Abstract
Eight lineages of Mycobacterium tuberculosis sensu stricto are described. Single-country or small observational data suggest differences in clinical phenotype between lineages. We present strain lineage and clinical phenotype data from 12,246 patients from 3 low-incidence and 5 high-incidence countries. We used multivariable logistic regression to explore the effect of lineage on site of disease and on cavities on chest radiography, given pulmonary TB; multivariable multinomial logistic regression to investigate types of extra-pulmonary TB, given lineage; and accelerated failure time and Cox proportional-hazards models to explore the effect of lineage on time to smear and culture-conversion. Mediation analyses quantified the direct effects of lineage on outcomes. Pulmonary disease was more likely among patients with lineage(L) 2, L3 or L4, than L1 (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.79, (95% confidence interval 1.49-2.15), p<0.001; aOR=1.40(1.09-1.79), p=0.007; aOR=2.04(1.65-2.53), p<0.001, respectively). Among patients with pulmonary TB, those with L1 had greater risk of cavities on chest radiography versus those with L2 (aOR=0.69(0.57-0.83), p<0.001) and L4 strains (aOR=0.73(0.59-0.90), p=0.002). L1 strains were more likely to cause osteomyelitis among patients with extra-pulmonary TB, versus L2-4 (p=0.033, p=0.008 and p=0.049 respectively). Patients with L1 strains showed shorter time-to-sputum smear conversion than for L2. Causal mediation analysis showed the effect of lineage in each case was largely direct. The pattern of clinical phenotypes seen with L1 strains differed from modern lineages (L2-4). This has implications for clinical management and could influence clinical trial selection strategies.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research was funded in whole, or in part, by the Wellcome Trust [214560/Z/18/Z]. For the purpose of open access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission. This work was supported by Wellcome Trust (grants 226007/Z/22/Z to LG) and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health (grant 1R01AI146338 to LG). Parts of this work have been funded by the Leibniz Science Campus Evolutionary Medicine of the LUNG (EvoLUNG), the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany’s Excellence Strategy – EXC 2167 Precision Medicine in Inflammation as well as the Research Training Group 2501 TransEvo, and the German Center for Infection Reasearch (DZIF). TMW is a Wellcome Trust Clinical Career Development Fellow (214560/Z/18/Z). The funders played no role in the design, execution, or reporting of this study.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
IRB approvals were obtained from the University of Lübeck (Germany) Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia via the Peruvian Ministry of Health (ref. 100252) (Peru) Pham Ngoc Thach Hospital Ho Chi Minh City and the University of Oxford (OxTREC) (Vietnam) China CDC (China) University of Witwatersrand Human Research Ethics Committee (ref. M160667) (South Africa) Hasan Sadikin Hospital/Faculty of Medicine of Universitas Padjadjaran (clinical trial ref. NCT02169882) (Indonesia) Observational/Interventions Research Ethics Committee, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (ref: 6449) (Indonesia) institutional review boards in Indonesia in the context of the TANDEM study (Indonesia) Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan (ref: OSR 82/DG 26/2/10, amended 11/12/14) (Italy). Data from the UK data were obtained entirely from the published literature. Those data had been collected under public health law with no need for further IRB approval or individual patient consent.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data used in the study are available in the supplementary materials. All code is available via the link supplied in the manuscript.