Knowledge of COVID-19 Symptoms, Transmission, and Prevention: Evidence from Health and Demographic Surveillance in Southern Mozambique
======================================================================================================================================

* Ariel Q. Nhacolo
* Zachary J. Madewell
* Jonathan A. Muir
* Charfudin N. Sacoor
* Elisio G. Xerinda
* Teodimiro Matsena
* Quique Bassat
* Cynthia G. Whitney
* Inácio M. Mandomando
* Solveig A. Cunningham

## Abstract

Over 230,000 COVID-19 cases and over 2,200 deaths have been reported in Mozambique though May 2023. Understanding community members’ knowledge of SARS-CoV-2 transmission and prevention is essential for directing public health interventions to reduce disease spread and improve vaccination coverage. Here, we describe knowledge of COVID-19 transmission, prevention, and symptoms among community residents in Mozambique. We conducted a cross-sectional survey among 33,087 households in a Health and Demographic Surveillance System in Manhiça, Mozambique. Participants were recruited at the tail end of the Delta variant wave in September 2021 to the peak of Omicron cases in January 2022. Principal components analysis was used to create scores representing knowledge of COVID-19 symptoms, transmission, and prevention. Multiple imputation and quasi-Poisson regression were used to examine associations between demographic characteristics and sources of COVID-19 information, and knowledge of COVID-19 symptoms, transmission, and prevention. We examined whether sources of COVID-19 information mediated the relationship between educational attainment and knowledge of symptoms, transmission, and prevention. Across this rural community, 98.2%, 97.0%, and 85.1% of respondents reported knowing how COVID-19 could be prevented, that SARS-CoV-2 can cause disease, and how SARS-CoV-2 is transmitted, respectively. Most cited symptoms were cough (51.2%), headaches (44.9%), and fever (44.5%); transmission mechanisms were droplets (50.5%) or aerosol (<5 µm diameter) (46.9%) from an infected person; and prevention measures were handwashing (91.9%) and mask-wearing (91.8%). Characteristics associated with greater knowledge of symptoms, transmission, and prevention included having at least primary education, older age, employment, higher wealth, and Christian religion. Respondents who had had COVID-19 symptoms were also more likely to have knowledge of symptoms, transmission, and prevention. Gathering information from TV, WhatsApp, radio, and hospital mediated the relationship between educational attainment and knowledge scores. These findings support the need for outreach and for community-engaged messaging to promote prevention measures, particularly among people with low education.

Keywords
*   community
*   household
*   SARS-CoV-2
*   sub-Saharan Africa
*   health education
*   health communication
*   Delta
*   Omicron

## Introduction

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was first reported in Mozambique in March 2020. Since then, there have been over 230,000 confirmed cases and over 2,200 deaths reported in Mozambique through May 2023 [1], though the death toll could be much higher than official figures due to the challenges experienced in the country’s surveillance capacities and under-reporting [2].

Effective public health education programs are required to reduce the burden of COVID-19 and the strain on healthcare system resources. Studies of COVID-19 in sub-Saharan Africa have demonstrated positive associations between higher level of knowledge and practicing prevention measures [3, 4]. Knowledge of COVID-19 transmission and disease was also positively associated with vaccination coverage [5], which is one of the most effective strategies for protecting individuals against COVID-19 hospitalization and death [6, 7]. As of May 2023, 59.1% of Mozambique’s population had completed a primary COVID-19 vaccine series of BBIBP-CorV (Sinopharm, Beijing CNBG) (two doses), Ad26.COV2.S (Janssen) (one dose), or ChAdOx1-S (Covishield) (two doses), but only 3.5% of these had received a booster dose [1]. COVID-19 vaccines became available for adolescents aged 12-17 in Mozambique in November 2022 [8].

Currently, there is limited information about knowledge of COVID-19 transmission, prevention, and symptoms in Mozambique. Two cross-sectional surveys on knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) among community healthcare workers in Mozambique using an online health platform [9] and among adolescents using a cross-sectional survey in two provinces of Central Mozambique [10] found low knowledge of symptoms, transmission, and prevention measures, but these were done early in the pandemic, before the emergence of more transmissible variants such as Delta and Omicron [11, 12]. The studies’ generalizability was also limited by convenience samples and small sample sizes. We conducted a population-based, representative study to evaluate factors associated with knowledge of COVID-19 symptoms, transmission, and prevention, in a rural setting of southern Mozambique. This approach is important for reducing household transmission and improving vaccination coverage [13] and provides information on how to tailor communication strategies to reduce community infectious disease transmission.

## Materials and Methods

### Study design

This study is part of a broader examination within the Child Health and Mortality Prevention Surveillance (CHAMPS) network to analyze the consequences of COVID-19 lockdowns for child health and mortality [14–17]. Leveraging the established platform of the CHAMPS Network of Health and Demographic Surveillance Systems (HDSSs) [18], we administered a short questionnaire to all households in a rural district [19]. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guidelines for cross-sectional studies were followed.

### Study setting and population

Manhiça is a district in Maputo Province, located about 85 km north of the capital city, Maputo. An HDSS was established there in 1996 by the Manhiça Health Research Center (CISM) and currently covers the entire Manhic_Ja District, which spans 2,380 km2. More information about the Manhic_Ja HDSS has been published elsewhere [20]. With a population of 201,845 [20], Manhiça is the second most populated district in Maputo Province after the Matola District (the capital of Maputo Province). The major economic activity is sugarcane farming—Maragra and Xinavane are the main sugar factories in the country. The health system in Manhiça comprises one district hospital located in Manhiça village, one rural hospital located in the Xinavane administrative post, and 19 health centers.

Manhiça is a geographic corridor highly exposed to transmissible diseases such as HIV, and currently COVID-19, stemming from population migration. A large proportion of the Manhiça population migrate to the nearby capital city of Maputo or beyond to South Africa with regular return visits to their households in Manhiça. Moreover, the district is crossed by Mozambique’s main road (National Road Number 1), which connects the Southern, Central, and Northern regions of the country as well as neighboring countries of South Africa, Eswatini, Zimbabwe, Malawi, Zambia, and Tanzania. The district is also crossed by a railroad that connects to Maputo city and harbor. These transportation systems facilitate population migration and disease spread.

In each household, one household member was asked to participate on behalf of the household. Household members were eligible for inclusion if they resided at the residence between March 2020 and the date of interview between September 2021 and January 2022. The questionnaire was conducted together with standard procedures for regular HDSS visits to all residences in the defined catchment area (census method) [20].

### Data collection and quality assurance

A survey instrument was developed to collect information about households’ experiences during the COVID-19 lockdown, which included information on knowledge regarding COVID-19 symptoms, transmission, and prevention. Questions were based on guidelines issued by the Ministry of Health for COVID-19 prevention in Mozambique [21]. Interviewers asked open-ended questions and recorded participants’ responses. Data collection was conducted by HDSS fieldworkers during their regular visits to the households between September 2021 and January 2022 through tablet-based in-person interviews with heads of households or their representatives if the heads were unavailable. These data were linked with data from the HDSS questionnaires to incorporate socio-demographic data about the households: household size, number of children under 5 years of age, number of adults over 60 years, and number of pregnant women; household assets; and materials used for constructing the houses (Supplemental Methods, S1-S2 Figs); variables about the head of household were age, sex, occupation, education, religion, mother language, and marital status.

Fieldworkers and supervisors were trained on the use of this new module by the study coordinator. Data cleaning and quality assurance followed standard procedures for the HDSS, whereby 5% of households visited each week were revisited to confirm the recorded information [22]. There was a script to filter errors at the time of uploading the data from the tablets to the server. Records with inconsistences were returned to the field for reconciliations.

### Measures

Head of household variables were: sex (female, male), age group (<18 years, 18-39 years, 40-64 years, ≥65 years), religion (Catholic, Protestant, Christian unspecified, Zion church member, atheist, Evangelical, other, don’t know), language (Tsonga, Echuwabo, Cisena, Bitonga, other), education (higher education, technical education, secondary education, primary education, no education), occupation (retired/pensioner, does not work, professional, merchants, skilled manual, unskilled manual, student/volunteer, other), marital status (single, married/de facto union, separated/divorced, widowed), and had had COVID-19 symptoms since COVID-19 was first reported in Mozambique (yes, no). Household variables were: household size (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6+), number of children under 5 years (0, 1, 2+), number of adults over 60 years (0, 1, 2+), number of pregnant women (0, 1+), and wealth index, which was derived from principal components analysis (PCA) (Supplemental Methods).

In accord with other KAP studies [17, 23–25], we used PCA-based factor analysis to create scores for assessing the degree of knowledge of COVID-19 symptoms, transmission, and prevention (Supplemental Methods). The overall Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin index of sampling adequacy was 0.71, 0.73, and 0.83 for knowledge of symptoms, transmission, and prevention, so we concluded the sample size and data were adequate for the PCAs. The resultant compound factor for knowledge of symptoms included seven variables that accounted for 32% of the variability in the data: difficulty breathing, dry cough, fever, headaches, muscle pain, and sore throat (Table S1). The compound factor for knowledge of transmission included eight variables that explained 29% of the variation: hugging, kissing, and droplets from an infected person; and touching a fomite (objects or materials which are likely to carry infection, such as clothes, utensils, and furniture), an infected person, or one’s own eyes or nose, or mouth. The compound factor for knowledge of prevention included eight variables that explained 31% of the data variability: avoid crowded places, touching eyes, touching mouth, touching nose, or traveling; social distancing; quarantine; and wash hands with alcohol. Knowledge of symptoms, transmission, and prevention scores ranged from 0 to 3.3, 0 to 4.2, and 0 to 4.7, respectively, with higher scores representing greater knowledge.

Our survey also asked participants what they would do if someone in their family had symptoms suggestive of COVID-19. Response categories included: go to the hospital, quarantine, call the hospital, call the community leader, and treat symptoms at home; respondents could have said yes to multiple categories. Sources of information about COVID-19 included: TV, SMS/WhatsApp, radio, hospital, community leaders.

### Statistical Analysis

We reported frequency distributions of individual characteristics (age, sex, education, occupation, religion, language, marital status) and household characteristics (wealth index, total number of household members, number under 5 children, number above 60 adults, number of pregnant women). We also reported frequencies and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for knowledge of COVID-19 symptoms, transmission, and prevention; management of suspected cases; and sources of information. There were minimal missing data for demographic variables, between 0.1% (age) to 9.6% (education). Consistent with other KAP studies [26–29], we used multiple imputation with predictive mean matching for these missing data to retain statistical power and avoid selection bias (Supplemental Methods).

Quasi-Poisson regression was used to evaluate unadjusted and adjusted associations between characteristics (age; sex; language; religion; marital status; education; occupation; wealth index; had COVID-19 symptoms; number of household members, children under 5, older adults, and pregnant women; sources of information) and knowledge of symptoms, transmission, and prevention scores (Supplemental Methods). Logistic regression was used to evaluate unadjusted and adjusted associations between the same characteristics and whether the respondents had experienced symptoms associated with COVID-19. Finally, we assessed whether sources of COVID-19 information mediated the relationship between educational attainment and knowledge of symptoms, transmission, and prevention scores (Supplemental Methods). This analysis followed causal mediation analysis methods as previously described by VanderWeele [30] and has been used in other KAP studies [31–34]. All analyses were done in R software, version 4.2.3 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

### Ethical statement

The HDSS data collection has ethical approval from the Institutional Ethics Review Board for Health (CIBS) and Internal Scientific Committee (CCI) at CISM, and the National Bioethics Committee for Health (CNBS-Mozambique).

This study used part of the existing HDSS data, for which all the heads of households and household members in Manhiça district have voluntarily agreed and signed a written detailed informed consent for providing their demographic and socio-economic data, including that of their households and their young dependents (children under the age of 18 years), in the context of HDSS. In relation to new data, the study team obtained approval from CISM’s CCI and CIBS to collect the data based on voice-recorded informed oral consent to minimize the risk of COVID-19 transmission when handling paper-based informed and signed consents between interviewers and interviewees. Data collection was mainly over the phone to minimize contacts due to COVID-19. Even during household visits (which were done for participants unreachable by phone), informed consent was oral and voice-recorded to minimize the risk of COVID-19. Written informed consent was obtained from the parent or guardian of each participant under 18 years of age.

All communications with study participants were done with the language of each participant’s preference. Where the preferred language was not Portuguese, the fieldworkers translated the questionnaires *in situs* as in other studies that the HDSS and social science team has conducted. Where the fieldworker could not speak the participant’s preferred language, a translator was sought in the household, or a suitable fieldworker conducted the communication at another time. Data collection was done between September 2021 and January 2022.

## Results

The Manhiça HDSS is home to 40,636 active households in 2021, of which 33,087 (81.4%) responded to this survey (Fig 1). Respondents (18,823, 56.9%) were heads of household, their spouses (7,905, 23.9%), children (3,025, 9.1%), or other family members (3,334, 10.1%). The majority of respondents (72.4%) were female, and the median age was 38 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 27–53 years) (Table 1). More than half (54.4%) spoke Xirhonga, 34.5% were Zion church members, 70.0% had primary or no education, and 73.5% were manual laborers. Median household size was 3 (IQR: 2–5). Of all households, 43.5% had children under 5 years, 26.5% had adults over 60 years, and 3.0% had pregnant women (Table 1). Eight percent (2,465/33,087) of respondents reported having had symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 since the disease was first reported in Mozambique, most commonly flu-like symptoms (50.4%, 1,242/2,465), dry cough (48.0%, 1,182/2,465), headaches (33.8%, 832/2,465), fever (27.0%, 665/2,465), and cough with sputum (21.9%, 541/2,465) (Table S2).

![Fig 1.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2023/06/30/2023.03.31.23288026/F1.medium.gif)

[Fig 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/06/30/2023.03.31.23288026/F1)

Fig 1. Map of Manhiça District.
Source: Created by the authors using Health and Demographic Surveillance System (HDSS) cartographic data.

View this table:
[Table 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/06/30/2023.03.31.23288026/T1)

Table 1. Descriptive statistics of individuals who participated in COVID-19 cross-sectional survey, Mozambique, September 2021 – January 2022, (N=33,087)

Nearly all (99.4%, 32,901/33,087) participants had heard of coronavirus, but 20.9% (6,926/33,087) were unfamiliar with the term COVID-19. Of all respondents, 98.2% reported knowing how SARS-CoV-2 transmission could be prevented, 97.0% knew SARS-CoV-2 may cause disease, and 85.1% knew how SARS-CoV-2 is transmitted. The most commonly mentioned prevention measures were washing hands with soap (91.9%) and wearing a facemask (91.8%), whereas least mentioned included avoiding touching eyes (3.8%), nose (4.0%), and mouth (4.9%) (Fig 2). Most mentioned transmission mechanisms were droplets (50.5%) and aerosol (<5 µm diameter) (46.9%) from an infected person; least mentioned were touching eyes or nose (9.2%), or mouth (10.7%). The most recognized COVID-19 symptoms were dry cough (51.2%), headaches (44.9%), and fever (44.5%); least mentioned were nausea/vomiting (3.7%) and muscle or body aches (13.7%). Most participants (88.6%) indicated they would take symptomatic family members to the hospital for treatment, whereas 3.8% stated they would treat symptoms at home. The most cited sources of information regarding COVID-19 were television (44.0%), community leaders (36.2%), and radio (33.7%) (Table S3).

![Fig 2.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2023/06/30/2023.03.31.23288026/F2.medium.gif)

[Fig 2.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/06/30/2023.03.31.23288026/F2)

Fig 2. Knowledge of COVID-19 transmission, prevention and symptoms, and management of suspected cases, Mozambique, September 2021 – January 2022 (N=33,087).
Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals.

Unadjusted analyses between demographics and sources of information, and PCA-derived knowledge of symptoms, transmission, and prevention scores are shown in S3 Fig: these were positively correlated (*r* = 0.47 ∼ 0.63; *p* < 0.001) (S4 Fig). Adjusting for all other variables in the models (see Fig 3), knowledge of COVID-19 symptoms, transmission, and prevention scores were highest among heads of household with higher (β coefficients: 0.43 ∼ 0.47), technical (0.42 ∼ 0.46), or secondary (0.35 ∼ 0.41) education with no education as reference; and cited TV (0.25 ∼ 0.47), radio (0.16 ∼ 0.38), or SMS/WhatsApp (0.16 ∼ 0.36) as sources of information for COVID-19. Sources of information were significant mediators of the relationship between educational attainment and knowledge of symptoms, transmission, and prevention scores (Tables S4-S6). Compared to participants with no formal education, those with ≥primary education were more likely to have cited TV, hospital, radio, SMS/WhatsApp, and community leaders as sources of COVID-19 information than not cite them as sources of information; the higher the education level, the more likely participants cited these as sources of information. A significant proportion of the positive association between educational attainment and knowledge of symptoms, transmission, and prevention scores can be explained by mediators (TV, SMS/WhatsApp, and radio sources of information): the higher the education level, the greater the impact of these mediators on knowledge scores. Conversely, there was a significant negative natural indirect effect for community leaders and hospital, which indicates these sources of information may have attenuated the positive association of education on knowledge scores. Specifically, these sources of information were associated with slightly reduced COVID-19 knowledge among those with higher education.

![Fig 3.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2023/06/30/2023.03.31.23288026/F3.medium.gif)

[Fig 3.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/06/30/2023.03.31.23288026/F3)

Fig 3. Adjusteda associations between demographics and sources of information, and knowledge of prevention, symptoms, and transmission indicesb derived from principal components analysis, Mozambique, September 2021 – January 2022 (N=33,087).
Points represent β coefficients and error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. aAdjusted for all other variables in the model. bKnowledge of prevention includes: avoid crowded places, touching eyes, touching mouth, touching nose, or traveling; social distancing; quarantine; and wash hands with alcohol. Knowledge of symptoms includes: difficulty breathing, dry cough, fever, headaches, muscle pain, and sore throat. Knowledge of transmission includes: avoid crowded places, touching eyes, touching mouth, touching nose, or traveling; social distancing; quarantine; and wash hands with alcohol.

In adjusted analyses, higher knowledge of symptoms, transmission, and prevention scores were among participants who were 18-64 years (0.07 ∼ 0.19) with ≥65 as reference; were Roman Catholic, Protestant, or Evangelical (0.05 ∼ 0.22) with Zion church members as reference; were merchants (0.08 ∼ 0.15), retired/pensioners (0.17 ∼ 0.18), or professionals (0.07 ∼ 0.12) with unemployed as reference; and were in the poorer to richest wealth index quintiles (0.11 ∼ 0.25) with poorest as reference (Fig 3). Knowledge scores for all three indices were significantly lower for widowed (-0.10 ∼ -0.09) compared to married participants. Furthermore, knowledge of symptoms and transmission, but not prevention, were higher for those who had COVID-19 symptoms (0.10 ∼ 0.11). Knowledge of prevention and transmission were higher for males than females (0.04 ∼ 0.08). Variance inflation factors for independent variables in all three adjusted models were <1.3, so there was no evidence of collinearity (Table S7).

The adjusted odds of having had symptoms consistent with COVID-19 were higher for participants with primary, secondary, technical, or higher education (aORs: 1.74 ∼ 6.56) with no education as reference; Catholics, Protestants, Christians, Evangelicals, and Atheists with Zion church members as reference (aORs: 1.44 ∼ 2.02); professionals (aOR: 1.30; 95% CI: 1.07-1.59) with unemployed as reference; single (aOR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.07-1.35) with married as reference; and reported TV (aOR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.19-1.47) as a source of COVID-19 information (Fig 4). The adjusted odds of COVID-19 symptoms were lower for individuals in the richest wealth index quintile (aOR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.70, 0.98), were <18 years with ≥65 years as reference (aOR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.24, 0.54) and who learned about COVID-19 from hospital, radio, or community leaders (aORs: 0.59 ∼ 0.80).

![Fig 4.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2023/06/30/2023.03.31.23288026/F4.medium.gif)

[Fig 4.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/06/30/2023.03.31.23288026/F4)

Fig 4. Unadjusted and adjusteda associations between demographics and sources of information, and had COVID-19 symptoms, Mozambique, September 2021 – January 2022 (N=33,087).
X-axis is shown on a log-scale. aAdjusted for all other variables in the model.

## Discussion

Community public health measures to reduce infectious disease transmission are contingent upon individual perceptions of risk and knowledge. In this census of over 33,000 household members in Manhiça, Mozambique, almost everyone had heard of coronavirus, were aware of COVID-19 symptoms, and knew how COVID-19 could be prevented. The most recognized COVID-19 symptoms were dry cough, headaches, fever, difficulty breathing, and sore throat, consistent with findings from a systematic review of COVID-19 knowledge in sub-Saharan Africa [4]. This study was conducted at the tail end of the Delta variant wave in September through the peak of Omicron cases in January in Mozambique [35]. The most common Delta symptoms reported in the ZOE COVID Study in the U.K. included runny nose, headache, sneezing, sore throat, and loss of smell, whereas the most common Omicron symptoms were runny nose, headache, sore throat, sneezing, and persistent cough [36]. There was high knowledge of nonpharmaceutical prevention measures such as handwashing and mask-wearing, similar to a study in Ethiopia [37], but less than half of household members reported social distancing and avoiding crowded places as prevention measures, which are among the most effective public health measures to prevent SARS-CoV-2 transmission [38, 39]. Approximately half of household members knew that SARS-CoV-2 may be transmitted from droplets or aerosol from an infected person, which is the primary mode of SARS-CoV-2 transmission [40]. We also found that knowledge of symptoms, transmission, and prevention scores were positively correlated and there were consistent results between the knowledge outcomes.

The finding that participants with higher education had greater knowledge of COVID-19 symptoms, transmission, and prevention is consistent with studies in Australia [41], Ethiopia [17, 42], Indonesia [43], and South Korea [44]. Other studies also found that higher education was associated with COVID-19 vaccine acceptance [5, 45]. Mediation analyses demonstrated that TV, SMS/WhatsApp, and radio sources of information were significant mediators in the relationship between educational attainment and knowledge scores. Household heads with higher education were more likely to report TV, SMS and radio as sources of COVID-19 information, which were associated with higher knowledge scores. Only 20% of those with no education had a TV and 70% had a cellphone, whereas 86% with higher/university education had a TV and 99% had a cellphone. These resource discrepancies may also contribute to the finding that individuals in the higher wealth quintiles had higher knowledge scores. Other studies found that lower education was associated with misinformation, which may in part explain lower knowledge among this group as well [41, 46]. Participants with higher education also had the highest odds of having COVID-19 symptoms compared to those with no education, perhaps suggesting greater awareness of COVID-19 symptoms.

Older respondents had higher COVID-19 knowledge, consistent with other studies [43]. Older adults, particularly those with comorbidities, are at greater risk for severe illness, hospitalizations, and death from COVID-19: 70% of COVID-19-attributed deaths in the U.S. were among adults 70 years or older [47]. Other studies reported greater vaccination [5] and other preventive measures [48] among older adults compared to young adults. An online survey in Mozambique found that older participants were more likely to accept COVID-19 vaccines [49]. Mozambique has a young population with a median age of 17.6 years [50]. Although younger adults are less likely to be hospitalized with COVID-19 compared to older adults, some develop severe disease, and they may be infectious without symptoms [51].

Other factors associated with higher COVID-19 knowledge scores included employment as merchants, professionals, and unskilled manual laborers; and Catholic, Protestant, and Evangelical religions. Additional outreach promoting information regarding COVID-19 transmission and prevention, as well as vaccine safety and effectiveness, should be tailored to local communities in their language and should engage community leaders [29, 52]. Although not evaluated in this study, other KAP studies found higher knowledge scores among individuals with positive HIV status, urban residence, and no previous SARS-CoV-2 infection [10, 24]. Although we did not know HIV status of participants, this study was conducted in a community with high HIV prevalence. It is conceivable that previous experiences with and exposure to messaging for HIV and other endemic infectious diseases increased COVID-19 awareness in Manhiça. Additionally, individuals with HIV may have greater contact with the healthcare system, increasing the opportunity to learn about COVID-19 from healthcare providers. Rural southern Mozambique is also characterized by high levels of labor migration within Mozambique and to South Africa, but this study did not assess how that affected COVID-19 knowledge.

This study had several limitations. This study is not designed to be representative of all households in Mozambique; generalizability to a specific population is a feature of all population-based sub-national studies [18, 53]. Still, these results have broader relevance to educating communities about COVID-19 prevention. This was a cross-sectional study, which precludes establishing causal and temporal relationships between demographics and knowledge scores. There may have been social desirability bias in responses about knowledge. There may have been response bias if individuals with greater knowledge of COVID-19 were more likely to participate than those with less knowledge. Finally, there may have been recall bias due to the length of time in the study. Notwithstanding these limitations, regional census entails that these findings are representative of the district. To our knowledge, there are no other studies of knowledge of COVID-19 symptoms, transmission, and prevention among community members in Mozambique.

## Conclusions

In this census of over 33,000 community members in a rural district of Mozambique, most individuals had high knowledge of COVID-19 symptoms and prevention, but there was less knowledge about transmission. Messaging regarding COVID-19 in southern Mozambique effectively increased awareness of symptoms and prevention. These findings support the need for outreach and community engagement considering the target audience to promote COVID-19 prevention measures, particularly among vulnerable populations with lower educational status.

## Supporting information

Supplement [[supplements/288026_file06.docx]](pending:yes)

## Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

## Disclaimer

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

## Acknowledgements

CISM is supported by the Government of Mozambique and the Spanish Agency for International Development (AECID). ISGlobal receives support from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation through the “Centro de Excelencia Severo Ochoa 2019-2023” Program (CEX2018-000806-S), and support from the Generalitat de Catalunya through the CERCA Program.

## Footnotes

*   We updated references

*   Received March 31, 2023.
*   Revision received June 29, 2023.
*   Accepted June 30, 2023.


*   © 2023, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

This pre-print is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International), CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, as described at [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

## References

1.  1.World Health Organization. COVID-19 Mozambique 2022 [cited 2022 October 11]. Available from: [https://covid19.who.int/region/afro/country/mz](https://covid19.who.int/region/afro/country/mz).
    
    

2.  2.Wang H, Paulson KR, Pease SA, Watson S, Comfort H, Zheng P, et al. Estimating excess mortality due to the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic analysis of COVID-19-related mortality, 2020–21. The Lancet. 2022;399(10334):1513–36.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/s0140-6736(21)02796-3&link_type=DOI) 

3.  3.Yesuf M, Abdu M. Knowledge, attitude, prevention practice, and associated factors toward COVID-19 among preparatory school students in Southwest Ethiopia, 2021. PLOS ONE. 2022;17(1):e0262907.
    
    

4.  4.Nwagbara UI, Osual EC, Chireshe R, Bolarinwa OA, Saeed BQ, Khuzwayo N, et al. Knowledge, attitude, perception, and preventative practices towards COVID-19 in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review. PLOS ONE. 2021;16(4):e0249853.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1371/journal.pone.0249853&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F06%2F30%2F2023.03.31.23288026.atom) 

5.  5.Abebe H, Shitu S, Mose A. Understanding of COVID-19 vaccine knowledge, attitude, acceptance, and determinates of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among adult population in Ethiopia. Infection and drug resistance. 2021;14:2015.
    
    

6.  6.Shapiro J, Dean NE, Madewell ZJ, Yang Y, Halloran ME, Longini I. Efficacy estimates for various COVID-19 vaccines: what we know from the literature and reports. MedRxiv. 2021:2021.05. 20.21257461.
    
    

7.  7.Song S, Madewell ZJ, Liu M, Longini IM, Yang Y. Effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines against Omicron infection and severe events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of test-negative design studies. Frontiers in Public Health. 2023;11.
    
    

8.  8.U.S. Embassy in Mozambique. U.S. Government and Government of Mozambique Launch Adolescent Vaccine Campaign with Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccines 2022 [cited 2023 March 2]. Available from: [https://mz.usembassy.gov/u-s-government-and-government-of-mozambique-launch-adolescent-vaccine-campaign-with-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccines/](https://mz.usembassy.gov/u-s-government-and-government-of-mozambique-launch-adolescent-vaccine-campaign-with-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccines/).
    
    

9.  9.Feldman M, Lacey Krylova V, Farrow P, Donovan L, Zandamela E, Rebelo J, et al. Community health worker knowledge, attitudes and practices towards COVID-19: Learnings from an online cross-sectional survey using a digital health platform, UpSCALE, in Mozambique. PLOS ONE. 2021;16(2):e0244924.
    
    

10. 10.Marotta C, Nacareia U, Estevez AS, Tognon F, Genna GD, De Meneghi G, et al., editors. Mozambican adolescents and youths during the COVID-19 pandemic: knowledge and awareness gaps in the provinces of sofala and tete. Healthcare; 2021: MDPI.
    
    

11. 11.Madewell ZJ, Yang Y, Longini IM, Jr., Halloran ME, Dean NE. Household Secondary Attack Rates of SARS-CoV-2 by Variant and Vaccination Status: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(4):e229317.
    
    

12. 12.Madewell ZJ, Yang Y, Longini IM, Halloran ME, Vespignani A, Dean NE. Rapid review and meta-analysis of serial intervals for SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron variants. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2023;23(1):429.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/s12879-023-08407-5&link_type=DOI) 

13. 13.Madewell ZJ, Yang Y, Longini IM, Halloran ME, Dean NE. Factors associated with household transmission of SARS-CoV-2: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA network open. 2021;4(8):e2122240-e.
    
    

14. 14.Muir JA, Dheresa M, Madewell ZJ, Getachew T, Mengesha G, Whitney CG, et al. Food Insecurity amid COVID-19 Lockdowns: Assessing Sociodemographic Indicators of Vulnerability in Harar and Kersa, Ethiopia. medRxiv. 2023:2023.01.31.23284545.
    
    

15. 15.Muir JA, Dheresa M, Madewell ZJ, Getachew T, Mengesha G, Whitney CG, et al. Household Hardships during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Examining Household Vulnerability and Responses to Pandemic Related Shocks in Eastern Ethiopia. medRxiv. 2023:2023.02.01.23285322.
    
    

16. 16.Dheresa M, Muir JA, Madewell ZJ, Getachew T, Daraje G, Mengesha G, et al. COVID-19 Impact Data for the CHAMPS HDSS Network: Data from Harar and Kersa, Ethiopia. V1 ed: UNC Dataverse; 2023.
    
    

17. 17.Dheresa M, Madewell ZJ, Muir JA, Getachew T, Daraje G, Mengesha G, et al. Knowledge of COVID-19 prevention in Eastern Ethiopia. medRxiv. 2023:2023.06.28.23291972.
    
    

18. 18.Cunningham SA, Shaikh NI, Nhacolo A, Raghunathan PL, Kotloff K, Naser AM, et al. Health and demographic surveillance systems within the child health and mortality prevention surveillance network. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2019;69(Supplement_4):S274–S9.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/cid/ciz609&link_type=DOI) 

19. 19.Nhacolo A, Magaço A, Amosse F, Hunguana A, Matsena T, Nhacolo A, et al. Perceptions and compliance with COVID-19 preventive measures in Southern and Central regions of Mozambique: a quantitative in-person household survey in the districts of Manhiça and Quelimane. medRxiv. 2022:2022.11.17.22282473.
    
    

20. 20.Nhacolo A, Jamisse E, Augusto O, Matsena T, Hunguana A, Mandomando I, et al. Cohort Profile Update: Manhiça Health and Demographic Surveillance System (HDSS) of the Manhiça Health Research Centre (CISM). Int J Epidemiol. 2021;50(2):395.
    
    

21. 21.Ministério da Saúde /  Direcção Nacional de Saúde Pública. Manual de prevencao da COVID-19 Maputo2020 [cited 2023 March 2]. Available from: [https://www.misau.gov.mz/index.php/manuais-e-material-educativo?download=322:manual-de-prevencao-a-covid-19](https://www.misau.gov.mz/index.php/manuais-e-material-educativo?download=322:manual-de-prevencao-a-covid-19).
    
    

22. 22.1.  Nichols AL, 
    2.  Edlund J
    
    Cunningham SA, Muir JA. Data Cleaning. In: Nichols AL, Edlund J, editors. The Cambridge Handbook of Research Methods and Statistics for the Social and Behavioral Sciences: Volume 1: Building a Program of Research. Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2023. p. 443–67.
    
    

23. 23.Hajj A, Domiati S, Haddad C, Sacre H, Akl M, Akel M, et al. Assessment of knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding the disposal of expired and unused medications among the Lebanese population. J Pharm Policy Pract. 2022;15(1):107.
    
    

24. 24.Kwabla MP, Nyasordzi J, Kye-Duodu G, Ananga MK, Amenuvegbe GK, Otoo J, et al. Factors associated with COVID-19 knowledge among Ghanaians: A national survey. PLOS ONE. 2022;17(11):e0276381.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1371/journal.pone.0276381&link_type=DOI) 

25. 25.Madewell ZJ, Chacón-Fuentes R, Jara J, Mejía-Santos H, Molina I-B, Alvis-Estrada JP, et al. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of seasonal influenza vaccination in healthcare workers, Honduras. Plos one. 2021;16(2):e0246379.
    
    

26. 26.Berhe NM, Van de Velde S, Rabiee-Khan F, van der Heijde C, Vonk P, Buffel V, et al. Knowledge deficit and fear of COVID-19 among higher education students during the first wave of the pandemic and implications for public health: a multi-country cross-sectional survey. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):1144.
    
    

27. 27.Rizzo C, Campagna I, Pandolfi E, Croci I, Russo L, Ciampini S, et al. Knowledge and Perception of COVID-19 Pandemic during the First Wave (Feb-May 2020): A Cross-Sectional Study among Italian Healthcare Workers. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(7).
    
    

28. 28.Bikaki A, Machiorlatti M, Clark LC, Robledo CA, Kakadiaris IA. Factors Contributing to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Hesitancy of Hispanic Population in Rio Grande Valley. Vaccines (Basel). 2022;10(8).
    
    

29. 29.Madewell ZJ, Chacón-Fuentes R, Badilla-Vargas X, Ramirez C, Ortiz M-R, Alvis-Estrada J-P, et al. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding seasonal influenza vaccination during pregnancy in Costa Rica: A mixed-methods study. Vaccine. 2022;40(48):6931–8.
    
    

30. 30.Vander Weele T. Explanation in causal inference: methods for mediation and interaction Oxford University Press; 2015.
    
    

31. 31.Sengupta M, Dutta S, Roy A, Chakrabarti S, Mukhopadhyay I. Knowledge, attitude and practice survey towards COVID-19 vaccination: A mediation analysis. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2022;37(4):2063–80.
    
    

32. 32.Luz PM, Brown HE, Struchiner CJ. Disgust as an emotional driver of vaccine attitudes and uptake? A mediation analysis. Epidemiol Infect. 2019;147:e182.
    
    

33. 33.Maloney P, Tietje L, Rung A, Broyles S, Couk J, Peters E, et al. The mediating effects of barriers to vaccination on the relationship between race/ethnicity and influenza vaccination status in a rural Southeastern Louisiana medical center. J Prev Med Hyg. 2022;63(3):E482–e91.
    
    

34. 34.Granderath JS, Sondermann C, Martin A, Merkt M. Actual and Perceived Knowledge About COVID-19: The Role of Information Behavior in Media. Front Psychol. 2021;12:778886.
    
    

35. 35.World Health Organization. WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard: Mozambique 2022 [cited 2022 December 23]. Available from: [https://covid19.who.int/region/afro/country/mz](https://covid19.who.int/region/afro/country/mz).
    
    

36. 36.Menni C, Valdes AM, Polidori L, Antonelli M, Penamakuri S, Nogal A, et al. Symptom prevalence, duration, and risk of hospital admission in individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 during periods of omicron and delta variant dominance: a prospective observational study from the ZOE COVID Study. The Lancet. 2022;399(10335):1618–24.
    
    

37. 37.Desalegn Z, Deyessa N, Teka B, Shiferaw W, Hailemariam D, Addissie A, et al. COVID-19 and the public response: Knowledge, attitude and practice of the public in mitigating the pandemic in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. PLOS ONE. 2021;16(1):e0244780.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1371/journal.pone.0244780&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F06%2F30%2F2023.03.31.23288026.atom) 

38. 38.Talic S, Shah S, Wild H, Gasevic D, Maharaj A, Ademi Z, et al. Effectiveness of public health measures in reducing the incidence of covid-19, SARS-CoV-2 transmission, and covid-19 mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis. bmj. 2021;375.
    
    

39. 39.Madewell ZJ, Yang Y, Longini IM, Halloran ME, Dean NE. Household transmission of SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA network open. 2020;3(12):e2031756-e.
    
    

40. 40.Meyerowitz EA, Richterman A, Gandhi RT, Sax PE. Transmission of SARS-CoV-2: a review of viral, host, and environmental factors. Annals of internal medicine. 2021;174(1):69–79.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.7326/M20-5008&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F06%2F30%2F2023.03.31.23288026.atom) 

41. 41.Pickles K, Cvejic E, Nickel B, Copp T, Bonner C, Leask J, et al. COVID-19 misinformation trends in Australia: prospective longitudinal national survey. Journal of medical Internet research. 2021;23(1):e23805.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.2196/23805&link_type=DOI) 

42. 42.Yesse M, Muze M, Kedir S, Argaw B, Dengo M, Nesre T, et al. Assessment of knowledge, attitude and practice toward COVID-19 and associated factors among health care workers in Silte Zone, Southern Ethiopia. PLOS ONE. 2021;16(10):e0257058.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1371/journal.pone.0257058&link_type=DOI) 

43. 43.Sulistyawati S, Rokhmayanti R, Aji B, Wijayanti SPM, Hastuti SKW, Sukesi TW, et al. Knowledge, attitudes, practices and information needs during the covid-19 pandemic in indonesia. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy. 2021;14:163.
    
    

44. 44.Lee M, Kang B-A, You M. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) toward COVID-19: a cross-sectional study in South Korea. BMC public health. 2021;21(1):1–10.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/s12889-021-10961-z&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=33451323&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F06%2F30%2F2023.03.31.23288026.atom) 

45. 45.Shakeel CS, Mujeeb AA, Mirza MS, Chaudhry B, Khan SJ. Global COVID-19 vaccine acceptance: a systematic review of associated social and behavioral factors. Vaccines. 2022;10(1):110.
    
    

46. 46.Madewell ZJ, Chacón-Fuentes R, Jara J, Mejía-Santos H, Molina I-B, Alvis-Estrada JP, et al. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of seasonal influenza vaccination among older adults in nursing homes and daycare centers, Honduras. PLOS ONE. 2021;16(2):e0246382.
    
    

47. 47.Goldstein JR, Lee RD. Demographic perspectives on the mortality of COVID-19 and other epidemics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2020;117(36):22035–41.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NDoicG5hcyI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czoxMjoiMTE3LzM2LzIyMDM1IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjMvMDYvMzAvMjAyMy4wMy4zMS4yMzI4ODAyNi5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

48. 48.González-Herrera A, Rodríguez-Blázquez C, Romay-Barja M, Falcon-Romero M, Ayala A, Forjaz MJ. Age differences in knowledge, attitudes and preventive practices during the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain. Scientific Reports. 2022;12(1):1–8.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41598-022-19175-8&link_type=DOI) 

49. 49.Dula J, Mulhanga A, Nhanombe A, Cumbi L, Júnior A, Gwatsvaira J, et al. COVID-19 vaccine acceptability and its determinants in Mozambique: An online survey. Vaccines. 2021;9(8):828.
    
    

50. 50.United Nations. Population Division: World Population Prospects 2022 2022 [cited 2022 December 27]. Available from: [https://population.un.org/wpp/](https://population.un.org/wpp/).
    
    

51. 51.Ravindra K, Malik VS, Padhi BK, Goel S, Gupta M. Asymptomatic infection and transmission of COVID-19 among clusters: systematic review and meta-analysis. Public Health. 2022;203:100–9.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.puhe.2021.12.003&link_type=DOI) 

52. 52.Madewell Z, Chacón-Fuentes R, Badilla-Vargas X, Ramirez C, Ortiz MR, Alvis-Estrada JP, et al. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices for the use of seasonal influenza vaccination, healthcare workers, Costa Rica. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2021;15(7):1004–13.
    
    

53. 53.Clark S, Wakefield J, McCormick T, Ross M. Hyak Mortality Monitoring System: Innovative Sampling and Estimation Methods–Proof of Concept by Simulation. Global Health, Epidemiology and Genomics. 2018;3.