Abstract
Objectives Assess ChatGPT’s performance on the Clinical Informatics Board Examination (CIBE) and discuss the implications of large language models (LLMs) for board certification and maintenance.
Materials and Methods We tested ChatGPT using 260 multiple-choice questions from Mankowitz’s Clinical Informatics Board Review book, omitting six image-dependent questions.
Results ChatGPT answered 190 (74%) of 254 eligible questions correctly. While performance varied across the Clinical Informatics Core Content Areas, differences were not statistically significant.
Discussion ChatGPT’s performance raises concerns about the potential misuse in medical certification and the future validity of knowledge assessment exams. While ChatGPT is able to answer multiple-choice questions accurately, relying on AI systems for exams will compromise the credibility and validity of at-home assessments and undermine public trust.
Conclusion The advent of AI and LLMs threatens to upend existing processes to board certification and maintenance and necessitates new approaches to the evaluation of proficiency in medical education.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
