Mobilizing faith-based COVID-19 health ambassadors to address COVID-19 health disparities among African American older adults in under-resourced communities: A hybrid, community-based participatory intervention

a) Evidence strength

The project utilized a CBPR approach, considered a high-quality study design in the field of public health research (18). The project’s use of faith-based health advisors aligns with evidence supporting this approach’s effectiveness in closing unmet needs gaps and decreasing health disparities for minority communities, including AAs (11, 12, 19–23). The CDC “scaling up operation” recommends that faith-based organizations (FBOs) establish and maintain communication with local authorities and work closely with health organizations to implement COVID-19 guidelines Field [22] effectively. Telehealth methods had been suggested as an innovative approach to delivering healthcare services to vulnerable populations, such as AAs, who experience disparities in accessing and maintaining healthcare services (24–26). AA churches have historically supported their families economically, spiritually, socially, and culturally through programs that are unmatched by other social institutions (11).

b) Relative advantage

CHAs reported various advantages of telehealth technology, including improved access to primary care provider, reduced barriers to support, and more frequent communication with participants. This allowed for personalized and timely assistance, reduced in-person visits during the pandemic, and provided greater flexibility in scheduling provider appointments.

c) Adaptability

The COVID-19 pandemic greatly impacted chronic disease management for underserved older adults, with social distancing limiting in-person visits. Telehealth was initially used but faced technological barriers and rapport challenges. The project team adapted with a hybrid model, combining in-person and telehealth check-ins, allowing for personalized care and improved communication.

d) Design quality and packaging

The research project ensured design quality by providing comprehensive training to FBO leaders and CHAs through a 3-day virtual workshop. FBO leaders received computers, while CHAs were given iPads, resource manuals, and biweekly discussion topics with detailed links to data and resource materials. Continuous feedback and response mechanisms were implemented through weekly meetings with research staff.

e) Complexity

The project involved bi-weekly meetings for nine months, with maintaining regular communication between CHAs and older adults. Pre-and post-intervention surveys focused on nutrition, physical activity, food insecurity and a health tracking assessment was utilized to measure progress. A hybrid model of videoconferencing, phone calls, and in-person sessions provided flexibility, but also required reliable internet and access to technology. The team addressed these challenges by offering technical support and troubleshooting.

a) Culture

The use of CHAs from the churches also ensured that the project was culturally appropriate and responsive to the community’s needs. Several specific examples of the culture construct can be highlighted to demonstrate how it was addressed and integrated throughout this project’s implementation process. Some included:

Cultural beliefs about health and illness – The project addressed community preferences for traditional or alternative medicine by training CHAs to integrate these beliefs into evidence-based self-management strategies.

“As a CHA, I encountered an older adult who relied on herbal remedies to manage their diabetes. I worked with them to ensure these remedies were used alongside conventional treatments, resulting in better blood sugar control.” (FBO#1,CHA#2)

Dietary practices and preferences – The research team ensured that culturally relevant nutritional advice was provided, considering specific dietary practices and preferences within the AA community.

“One of my older adults loved soul food, so I helped them find ways to prepare their favorite dishes using healthier ingredients and cooking methods, making their meals both culturally satisfying and beneficial to their health.” (FBO#2,CHA#1)

Language and communication – CHAs were recruited for their familiarity with the cultural context and communication styles of AA older adults, and educational materials were adapted to be culturally appropriate.

“We made sure our educational materials spoke to our community, using analogies and references that our older adults could easily relate to. This approach made complex health concepts more accessible and understandable.” (FBO#4,CHA#2)

Family and community dynamics – CHAs were encouraged to engage with the older adults, their families, and community networks, fostering a supportive environment for self-management strategies.

‘Most of the people I recruited were my family – my husband and sisters. Going through this process, I was able to find out about everyone’s health issues that I never knew they dealt with in the past.’ (FBO#1,CHA#1)

Traditional community gatherings – The research team used traditional AA community gatherings as opportunities to raise awareness about the health ambassador program and engage with the community, demonstrating respect for the community’s culture and building trust with older adults and their families.

“I used our weekly dinner and bingo sessions to talk with community members about the health ambassador program. We shared stories, addressed concerns, and offered support in a relaxed, familiar environment. It helped us build trust and connect with the community on a deeper level.” (FBO#5,CHA#3)

b) Implementation climate

The implementation climate for the CHA intervention required a sense of shared commitment, necessary resources, training, and clear goals. Issues related to clarity posed challenges, including confusion about objectives, roles, and expected outcomes. To address these issues, the research team organized additional meetings and workshops, developed detailed guidelines, established more explicit performance metrics, and implemented regular check-ins with CHAs and community partners. These efforts helped maintain clarity, resolve emerging issues, and reinforce the shared commitment to the program’s goals.

Tension for change: This awareness of existing health disparities within our target communities created a sense of urgency and motivation for change among the research team, CHAs, and community partners, fostering a conducive environment for implementing the CHA intervention. The lack of support felt by AA older adults, heightened concern, misinformation, disinformation, confusion messaging and awareness of the risks associated with the pandemic increased this tension for change as stakeholders recognized the need for additional support and resources.

As the CHA intervention was implemented, the research team gathered success stories from older adults who had benefitted from the support provided by the CHAs. Sharing these success stories with the broader community, including those who were initially resistant to the program, helped demonstrate the intervention’s positive impact and increased the tension for change by showcasing the program’s benefits.

Compatibility: To address the specific needs of each participant, the project permitted CHAs to customize the delivery of interventions based on the choices and circumstances of each older adult (Kangovi et al., 2014). Depending on the participant’s comfort level and accessibility, CHAs selected in-person visits, phone conversations, or virtual meetings. Its adaptability boosted the program’s compatibility with the various demands of the older adults and aided in sustaining participation throughout the intervention.

Relative Priority: Non-participating local church leaders and FBOs collaborated with the project team, referring older adults needing CHA support and actively participating in evaluating and improving the intervention.

Self-efficacy

The project equipped CHAs with the knowledge, skills, and resources to provide tailored support, broadly classifying the approach under training, social support, and peer modeling.

Training: CHAs were trained to employ goal-setting, problem-solving, and self-monitoring approaches to assist older persons in gaining confidence in their abilities to manage chronic diseases and stick to treatment programs.

Peer Modeling: The CHAs, who shared comparable cultural and socioeconomic backgrounds with the older persons they supported, functioned as role models by displaying good self-management skills and highlighting success stories from their communities. Peer modeling played a crucial impact in boosting older individuals’ self-efficacy.

CHAs offered personal experiences or stories of community members who effectively treated their chronic health conditions, demonstrating the viability of adopting healthy practices and highlighting the advantages of active self-management.

Social Support: The CHAs also gave older persons with social support, boosting their self-efficacy by establishing a sense of belonging and connection. This assistance comprised emotional encouragement, educational support, and practical solutions in managing their chronic diseases. CHAs provided reassurance, answered concerns, and assisted with chores such as organizing medical visits and navigating the healthcare system.

a) Planning

The project team began by clearly outlining the objectives and goals of the intervention, such as improving chronic disease management among participants and increasing their engagement in health-promoting behaviors. Next, the team conducted a thorough assessment of the available resources, including human and technological resources, to support the implementation of the intervention. For instance, we identified local health professionals within the churches who could serve as CHAs and ensured access to necessary technological tools. After assessing the resources, the project team developed a detailed timeline for the implementation of the intervention, which included milestones and deadlines for each phase of the project (Table 4).

Lastly, recognizing that unforeseen challenges might arise during the implementation of the intervention, particularly given the uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic, the project team developed contingency plans to address potential barriers. For instance, we prepared alternative training methods and modes of communication to accommodate potential lockdowns or changes in public health guidelines.

b) Engaging

Ten out of the seventeen FBOs representing the study’s first cohort with their respective leaders actively partook in the study. Each participating FBO leader was sent an invitation notice via email, which contained information regarding the study. Once an expression of interest to participate was received, the research team met with these leaders to deliberate the expectations and research plan. FBO leaders were crucial in recruiting potential volunteers as CHAs based on their experience, interest, and ability to work with older adults in their congregation. FBOs held virtual meetings to discuss the project’s goals and objectives with interested volunteers and provided them with details of the eligibility criteria. They also used various communication channels such as bulletins, newsletters, and announcements during the few in-person services to spread the word about volunteer opportunities.

Opinion leaders (Formally appointed implementation leaders): As internal implementation leaders, FBO leaders faced competing priorities and interests, making it challenging to consistently support the project. The research team implemented strategies such as flexible scheduling, frequent communication, and progress updates to address this. The research team maintained their support and involvement by accommodating the FBO leaders’ busy schedules.

Champions: CHAs faced challenges balancing responsibilities and staying up-to-date with relevant information. The research team supported CHAs through refresher training, providing iPads, offering recognition, weekly check-ins, and maintaining constant communication. By addressing these challenges and offering flexible scheduling, the team created an environment for CHAs to thrive.

c) Executing

To enhance CHA recruitment efforts by leaders of various FBOs, the research team employed a combination of strategies and procedures to ensure we attracted and retained dedicated, competent and diverse group of individuals. These strategies and procedures included:

External Collaborations: The research team partnered with local community organizations, such as African American Community Empowerment Council (AACEC), to identify potential CHAs within their target population. This approach facilitated the recruitment of individuals who were already active in their communities and had established connections with the older adults they would support.

Word-of-mouth referrals: The research team encouraged existing CHAs and other community members involved in the project to refer potential candidates from their personal and professional networks. This strategy helped identify individuals who were passionate about helping others and had the interpersonal skills necessary to succeed as a CHA.

Social Media: The research team utilized various advertising channels, such as our FBOs’ social media platforms and radio announcements, to reach a wider audience and inform them about the opportunity to become a CHA. This strategy increased the visibility of the project and attracted a diverse pool of candidates.