical and mental health. Unfortunately, many people in the United States face the very real threat of housing insecurity. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, more than 2 million households were being threatened with evictions in formal court filings each year (1). Early in the pandemic, further threats to housing security brought on by economic disruptions were recognized as a public health issue, resulting in federal, state and local eviction moratoria as US households struggled with the direct and indirect impacts of the pandemic (2–4).

The end of the federal eviction moratorium in August 2021 coincided with an increasing awareness that many survivors of SARS-CoV-2 infection develop long-term symptoms, signaling a potential public health crisis (5). Long COVID, also known as Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 and Post-COVID Conditions, is an umbrella term for a range of etiologies and illness experiences resulting from or triggered by COVID-19 infection, presenting with heterogeneous severity, duration, and symptomatology across multiple organ systems (6–8). Many people who develop Long COVID will experience profound livelihood changes due to the onset of physical or cognitive impairments resulting in disability, social exclusion, and reduced employment (9). To date, however, no studies have assessed the degree to which people living with Long COVID face increased risk of housing insecurity.

Data from the Household Pulse Survey (HPS), a nationally representative survey of US households produced by the Census Bureau to monitor the social and economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic (10), have been used by researchers to describe the inter-relationship of housing insecurity with financial hardship, disability, and health status during various stages of the pandemic (11–13). In mid-2022, the survey added new questions about long term symptoms following acute COVID-19, making it the first source of nationally representative surveillance data on Long COVID (14,15).

The present study uses these data to assess the association of Long COVID with housing insecurity among US adults with a history of COVID-19. Specifically, we hypothesized that compared to people who had COVID-19 but did not report long-term symptoms, those who report symptoms lasting longer than 3 months that they did not have prior to their active infection (henceforth Long COVID) would be more likely to report indicators of housing insecurity including significant difficulty with routine household expenses, being behind on rent or mortgage payments, and perceived likelihood of eviction or foreclosure. Additionally, we hypothesized that among people with Long COVID, measures of functional impairment, current symptoms, and impact of symptoms on day-to-day life would be associated with increased prevalence of each indicator of housing insecurity.

## METHODS

### Study Population

Respondents were recruited from a stratified sample of domiciles in the US Census Bureau’s Master Address File, with one adult from each household being invited by phone or email to complete a 20-minute online questionnaire (16). We accessed Public Use Files from Phases 3.6 - 3.8 and utilized data from weeks 49 - 56, representing 8 waves of data collected over 7 months from September 14, 2022 – April 10, 2023 (17). We excluded survey responses without confirmed history of COVID-19 infection (positive test result or diagnosis from healthcare provider) and those with onset of COVID-19 in the four weeks prior to taking the survey.

### Measures

#### Housing Tenure and Indicators of Housing Insecurity

Using data available from the HPS, we defined housing tenure as either owning a home or renting. A minimal proportion (< 1%) of non-homeowners reported occupying their home without making payments; these were respondents of predominantly low socio-economic status and collapsed into the “renting” category for this analysis. We operationalized three binary indicators of housing insecurity as outcome variables in this study. Significant difficulty with household expenses was defined as responding “Very difficult” to the question “In the last 7 days, how difficult has it been for your household to pay for usual household expenses, including but not limited to food, rent or mortgage, car payments, medical expenses, student loans, and so on?” Being behind on rent or mortgage payments was defined as responding “No” to the question “Is the household currently caught up on rent [or mortgage] payments?” Perceived likelihood of eviction or foreclosure was defined as responding “Somewhat likely” or “Very likely” to the question “How likely is it that your household will have to leave this home or apartment within the next two months because of eviction [or foreclosure]?” Respondents who reported not making rent or mortgage payments were considered not being behind on payments or at risk of eviction or foreclosure.

#### Long COVID Status, Current Symptoms, and Measures of Functional Impairment

Those who reported ever testing positive or being told by a healthcare provider that they had COVID-19 were asked follow-up questions about long-term symptoms. We defined Long COVID as responding affirmatively to the question “Did you have any symptoms lasting 3 months or longer that you did not have prior to having coronavirus or COVID-19? Long term symptoms may include tiredness or fatigue, difficulty thinking, concentrating, forgetfulness, or memory problems (sometimes referred to as “brain fog”), difficulty breathing or shortness of breath, joint or muscle pain, fast-beating or pounding heart (also known as heart palpitations), chest pain, dizziness on standing, menstrual changes, changes to taste/smell, or inability to exercise.” We defined current symptoms as responding affirmatively to “Are you currently experiencing symptoms?”. Those who reported current symptoms were additionally asked “Do these long-term symptoms reduce your ability to carry out day-to-day activities compared with the time before you had COVID-19?” which we used to define symptom impact as “Not at all,” “A little,” or “A lot”.

Measures of functional impairment were collected on all survey respondents, unrelated to questions about COVID-19. Adapted from the Washington Group Short Set on Functioning (18), these questions asked about difficulty with seeing, hearing, cognition, mobility, self-care, and communication. Within each domain, No Limitation was defined as responding “None at all”, Moderate Limitation was defined as responding “Some difficulty”, and Severe Limitation was defined as responding “A lot of difficulty” or “Cannot do at all”.

#### Socio-Demographic Covariates

Demographic information collected on the survey included age, gender, educational attainment, race and ethnicity, marital status, and prior year household income. In this study, age and gender are hypothesized as confounders as they have been consistently associated with both the exposure and the outcome in previous studies (6,7). While statistical adjustment for confounders can reduce bias in effect estimates, unnecessary adjustment for effect modifiers, colliders, and mediators can have the opposite effect of increasing bias (19). As race/ethnicity, income, and household size likely have a role in the hypothesized association but were not specifically hypothesized as confounders, they were added as covariates in a separate sensitivity analysis.

#### Statistical Analysis

We used person-level survey weights provided by the HPS to estimate counts and proportions of study variables for the target population of US adults with a history of COVID-19. For bivariate analyses, we described the unadjusted survey-weighted proportions of housing insecurity indicators, socio-demographic covariates, functional limitations, and symptoms by Long COVID status.

To assess the association of housing insecurity and Long COVID, we used survey-weighted multivariable generalized linear models with a quasi-Poisson distribution, logarithmic link function, and robust standard errors to estimate adjusted prevalence ratios (20). Separate models were fitted for each indicator of housing insecurity in three sets of models as described below, adjusted for age, gender, and survey wave.

First, we regressed housing insecurity indicators on Long COVID, including an interaction term with housing tenure to assess whether the effect estimates differed between homeowners and renters. Second, we regressed indicators of housing insecurity on measures of functional limitation among people with Long COVID. Lastly, we regressed housing insecurity indicators on the presence or absence of current Long COVID symptoms and impact of these symptoms on day-to-day life among people with Long COVID. As a sensitivity analysis, we additionally adjusted each model for education, income, race/ethnicity, and household size. All analyses were performed in R version 4.2.2 using the survey package (21,22). Conforming to Columbia University Institutional Review Boards policy on Use of Publicly Available Datasets for Research, formal review was not required.

## RESULTS

### Descriptive Analysis

A total of 203,807 survey respondents met inclusion criteria across the 8 waves of HPS data, representing an estimated 94,448,919 US adults with a history of confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, of whom an estimated 27,250,409 (28.8%) experienced new symptoms lasting 3 months or longer, meeting the study definition of Long COVID. One in five US adults with a history of COVID-19 (20.1%, 95% CI 19.7 – 20.1) experienced at least one measure of housing insecurity during the study period, including significant difficulty with household expenses (16.2%, 15.9 – 17.0), being behind on rent or mortgage payments (6.0%, 5.7 – 6.0), or being at risk of eviction or foreclosure (1.9%, 1.8 – 2.0). Inclusion in the study overall and for each sub-analysis is illustrated in Figure 1. Overall, 16% of eligible respondents were excluded due to missing data, and a comparison of included and excluded participants is provided in Table S1.

![Figure 1:](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2023/06/06/2023.06.05.23290930/F1.medium.gif)

[Figure 1:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/06/06/2023.06.05.23290930/F1)

Figure 1: Inclusion of respondents in the overall study sample and each sub-analysis.

Demographic characteristics, housing data, and health measures are summarized by Long COVID status in Table 1. People with Long COVID were more likely than those without Long COVID to rent rather than own their home and more likely to report all three indicators of housing insecurity. People with Long COVID were also more likely to report moderate or severe functional limitation across each of the five domains assessed. For example, roughly two-thirds of people with Long COVID experienced cognitive limitations, nearly twice the prevalence of those without. Just under half of those with Long COVID were currently experiencing Long COVID symptoms at the time of the survey (43.8%, 43.0 – 45.0), and around 8 in 10 of these people reported that their symptoms reduced their ability to carry out day-to-day activities compared with the time preceding their active infection (79.8%, 78.9 – 81.0). People with Long COVID were additionally more likely to be female, transgender, or non-binary, more likely to be widowed, divorced, or separated, less likely to have a college degree, and more likely to report a 2021 household income of $50,000 or less.

View this table:
[Table 1:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/06/06/2023.06.05.23290930/T1)

Table 1: Selected demographic characteristics, indicators of housing insecurity, functional limitations, and COVID-19 symptoms by illness status among US adults with a history of COVID-19, September 2022 – April 2023.

### Housing Insecurity and Long COVID

Models of the association of Long COVID with housing insecurity and its interaction with housing tenure are summarized in Table 2. The adjusted prevalence of housing insecurity among people with Long COVID was nearly twice as high as those without Long COVID, measured as difficulty with household expenses (Prevalence ratio [PR] 1.82, CI 1.72 - 1.93; P<.001), being behind on rent or mortgage (PR 1.76, CI 1.57 - 1.98; P<.001), or facing likely eviction or foreclosure (PR 2.12, CI 1.58 - 2.85; P<.001). Households renting their homes were also 2 - 6 times more likely to report housing insecurity than homeowners. There was not consistent evidence for multiplicative interaction between these exposures, though Long COVID was slightly less associated with difficulty making household expenses for renters compared to homeowners.

View this table:
[Table 2:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/06/06/2023.06.05.23290930/T2)

Table 2: Association between Long COVID, Housing Tenure, and Housing Insecurity among adults with history of confirmed COVID-19 in the United States, September 2022 – April 2023.

Models of the association between functional impairment and housing insecurity among people with Long COVID and are summarized in Figure 2 and Table S2. There was a consistent trend of increased housing insecurity among people with Long COVID who reported moderate or severe functional limitation across all domains. Difficulty making household expenses was more strongly associated with severe limitation compared to moderate limitation, but this difference was less apparent for being behind on housing payments or being at risk of eviction or foreclosure.

![Figure 2:](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2023/06/06/2023.06.05.23290930/F2.medium.gif)

[Figure 2:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/06/06/2023.06.05.23290930/F2)

Figure 2: Association of Functional Limitations with Housing Insecurity Among Adults with Long COVID in the United States, September 2022 – April 2023. Estimates are displayed as Prevalence Ratios (PR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI), adjusted for age, gender, and survey wave. The reference group for each PR is respondents who reported no functional limitation. Models included all survey respondents with Long COVID (n = 54,446)

Models estimating the association of currents symptoms and symptom impact with housing insecurity among people with Long COVID are summarized in Table 3. The adjusted prevalence of housing insecurity was slightly elevated among people whose symptoms were current compared to those not currently experiencing symptoms. Among those who reported current symptoms, the prevalence of housing insecurity was strongly associated with reported impact of symptoms on day-to-day life compared to the time preceding SARS-CoV-2 infection. Compared to those who reported that their current symptoms did not impact their day-to-day life compared to the time before they had COVID-19, those who reported that their symptoms impacted their life “a lot” were over 3 times more likely to report difficulty making household expenses (PR 3.41, CI 2.97 – 3.92) and being behind on rent (PR 3.50, CI 2.66 – 4.61), and nearly tenfold more likely to be at risk for eviction or foreclosure (PR 9.21, CI 5.55-15.29).

View this table:
[Table 3:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/06/06/2023.06.05.23290930/T3)

Table 3: Association between Symptoms and Housing Insecurity Among Adults with Long COVID in the United States, September 2022 – April 2023

Sensitivity analyses are summarized in Tables S3 –S5. Additional adjustment in the models for education, income, race/ethnicity, and household size resulted in a small (∼10%) attenuations to the magnitudes of the effect sizes reported.

## DISCUSSION

Based on a large, representative survey of US households during the third year of the COVID-19 pandemic, over 25 million US adults were estimated to have experienced long-term symptoms after infection with SARS-CoV-2. This represents 29% of COVID-19 survivors, which is higher than some conservative estimates of the prevalence of Long COVID but consistent with prior studies in the United States (23–26).

One third of people with Long COVID were either struggling to make household expenses, behind on housing payments, or facing likely eviction or foreclosure in the near future. These measures of housing insecurity were roughly twice as prevalent among people with Long COVID compared to those who had COVID-19 without long term symptoms, and significantly more prevalent among renters compared to homeowners. Among people living with Long COVID, housing insecurity was significantly elevated among those who reported that these long-term symptoms reduce their ability to carry out day-to-day activities compared to the time prior to their illness, and significantly elevated among those who specifically report moderate or severe functional impairments, particularly cognitive, mobility, and self-care limitations.

This research illuminates the profound ongoing social and economic consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite a significant decline in incident COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths, the pandemic continues to impact millions of people in the US on a daily basis, particularly those survivors of SARS-CoV-2 infection who continue to experience long-term symptoms. While we are still learning about the underlying causes of Long COVID, it is clear that many survivors of COVID-19 experience lasting health problems, posing a significant population health challenge. Even after the end of the federal Public Health Emergency in the United Statues (27), is essential that sustained pandemic recovery efforts acknowledge and address the ongoing public health crisis of Long COVID and provide support through continued COVID-19 prevention, disability accommodations at work, and housing support and renter protection. As the manifold health and social consequences of housing insecurity and homelessness are well documented, addressing housing insecurity must be at the forefront of any effective effort to address Long COVID as public health crisis. The large and increasing number of people who are already homeless in the United States adds to the urgency.

This study was cross-sectional, and there are various potential interpretations of the observed associations. People with Long COVID may experience functional limitations and disability that lead to disrupted livelihoods and subsequent challenges in securing and maintaining suitable housing. Alternatively, those with a history of unstable housing may be more prone to developing sequelae from COVID-19 due to material deprivation and stress. Notably, the prevalence of both Long COVID and housing insecurity were elevated among vulnerable populations, and adjustment for race, ethnicity, income, and education slightly attenuated the magnitude of the association between Long COVID and housing insecurity. A better understanding of how social and structural determinants of health shape the increased risk of economic hardship faced by people with Long COVID should be a priority for future research. Regardless of the specific causal pathways involved, however, this evidence demonstrates that many people living with Long COVID face significant economic and social hardships while effective treatments are not yet available.

Strengths of this paper include leveraging hundreds of thousands of survey responses over a 7-month period from a nationally representative survey during the third year of the COVID-19 pandemic, providing generalizable estimates of the downstream public health manifestations of the first several waves of infections. This study does also has several limitations. First, assessment of Long COVID status was subject to several constraints. Only those who reported a positive COVID-19 test or physician confirmed diagnosis were asked about long-term symptoms, a conditional case definition for Long COVID which excludes people who were unable to access testing or healthcare at the time of their active infection for any reason, and the social and structural drivers of inequality in access to these resources have been well-documented (28,29). Determination of illness duration was not possible from these data, and questions on the impact of Long COVID symptoms on day-to-day life were limited to only those experiencing symptoms at the time of the survey, despite previous research on episodic and relapsing patterns of symptoms in many people with Long COVID (7,30). Second, the potential for recall and selection bias may challenge the internal and external validity of our results. Recall bias, or any tendency of those experiencing housing insecurity to be systematically more or less likely to recall long term symptoms or attribute non-specific symptoms to COVID-19, could bias estimates away from or towards the null, respectively. Additionally, overall response rates to the survey are low and participation from minoritized communities was generally lower than from non-Hispanic white residents.

This study highlights the fact that millions of people with Long COVID struggle with routine expenses, including housing payments, and may be at risk of eviction or foreclosure. While longitudinal and qualitative data are needed to describe in more granular and causal terms how the illness experience of Long COVID relates to social and economic hardships in the context of other disruptive long-term impacts of the pandemic, it is clear that the pandemic continues to have deep and sustained impacts on those with viral onset chronic illness, and a comprehensive response and recovery effort will require acknowledging, monitoring, and supporting people with Long COVID.

## Supporting information

Supplement [[supplements/290930_file05.docx]](pending:yes)

## Data Availability

Data used in this present work are publicly available online at [https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/household-pulse-survey/datasets.html](https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/household-pulse-survey/datasets.html)

[https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/household-pulse-survey/datasets.html](https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/household-pulse-survey/datasets.html) 

## ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We would like to thank Lisa McCorkell and Letícia Soares from the Patient-Led Research Collaborative for their helpful comments on a previous draft of this manuscript. Results from this study were presented at the 2023 Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists Annual Meeting. This work was supported by National Institute of Mental Health #T32-MH013043.

*   Received June 5, 2023.
*   Revision received June 5, 2023.
*   Accepted June 6, 2023.


*   © 2023, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

This pre-print is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International), CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, as described at [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

## REFERENCES

1.  1.Gromis A, Fellows I, Hendrickson JR, Edmonds L, Leung L, Porton A, et al. Estimating eviction prevalence across the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2022 May 24;119(21):e2116169119.
    
    

2.  2.Raajkumar A. How Effective Were National, State, and Local Eviction Moratoria? 2022 Jun 21 [cited 2023 Jan 16]; Available from: [https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/notes/feds-notes/how-effective-were-national-state-and-local-eviction-moratoria-20220621.html](https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/notes/feds-notes/how-effective-were-national-state-and-local-eviction-moratoria-20220621.html)
    
    

3.  3.Benfer EA, Vlahov D, Long MY, Walker-Wells E, Pottenger JL, Gonsalves G, et al. Eviction, Health Inequity, and the Spread of COVID-19: Housing Policy as a Primary Pandemic Mitigation Strategy. J Urban Health. 2021 Feb;98(1):1–12.
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F06%2F06%2F2023.06.05.23290930.atom) 

4.  4.Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.), Raajkumar AV. How Effective Were National, State, and Local Eviction Moratoria? FEDS Notes. 2022 Jun;(2022-06–21):None-None.
    
    

5.  5.Phillips S, Williams MA. Confronting Our Next National Health Disaster — Long-Haul Covid. N Engl J Med. 2021 Aug 12;385(7):577–9.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1056/NEJMp2109285&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F06%2F06%2F2023.06.05.23290930.atom) 

6.  6.Michelen M, Manoharan L, Elkheir N, Cheng V, Dagens A, Hastie C, et al. Characterising long COVID: a living systematic review. BMJ Global Health. 2021 Sep 1;6(9):e005427.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NToiYm1qZ2giO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6MTE6IjYvOS9lMDA1NDI3IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjMvMDYvMDYvMjAyMy4wNi4wNS4yMzI5MDkzMC5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

7.  7.Davis HE, McCorkell L, Vogel JM, Topol EJ. Long COVID: major findings, mechanisms and recommendations. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2023 Jan 13;1–14.
    
    

8.  8.Castanares-Zapatero D, Chalon P, Kohn L, Dauvrin M, Detollenaere J,  Maertens de Noordhout C, et al. Pathophysiology and mechanism of long COVID: a comprehensive review. Ann Med. 2022 Dec;54(1):1473–87.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1080/07853890.2022.2076901&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=35594336&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F06%2F06%2F2023.06.05.23290930.atom) 

9.  9.Nittas V, Gao M, West EA, Ballouz T, Menges D, Wulf Hanson S, et al. Long COVID Through a Public Health Lens: An Umbrella Review. Public Health Rev [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2023 Jan 16];43. Available from: [https://www.ssph-journal.org/articles/10.3389/phrs.2022.1604501/full](https://www.ssph-journal.org/articles/10.3389/phrs.2022.1604501/full)
    
    

10. 10.US Census Bureau. Measuring Household Experiences during the Coronavirus Pandemic [Internet]. Census.gov. [cited 2022 Nov 11]. Available from: [https://www.census.gov/householdpulsedata](https://www.census.gov/householdpulsedata)
    
    

11. 11.Bushman G, Mehdipanah R. Housing and health inequities during COVID-19: findings from the national Household Pulse Survey. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2022 Feb;76(2):121– 7.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NDoiamVjaCI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czo4OiI3Ni8yLzEyMSI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDIzLzA2LzA2LzIwMjMuMDYuMDUuMjMyOTA5MzAuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 

12. 12.Friedman C. Housing insecurity of medicaid beneficiaries with cognitive disabilities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Disability and Health Journal. 2023 Jan 1;16(1):101375.
    
    

13. 13.Kim D. Financial hardship and social assistance as determinants of mental health and food and housing insecurity during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. SSM Popul Health. 2021 Dec;16:100862.
    
    

14. 14.Levine RL. Addressing the Long-term Effects of COVID-19. JAMA. 2022 Sep 6;328(9):823–4.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/jama.2022.14089&link_type=DOI) 

15. 15.US Census. Household Pulse Survey Phase 3.5 [Internet]. Census.gov. [cited 2022 Nov 11]. Available from: [https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2022/household-pulse-phase-3-5.html](https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2022/household-pulse-phase-3-5.html)
    
    

16. 16.US Census Bureau. Household Pulse Survey Technical Documentation [Internet]. Census.gov. [cited 2023 Jun 3]. Available from: [https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/household-pulse-survey/technical-documentation.html](https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/household-pulse-survey/technical-documentation.html)
    
    

17. 17.US Census Bureau. Household Pulse Survey Public Use File (PUF) [Internet]. Census.gov. [cited 2022 Nov 11]. Available from: [https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/household-pulse-survey/datasets.html](https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/household-pulse-survey/datasets.html)
    
    

18. 18.Weeks JD, Dahlhamer JM, Madans JH, Maitland A. Measuring disability_J: an examination of differences between the Washington Group Short Set on Functioning and the American Community Survey disability questions. National Center for Health Statistics (U.S.), editor. National Health Statistics Reports [Internet]. 2021 Aug 9;(161). Available from: [https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/107202](https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/107202)
    
    

19. 19.Wysocki AC, Lawson KM, Rhemtulla M. Statistical Control Requires Causal Justification. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science. 2022 Apr 1;5(2):25152459221095824.
    
    

20. 20.Zou G. A Modified Poisson Regression Approach to Prospective Studies with Binary Data. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2004 Apr 1;159(7):702–6.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/aje/kwh090&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=15033648&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F06%2F06%2F2023.06.05.23290930.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000220484900009&link_type=ISI) 

21. 21.R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Internet]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2021. Available from: [https://www.R-project.org](https://www.R-project.org)
    
    

22. 22.Lumley T. survey: analysis of complex survey samples. 2020.
    
    

23. 23.Perlis RH, Santillana M, Ognyanova K, Safarpour A, Lunz Trujillo K, Simonson MD, et al. Prevalence and Correlates of Long COVID Symptoms Among US Adults. JAMA Network Open. 2022 Oct 27;5(10):e2238804.
    
    

24. 24.Robertson MM, Qasmieh SA, Kulkarni SG, Teasdale CA, Jones HE, McNairy M, et al. The Epidemiology of Long Coronavirus Disease in US Adults. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2023 May 1;76(9):1636–45.
    
    

25. 25.Spatz ES, Gottlieb M, Wisk LE, Anderson J, Chang AM, Gentile NL, et al. Three-Month Symptom Profiles Among Symptomatic Adults With Positive and Negative Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Tests: A Prospective Cohort Study From the INSPIRE Group. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2023 May 1;76(9):1559–66.
    
    

26. 26.O’Mahoney LL, Routen A, Gillies C, Ekezie W, Welford A, Zhang A, et al. The prevalence and long-term health effects of Long Covid among hospitalised and non-hospitalised populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. eClinicalMedicine. 2023 Jan 1;55:101762.
    
    

27. 27.Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs, US Department of Health and Human Services. Fact Sheet: End of the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency [Internet]. HHS.gov. 2023 [cited 2023 May 12]. Available from: [https://www.hhs.gov/about/news/2023/05/09/fact-sheet-end-of-the-covid-19-public-health-emergency.html](https://www.hhs.gov/about/news/2023/05/09/fact-sheet-end-of-the-covid-19-public-health-emergency.html)
    
    

28. 28.Mody A, Pfeifauf K, Geng EH. Using Lorenz Curves to Measure Racial Inequities in COVID-19 Testing. JAMA Network Open. 2021 Jan 8;4(1):e2032696.
    
    

29. 29.Bilal U, Tabb LP, Barber S, Diez Roux AV. Spatial Inequities in COVID-19 Testing, Positivity, Confirmed Cases, and Mortality in 3 U.S. Cities. Ann Intern Med. 2021 Jul 20;174(7):936–44.
    
    

30. 30.Davis HE, Assaf GS, McCorkell L, Wei H, Low RJ, Re’em Y, et al. Characterizing long COVID in an international cohort: 7 months of symptoms and their impact. EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Aug;38:101019.