Abstract
Reliable assessment of suicide and self-harm risk in emergency medicine is critical for effective intervention and treatment of patients affected by mental health disorders. Teams of clinicians are faced with the challenge of rapidly integrating medical history, wide-ranging psychosocial factors, and real-time patient observations to inform diagnosis, treatment and referral decisions. Patient outcomes therefore depend on the reliable flow of information though networks of clinical staff and information systems. We studied information flow at a systems-level in a tertiary hospital emergency department using network models and machine learning. Data were gathered by mapping trajectories and recording clinical interactions for patients at suspected risk of suicide or self-harm. A network model constructed from the data revealed communities closely aligned with underlying clinical team structure. By analysing connectivity patterns in the network model we identified a vulnerability in the system with the potential to adversely impact information flow. We then developed an algorithmic strategy to mitigate this risk by targeted strengthening of links between clinical teams. Finally, we investigated a novel application of machine learning for distinguishing specific interactions along a patient’s trajectory which were most likely to precipitate a psychiatric referral. Together, our results demonstrate a new framework for assessing and reinforcing important information pathways that guide clinical decision processes and provide complimentary insights for improving clinical practice and operational models in emergency medicine for patients at risk of suicide or self-harm.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
SH and MS received funding for this research from The University of Western Australia Young Lives Matter Foundation (UWA YLM) which was a cross-disciplinary research initiative active from 2018 to 2021. UWA YLM supported research at The University of Western Australia through internal funding schemes (https://www.research.uwa.edu.au/). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was approved as a Quality Activity by WA Health North Metropolitan Health Service and received Ethics Approval from the Chair of the North Metropolitan Health Service Research Ethics Committee.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data and code for this study are available online at https://github.com/mhmcc/ED-interaction-mapping
