ABSTRACT
Objective We sought to explore the variation in emotional responses and identify clusters of emotional patterns associated with sociodemographic, clinical, and familial factors.
Methods A large-scale survey with questions on demographics, experiences, and emotions at the time of diagnosis was sent to childhood cancer caregivers and completed between August 2012 and April 2019. Dimensionality reduction and statistical tests for independence were used to investigate relationships between sociodemographic, clinical, and psychosocial factors and 32 representative emotions.
Results Data from 3142 respondents were analyzed. Through principal components analysis and t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding analysis, three clusters of emotional responses were identified, captured 44%, 20% and 36% of respondents, respectively. Hallmark emotions within each cluster were “anger and grief” (Cluster 1), “pessimism, relief, impatience, insecurity, discouragement, and calm” (Cluster 2), and “hope” (Cluster 3). Cluster membership was associated with differences in parental factors, such as educational attainment, family income, and biological parent status, as well as child-specific factors, including age at diagnosis and cancer type.
Conclusions The study revealed substantial heterogeneity in emotional responses to a child’s cancer diagnosis than previously recognized, with differences linked to both caregiver and child-related factors. These findings underscore the importance of developing responsive and effective programs to improve targeted support for caregivers from the time of diagnosis throughout a family’s childhood cancer journey.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by Alex's Lemonade Stand Foundation (CEW, LT, KMW), The National Institutes of Health R21CA242439-01 (KMW) and The Children's Health and Discovery Initiative of Translating Duke Health (KWM).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
IRB of Duke University Health System gave ethical approval for this work (Pro00100771).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Funding: This work was supported by Alex’s Lemonade Stand Foundation (CEW, LT, KMW), The National Institutes of Health R21CA242439-01 (KMW) and The Children’s Health and Discovery Initiative of Translating Duke Health (KWM).
Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.
Data availability: De-identified, individual-level data are available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Data Availability
De-identified, individual-level data are available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- ALSF
- Alex’s Lemonade Stand Foundation
- CNS
- central nervous system
- MCC
- My Childhood Cancer
- PCA
- Principal component analysis
- t-SNE
- t-stochastic neighbor embedding
