Abstract
Objective Recommendations on early childhood allergy prevention (ECAP) are found in clinical practice guidelines (CPG) and food-based dietary guidelines (FBDG). This study aims to compare the methodological quality and the content of recommendations in CPGs and FBDGs for ECAP.
Study Design and Setting We assessed methodological quality of a sample of 36 guidelines (23 CPGs, 13 FBDGs), retrieved through extensive searching, with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation tool (AGREE) II. On a subset of recommendations, we performed an in-depth analysis by type of intervention for direction of and strength of recommendation and level of evidence. Descriptive analysis was conducted with SPSS 27.
Results CPGs scored higher than FBDGs in most AGREE domains (3, 4, 5 and 6). The 36 guidelines contain 280 recommendations on ECAP, with 68 addressing the introduction of complementary foods and allergenic foods. We found only slight differences between those recommendations in CPGs and FBDGs.
Conclusion FBDGs on ECAP are of lower quality than CPGs. This does not affect their recommendations on the introduction of complementary foods and allergenic foods but may compromise their trustworthiness.
What is new?
- Methodological quality of guidelines on ECAP is low, especially in FBDGs
- Recommendations on introduction of complementary feeding rarely vary
- Recommendations on introduction of potential allergenic foods show slight variation
- More attention is needed on the slight differences and the underlying evidence
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study is part of the interdisciplinary public health research group HELICAP (Health literacy in early childhood allergy prevention, www.helicap.org), located at the Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, University of Education Freiburg, University of Regensburg and Hanover Medical School (Steering committee members: Christian Apfelbacher, Eva Maria Bitzer, Susanne Brandstetter, Janina Curbach, Marie-Luise Dierks, Markus Antonus Wirtz). The research group HELICAP is funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG, project number: 409800133, grant number: FOR 2959 BI 755/2-1). The funding source was not involved in study design, collection, analysis and interpretation of the data, the writing of the report and the decision to submit the article for publication.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
(evamaria.bitzer{at}ph-freiburg.de)
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are contained in the manuscript or available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.
