ABSTRACT
Background The correlate(s) of protection against SARS-CoV-2 remain incompletely defined. Additional information regarding the combinations of antibody and T cell-mediated immunity which can protect against (re)infection are needed.
Methods We conducted a population-based, longitudinal cohort study including 1044 individuals of varying SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and infection statuses. We assessed Spike (S)- and Nucleocapsid (N)-IgG and wildtype, delta, and omicron neutralizing antibodies. In a subset of 328 individuals, we evaluated S, Membrane (M) and N-specific T cells. 3 months later, we reassessed antibody (n=964) and T cell (n=141) responses and evaluated factors associated with protection from (re)infection.
Results At study start, >98% of participants were S-IgG seropositive. N-IgG and M/N-T cell responses increased over time, indicating viral (re)exposure, despite existing S-IgG. Compared to N-IgG, M/N-T cells were a more sensitive measure of viral exposure. N-IgG titers in the top 33% of participants, omicron neutralizing antibodies in the top 25%, and S-specific T cell responses were all associated with reduced likelihood of (re)infection over time.
Conclusions Population-level SARS-CoV-2 immunity is S-IgG-dominated, but heterogenous. M/N T cell responses can distinguish previous infection from vaccination, and monitoring a combination of N-IgG, omicron neutralizing antibodies and S-T cell responses may help estimate protection against SARS-CoV-2 (re)infection.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The Corona Immunitas research network is coordinated by the Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+) and funded by fundraising of SSPH+ including funds of the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health and private funders (ethical guidelines for funding stated by SSPH+ were respected), by funds of the cantons of Switzerland (Vaud, Zurich, and Basel), and by institutional funds of the Universities.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study protocol was approved by the Cantonal Ethics Committee of Zurich (BASEC Registration No. 2020-01247) and registered (ISRCTN registry 18181860, date of registration 13 July 2020, retrospectively registered).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors and will be made available upon study publication.
