Abstract
The term “long COVID” (LC) was coined in spring 2020 by individuals with ongoing symptoms following COVID-19, but it took until December 2020 for clinical codes to be created in order to record persistent post-COVID-19 illness and referrals within electronic health records (EHRs). Analysis of whole-population EHR databases have helped understand the epidemiology of LC; yet concerns exist about the completeness of accessible EHRs for LC. UK longitudinal population studies (LPS) collected self-reported data on COVID-19 and LC from early 2020 and deposited these data in the UK Longitudinal Linkage Collaboration (UK LLC) research database where they are systematically linked to the participants EHRs. Comparisons of LPS reported LC with recorded LC in the EHRs of the same individuals may be helpful in understanding the epidemiology of emerging conditions such as LC. We used data from 10 UK LPS in the UK LLC to investigate whether participants self-reporting LC had a LC diagnosis or referral code in their English EHR after 10 to 22 months of follow up. Of 6412 participants with COVID-19 symptom duration data and linkage to health records, 898 (14.0%) self-reported LC of any severity in LPS surveys. Among these, just 42 (4.7%; 95% CI: 3.5, 6.3) were identified with LC-related codes in EHRs. In individuals reporting debilitating LC, this proportion was only marginally higher (5.6%; 95% CI: 3.7, 8.3). Our data show a striking discrepancy between LC as perceived and reported by participants in LPS and evidence of LC recorded in their EHRs; and that this discrepancy was patterned by ethnicity and possibly by indicators of deprivation. Self-reported symptoms may not be reflected in coded EHRs due to factors including variations in individuals help seeking behaviours, clinician coding practices and the availability of appropriate codes. However, these considerations appear unlikely to provide a complete explanation for the substantial observed reporting discrepancy. These results may indicate substantial unmet clinical need, in keeping with patient reports of difficulties accessing healthcare and sub-optimal recognition of, and response to, their illness when they do. They may also indicate potential shortcomings of epidemiological research on LC based on EHR- or LPS-based ascertainment alone and illustrate the value of triangulation between LPS and EHR data where linked and made available through resources such as the UK LLC.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Protocols
https://ukllc.ac.uk/data-use-register/llc_0006
Funding Statement
This research was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR; grants COV-LT-0009; MC_PC_20051). The UK LLC is an initiative of the UKRI-funded Longitudinal Health and Wellbeing National Core Study led by University College London and University of Bristol (Grant codes: MC_PC_20030, MC_PC_20059). JM is partly funded by the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration West. This work uses data accessed within UK LLCs Trusted Research Environment (TRE), hosted by the Secure eResearch Platform (SeRP UK). We thank the SeRP UK Team at Swansea University and NHS Digital Health and Care Wales for providing the TREs infrastructure and support. This work uses data provided by participants of the contributing LPS within the UK LLC TRE, which have been collected through their longitudinal study or as part of their care and support and/or interactions with UK government services. We wish to recognise and thank the study participants and each contributing LPS team, including data managers, administrators and those collecting data. We thank the following LPS for contributing data that made this research possible: Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) 1970 British Cohort Study (BCS70) Medical Research Council (MRC) National Survey of Health and Development (NSHD) Millennium Cohort Study (MCS) National Child Development Study (NCDS) Next Steps TwinsUK The UK Household Longitudinal Study (Understanding Society). We thank the NHS and particularly NHS Digital for their work in curating participants health records and for making these available for public benefit research designed to improve health services.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Haydock Research Ethics Committee of the UK's Health Research Authority gave ethical approval for this work (ref: 20/NW/0446).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data used in the present study are available to request from the UK Longitudinal Linkage Collaboration - the national Trusted Research Environment for UK longitudindal population studies (https://ukllc.ac.uk). The syntax used in this study is available from the UK LLC GitHub (https://github.com/UKLLC/LLC_0006).
