Abstract
Background Antimicrobials are widely used to protect human and animal health. Wide scale misuse can lead to the development and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). In low and middle-income countries, knowledge, attitudes and practices are assumed to contribute to AMR.
Objective To provide empirical data on knowledge and attitudes towards antibiotic use and resistance in livestock farmers, human and animal health professionals in Kyegegwa district, Uganda. To assess which factors (farming, education, affiliation with health-related ministries, gender, keeping cattle, goats, pigs, poultry or sheep) are associated with poor knowledge.
Methods A questionnaire related to antibiotic usage (AMU) and AMR, as well as demographic data was developed and administered to health practitioners of both the humanmedical and the livestock sector, and (semi)-intensive livestock farmers. Polytomous latent class analysis was used to cluster respondents - based on their responses - in different classes of knowledge and attitudes. The association between the probability of belonging to latent classes and demographic data was assessed by multinomial regression models and conditional inference trees.
Results In total 1022 responses were available (response rate 68.1%). More than 50% of the cattle received antibiotics at least three times during the last six months and in 39.1% members of the respondents’ households of this study were on antibiotics. Three latent classes related to attitude towards antibiotic access, usage and disposal; and two classes regarding resistance have been revealed. Class membership was associated with a number of socio-demographic factors.
Conclusion Inadequate knowledge and inappropriate practices as evidenced in this study should support further policy formulations and strategies to regulate AMU. It will also be useful in refining the implementation of local and national action plans and efforts to control AMR. A key component of this will require promotion of One Health approach and effective communication to tackle prevailing misconceptions.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
SH received a funding from the Hanela-Stiftung titled "Global and local health for humans and animals". This fundling partly supported the master thesis of Mary Ann Kahunde. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Clearance for the study was sought from the School of Biosecurity, Biotechnology and Labor-atory Sciences (SBLS) Institutional Review Board, and the College of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity (COVAB), Makerere University. Permission to conduct this study was sought from the Chief Administrative Officer and the District Council of Kyegegwa District Local Government. Verbal consent was sought from the respondents who were medical and veterinary professionals and livestock farmers, and confidentiality of the information was guaranteed before the interview.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.