Abstract
The current study characterizes a cohort of veteran claims filed with the Veterans Benefits Administration for posttraumatic stress disorder secondary to experiencing military sexual trauma, compares posttraumatic stress disorder service-connection award denial for military sexual trauma-related claims versus combat-related claims, and examines military sexual trauma -related award denial across gender and race. We conducted analyses on a retrospective national cohort of veteran claims submitted and rated between October 2017-May 2022, including 102,404 combat-related claims and 31,803 military sexual trauma-related claims. Descriptive statistics were calculated, logistic regressions assessed denial of service-connection across stressor type and demographics, and odds ratios were calculated as effect sizes. Military sexual trauma-related claims were submitted primarily by White women Army veterans, and had a two times higher odds of being denied (27.6%) than combat claims (18.2%). When controlling for demographics including age, race, and gender, men veterans had a 1.77 times higher odds of having military sexual trauma-related claims denied compared to women veterans (36.6% vs. 25.4%), and Black veterans had a 1.39 times higher odds of having military sexual trauma-related claims denied compared to White veterans (32.4% vs. 25.3%). Three-fourths of military sexual trauma-related claims were awarded in this cohort, however, there were disparities in awarding of claims across gender and race for men and Black veterans, which suggest the possibility of systemic barriers for veterans from underserved backgrounds and/or who may underreport military sexual trauma.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work. Dr. Webermann’s time is funded by the Advanced Fellowship in Women’s Health through the VA Office of Academic Affiliations. The funding sources had no involvement in the study design, analyses, article preparation, or decision to submit.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The present study was approved by the VA Connecticut Healthcare System Institutional Review Board in December 2022
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
The opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not represent the official policy or position of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs or the U.S. government. Dr. Webermann’s time is funded by the Advanced Fellowship in Women’s Health through the VA Office of Academic Affiliations. The funding sources had no involvement in the study design, analyses, article preparation, or decision to submit. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Data Availability
Given restrictions imposed by good ethical practice and requirements of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Institutional Review Board regarding protection of human subjects data, and consistent with journal guidelines for cases where there are ethical restrictions to uploading the data publicly, such as the data being potentially identifying or a lack of patient consent to publicly share the data, we will make the data available to qualified researchers upon request. We have identified a non-author contact point who will process all data requests and provide access to de-identified data as appropriate. The non-author contact is Praveen Kamath and he can be contacted at praveen.kamath@va.gov.
