ABSTRACT
Background Predicting mortality and morbidity amongst hospitalized patients has long been a struggle for inpatient Internal Medicine physicians. To prevent physician burnout, hospital organizations are turning to shift work for the care of hospitalized patients. Such shift work frequently leads to a handoff of patients, with many physicians often being the sole provider in the hospital for close to one hundred patients.
Objectives We propose developing an artificial intelligence model that helps predict which patients will be most at risk of increased mortality. This model would assist providers and frontline staff in focusing their efforts on improving patient outcomes.
Materials and Methods Records of patients who were transferred from non-intensive care units to intensive care units were queried from the Veteran Affairs Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW). Two thousand four hundred twenty-five records were identified. The patient outcome was designated a dependent variable, with bad outcome defined as the patient dying within 30 days of admission and good outcome as the patient being alive within 30 days of admission. Using twenty-two independent variables, we trained sixteen machine learning models, of which six best-performing ones were fine-tuned and evaluated on the testing dataset. Finally, we repeated this process with twenty independent variables, omitting the Length of Stay and Days to Intensive Care Unit Transfer variables which are unknown at the time of admission.
Results The best results were obtained with the LightGBM model with both datasets, one that included Length of Stay and Days to Intensive Care Unit Transfer variables and the other without these two variables. The former achieved Receiver Operating Characteristics Curve - Area Under the Curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.89, an accuracy of 0.72, a sensitivity of 0.97, and a specificity of 0.68, while the latter achieved a ROC-AUC of 0.86, an accuracy of 0.71, sensitivity of 0.94 and specificity of 0.67 respectively.
Conclusions Our predictive mortality model may offer providers a means for optimizing the utilization of resources when managing a large caseload, especially with shift changes.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This material is the result of work supported by the resources and the use of facilities at the James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital Research and Development Committee reviewed and approved this study.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors