Increase in group A streptococcal meningitis with the M1UK variant ================================================================== * Boas C.L. van der Putten * Bart J.M. Vlaminckx * Brechje de Gier * Wieke Freudenburg-de Graaf * Nina M. van Sorge ## Abstract We analyzed over 40 years of bacteriological surveillance data to reveal a 4-fold increase in Group A streptococcal (GAS) meningitis in 2022 compared to the annual average of 1982-2021 (n=5/year). Already four GAS meningitis cases occurred in 2023 (until Feb 20th). Moreover, from May 2022 all GAS meningitis cases were caused by the *Streptococcus pyogenes emm*1 strains, of which 15 of the 19 (79%) belonged to the toxicogenic M1UK variant. Based on these observations, we urge clinicians to be vigilant regarding clinical sign of meningitis with invasive GAS infections, since this disease manifestation appears to have a higher than expected occurrence due to clonal replacement by the recently-emerged M1UK variant. ## Introduction *Streptococcus pyogenes* can cause a wide range of invasive infections, collectively referred to as invasive group A streptococcal (iGAS) infections. A rare but severe disease manifestation of iGAS is meningitis, which has an estimated incidence in adults of 0.2 per 1,000,000 persons per year 1,2. Several European countries as well as the United States have observed an unprecedented increase of iGAS infections in the past months, where the relative contribution of specific iGAS disease manifestations may differ from historic observations 3,4. Here we performed an epidemiological assessment of GAS meningitis cases based on over 40 years of national bacteriological surveillance data. ## Methods Microbiological surveillance and molecular epidemiology of all-cause bacterial meningitis, including S. pyogenes, is performed by the Netherlands Reference Laboratory for Bacterial Meningitis (NRLBM). For this study, we analyzed S. pyogenes isolates cultured from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) between 1982-2023 (until Feb 20st), amounting to >40 years of consistent national data collection. Typing of S. pyogenes is based on sequence variation in 180 bp of the emm gene and is routinely performed by the NRLBM since 2013 according to the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) protocol. Whole-genome sequencing (Illumina HiSeq) was performed on 19 *emm*1.0 isolates received between 2019 and 20th Dec 2022. ## Results Between 1982 and 2021, the NRLBM received a total of 216 *S. pyogenes* CSF isolates, with an annual average of five isolates (range 1-15). In contrast, 19 *S. pyogenes* CSF isolates were received in 2022, nearly 4-times higher than the 40-year annual average. Moreover, we already received four *S. pyogenes* CSF isolates until 20 Feb 2023. Among the 48 CSF isolates from 2013-2021, 19 different *emm* (sub)types were distinguished, with *emm*1.0 ranking overall as the dominant *emm*-type at 35% (n=17; Figure 1), which is not uncommon among iGAS manifestations in Western countries5. However, from the 23 S. pyogenes CSF isolates that were received between 2022 and 20th Feb 2023, 20 (87%) isolates were identified as *emm*1.0 (Figure 1). We performed whole-genome sequencing on a smaller selection of *emm*1.0 isolates to distinguish whether they belonged to the recently-identified M1UK variant, which produces significantly higher levels of the SpeA superantigen compared to the previously circulating M1global strains6. Of the 19 *emm*1.0 isolates received between 2019 and 20th December 2022, 15 (79%) belonged to the M1UK lineage, with all isolates received from May 2022 onwards representing the M1UK variant. This suggests an extensive clonal replacement of *S. pyogenes emm*1.0 by this toxicogenic variant. ![Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2023/03/01/2023.02.27.23286423/F1.medium.gif) [Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/03/01/2023.02.27.23286423/F1) Figure 1. Number of received S. pyogenes CSF isolates with proportion of *emm*1.0, 2013-2023 (until Feb 20th). ## Discussion Our study only considered GAS meningitis patients based on *S. pyogenes* cultured from CSF, thereby excluding meningitis patients with only a positive *S. pyogenes* blood culture. This may have resulted in an underestimation of the overall national occurrence of GAS meningitis. Furthermore, submission bias of *S. pyogenes* isolates to the NRLBM may play a role, given the increased submission of isolates throughout 2022. Notwithstanding these study limitations, the strong overrepresentation of *emm*1.0 and particularly the toxicogenic M1UK variant among the received CSF isolates is unprecedented. We therefore urge clinicians to be vigilant regarding the occurrence of meningitis with iGAS, as this disease manifestation appears to have a higher than expected occurrence due to clonal replacement by the recently emerged M1UK variant. ## Data Availability The mentioned strains are available upon request to the authors. ## Conflict of interest NMvS declares fee for service and consultancy fees directly paid to the institution from MSD and GSK outside the submitted work. NMvS declared royalties related to a patent (WO 2013/020090 A3) on vaccine development against *Streptococcus pyogenes* (Vaxcyte; Licensee: University of California San Diego with NMvS as co-inventor). NMvS is a member of the Science advisory Board for the ItsME foundation (unpaid) and Rapua te me ngaro ka tau project (paid to institution; Project facilitating Strep A vaccine development for Aotearoa New Zealand). Other authors declare no conflict of interest. ## Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Agaath Arends-van ‘t Klooster, Wendy Bril-Keijzers, Ilse de Beer-Schuurman, Jolein Pleijster, and Claudia Burger for their continued contributions as part of the NRLBM and the Dutch medical microbiology laboratories for sustained voluntary submission of *S. pyogenes* isolates. * Received February 27, 2023. * Revision received February 27, 2023. * Accepted March 1, 2023. * © 2023, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory This pre-print is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International), CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, as described at [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ## References 1. 1.Lucas MJ, Brouwer MC, Bovenkerk S, Man WK, van der Ende A, van de Beek D. Group A streptococcal meningitis in adults. J Infect. 2015;71(1):37–42. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F03%2F01%2F2023.02.27.23286423.atom) 2. 2.Kjaergaard N, Bodilsen J, Justesen US, et al. Community-acquired meningitis caused by beta-haemolytic streptococci in adults: a nationwide population-based cohort study. European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases. 2019;38(12):2305–2310. 3. 3.Holdstock V, Twynam-Perkins J, Bradnock T, et al. National case series of group A Streptococcus pleural empyema in children: clinical and microbiological features. Lancet Infect Dis. 2023. 4. 4.van Kempen EB, Bruijning-Verhagen PC, Borensztajn D, et al. Increase in invasive Group A streptococcal infections in children in the Netherlands, a survey among 7 hospitals in 2022. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2023;Preprint. 5. 5.Steer AC, Law I, Matatolu L, Beall BW, Carapetis JR. Global emm type distribution of group A streptococci: systematic review and implications for vaccine development. Lancet Infect Dis. 2009;9(10):611–616. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S1473-3099(09)70178-1&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19778763&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F03%2F01%2F2023.02.27.23286423.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000270773500016&link_type=ISI) 6. 6.Lynskey NN, Jauneikaite E, Li HK, et al. Emergence of dominant toxigenic M1T1 Streptococcus pyogenes clone during increased scarlet fever activity in England: a population-based molecular epidemiological study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19(11):1209–1218. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30446-3&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F03%2F01%2F2023.02.27.23286423.atom)