Abstract
Background Healthcare workers frequently experience needle sticks and other sharp injuries, which are among the most prevalent types of occupational accident in hospital settings. Studies indicate that approximately 50% of these devices are contaminated with blood, exposing users to potential infections from blood-borne pathogens such as HIV. Despite the efficacy of post-exposure prophylaxis in lowering the risk of HIV transmission, ensuring consistent adherence to this treatment regimen remains a widely acknowledged challenge.
Objective This study aimed to assess healthcare workers’ adherence to HIV post-exposure prophylaxis following needlestick and sharp injuries at Kijabe Hospital, Kenya, between February 2017 and June 2022.
Method A retrospective chart review was conducted on healthcare workers who were started on HIV PEP following a reported occupational exposure due to needle sticks and sharp injuries between February 2017 and June 2022.
Result In total, 136 healthcare workers were exposed to needle sticks and sharp injuries. The majority of exposures (82.3%) were at a high risk of HIV transmission. The overall adherence rate to the 28-day HIV-PEP course was 26%. Healthcare workers were more likely to complete HIV-PEP when the source’s HIV status was positive than when it was negative [ 42.4% vs. 11.8%; p = 0.001]. The drug regimen (TDF/3TC/DTG) was significantly associated with default treatment (aOR, 5.0 (95% CI 2.0 – 11.0) (p= 0.001) compared with patients using the TDF/3TC/ATVr regimen.
Conclusion Our study found that 74% of healthcare workers did not complete the full 28-day course of HIV post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) as recommended, indicating a significant issue with adherence. This highlights the need for strategies to improve compliance and ensure occupational health. Additionally, as there is limited research on HIV PEP completion rates among healthcare workers in Kenya, these findings will contribute valuable knowledge in this area.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee/IRB of Tenwek Hospital Institutional Ethics Review Committee gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Funding:This study was not funded
Conflict of interest: Authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Few revision on study background, discussion and conclusion have been made
