Abstract
Purpose In this paper, we aimed to clinically interpret Temporal-Superior-Nasal-Inferior-Temporal (TSNIT) retinal optical coherence tomography (OCT) images in a convolutional neural network (CNN) model to differentiate between normal and glaucomatous optic neuropathy.
Methods Three modified pre-trained deep learning (DL) models: SqueezeNet, ResNet18, and VGG16, were fine-tuned for transfer learning to visualize CNN features and detect glaucoma using 780 segmented and 780 raw TSNIT OCT B-scans of 370 glaucomatous and 410 normal images. The performance of the DL models was further investigated with Grad-CAM activation function to visualize which regions of the images are considered for the prediction of the two classes.
Results For glaucoma detection, VGG16 performed better than SqueezeNet and ResNet18 models, with the highest AUC (0.988) on validation data and accuracy of 93% for test data. Moreover, identical classification results were obtained from raw and segmented images. For feature localization, three models accurately identify the distinct retinal regions of the TSNIT images for glaucoma and normal eyes.
Conclusion This evidence-based result demonstrates the remarkable effectiveness of using raw TSNIT OCT B-scan for automated glaucoma detection using DL techniques which mitigates the black box problem of artificial intelligence (AI) and increases the transparency and reliability of the DL model for clinical interpretation. Moreover, the results imply that the raw TSNIT OCT scan can be used to detect glaucoma without any prior segmentation or pre-processing, which may be an attractive feature in large-scale screening applications.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study adhered to all the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the UNSW Sydney ethics committee
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors