Abstract
Introduction The incidence of medication error in anesthesia can be variable among different studies likely due to recall bias in retrospective studies. In prospective survey studies, questionnaires are sent to anesthesia care providers to facilitate self-reports of medication errors during a pre-planned follow-up period. This systematic review investigates all prospective survey studies of medication errors in adult patients undergoing general anesthesia. Our objective is to identify the incidence and characteristics of the common medication errors during general anesthesia. We also want to determine the contributing factors and outcomes of these errors.
Methods We conducted database searches of Embase and Medline for medication errors in anesthesia between 1980 to 2019 and 2020 to 2021. Ten prospective survey studies detailing medication errors involving adult patients under general anesthesia were included. Data on response rate, incidence of errors, types of error and medications, patient outcomes, and contributing factors were collected.
Results Ten studies were included of which six studies provided a response rate ranging from 53% to 97.5%. The incidence of medication errors ranged from 0.02% to 1.12% or 1 in every 90 to 5000 anesthetics. A total of 1,676 medication errors during general anesthesia were analyzed. The most reported error was the substitution error (31.6% [530/1676]), followed by incorrect dose (28.4% [476/1676]). The class of medication most associated with administration errors were muscle relaxants, opioids, and antibiotics. Most patient outcomes were of no harm. Inexperience of the anesthesiologist, nurse or student was the most reported contributing factor, followed by haste or pressure to proceed, and communication problems.
Conclusion The incidence of medication errors during general anesthesia were as high as 1.12% and the most common errors were substitution error and incorrect dose. Inexperience, time pressure, and communication problems were contributing factors. This information can be used to inform safety practices in anesthesia.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
N/A
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵* Bradley Murphy, E-mail: bradley.murphy{at}medportal.ca (BPM)
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
