Abstract
While the world is trying to get rid of the Covid 19 pandemic, the beginning of the monkeypox(MPX) pandemic has recently appeared and is threatening many countries of the world. MPX is a rare disease caused by infection with the MPX virus, and it is among the same family of pox viruses. The danger is that MPX causes pustules all over the body, which causes a revolting view to the body regions and works as a source of infection in case of skin contact between individuals. Pustules and rashes are common symptoms of many pox viruses and other skin diseases such as Measles, chicken pox, syphilis, Eczema, etc, Therefore, the medical and clinical diagnosis of monkeypox is one of the great challenges for doctors and specialists. In response to this need, Artificial intelligence can develop aid systems based on machine and deep learning algorithms for diagnosing these types of diseases based on datasets of skin images to those types of diseases. In this paper, a deep learning approach called Dense Net-121model is applied, tested, and compared with the convolution neural network (CNN) model for diagnosing monkeypox through a skin image dataset of MPX and Measles images. The most significant finding to emerge from this study is the superiority of the Dense Net-121 model over CNN in diagnosing MPX cases with a testing accuracy of 93%. These findings suggest a role for using more deep learning algorithms for accurately diagnosing MPX cases with bigger datasets of similar pustules and rashes diseases.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵* Scientific Research Group in Egypt (SRGE), http://egyptscience.net/
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
