Abstract
Background Panic attacks are an impairing mental health problem that affects about one in 10 US adults every year. Current DSM criteria describe panic attacks as unexpected, occurring without warning or triggering events. The unexpected nature of panic attacks not only leads to increased anxiety for the individual but has also made panic attacks particularly challenging to study. However, recent evidence suggests that individuals who experience such attacks could identify attack triggers.
Objective We aimed to explore both retrospectively and prospectively, qualitative, and quantitative factors associated with the onset of panic attacks.
Method We remotely recruited a diverse sample of 87 individuals who regularly experienced panic attacks from 30 states in the US. Participants responded to daily questions relating to their panic attacks and wellness behaviors each day for 28 days. We also considered daily community level factors captured by the Hedonometer, a metric which estimates population-level happiness daily using a random 10% of all public tweets.
Results Consistent with our prior work, most participants (95%) were able to retrospectively identify a trigger for their attack. Worse individual mood was associated with greater likelihood of experiencing a same-day panic attack over and above other individual wellness factors. Worse individually reported mood and state-based population level mood as indicated by the Hedonometer were associated with greater likelihood of next-day panic attack.
Conclusions These promising results suggest that individuals who experience panic attacks may be able to expect the unexpected. The importance of individual and state-based population level mood in panic attack risk could be used to ultimately inform future prevention and intervention efforts.
Competing Interest Statement
EWM and RSM are Co-founders of PanicMechanic, Inc., SB discloses stock ownership in PanicMechanic, Inc.
Funding Statement
This research was supported by grants from UVM Ventures and K23 National Institute of Mental Health Career Development Award (Dr. McGinnis: MH123031)
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The institutional review board of the University of Vermont gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Conflicts of Interest: EWM and RSM are Co-founders of PanicMechanic, Inc., SB discloses stock ownership in PanicMechanic, Inc.
Source of Funding: This research was supported by grants from UVM Ventures and K23 National Institute of Mental Health Career Development Award (Dr. McGinnis: MH123031).
Data Availability
Data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors for valid research purposes.
