Abstract
Background Vitamin D (vitD) has been correlated with a number of health outcomes and disease states; however, these relationships are likely confounded by the role of outdoor physical activity (PA). Currently, there are few studies that consider confounders to vitD status and the potentially spurious relationships between PA and vitD status.
Methods This scoping review will employ Arksey and O’Malley’s five-stage approach. Publications will be identified through five databases (CINAHL, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, and SportDISCUS) and reviewed in Covidence.
Results The findings are expected to help identify what information is presently available regarding the correlation between outdoor PA and vitD status. The results of this scoping review will help to inform a quantitative analysis of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) All of Us database.
Discussion It is unclear what effect outdoor PA may have on the relationship between vitD status and health outcomes and if any portion of this relationship is spurious. This scoping review will initiate an exploration of the relationship between vitD and PA to determine the strength and magnitude of potential confounders. Ultimately, we seek to reassess previous findings and determine the true effect of vitD alone by isolating the effect of outdoor PA.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study. All relevant data from this study will be made available upon study completion.