Abstract
Background Risk of suicide is complex and often a result of multiple interacting factors. It is vital research identifies predictors of suicide to provide a strong evidence base for targeted interventions.
Methods Using linked Census and population level mortality data we estimated rates of suicide across different groups in England and Wales and examine which factors are independently associated with the risk of suicide.
Findings The highest rates of suicide were amongst those who reported an impairment affecting their day-to-day activities, those who were long term unemployed or never had worked, or those who were single or separated. Rates of suicide were highest in the White and Mixed/multiple ethnic groups compared to other ethnicities, and in people who reported a religious affiliation compared with those who had no religion. Comparison of minimally adjusted models (predictor, sex and age) with fully-adjusted models (sex, age, ethnicity, region, partnership status, religious affiliation, day-to-day impairments, armed forces membership and socioeconomic status) identified key predictors which remain important risk factors after accounting for other characteristics; day-to-day impairments were still found to increase the incidence of suicide relative to those whose activities were not impaired after adjusting for employment status. Overall, rates of suicide were higher in men compared to females across all ages, with the highest rates in 40-to-50-year-olds.
Interpretation The findings of this work provide novel population level insights into the risk of suicide by sociodemographic characteristics. Understanding the interaction between key risk factors for suicide has important implications for national suicide prevention strategies.
Funding This study received no specific funding.
Evidence before this study Previous studies have identified key risk factors for suicide; being male and being aged 40 to 50 years of age have the highest rates of suicide. Suicide is a major public health concern, with prevention strategies imperative to minimising events.
Added value of this study For the first time we make population level estimates of suicide rates in England and Wales using death registration data linked to 2011 Census.
Furthermore, we calculate incidence rate ratios for fully adjusted models which provide novel insights into the interplay between different risk factors. For instance, we see that people who report having day-to-day impairments risk of suicide is 2- to 3-times higher for men and women respectively compared to people who do not report day-to-day impairments, after adjusting for other characteristics such as socioeconomic status which are likely associated with impairments.
Implications of this study Understanding the groups most at risk of suicide is imperative for national suicide prevention strategies. This work provides novel population level insights into the risk of suicide by sociodemographic characteristics.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval was obtained from the National Statistician's Data Ethics Advisory Committee.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
In accordance with NHS Digitals Information Governance requirements the study data cannot be shared
