Persistent humoral immunity in children and adolescents throughout the COVID-19 pandemic (June 2020 to July 2022): a prospective school-based cohort study (Ciao Corona) in Switzerland

Introduction

Monitoring the evolution of seroprevalence and assessing changes in humoral immunity against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in children and adolescents over time is important to understand how the pandemic evolved and to inform public health measures including vaccination strategies as well as preventive measures at school.

Several serological studies were conducted to detect SARS-CoV-2 infections in children and adolescents and to determine seroprevalence at different times of the pandemic [1–6]. However, little is known about the development and persistence of those antibodies over time as most studies were cross-sectional [1–5] and there is only limited data from longitudinal studies assessing the humoral immunity in children and adolescents [7]. A systematic review [7] reported persistence of cellular and humoral immunity in the pre-Omicron period lasting for at least 10 to 12 months in children and adolescents. Meanwhile, few studies [8, 9] focused on immune responses following Omicron, addressing neutralising activity and differentiating between natural infection, vaccination, or both [10].

Many countries started to administer COVID-19 vaccines to children and adolescents in 2021 to 2022, after trials demonstrated the effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccine against re-infection [11, 12] or severe disease [13], and vaccination was approved by the Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency. In Switzerland, the COVID-19 vaccine was available for adolescents aged 12 years and older by mid 2021 and for children aged 5 to 11 years in early 2022 [14].

In the beginning of 2022, the high incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infections in children and adolescents due to the highly infectious Omicron variant despite the rollout of vaccines raised concerns [15–17]. In that period, the coincidence of incomplete immunisation of youth and the highly transmissible Omicron variant affected the evolution of seroprevalence and the longitudinal development of the humoral immunity in children and adolescents.

In this observational school-based study, we aimed to assess the longitudinal development of the humoral immunity in children and adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic with a particular focus on how anti-spike IgG antibodies and neutralising response changed during the first Omicron peak in the context of (re-)infections, vaccinations, or their combination.

Method

Timeline of testing

Venous blood samples were collected in five testing rounds. The first testing round (T1) was performed in June/July 2020, the second (T2) in October/November 2020, the third (T3) in March/April 2021, the fourth (T4) in November/December 2021 and the last fifth (T5) testing round in June/July 2022. As shown in the study participant flow chart (Figure 1), we followed corresponding repeated cross-sectional cohorts and a longitudinal cohort. The longitudinal cohort consisted of children and adolescents participating in the last (T5) and at least three previous testing rounds. In addition, we only included children and adolescents where the seroconversion from one to the subsequent testing round was detectable.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1:

Flowchart of participants. Newly enrolled children and adolescents did not participate in previous rounds. *Longitudinal cohort consists of children and adolescents participating in the last (T5) and at least three other testing rounds. Yrs: years.

Results

2. Repeated cross-sectional cohorts: Development of seroprevalence

Figure 2 shows the seroprevalence of children and adolescents for each timepoint of testing. Seroprevalence increased with each testing round in children and adolescents. Between T4 (Nov/Dec 2021) and T5 (Jun/Jul 2022) seroprevalence increased from 46.4% [95% credible interval [CrI] 42.6-51.0%] to 96.9% [95% CrI 95.2-98.1%] in the overall study population and from 31.3% [95% CrI 27.5-35.9%] to 95.8% [95% CrI 93.1-97.8%] among unvaccinated children and adolescents. At T4, 25.3% of all children and adolescents were vaccinated (all of whom were ≥12yrs old), and at T5 43.4% (28% of children <12 and 58% of adolescents ≥12yrs old) (see Table 1). When stratifying according to age, children below the age of 12 had a bigger increase in seroprevalence between T4 and T5 (28.4% [95% CrI 24.2-33.2%] to 95.7% [95% CrI 93.4-97.4%], respectively) compared to adolescents of 12 years or more (69.4% [95% CrI 64.0-75.4%] to 98.4% [95% CrI 97.3-99.2%], respectively) (Supplementary Table 2).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 2:

Evolution of the incidence of diagnosed SARS-CoV-2 infections in Switzerland and participants’ seroprevalence from June 2020 to July 2022 using the cross-sectional cohort. Unvaccinated (light blue): unvaccinated children and adolescents across all 5 testing rounds; overall (dark blue): all children and adolescents participating; grey: predominant variant of concern in Switzerland (>50% of VOC circulating); *Seroprevalence was adjusted for school level, sex and district and test sensitivity and specificity.

3. Longitudinal Cohort: Trajectory of Anti-spike IgG Antibodies

Figure 3 shows the trajectory of anti-spike IgG antibodies using the longitudinal cohort (n = 386) excluding children and adolescents who never tested seropositive throughout all five testing rounds (n= 37) and children and adolescents who seroconverted between T4 (Nov/Dec 2021) and T5 (Jun/Jul 2022) (n= 328). We categorised participants into four groups according to their time of seroconversion, e.g., group 1 seroconverted before T1 (Jun/Jul 2020), group 2 seroconverted between T1 (Jun/Jul 2020) and T2 (Oct/Nov 2020), group 3 seroconverted between T2 (Oct/Nov 2020) and T3 (Mar/Apr 2021), and group 4 seroconverted between T3 (Mar/Apr 2021) and T4 (Nov/Dec 2021). Anti-spike IgG antibodies remained detectable 6 months (T4 to T5: 99% (n= 208/210)), 12 months (T3 to T5: 99% (n= 113/114)), 18 months (T2 to T5: 93% (n= 28/30)) or 24 months (T1 to T5: 69% (n= 22/32)) in children and adolescents after seroconversion, respectively. At T5, antibodies were still detectable in 99% (n= 384/386) of all children and adolescents who seroconverted in any previous testing round (Supplementary Figure 1 shows the MFI ratio converted to U/ml for Roche Elecsys anti-spike IgG (WHO measure)). Anti-spike IgG titres increased with each testing round either by reinfection, vaccination, or a combination of the two. A first increase in antibody titres occurred between T3 and T4, coinciding with the introduction of vaccination in this age group in Switzerland. The highest increase in titres, visualised by the most substantial colour change in Figure 3, occurred between T4 and T5 when Omicron became the predominant VOC.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 3:

Individual trajectories of anti-spike IgG (anti-S IgG) mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) ratios over time separated by first incidence of seropositive result (n= 386). S-IgG+: Anti-Spike IgG positive MFI ratio; 1) S-IgG+ since T1: n= 32; 2) S-IgG+ since T2: n= 30; 3) S-IgG+ since T3: n= 114; 4) S-IgG+ since T4: n= 210. Children and adolescents seroconverting from T4 to T5 are not shown (n= 328). Grey denotes seronegative anti-spike IgG result (≤6 U/ml). Colour denotes seropositive anti-spike IgG result with different level titres. White colour indicates no blood result available. 37 children and adolescent tested seronegative throughout all five testing rounds are not shown in the figure.

To better understand the duration of protection of infection-elicited antibodies in children and adolescents, we evaluated the decay of anti-spike IgG. In a subpopulation of unvaccinated children and adolescents, excluding all children and adolescents with potential reinfection (detected by the presence of anti-nucleocapsid IgG or any increase in titres between two testing points), we estimated the anti-spike IgG antibody half-life after following them up for 365 days. The anti-spike IgG half-life estimate for this primary analysis was 305 days [95% CI 263-363 days] (Supplementary Figure 2A). For the sensitivity analysis, considering a time window of 220 days of follow up, the half-life estimate was 220 days [95% CI 170-312 days] (Supplementary Figure 2B).

4. Effect of the Omicron Wave

4.1. Longitudinal Cohort: Evolution of Anti-spike-IgG Antibodies

Figure 4 shows the evolution of anti-spike IgG antibodies in groups of children and adolescents separated by their serology and exposure status (i.e., seronegative, only infected, only vaccinated, with hybrid immunity) at T4 (Nov/Dec 2021) and followed to T5 (Jun/Jul 2022). This was the time when Omicron started to be the dominant VOC until the end of the first large infection peak (Figure 2). Children and adolescents with hybrid immunity and who were only vaccinated showed similarly high titre levels at T4 or T5, whereas infected but unvaccinated children and adolescents showed considerably lower titres (Supplementary Table 3 or 4). Yet, titres of all groups increased from T4 to T5 on average. The highest increase in titres was seen in children and adolescents who were infected or seronegative in T4 and received their first vaccination between T4 and T5. The smallest increase and the lowest titres in T4 and T5 were observed in children and adolescents who were previously seronegative and had their first SARS-CoV-2 infection (Supplementary Figure 3 and Supplementary Table 4 and 5 shows the MFI ratio converted to U/ml for Roche Elecsys anti-spike IgG (WHO measure)).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 4:

Evolution of anti-spike IgG MFI ratios between T4 (Nov/Dec 2021) and T5 (June/July 2022) among seronegative, infected, vaccinated children and adolescents, and those with hybrid immunity at T4 shown as violin plots display mirrored density for each titre value (continuous distribution). For example, the top left panel represents 38 children and adolescents, who had median MFI titre of 107.1 in T4 (blue) and increased to median MFI titre of 133.1 in T5 (red)". Negative denotes seronegative at T4, Infected denotes seropositive but not yet vaccinated, Vaccinated denotes vaccinated participants, but negative in previous rounds and without evidence for anti-nucleocapsid IgG response. Children and adolescents with hybrid immunity were seropositive before getting vaccinated, or were vaccinated and tested positive for anti-nucleocapsid-IgG antibodies. Titre levels at T4 and at T5 are shown in blue and orange, respectively. Boxplots in panels show the median and interquartile range (IQR; whisker: 1.5 IQR). 60 children and adolescents are not shown in the figure (n=31 seronegative at T4 and T5, n=29 no data at T4).

To detect and quantify infections or reinfections between T4 (Nov/Dec 2021) to T5 (Jun/Jul 2022), we tested anti-nucleocapsid IgG antibodies, as they were expressed only after a SARS-CoV-2 infection and not after a vaccination. By mid 2022, more infections or reinfections happened in unvaccinated children and adolescents (74%) than in vaccinated (27%), indicating that vaccinated children and adolescents were likely better protected against an infection (Supplementary Table 6).

4.2. Longitudinal Cohort: Evolution of the Neutralising Antibodies

Figure 5 shows the development of neutralising antibodies against different SARS-CoV-2 variants (Wildtype, Delta, and Omicron) between T4 (Nov/Dec 2021) and T5 (Jun/Jul 2022). We again separated participants into the four different groups according to their serology at T4 and exposure status (i.e., seronegative, only infected, only vaccinated, or with hybrid immunity). In general, neutralising activity increased in all groups between T4 and T5. The neutralising response was proportionally higher, but comparable in those with hybrid immunity and vaccination only (e.g., anti-Omicron at T5 98.9% [95% CI 96.0-99.7%] and 81.6% [95% CI 74.9-86.9%], respectively, Supplementary Table 3), but lower in infected participants (e.g., anti-Omicron at T5 64.9% [95% CI 59.8-69.7%]). The neutralising response at T5 was higher for infected children and adolescents at T4 (Figure 5i) compared to seronegative children and adolescents at T4 (Figure 5l, Supplementary Table 7 shows detailed test results). Overall, neutralising response was highest against anti-Wildtype, followed by anti-Delta and anti-Omicron, except in children and adolescent getting newly infected between T4 to T5 (Figure 5l), where anti-Omicron showed highest neutralising response, followed by anti-Wildtype and anti-Delta.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 5:

Evolution of neutralising antibody half maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50) between T4 (Nov/Dec 2021) and T5 (June/July 2022) among negative, infected, vaccinated children and adolescents, and those with hybrid immunity shown by violin plots display mirrored density for each NAB IC50 value (continuous distribution). Negative denotes seronegative at T4, Infected denotes seropositive but not yet vaccinated, Vaccinated denotes vaccinated participants, but negative in previous rounds and without evidence for anti-nucleocapsid IgG response. Children and adolescents with hybrid immunity were seropositive before getting vaccinated, or were vaccinated and tested positive for anti-nucleocapsid IgG antibodies. Dotted line indicates NAB IC50 value threshold (50) for half maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC₅₀) for neutralising activity. Children and adolescents with NAB IC50 values above the threshold are assumed to have 50% or higher neutralisation capacity. Boxplots in panels show the median and interquartile range (IQR; whisker: 1.5 IQR). 60 children and adolescents are not shown in the figure (n=31 seronegative at T4 and T5, n=29 no data at T4).

Discussion

Throughout the course of the Ciao Corona study from June 2020 to July 2022, seroprevalence increased with each further circulating VOC and uptake of vaccination in children and adolescents. By July 2022 despite incomplete uptake of vaccination (58% in those ≥12 years, 28% in <12 years), 96.9% [95% CrI 95.2-98.1%] of all children and adolescents had anti-spike IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 and most children under the age of 12 became seropositive during the Omicron wave despite low vaccination uptake. Also, 93% of children and adolescents who seroconverted early in the pandemic were persistently seropositive for up to 18 months. Furthermore, vaccinated children and adolescents regardless of prior infection had high to very high anti-spike IgG titres and proportionally higher neutralising response, compared to unvaccinated but infected children and adolescents who showed lower SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike IgG titres and neutralising responses.

We found a sharp increase in seroprevalence from 46.4% in T4 (Nov/Dec 2021) to 96.9% in T5 (Jun/Jul 2022), and anti-spike IgG antibody titre levels in seropositive participants were overall higher at T5 compared to the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. While this is not surprising for those receiving a vaccination, mostly adolescents of 12 years or more, it is remarkable that also most without vaccination, i.e., children below the age of 12, became seropositive. This is likely attributable to the overall high incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infections in the first half of 2022, where the highly transmissible Omicron variant that was able to evade both natural and vaccine-induced immunity became dominant [15–17]. These findings are consistent with other international studies in children and adolescents also reporting high seroprevalence and titre levels by mid 2022 [4, 36–38]. However, seroprevalence is dependent on the course of the pandemic, the circulating VOC, geographical region, and the uptake of vaccines, which is why great variability in seroprevalence estimates were stated across different reports [39].

In our study, children and adolescents who seroconverted early in the COVID-19 pandemic, were persistently seropositive for up to 18 months. Several studies reported on duration of persistence of antibodies after a SARS-CoV-2 infection in children and adolescents. Some studies reported that anti-spike IgG levels decrease within 4 to 6 months [40, 41], whereas others showed that they remained detectable up to 9 to 18 months [9, 42, 43].

We likewise estimated that the anti-spike IgG half-life was 305 days in children and adolescents overlooking a window of 365 days. The half-life estimate of our sensitivity analysis using a time window of 220 days, was comparable to those of adults reporting between 145 to 238 days [8, 29–33]. Data on anti-spike IgG half-life in children and adolescents is limited and results are controversial, ranging from faster decay of anti-spike IgG antibodies [8] to similar [9] waning between children and adults. Thus, the estimate of half-life in our primary analysis was higher than that of the sensitivity analysis and also higher than what has previously been reported in adults. Several factors may explain these differences including the unknown timepoint of infection, differential missingness due to immune function, as well as differing assumptions made in the analyses. In particular, the sensitivity analysis with the shorter time window covered only the early time after infection in which a faster decay of antibodies takes place, while the primary analysis covered the period of a full year including both the initial fast decline of antibodies followed by a period in which the decay was much slower and steadier [8, 9].

Comparing the four groups, we found that anti-spike IgG antibody titres and neutralising response were higher in children and adolescents with hybrid immunity or vaccination only compared to only infected children and adolescents in July 2022. Neutralising capacity was proportionally higher against all VOC in children and adolescents with hybrid immunity or who were vaccinated compared to children and adolescents being only infected. We may have underestimated the proportion of children and adolescents with hybrid immunity, considering that anti-nucleocapsid IgG antibodies wane quickly and are also less expressed among vaccinated individuals [44–46]. Therefore, we likely missed infections in early 2022 if anti-nucleocapsid IgG were undetectable despite infection. However, since anti-spike IgG titres and neutralisation were similar among those vaccinated or with hybrid immunity in comparison with adults [37, 47–49], it is unlikely that this would have relevantly changed our findings. Numerous studies demonstrate that adults with high antibody titres and neutralising activity are protected against developing a severe course of SARS-CoV-2 disease [50–52]. Because only one adolescent had a hospital stay of less than 24 hours likely related to a SARS-CoV-2 infection, it remains unclear whether the findings in adults of higher protection against severe disease by vaccination and/or hybrid immunity can also be translated to children and adolescents. A study to test this hypothesis in youth would require an extremely large population-based study, as children and adolescents have a severe course of disease in less than 1 %, far less than observed in adults [53, 54].

Our findings show that the overall humoral and population immunity is high in children and adolescents in Switzerland. Policy makers and healthcare professionals in Switzerland closely followed our study and considered these findings to guide their decisions on public health recommendations and pandemic-related measures for children and adolescents. Repeated discussions of our results with cantonal and national public health authorities contributed to the decision of the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health that vaccination for youth below the age of 16 was no longer recommended, and all preventive measures regarding children and adolescents were lifted [55].

The Ciao Corona study is unique and one of few large longitudinal studies in youth [9, 37, 43]. We were able to reflect the time periods of the circulation of the major SARS-CoV-2 variants (Wildtype, Alpha, Delta, and Omicron) during our five testing rounds between June 2020 and July 2022. Also, serological testing allowed us to detect children and adolescents with asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. With the longitudinal cohort we were able to assess temporal changes in humoral activity during the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, our study is the first to show the proportion of children and adolescents with neutralising antibodies based on a large school-based study.

However, some limitations need to be considered when interpreting the findings of this study. First, the exact timing of SARS-CoV-2 infections in children and adolescents is not known in sero-epidemiological studies. Thus, infection could have occurred days to months before a participant tested seropositive in our study. Second, we may have misclassified some children and adolescents when classifying them into the four different groups. Vaccination status was self-reported by the study participants or their parents. This could have led to an over- or underestimation of seroprevalence and differences in antibodies in the groups, due to recall bias. Differentiation between children and adolescents with hybrid immunity or vaccination only was based on the presence of SARS-CoV-2 anti-nucleocapsid IgG antibodies. Since the anti-nucleocapsid IgG antibodies response is weaker when vaccinated (as shown in different studies [44–46]), we likely underestimated children and adolescents with hybrid immunity. Third, the estimation of anti-spike IgG half-life bears the limitations that the decay was calculated using the first seropositive result and the time between our testing rounds varied between 4 to 8 months. Due to the missing information on the exact timepoint of infection, we set the peak at the first seropositive result to measure the decline in anti-spike IgG. However, this approach may possibly underestimate maximum antibody titers and enhancing variability of measured values. Consequently, we may have overestimated the half-life in children and adolescents. Fourth, persistence of anti-spike IgG antibodies over 24 months in 69% of children and adolescents may be underestimated due to false positive serological results at T1 (Jun/Jul 2020) when SARS-CoV-2 prevalence was low [56].

Conclusion

In this study, we highlighted the importance of serological studies as a COVID-19 monitoring tool and the development of humoral immunity in children and adolescents. Our findings show that the Omicron wave and the rollout of vaccines led to almost 100% seropositivity and boosted seroprevalence and anti-spike IgG antibody titres (by infection, reinfection, and/or vaccination) as well as led to better neutralising capacity in children and adolescents. Especially during the first peak of the Omicron wave, most unvaccinated children under the age of 12 became seropositive compared to adolescents of 12 years and older, who had access to vaccines since June 2021. Nevertheless, during the entire study period parents of three children and adolescents reported a hospital stay of less than 24 hours, of which one was possibly related to an acute SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Authors Contributions

SK and MAP came up with the study idea. SK, MAP, TR, and JF developed the preliminary design. SK, MAP, TR and AU established the study design and methodology. SK, AU, TR, SR, SRH and AR performed participant recruitment, data collection and management. SRH, SR, AU and AR conducted the data cleaning and the statistical analysis. GP, CF, CP and DLC devised the serology analysis protocol and supervised, conducted, and assessed the serological examinations. AR wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors were involved in the interpretation of the findings, the review and authorisation of the manuscript for intellectual accuracy. SK is the corresponding author and guarantor, assuming complete accountability for the conducted research. Furthermore, SK had full access to the data, and made the final decision to publish. The corresponding author (SK) attests that all listed authors meet authorship criteria and that no others meeting the criteria have been omitted.

Competing interests

All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: support from Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), Swiss Federal Office of Public Health, private funders, funds of the cantons of Switzerland (Vaud, Zurich, and Basel), institutional funds of universities, and University of Zurich Foundation for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Funding

The Ciao Corona study was embedded in the nationally coordinated research network Corona Immunitas, coordinated by the Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+). The Ciao Corona study was funded by fundraising of SSPH+, which included funds of the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health as well as private funders (the SSPH+ ethical guidelines for funding will be considered), by the Cantons of Switzerland (Vaud, Zurich, and Basel), by institutional funds of the Universities. Additionally, the University of Zurich Foundation provided funding specific to this study. The funder played no part in neither the planning and implementation of the study; nor the collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; nor the writing, reviewing, and approving of the manuscript; nor the choice to submit the manuscript for publication. All authors were able to fully access the output of the data analysis and take responsibility for integrity and accuracy.

Ethics approval

The Ethics Committee of the Canton Zurich, Switzerland, approved the study (2020-01336). All study participants provided written informed consent prior to study enrolment.

Transparency declaration

The lead authors affirm that the manuscript is an honest, accurate, and transparent account of the study being reported, no important aspects of the study have been omitted, and any discrepancies from the study as originally planned and registered have been explained.