ABSTRACT
Background The prognostic utility of NT-proBNP in the setting of hypertension has not been well-characterized in the general US adult population.
Methods We measured NT-proBNP among adults aged 20 years who participated in the 1999-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. In adults without a history of cardiovascular disease, we assessed the prevalence of elevated NT-pro-BNP by blood pressure (BP) treatment and control categories. We examined the extent to which NT-proBNP identifies participants at higher risk for mortality across BP treatment and control categories.
Results The number of US adults without CVD with elevated NT-proBNP (≥125 pg/ml) was 6.2 million among those with untreated hypertension, 4.6 million among those with treated controlled hypertension, and 5.4 million among those with treated uncontrolled hypertension. After adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, and race/ethnicity, participants with treated controlled hypertension and elevated NT-proBNP had increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR 2.29, 95% CI 1.79, 2.95) and increased risk of cardiovascular mortality (HR 3.83, 95% CI: 2.34, 6.29), compared to those without hypertension and with low levels of NT-proBNP (<125 pg/ml). Among those on antihypertensive medication, those with SBP 130-139 mm Hg and elevated NT-proBNP had increased risk of all-cause mortality, compared to those with SBP<120 mm Hg and low levels of NT-proBNP.
Conclusions Among a general population of adults free of cardiovascular disease, NT-proBNP can provide additional prognostic information within and across categories of BP. Measurement of NT-proBNP may have potential for clinical use to optimize hypertension treatment.
Competing Interest Statement
Dr. Christenson has received grant support from Roche Diagnostics, Fujirebio Diagnostics, Beckman Coulter, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, Becton Dickinson, Abbott Diagnostics, Mitsubishi, and Horiba Medical; and has consulting agreements with PixCell, Beckman Coulter, Quidel, Siemens Healthineers, and Roche Diagnostics. Dr. Selvin receives payments from Wolters Kluwer for chapters and laboratory monographs in UpToDate on measurements of glycemic control and screening tests for type 2 diabetes.
Funding Statement
This work was funded by a grant from the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Biomarkers Consortium to the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health (PI: Elizabeth Selvin). The Foundation for the National Institutes of Health received support for this project from Abbott Laboratories, AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, the National Dairy Council, Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, Roche Diagnostics, and Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics. Ms. Daya was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) grant T32 HL007024. Dr. Echouffo- Tcheugui was supported by NIH/NHLBI grant K23 HL153774. Dr. Selvin was also supported by NIH/NHLBI grant K24 HL152440. SPJ is supported by K23 HL135273.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The NHANES protocols and this stored serum study was approved by the ethics review board of the National Center for Health Statistics.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author, Natalie R Daya (ndaya1{at}jh.edu), on reasonable request. All NHANES data is publicly available.
