ABSTRACT
Background Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a chronic pain condition characterised by peripheral and central sensory and motor dysfunction. Implicit motor imagery is known to be impaired in these patients, but evidence is still lacking for explicit motor imagery. Using a self-rated questionnaire, this study aims to compare explicit motor imagery abilities between individuals with CRPS, with chronic limb pain (CLP) and healthy controls and also examine differences between affected and unaffected limbs.
Methods In this single-centre observational study, 123 participants were recruited (CRPS = 40, chronic limb pain, CLP = 40, and healthy individuals = 43). Participants completed the Movement Imagery Questionnaire - Revised Second (MIQ-RS) once for each body side. The total MIQ-RS score, and the kinesthetic and visual subscores were compared between groups and between the affected and unaffected sides.
Results The MIQ-RS revealed no significant differences in explicit motor imagery abilities, neither between groups nor between the affected and unaffected side. Null Hypothesis Bayesian Testing on kinesthetic motor imagery abilities indicated a sevenfold likelihood of no differences between groups and a more than fivefold likelihood of no differences between sides.
Conclusion CRPS and chronic limb pain individuals showed preserved explicit motor imagery abilities, notably on the pain side. The preservation of these abilities supports the recommendation of mental imagery therapy to improve motor function and relieve pain in chronic pain patients.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee of Full Institution : French Research Commitee "Comite de Protection des Personnes Sud Mediterrannee IV" gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Thanks to the reviewer's comments, the article has been rewritten, adding statistical analyses of categorisation and homogeneity to the previous analyses. The discussion has been improved and the bibliography updated.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
