Abstract
Epilepsy surgery is the treatment of choice for drug-resistant epilepsy patients, but up to 50% of patients continue to have seizures one year after the resection. In order to aid presurgical planning and predict postsurgical outcome in a patient-by-patient basis, we developed a framework of individualized computational models that combine epidemic spreading with patient-specific connectivity and epileptogeneity maps: the Epidemic Spreading Seizure and Epilepsy Surgery framework (ESSES). The ESSES parameters were fitted in a retrospective study (N = 15) to reproduce invasive electroencephalography (iEEG)-recorded seizures. ESSES could not only reproduce the iEEG-recorded seizures, but significantly better so for patients with good (seizure-free, SF) than bad (non-seizure-free, NSF) outcome (area under the curve AUC = 0.73). Once the model parameters were set in the retrospective study, ESSES can be applied also to patients without iEEG data. We illustrate here the clinical applicability of ESSES with a pseudo-prospective study (N = 34) with a blind setting (to the resection strategy and surgical outcome) that emulated the presurgical conditions. ESSES could predict the chances of good outcome after any resection by finding patient-specific optimal resection strategies, which we found to be smaller for SF than NSF patients, suggesting an intrinsic difference in the network organization or presurgical evaluation results of NSF patients. The actual surgical plan also overlapped more with the optimal resection, and had a larger effect in decreasing modeled seizure propagation, for SF patients than for NSF patients. Overall, ESSES could correctly predict 75% of NSF and 80.8% of SF cases pseudo-prospectively. Our results show that individualised computational models may inform surgical planning by suggesting optimal resections and providing information on the likelihood of a good outcome after a proposed resection. This is the first time that such a model is validated on a fully independent cohort without the need for iEEG recordings.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Ana P. Millan and Ida A. Nissen were supported by ZonMw and the Dutch Epilepsy Foundation, project number 95105006. Piet Van Mieghem has been funded by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No 101019718).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
All patients gave written informed consent and the study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the VUmC (Vrij Universiteit Medical Center) Medical Ethics Committee.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data used for this manuscript are not publicly available because the patients did not consent for the sharing of their clinically obtained data. Requests to access to the data-sets should be directed to the corresponding author.
