Abstract
Context Recent reviews have demonstrated a shift towards anatomical double bundle (DB) techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). However, to our knowledge, there are no reviews that have directly assessed the relationship between bone tunnel graft angle placement in DB ACLR and clinical outcomes.
Objective To investigate the effect of bone tunnel graft angle on clinical outcomes in DB ACLR.
Data Sources We performed a comprehensive search of the databases PubMed, Scopus, and Embase using the search terms (Fixation OR Angle) AND (ACL OR anterior cruciate ligament) AND (double-bundle OR DB OR double bundle) AND (Reconstruction OR surgery OR arthroscopy) across all time periods.
Study Selection Two independent authors performed a systematic review of the literature. After removing duplicates and applying inclusion/exclusion criteria on a number of clinical outcomes and other factors, 5 eligible studies were recruited under PRISMA guidelines from the 1032 titles identified.
Study Design Systematic Review
Level of Evidence 2a
Data Extraction Systematic review of clinical trials and extraction of relevant surgical data.
Results Our data did not support the original hypothesis and rather showed that increasing the PL bundle angle from 0° to 90° leads to better performance on the pivot-shift tests. Having a nonzero AM bundle graft fixation angle, more specifically at or above 20°, produces better performance on the ATT, Tegner, Lysholm and pivot-shift tests when compared to a 0° angle.
Conclusions A PL bundle angle at or above 45° as well as a nonzero AM bundle angle both yielded better clinical outcome scores. However, with respect to a specific combination, there is no consensus on an optimal graft angle combination in DB ACLR currently. Future randomized controlled trials on this topic are recommended to better understand the effects of greater ranges of graft fixation angles on clinical outcome heterogeneity.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the study are available online
