ABSTRACT
Background The National Policy on Integral Health of Lesbians, Gays, Bisexuals, Transvestites, and Transsexuals (PNSILGBT+) aims to eliminate discrimination and institutional prejudice in public health services, with emphasis on training and enabling professionals to assist in the care of this population. However, for transsexuals and transvestites, this access continues to be neglected.
Aim To determine the profile of health professionals, their academic-professional training in health, and their knowledge about the specificities of gender identity.
Methods This is a cross-sectional, observational, quantitative survey conducted with health professionals working in the Caeté Region. Data were collected using a semi-structured questionnaire, which was applied online via Google Forms in the period from March 2021 to August 2021.
Outcomes Epidemiological profile, academic education, area of practice, and knowledge about gender identity were predictors for the descriptive analysis.
Results The sample consisted of 73 participants: 82.19% female, 100% cisgender, with a mean age of 32.37±7.80 years, and the majority self-declared as Catholic (65.75%). The largest number of health professionals were in Nursing (34.24%), practicing in Tertiary Care (50.68%), with an average time of service of 6.24±6.30 years. The volunteers reported that they did not understand the difference between cisgender and transgender people (57.53%), admitting that they had not received any training on gender identity or the healthcare of Lesbians, Gays, Bisexuals, Transvestites, and Transsexuals (LGBT)+ people (79.45%). However, 87.67% understood the importance of training on this subject for the healthcare of this population.
Clinical Implications This study demonstrates the need for continued trainings on gender identity, health and care of the LGBT+ population, with a focus on transgender people, to eliminate institutional bias.
Strengths and limitations The research was based on the search for professionals’ knowledge about gender identity, even in healthcare in a region in the interior of the Amazon, however it did not reach the preterit sample n, but it was important for the debate between the professionals reached and the institutions and their managers.
Conclusion The academic training and professional development of health professionals are still lacking when it comes to the theme studied; a fundamental point needed to comply with the National Curricular Guidelines (NCDs) for courses in health, National Policy for Professional Development, and in particular, the PNSILGBT+.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
to the Santo Antônio Maria Zaccaria Hospital (HSAMZ), the City Hall and Municipal Health Department (SEMUSB) of Bragança, the Ministry of Education and the Ministry of Health, the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) and the Federal University of Pará (UFPa) through the Multiprofessional Residency in Women's and Children's Health and the Dean's Office for Research and Graduate Studies, which funded this publication through the Qualified Publication Support Program (PAPQ).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The research was submitted to the Research Ethics Committee of the Center for Tropical Medicine of the Federal University of Pará (Núcleo de Medicina Tropical da Universidade Federal do Pará—CEP—NMT/UFPa: CAAE—40179820.6.0000.5172) and was approved through Opinion No. 4,514,620.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Not Applicable
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Not Applicable
Footnotes
Email: pedro.barbosa{at}ics.ufpa.br
Email: rosereis{at}yahoo.com.br
E-mail: ericacarneiro{at}uepa.br
Email: cibelecamara{at}hotmail.com
Data Availability
We declare Data Availability