Abstract
Mechanisms underlying chronic pain are insufficiently understood. Preclinical evidence suggests a potential contribution of excitatory glutamatergic and inhibitory GABAergic imbalances in pain-relevant brain areas, such as a lower excitatory/inhibitory tone in the brainstem periaqueductal grey (PAG). This cross-sectional magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) study investigated whether a lower excitatory/inhibitory tone is also observed in the PAG of patients with non-specific chronic low back pain (CLBP) and whether this would relate to altered psychophysical measures of descending pain modulation and experimental pressure pain sensitivity. Specifically, the ratio between pooled glutamate and glutamine and GABA levels (Glx/GABA), Glx and GABA in the PAG were compared between CLBP patients and pain-free controls. Further, associations of Glx/GABA with conditioned pain modulation (CPM) effects and pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) were assessed.
MRS was acquired on a 3T Philipps MR system using a point-resolved spectroscopy sequence optimized with very selective saturation pulses (OVERPRESS) and voxel-based flip angle calibration in a 1.1 mL volume of interest. Data from 41 CLBP patients (median [interquartile range]: 54 years [41 - 65], 22 females) and 29 age- and sex-matched controls (47 years [34 - 67], 17 females) fulfilled MRS quality criteria. CPM and PPTs were assessed at the lower back as most painful area and the non-dominant hand as pain-free control area. The CPM paradigm consisted of PPTs applied before, during (parallel CPM effect) and after a cold water bath and an ambient temperature water bath as control paradigm to identify ‘true’ CPM effects.
In the PAG of CLBP patients, a lower Glx/GABA ratio, i.e. a lower excitatory/inhibitory tone, was observed (P = 0.002, partial η2 = 0.14) driven by decreased Glx (P = 0.012, partial η2 = 0.11) and increased GABA (P = 0.038, d = 0.46). CLBP patients showed disrupted associations between Glx/GABA and PPTs compared to controls in both areas (lower back: P = 0.004, partial η2 = 0.12; hand: P = 0.002, partial η2 = 0.16). In controls, lower Glx/GABA was associated with lower PPTs (lower back: r = 0.48, P = 0.009, hand: r = 0.53, P = 0.003), but this link was missing in CLBP patients (r’s > -0.23, P’s > 0.150). Additionally, CLBP patients with more severe clinical pain showed smaller CPM effects at the hand (rho = 0.54, P = 0.003).
These findings suggest a dysfunction of the PAG in patients with CLBP and might indicate altered descending inhibition of deep tissue afferents.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the Clinical Research Priority Program "Pain" of the University of Zurich. L. Sirucek is supported by the Theodor und Ida Herzog-Egli Stiftung. The authors express their gratitude to Emma Louise Kessler, MD, for her generous donation to the Zurich Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee of "Kantonale Ethikkommission Zurich" gave ethical approval for this work (Nr.: 2019-00136).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data of participants who gave informed consent for further use of their anonymized data will be made available upon request.
