ACE-2-like enzymatic activity is associated with immunoglobulin in COVID-19 patients
====================================================================================

* Yufeng Song
* Regan Myers
* Lila Murphy
* Bailey Brooks
* Jeffrey M. Wilson
* Alexandra Kadl
* Judith Woodfolk
* Steven L. Zeichner

## Abstract

Many mechanisms responsible for COVID-19 pathogenesis are well-established, but COVID-19 includes features with unclear pathogenesis, such as autonomic dysregulation, coagulopathies, and high levels of inflammation. The receptor for SARS-CoV-2 spike protein’s receptor binding domain (RBD) is angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). We hypothesized that some COVID-19 patients may develop antibodies that have negative molecular image of RBD sufficiently similar to ACE2 to yield ACE2-like catalytic activity – ACE2-like abzymes. To explore this hypothesis, we studied patients hospitalized with COVID-19 who had plasma samples available obtained about 7 days after admission. ACE2 is a metalloprotease that requires Zn2+ for activity. However, we found that the plasma from some patients studied could cleave a synthetic ACE2 peptide substrate, even though the plasma samples were collected using disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate (EDTA) anticoagulant. When we spiked plasma with synthetic ACE2, no ACE2 substrate cleavage activity was observed unless Zn2+ was added or the plasma was diluted to decrease EDTA concentration. After processing samples by 100 kDa size exclusion columns and protein A/G adsorption, which depleted immunoglobulin by >99.99%, the plasma samples did not cleave the ACE2 substrate peptide. The data suggest that some patients with COVID-19 develop antibodies with abzyme-like activity capable of cleaving synthetic ACE2 substrate. Since abzymes can exhibit promiscuous substrate specificities compared to the enzyme whose active site image they resemble, and since proteolytic cascades regulate many physiologic processes, anti-RBD abzymes may contribute to some otherwise obscure COVID-19 pathogenesis.

## Introduction

The primary pathology in COVID-19 involves pulmonary disease1–3. Other end organ involvement, likely directly attributable to infection with the virus, can include gastrointestinal disease, such as diarrhea, and loss of smell and taste2–4. While the basic pathophysiology of COVID-19 is well-established, COVID-19 has many baffling features, including disorders involving high inflammation, disorders of the clotting cascade, and problems with blood pressure homeostasis2, 5, 6. Some sequelae do not develop until a week or more after infection, suggesting that their pathogenesis may result from secondary processes.

Reports suggest that some of the inflammatory processes associated with COVID-19 may relate to antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, S. For example, small numbers of children who have received COVID-19 vaccines and have had no evidence of infection with SARS-CoV-2, as well as a small number of infants born to mothers with COVID-197 have been described as having multi-system inflammatory syndrome of children (MIS-C)8.

In addition to acute COVID-19, some patients experience Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS CoV-2 infection (PASC, sometimes called “long COVID”), a heterogeneous group of symptoms that continue after acute infection has resolved and can include evidence of a hyperinflammatory state9, persistent coagulopathies, and neurophysiologic dysregulation, for example aberrant blood pressure regulation. While some clinical features observable at the beginning of the COVID-19 clinical course, such as SARS-CoV-2 viremia, autoantibodies, inflammatory markers, and activation of Epstein-Barr Virus, may be associated with an increased risk of long COVID10, the detailed pathogenic processes responsible for PASC remain unclear.

Membrane-bound angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is the main cellular receptor for SARS-CoV-2. Binding of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor binding domain (RBD) to ACE2 initiates the pathway that leads to infection of a new host cell. ACE2, a Zn2+ metalloenzyme, cleaves angiotensin II into angiotensin 1-7, which has vasodilatory activity. Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) cleaves angiotensin I to yield angiotensin II, which has vasoconstrictive and hypertensive effects. ACE2 therefore helps to counteract the hypertensive effects of angiotensin II, and so has blood pressure counterregulatory activity compared to ACE. There have been isolated reports and small case series describing persistent hypotension in patients with COVID-19 and patients with PASC without a clearly identified cause11–13.

The kallikrein-kinin system is a proteolytic cascade that helps regulate inflammation (reviewed in 14). There is cross-talk between the coagulation, kallikrein-kinin, complement and renin-angiotensin systems15. Some patients with severe COVID-19 respiratory disease have been found to have altered regulation of the kallikrein-kinin system in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid16. Abnormalities in the kallikrein-kinin system have been proposed as contributing to the pathogenesis of severe COVID-1917.

Catalytic antibodies, “abzymes”18, 19, are antibodies that have catalytic activity. When abzymes were first described, they generated considerable excitement. Investigators hypothesized that it would be possible to produce clinically and biotechnologically useful abzymes.

However, with additional studies, it became clearer that abzyme activity was significantly lower than the activity of more conventional enzymes (*k*cat/*Km* values ∼102 - 104 s-1•M s-1 20 vs. *k*cat/*Km* values of ∼105 s-2•M s-1)21. Hence, interest in the biotechnological applications of abzymes waned, but an appreciation of the potential role of abzymes in the pathogenesis of disease, including autoimmune disease, continued. High concentrations of abzymes in the circulation may compensate for the abzymes’ lower activity to yield clinically significant effects.

Patients with autoimmune diseases can make abzymes catalyzing, for example, cleavage of vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP)22, DNA23, immunoglobulin components24, components of the clotting cascade25–27, and myelin basic protein (MBP) in patients with multiple sclerosis28. Abzymes that cleave the HIV envelope protein have been observed to occur in patients with HIV, so there is precedence for the induction of a catalytic antibody by a virus29.

Investigators have deliberately made anti-idiotypic abzymes with catalytic activity like the activity of a particular enzyme of interest30, 31. Investigators identify an antibody against an enzyme, and then produce an antibody against the anti-enzyme antibody. For some of the anti-idiotypic antibodies, there is enough resemblance to the active site of the enzyme that the anti-idiotypic antibody has catalytic activity resembling the enzyme32, 33. In some instances, the substrate specificity of the abzyme differs substantially from that of the original enzyme31, 32, 34, with the abzyme showing more substrate promiscuity than the original enzyme.

The receptor binding domain of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein uses the ACE2 enzyme on the surface of the target future host cell as its receptor. The RBD is not an antibody, but it does bind ACE2. Taking as an example of abzyme production the anti-idiotypic antibody to an antibody against an enzyme, it is plausible to hypothesize that in some cases, an antibody against the RBD might resemble the ACE2 active site and so have catalytic activity. If an antibody directed against the RBD has some resemblance to ACE2, it is also plausible that anti-RBD antibodies, for some small fraction of patients, might have catalytic activity reminiscent of ACE2. We hypothesized that some COVID-19 patients may develop anti-RBD antibodies, with promiscuous catalytic activity that, in some cases, cleaves substrates in patients to yield clinically significant effects. FIG 1 outlines this hypothesis schematically. We therefore undertook a study to explore whether some COVID-19 patients might have antibodies that can cleave an ACE2 substrate.

![FIG 1.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2023/09/08/2022.12.19.22283685/F1.medium.gif)

[FIG 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/09/08/2022.12.19.22283685/F1)

FIG 1. 
Schematic diagram illustrating the hypothesis underlying the study. The SARS-COV-2 Spike Protein Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) binds ACE2 on the surface of a potential host cells. The RBD has a partial negative image of ACE2. Some antibodies against the RBD may then have a conformation sufficiently like ACE2 to have proteolytic activity similar to the proteolytic activity of ACE2. The hypothesis further suggests that the catalytic activity of some antibodies will have a substrate specificity like ACE2, but because the negative image of RBD present antibodies is imperfect, some antibodies with proteolytic activity will have an altered substrate specificity, potentially affecting multiple proteolytic regulatory cascades.

We studied plasma samples from a group of 67 patients, with samples obtained relatively early in their disease course, on about the 7th day of hospitalization. As a negative control we purchased pooled human plasma that was collected in late 2018, about a year before the first cases of COVID-19 were described. We tested plasma using an established fluorometric assay for ACE2 activity, which detects cleavage of an ACE2 peptide substrate. We found that some of the patients had ACE2 substrate peptide cleavage activity when the assay was run directly on disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate (EDTA)-anticoagulated plasma samples, even though ACE2 is a metalloprotease that requires Zn2+ for activity. Recombinant ACE2 added to plasma did not show ACE2 substrate-cleaving activity unless ZnCl2 was added to samples at concentrations greater than the EDTA. Processing the samples through a 100 KDa size exclusion column followed by absorption with protein A/G beads, which depleted IgG by >99.99%, eliminated the ability of the samples to cleave the ACE2 peptide substrate, supporting the hypothesis that a fraction of COVID-19 patients may develop antibodies that have ACE2 substrate cleavage activity.

## Methods

### Clinical Cohort

The clinical cohort was recently described in more detail in another publication35. The hypothesis motivating that work held that COVID-19 would lead to large scale reactivation of lymphotrophic herpesviruses EBV and HHV-6, but the data obtained in the study did not support that hypothesis. In brief, the University of Virginia (UVA) enrolled a prospective cohort of moderate to severe COVID-19 adult patients admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis confirmed by a nucleic acid amplification test. Patients consented were entered into the study. Clinical data were entered into study databases. Plasma was collected into clinical standard lavender top (EDTA anticoagulant) tubes. Samples were processed in the UVA Biorepository and Tissue Facility and stored at -80 C. Study participants (n=67) were adults ages 18 years and above. We used samples obtained on or about day 7 of hospitalization for this study, prior to anti-inflammatory drug administration. The predominant viral strain for our sample was the alpha strain with 98.51% of our sample (66 patients) being collected before July of 2021.The sample collection protocol was approved by the UVA IRB (HSR #200110), and approval was obtained to work on the specimens (HSR #HSR200362), and it follows the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines. EDTA-anticoagulated healthy normal donor plasma was purchased from Valley Biomedical ([http://www.valleybiomedical.com/](http://www.valleybiomedical.com/)), (Pooled Human Plasma, Cat. No. HP1051PK2, Lot No. 21M2548). This lot of plasma was collected on December 12, 2018 and December 13, 2018 (communication with Valley Biomedical technical support), about a year before the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, so it is extremely unlikely that the plasma was derived from any blood from patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. Plasma was aliquoted and stored at -20℃ according to manufacturer’s instructions.

### Angiotensin II Converting Enzyme (ACE2)-like Abzyme Activity Detection

Abzyme catalytic activities in plasma samples were measured using an Angiotensin II Converting Enzyme (ACE2) Activity Assay Kit, Fluorometric (Abcam, Cat. #ab273297) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. This assay employs a synthetic ACE2 peptide substrate labeled with a fluor and a quencher. The manufacturer’s product information claims a lower limit of detection for an unmodified assay of 400 µU. The manufacturer does not release detailed information concerning the peptide substrate, holding that information as a trade secret. The kit includes recombinant human ACE2 (ACE2) for use as a positive control. 50*μ*l plasma was added to wells in a 96-well black flat bottom assay plate (Corning, Cat. #3603) and incubated at room temperature (RT), in the dark for 15 min. Then, 50*μ*l of substrate pre-diluted according to manufacturer’s protocol was added into the wells of the plate, mixing the substrate with the plasma sample. The plate was immediately placed into a SpectraMax® M5 multi-model microplate reader (Molecular Devices) and the Relative Fluorescent Unit (RFU, Ex/Em = 320/420 nm) values were measured in kinetic mode every 20 min for a total of 16 hours at 37℃. ACE2 inhibitor provided in the assay kit was also used for additional controls.

### Determination of ACE2 Substrate Peptide Cleavage Activity in Plasma Samples With and Without Added ZnCl2 or Plasma Dilution

To evaluate whether native ACE2 shed into blood36, 37 could contribute to the catalytic activity observed in the patient plasma samples, we investigated whether EDTA present in the plasma samples inhibited activity of recombinant ACE2 spiked into the samples. EDTA can inhibit the catalytic activity of ACE2, a Zn2+ metaloprotease38, 39.

We conducted serial 10-fold dilutions of the normal donor plasma in ACE2 assay buffer from the assay kit and then added and then added 2 *μ*L recombinant positive control ACE2, provided as a positive control in the ACE2 assay kit (Abcam, Cat. #ab273297) to each well to the samples to the samples according to the manufacturer’s protocol, conducting the ACE2 assays on the serially diluted samples with the added recombinant ACE2. We also added ZnCl2 to some samples to achieve final concentrations ranging from 0 to 2 mM. Samples containing plasma, recombinant ACE2 and ZnCl2 mixture with pre-diluted ACE2 inhibitor served as negative comparisons. Then, 50 *μ*L of substrate (pre-diluted according to manufacturer’s protocol) was added into the wells. Relative Fluorescent Units were measured, and data was analyzed as described below.

### Human Immunoglobulin Depletion and Detection

To deplete immunoglobulins from the samples, patient plasma samples or pooled healthy donor plasma were centrifuged at 12,000 g at 4 ℃ for 15 min and supernatants were passed through 0.45 *μ*m syringe filter (FisherScientific, Cat. #97204) to remove contaminating particulate matter. We then placed 500 *μ*L of the filtered samples into ultrafiltration columns with 100kDa cut-off ultrafiltration membrane (Pierce™ Cat. # 88503) and centrifuged the columns at 12,000 × g at 4 ℃ until > 400 *μ*L of filtrate was produced. To further deplete antibodies in the plasma samples, we then incubated the flow-through fractions with 30 *μ*L pre-washed Protein A/G Magnetic Beads (Life Technologies, Cat. # 88803, 10 mg/mL) at room temperature (RT) for 1 hour, followed by magnetic removal of the beads, and repeated the same incubation procedure with another freshly prepared 30 *μ*L magnetic beads. The resulting processed plasma samples were stored at 4℃ for short times (less than 12 hours) or -20 ℃ for longer times. Human IgG was measured using a Human IgG ELISA Kit (Abcam, Cat. #ab100547) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. We added 50 *μ*L processed samples, as well as standards to multi-microwell strips and incubated them at room temperature for 2.5 hours. Strips were washed with wash buffer and 50 *μ*L diluted biotin-labeled IgG detection antibody were then added to each well with subsequent HRP-streptavidin incubation after another wash step. Each incubation was performed at room temperature for at least 1 hour. After washing, 100 *μ*L of TMB One-Step Substrate was added to each well and was incubated for 5 to 15 min at room temperature in the dark with gentle shanking. The reaction was stopped by adding 50 *μ*L Stop Solution to each well. OD values were read at 450 nm using an accuSkan FC micro-well plate reader (ThermoFisher). IgG concentrations were calculated based on standard curves generated with the same batch of assay strips. Human IgM was measured using a Human IgM ELISA Kit (Invitrogen, Cat. #BMS2098) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, after washing the strips twice, we added 100 *μ*L processed samples, as well as standards together with 50 *μ*L HRP-conjugated antibody to multi-microwell strips and incubated them at room temperature for at least 1 hour. Strips were washed with wash buffer. After washing, 100 *μ*L of TMB One-Step Substrate was added to each well and was incubated for 5 to 15 min at room temperature in the dark with gentle shanking. The reaction was stopped by adding 100 *μ*L Stop Solution to each well. OD values were read at 450 nm using an accuSkan FC micro-well plate reader (ThermoFisher). IgM concentrations were calculated based on standard curves generated with the same batch of assay strips.

### RBD Binding Assays

We measured IgG binding to the S-RBD in serum with a quantitative ImmunoCAPTM-based system, employing a Phadia 250 (Thermo-Fisher/Phadia), as described40. In brief, we biotinylated S-RBD (RayBiotech, Peachtree Corners, GA) and conjugated it to streptavidin-coated ImmunoCAPTMs (Thermo-Fisher/Phadia). We subtracted background signal by subtracting the signal due to unconjugated streptavidin ImmunoCAPTM, which was run in parallel with each sample.

### Data Analysis

Since the RFU values for the assays conducted on the samples reached 80% of maximum at about 240 min, RFU values observed over 240 min generated by an ACE2 kit were used to evaluate ACE2 substrate cleavage activity in the plasma samples. For each sample, a value corrected for baseline fluorescence in the sample was obtained by the subtracting the baseline RFU value from the value at each subsequent time and the sum of the baseline-corrected RFU values over 240 min was calculated using Excel. Subsequent statistical analysis and data visualization was done using R (version 4.2.1) with the Rstudio environment and packages ggplot2, tidyverse, readr, drc, ggpubr, ggh4x, gridExtra, and scales. Samples with the top 20% and a control bottom 10% RFU values over 240 min were identified for antibody depletion and further assays.

## Results

To develop assays with enhanced sensitivity for ACE2 substrate cleavage activity, we used a commercially available kit, in which a synthetic peptide ACE2 substrate labeled with a fluor and a quencher is exposed to sample. ACE2 substrate cleavage activity frees the fluor from quenching, followed by fluorometric evaluation over time. We first established the kit’s performance characteristics on commercially purchased EDTA-anticoagulated normal human plasma. ACE2 is as Zn2+-requiring metalloenzyme. Since EDTA was used as the anticoagulant, to make Zn2+ unavailable to the Zn2+-requiring metalloenzymes of the enzymes involved in the coagulation cascade, we first established whether exogenously added ACE2 could be detected when added to plasma samples under our assay conditions. We found that exogenously added recombinant ACE2 could not be detected, either using commercially obtained pooled plasma or in plasma samples pooled from our patients and obtained from our sample bank, unless Zn2+ was added or unless the plasma was diluted (FIG 2). Since no native ACE2 activity should be detectable in the EDTA-anticoagulated plasma, any ACE2 substrate cleavage activity observed in the EDTA-anticoagulated plasma should be due to something other than ACE or another Zn2+ metalloprotease.

![FIG 2.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2023/09/08/2022.12.19.22283685/F2.medium.gif)

[FIG 2.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/09/08/2022.12.19.22283685/F2)

FIG 2. 
Inhibition of exogenously added recombinant ACE2 substrate cleavage activity in undiluted EDTA-anticoagulated pooled plasma samples with and without added ZnCl2. ACE2 is a Zn2+ metalloprotease. In this ACE2 spiking experiment, no ACE2 activity was detectable when exogenous ACE2 was added to the plasma, unless Zn2+ was also added, or unless the plasma was diluted prior to the addition of the spiked-in ACE2. Adding an ACE2 inhibitor blocked detection of the ACE2 activity in all conditions, indicating that the activity was specific for ACE2. The findings indicate that no native ACE2 activity should be detectable in the EDTA-anticoagulated plasma and so any ACE2 substrate cleavage activity observed in the EDTA-anticoagulated plasma should be due to something other than ACE or another Zn2+ metalloprotease.

We performed the ACE2 assay on EDTA-anticoagulated (obtained using clinical standard lavender top tubes) research participant plasma samples obtained at about the 7th day of hospitalization for a cohort of 67 COVID-19 patients with moderate to severe disease. Using these samples, without dilution and without added Zn2+, we found that we could detect cleavage of the ACE2 peptide substrate in some of the patients, suggesting that the ACE2 peptide substrate cleavage activity was produced by an agent with co-factor characteristics different from canonical ACE2 (FIG 3). FIG 4 shows a scatter plot of the RFU values for the 67 patients studied.

![FIG 3.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2023/09/08/2022.12.19.22283685/F3.medium.gif)

[FIG 3.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/09/08/2022.12.19.22283685/F3)

FIG 3. 
Survey of ACE2 substrate cleavage activity in plasma from 67 patients with COVID-19 sampled at about day 7 of hospitalization. The plots present the results of the fluorometric assays for ACE2 substrate cleavage activity run on the 67 patients, plus control samples. Several patients, including the 11 patients we selected for further study (4, 5, 9, 11, 13, 15, 27, 43, 44, 47, 48) because they had among the top 20% of RFU values and had sufficient plasma sample remaining for the immunoglobulin depletion protocol, showed an ability to cleave ACE2 substrate. (HDP: commercially purchased pooled healthy donor plasma; HDP+P.C: HDP with added recombinant human ACE2; HDP+P.C+I: HDP+P.C.+ ACE2; inhibitor; P.P.P alone: pooled plasma from negative samples).

![FIG 4.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2023/09/08/2022.12.19.22283685/F4.medium.gif)

[FIG 4.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/09/08/2022.12.19.22283685/F4)

FIG 4. 
Scatter plot of the background corrected RFU values for the plasma samples from the 67 patients evaluated in this study. The top 20% of values are plotted in red, the middle 70% are plotted in black, and the bottom 10% are plotted in blue. The top 20% and bottom 10% were selected for the ACE2 substrate cleavage activity assays before and after immunoglobulin depletion shown in FIG 5.

To determine whether the ACE2 substrate cleavage activity was associated with the presence of immunoglobulin in the samples, we developed an immunoglobulin depletion protocol that includes an initial 0.45 um filtration step to remove large aggregates, followed by a 100 KDa size exclusion column chromatography step, and a subsequent staphylococcal A/G bead absorption step. To test whether patients with high RFU had ACE2 substrate cleavage activity associated with immunoglobulin, we selected samples from patients who had RFU values in the top 20% RFU values and which still had sufficient plasma samples remaining for the immunoglobulin depletion procedure and subsequent ACE2 assays. This selection yielded samples from 11 patients, 4, 5, 9, 11, 13, 15, 27, 43, 44, 47, and 48. We also selected samples from 3 patients (17, 64, 64) who were among the patients having the bottom 10% of ACE2 substrate cleavage activity and for which sufficient sample was available for the immunoglobulin depletion procedure as negative control. To determine whether our immunoglobulin depletion procedure also depleted IgM in addition to IgG, selected additional samples for which there sufficient plasma remained for the assays, patients 4, 5, 11, 13, 15, 27, 43, 44, 64, and the pooled healthy donor plasma, and determined IgM concentrations before and after immunoglobulin depletion. We also included a purchased pooled EDTA-anticoagulated plasma sample as an additional control. For both IgG and IgM, we found that our depletion procedure removed more than 99.99% of the immunoglobulins.

Table 2 show the results of the immunoglobulin depletion protocol applied to the patient plasma samples from these patients. The process depleted IgG by a factor of >>99.99%, leaving IgG in the samples at <2.5 ng/ml for all samples. Table 3 shows the results of assays for IgM run on selected samples for which sufficient sample remained for the assays. For all samples assayed, the immunoglobulin depletion procedure removed >99.9% of IgM.

View this table:
[Table 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/09/08/2022.12.19.22283685/T1)

Table 1. Patient Demographic and Clinical Characteristics (cohort previously described in35)
(IQR: interquartile range)

View this table:
[Table 2.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/09/08/2022.12.19.22283685/T2)

Table 2. 
Plasma IgG concentration before and after antibody depletion for selected patients exhibiting ACE2 substrate cleavage activity in FIG 2, then re-assayed for ACE2 substrate cleavage activity with results shown in FIG 4.

View this table:
[Table 3.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/09/08/2022.12.19.22283685/T3)

Table 3. Plasma IgM concentration before and after antibody depletion for selected patients.

We then re-assayed these samples to determine whether immunoglobulin depletion was associated with elimination of the ACE2 substrate cleavage activity (FIG 5), and found that for the 11 tested patients with ACE2 substrate cleavage activity in this cohort, depletion of the immunoglobulin was accompanied by elimination of ACE2 substrate cleavage activity.

![FIG 5.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2023/09/08/2022.12.19.22283685/F5.medium.gif)

[FIG 5.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/09/08/2022.12.19.22283685/F5)

FIG 5. 
ACE2 substrate cleavage activity in patients before and after immunoglobulin depletion. The figure shows ACE2 substrate cleavage activity for 11 patients (4, 5, 9, 11, 13, 15, 27, 43, 44, 47, 48) who had among the top 20% of RFU values and for which we had sufficient plasma for immunoglobulin depletion, before (blue points) and after (red points) immunoglobulin depletion by a 100 KDa size exclusion column followed by protein A/G bead absorption. We also show ACE2 substrate cleavage activity assays before and after immunoglobulin depletion for pooled patient plasma (PPP) negative controls and samples from three arbitrarily selected patients, 17, 64, 65, that had among the bottom 10% of RFU values and had sufficient plasma remaining for the immunoglobulin depletion protocol. The data suggest that for the 11 patients demonstrating ACE2 substrate cleavage activity in this cohort, the ACE2 substrate cleavage activity was depleted in an immunoglobulin-associated manner.

If our hypothesis is correct and the ability to cleave an ACE2 substrate is related to Abs against the RBD, then we should be able to observe a correlation between ACE2 substrate cleavage activity and the amount of Ab directed against the RBD in the patients’ samples. We assayed for anti-RBD Ab binding activity using a modification of an ImmunoCAPTM Assay activity using a Phadia 250 instrument and S-RBD (FIG 6). We found that there was a significant correlation between the amount of Ab in the patient plasma samples capable of binding the RBD and the ACE2 substrate cleavage activity, suggesting that the ACE2 cleavage activity was related to the amount of anti-RBD Ab present in the plasma sample.

![FIG 6.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2023/09/08/2022.12.19.22283685/F6.medium.gif)

[FIG 6.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/09/08/2022.12.19.22283685/F6)

FIG 6. 
Correlation of ACE2 substrate cleavage activity (ACE2 Activity) with anti-RBD antibody (Ab Against RBD) in patient plasma. Anti-RBD antibody concentrations in plasma samples were determined using ImmunoCAPTM antibody binding assay. The negative control pooled human plasma is indicated by the red symbol. The patient plasma samples are indicated in green. The negative control plasma values were omitted in the calculation of the r- and p-values.

## Discussion

Our experiments indicate that a fraction of patients with COVID-19 have an activity in plasma capable of cleaving a substrate for ACE2. The ACE2 substrate cleavage activity has divalent cation requirements different from native ACE2 and collocates with immunoglobulin presence during an immunoglobulin depletion procedure, suggesting that these patients may have antibodies with abzyme activity.

The ACE2 substrate cleavage activity showed a significant correlation with Ab directed against the RBD, further supporting the hypothesis that some anti-RBD Abs have ACE2 substrate cleavage activity, but there was considerable spread in the identification of ACE2 substrate cleavage activity observed for different levels of anti-RBD Ab. However, this spread would be expected if only a small fraction of Abs elicited against the RBD in fact had ACE2 substrate cleavage activity, with the initiation and maturation of Ab responses directed against the RBD resulting, in part, from non-specific processes.

Since abzymes can have a broadened substrate specificity compared to the original enzyme that they mirror, it is possible that abzymes made in response to SARS-COV-2 infection may cleave a range of substrates, including substrates that form components of important regulatory cascades, like clotting, blood pressure regulation, and inflammation processes, which could account for aspects of COVID-19 that cannot be directly attributed to viral infection and cell and tissue destruction.

Our study had several strengths. We studied a moderate number of patients, with samples collected prospectively from acutely hospitalized patients with clearly established COVID-19 relatively early in their disease course, but likely approaching at least 2 weeks following initial infection. The patients almost certainly were not admitted immediately following initial infection and the samples were obtained about a week after admission, providing enough time for the development of an initial antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 infection. We used a standard, widely-employed kit for ACE2 peptide substrate cleavage activity, standard size exclusion columns, protein A/G bead absorption immunoglobulin depletion techniques, and assays for immunoglobulins. The data showing that the ACE2 substrate cleavage activity was present even when there was sufficient EDTA to chelate the Zn2+ essential for ACE2 activity suggests that the ACE2 substrate cleavage activity had important characteristics different from native ACE2. The data that the ACE2 substrate cleavage activity was removed from the samples following processing with size exclusion columns and absorption with protein A/G beads suggests that the non-Zn2+-requiring ACE2 substrate cleavage activity co-localizes with immunoglobulin and the data that ACE2 substrate cleavage activity correlated with Ab against the RBD support the hypothesis that the patients with ACE2 substrate cleavage activity may have developed abzymes with this activity.

However, our study has several limitations. We only studied a limited subset of the patients admitted to our hospital, from patients who consented to the sample banking and study and for whom sufficient sample volumes were available. A contemporaneously collected, matched, prospective set of samples from patients without COVID-19 would have been ideal negative controls, but samples from such subjects were not obtained as part of the sample banking effort. We also only conducted the assays on patient samples obtained at a single time, about 7 days after hospitalization, so we have no data from patients who were discharged, transferred, or died prior to day 7 of hospitalization. For this study, we were unable to correlate the presence of ACE-2 abyme activity with clinical disease features. More importantly, in this study we have no data from patients later in their disease course or following convalescence from the acute disease. Inflammatory, coagulopathic, and physiologic dysregulatory phenomena predominate in the later stages of COVID-19 and at least some aspects of PASC and MIS-C appear to result from immune-mediated phenomena. However, some of these patients are treated with anti-inflammatory agents, including intravenous immunoglobulin, which would make the study of these patients for abzyme-like activity difficult. If abzymes with promiscuous substrate specificities develop in some COVID-19 patients, some of the clinical features of those disorders could potentially be attributed to abzymes, but this study is not able to directly address such additional hypotheses, which would require additional work. In addition, since abzymes can show substantial substrate specificity spread, it is possible that additional patients in our cohort had abzymes with substrate specificity sufficiently divergent from angiotensinogen that it was not detectable using our assay. It is also possible that COVID-19 patients develop anti-RBD antibodies with abzyme-like activity, but that these antibodies have no clinical significance. Some fraction of normal individuals may have ACE2-like abzyme activity, but this activity could have been diluted in the purchased pooled normal control plasma. However, if the abzyme activity in such patients was similar to that observed in the individual positive patients in this study, that activity would still be ∼15% of the activity of the positive patients, given the prevalence of detectable abzyme activity in our cohort, and so would have been likely detectable.

Finally, our study is merely associational. It is possible that we depleted some other, non-immunoglobulin component of COVID-19 patient plasma that has the ability to cleave the ACE2 substrate peptide with our 100 kDa size exclusion plus protein A/G treatment procedure. To unequivocally establish that some COVID-19 patients develop anti-SARS-CoV-2 immune responses that include abzymes, it would be necessary to isolate discrete monoclonal antibodies from patients with ACE2 substrate cleavage activity, and then characterize those monoclonal antibodies in detail. Such work lies outside the perimeters of this current study. It is also possible that some COVID-19 patients do, in fact, develop abzymes (ACE2-like – or with other catalytic activity), but that these abzymes have no clinical significance. Additional studies of potential abzyme-like activity in COVID-19 patients with different clinical disease manifestations and at different points in their disease course, including long after acute COVID-19, would be needed to establish the overall significance of abyzmes in COVID-19 disease. While understanding the detailed pathogenic significance of abzymes in COVID-19 still requires substantial investigation, the existence of abzymes in COVID-19 is increasingly well-established. In addition to the studies reported here, McConnell and co-workers 41 recently described the existence of abzymes in convalescent plasma COVID-19 patients capable of cleaving spike protein with virus neutralization. That two different groups independently found evidence of abzyme activity in plasma from COVID-19 patients provides significant support for the hypothesis that COVID-19 patients can develop antibodies with proteolytic activity.

Nevertheless, our study offers potential additional insight into some of the difficult-to-understand clinical features of COVID-19, and if some of the difficult manifestations of COVID-19 are related to the induction of antibodies with abzyme-like activity, that finding may suggest new therapeutic interventions. Some other viruses also have also evolved to use enzymes located on the target host cell surface as their receptors, so it is conceivable that those other viral infections may also elicit clinically problematic anti-viral antibodies. The number of spike protein RBDs presented to the immune system in a natural infection is vastly greater than the number of RBDs presented to the immune system following vaccination, offering many more opportunities for the induction of wide-ranging antibody responses, unlike the antigen exposure resulting from vaccination.

While complications following vaccination are very rare and the risk-benefit calculation greatly favors vaccination, some of the adverse side effects of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines might also be attributable to the rare induction of anti-RBD antibodies with catalytic activity.

## Institutional Review Board Statement

The sample collection protocol was approved by the UVA IRB (HSR #200110), and approval was obtained to work on the specimens (HSR #HSR200362).

## Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all participants involved in the study.

## Data Availability Statement

Data is presented in the manuscript and the supplements. Raw data can be obtained on request.

## Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

## Acknowledgments and Funding

The study was supported by internal funding from the University of Virginia, including the Manning Fund for COVID-19 Research at UVA the Ivy Foundation, the Pendleton Laboratory Fund for Pediatric Infectious Disease Research, a College Council Minera Research Grant, the Coulter Foundation, and NIAID, NIH (R01 AI176515) with sample acquisition costs supported by the HHV-6 Foundation. We thank the study participants for graciously agreeing to be research participants, and the research support staff who enrolled the study participants (led by Linda Bailes RN, Allison Raymond RN and Sarah Struchen RN). We also thank the University of Virginia Biorepository and Tissue Research Facility for processing the samples used in the study and for providing specimens (Technical Director, Patcharin Pramoonjago PhD).

## Footnotes

*   Additional experiments added and presented in Table 3 and a modified FIG 6. Methods clarified.

*   Received December 19, 2022.
*   Revision received September 8, 2023.
*   Accepted September 8, 2023.


*   © 2023, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

This pre-print is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International), CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, as described at [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

## References

1.  1.Bajema KL, Oster AM, McGovern OL, Lindstrom S, Stenger MR, Anderson TC, Isenhour C, Clarke KR, Evans ME, Chu VT, Biggs HM, Kirking HL, Gerber SI, Hall AJ, Fry AM, Oliver SE. Persons Evaluated for 2019 Novel Coronavirus - United States, January 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Feb 14;69(6):166–70. pmcid:PMC7017962
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.15585/mmwr.mm6906e1&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F09%2F08%2F2022.12.19.22283685.atom) 

2.  2.Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, Zhang L, Fan G, Xu J, Gu X, Cheng Z, Yu T, Xia J, Wei Y, Wu W, Xie X, Yin W, Li H, Liu M, Xiao Y, Gao H, Guo L, Xie J, Wang G, Jiang R, Gao Z, Jin Q, Wang J, Cao B. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):497–506. pmcid:PMC7159299
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F09%2F08%2F2022.12.19.22283685.atom) 

3.  3.Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Jama. 2020 Apr 7;323(13):1239–42.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/jama.2020.2648&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F09%2F08%2F2022.12.19.22283685.atom) 

4.  4.Chung TW, Sridhar S, Zhang AJ, Chan KH, Li HL, Wong FK, Ng MY, Tsang RK, Lee AC, Fan Z, Ho RS, Luk SY, Kan WK, Lam SH, Wu AK, Leung SM, Chan WM, Ng PY, To KK, Cheng VC, Lung KC, Hung IF, Yuen KY. Olfactory Dysfunction in Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients: Observational Cohort Study and Systematic Review. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 Jun;7(6):ofaa199. pmcid:PMC7284010
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/ofid/ofaa199&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=32548209&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F09%2F08%2F2022.12.19.22283685.atom) 

5.  5.Liao D, Zhou F, Luo L, Xu M, Wang H, Xia J, Gao Y, Cai L, Wang Z, Yin P, Wang Y, Tang L, Deng J, Mei H, Hu Y. Haematological characteristics and risk factors in the classification and prognosis evaluation of COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Haematol. 2020 Sep;7(9):e671–e8. pmcid:PMC7351397
    
    

6.  6.Del Valle DM, Kim-Schulze S, Huang HH, Beckmann ND, Nirenberg S, Wang B, Lavin Y, Swartz TH, Madduri D, Stock A, Marron TU, Xie H, Patel M, Tuballes K, Van Oekelen O, Rahman A, Kovatch P, Aberg JA, Schadt E, Jagannath S, Mazumdar M, Charney AW, Firpo-Betancourt A, Mendu DR, Jhang J, Reich D, Sigel K, Cordon-Cardo C, Feldmann M, Parekh S, Merad M, Gnjatic S. An inflammatory cytokine signature predicts COVID-19 severity and survival. Nat Med. 2020 Oct;26(10):1636–43. pmcid:PMC7869028
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/S41591-020-1051-9&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F09%2F08%2F2022.12.19.22283685.atom) 

7.  7.De Rose DU, Pugnaloni F, Calì M, Ronci S, Caoci S, Maddaloni C, Martini L, Santisi A, Dotta A, Auriti C. Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Neonates Born to Mothers with SARS-CoV-2 Infection (MIS-N) and in Neonates and Infants Younger Than 6 Months with Acquired COVID-19 (MIS-C): A Systematic Review. Viruses. 2022;14(4):750.
    
    

8.  8.Yousaf AR, Cortese MM, Taylor AW, Broder KR, Oster ME, Wong JM, Guh AY, McCormick DW, Kamidani S, Schlaudecker EP, Edwards KM, Creech CB, Staat MA, Belay ED, Marquez P, Su JR, Salzman MB, Thompson D, Campbell AP. Reported cases of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children aged 12-20 years in the USA who received a COVID-19 vaccine, December, 2020, through August, 2021: a surveillance investigation. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2022 Feb 22. pmcid:PMC8864018
    
    

9.  9.Crook H, Raza S, Nowell J, Young M, Edison P. Long covid-mechanisms, risk factors, and management. Bmj. 2021 Jul 26;374:n1648.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiYm1qIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjE3OiIzNzQvanVsMjZfMS9uMTY0OCI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDIzLzA5LzA4LzIwMjIuMTIuMTkuMjIyODM2ODUuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 

10. 10.Su Y, Yuan D, Chen, D.G., Ng, R.H., Wang, K., Choi, J., Li, S., Hong, S.,, Zhang R, Xie, J., Kornilov, S.A., Scherler, K., Pavlovitch-Bedzyk, A.J., Dong, S., Lausted, C., Lee, I.,, Fallen S, Dai, C.L., Baloni, P., Smith, B., Duvvuri, V.R., Anderson, K.G., Li, J., Yang, F., Duncombe,, C.J. M. D.J., Rostomily, C., Troisch, P., Zhou, J., Mackay, S., DeGottardi, Q., May, D.H,, Taniguchi R, Gittelman, R.M, Klinger, M., Snyder, T.M, Roper, R., Wojciechowska, G., Murray, K.,, Edmark R, Evans, S., Jones, L., Zhou, Y., Rowen, L., Liu, R., Chour, W., Algren, H.A, Berrington,, W.R. W. J.A., Cochran, R.A., Micikas, M.E., the ISB-Swedish COVID19 Biobanking Unit, Terri Wrin, Petropoulos, C.J., Cole, H.R., Fischer, T.D., Wei, W., Hoon, D.S.B., Price, N.D., Subramanian, N.,, Hill JA, Hadlock, J., Magis, A.T., Ribas, A., Lanier, L.L., Boyd, S.D., Bluestone, J.A., Chu, H., Hood,, L. G. R., Greenberg, P.D., Davis, M.M., Goldman, J.D., Heath, J.R.,. Multiple Early Factors Anticipate Post-Acute COVID-19 Sequelae. Cell. 2022.
    
    

11. 11.Hanidziar D,  Bittner EA. Hypotension, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, and COVID-19: A Clinical Conundrum. Anesth Analg. 2020 Sep;131(3):e175–e6. pmcid:PMC7302068
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F09%2F08%2F2022.12.19.22283685.atom) 

12. 12.Dani M, Dirksen A, Taraborrelli P, Torocastro M, Panagopoulos D, Sutton R, Lim PB. Autonomic dysfunction in ’long COVID’: rationale, physiology and management strategies. Clin Med (Lond). 2021 Jan;21(1):e63–e7. pmcid:PMC7850225
    
    

13. 13.Koudelka M, Sovová E. COVID-19 Causing Hypotension in Frail Geriatric Hypertensive Patients? Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Jun 18;57(6). pmcid:PMC8235779
    
    

14. 14.Hillmeister P, Persson PB. The Kallikrein–Kinin system. Acta Physiologica. 2012;206(4):215–9.
    
    

15. 15.Bekassy Z, Lopatko Fagerström I, Bader M, Karpman D. Crosstalk between the renin-angiotensin, complement and kallikrein-kinin systems in inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2022 Jul;22(7):411–28. pmcid:PMC8579187
    
    

16. 16.Martens CP, Van Mol P, Wauters J, Wauters E, Gangnus T, Noppen B, Callewaert H, Feyen JHM, Liesenborghs L, Heylen E, Jansen S, Pereira LCV, Kraisin S, Guler I, Engelen MM, Ockerman A, Van Herck A, Vos R, Vandenbriele C, Meersseman P, Hermans G, Wilmer A, Martinod K, Burckhardt BB, Vanhove M, Jacquemin M, Verhamme P, Neyts J, Vanassche T. Dysregulation of the kallikrein-kinin system in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of patients with severe COVID-19. eBioMedicine. 2022 2022/09/01/;83:104195.
    
    

17. 17.Carvalho PRd, Sirois P, Fernandes PD. The role of kallikrein-kinin and renin-angiotensin systems in COVID-19 infection. Peptides. 2021 2021/01/01/;135:170428.
    
    

18. 18.Tramontano A, Janda KD, Lerner RA. Catalytic antibodies. Science. 1986 Dec 19;234(4783):1566–70.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6Mzoic2NpIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEzOiIyMzQvNDc4My8xNTY2IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjMvMDkvMDgvMjAyMi4xMi4xOS4yMjI4MzY4NS5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

19. 19.Pollack SJ, Jacobs JW, Schultz PG. Selective chemical catalysis by an antibody. Science. 1986 Dec 19;234(4783):1570–3.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6Mzoic2NpIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEzOiIyMzQvNDc4My8xNTcwIjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjMvMDkvMDgvMjAyMi4xMi4xOS4yMjI4MzY4NS5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

20. 20.Hilvert D. Critical analysis of antibody catalysis. Annu Rev Biochem. 2000;69:751–93.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1146/annurev.biochem.69.1.751&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10966475&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F09%2F08%2F2022.12.19.22283685.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000089735700025&link_type=ISI) 

21. 21.Bar-Even A, Noor E, Savir Y, Liebermeister W, Davidi D, Tawfik DS, Milo R. The moderately efficient enzyme: evolutionary and physicochemical trends shaping enzyme parameters. Biochemistry. 2011 May 31;50(21):4402–10.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1021/bi2002289&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21506553&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F09%2F08%2F2022.12.19.22283685.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000290837400004&link_type=ISI) 

22. 22.Paul S, Volle DJ, Beach CM, Johnson DR, Powell MJ, Massey RJ. Catalytic hydrolysis of vasoactive intestinal peptide by human autoantibody. Science. 1989 Jun 9;244(4909):1158–62.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6Mzoic2NpIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEzOiIyNDQvNDkwOS8xMTU4IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjMvMDkvMDgvMjAyMi4xMi4xOS4yMjI4MzY4NS5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

23. 23.Shuster AM, Gololobov GV, Kvashuk OA, Bogomolova AE, Smirnov IV, Gabibov AG. DNA hydrolyzing autoantibodies. Science. 1992 May 1;256(5057):665-7.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6Mzoic2NpIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEyOiIyNTYvNTA1Ny82NjUiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo1MDoiL21lZHJ4aXYvZWFybHkvMjAyMy8wOS8wOC8yMDIyLjEyLjE5LjIyMjgzNjg1LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 

24. 24.Paul S, Li L, Kalaga R, Wilkins-Stevens P, Stevens FJ, Solomon A. Natural catalytic antibodies: peptide-hydrolyzing activities of Bence Jones proteins and VL fragment. J Biol Chem. 1995 Jun 23;270(25):15257–61.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiamJjIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEyOiIyNzAvMjUvMTUyNTciO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo1MDoiL21lZHJ4aXYvZWFybHkvMjAyMy8wOS8wOC8yMDIyLjEyLjE5LjIyMjgzNjg1LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 

25. 25.Thiagarajan P, Dannenbring R, Matsuura K, Tramontano A, Gololobov G, Paul S. Monoclonal antibody light chain with prothrombinase activity. Biochemistry. 2000 May 30;39(21):6459–65.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1021/bi992588w&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10828960&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F09%2F08%2F2022.12.19.22283685.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000087374100022&link_type=ISI) 

26. 26.Wootla B, Dasgupta S, Dimitrov JD, Bayry J, Lévesque H, Borg JY, Borel-Derlon A, Rao DN, Friboulet A, Kaveri SV, Lacroix-Desmazes S. Factor VIII hydrolysis mediated by anti-factor VIII autoantibodies in acquired hemophilia. J Immunol. 2008 Jun 1;180(11):7714–20.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6ODoiamltbXVub2wiO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6MTE6IjE4MC8xMS83NzE0IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjMvMDkvMDgvMjAyMi4xMi4xOS4yMjI4MzY4NS5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

27. 27.Lacroix-Desmazes S, Moreau A, Sooryanarayana, Bonnemain C, Stieltjes N, Pashov A, Sultan Y, Hoebeke J, Kazatchkine MD, Kaveri SV. Catalytic activity of antibodies against factor VIII in patients with hemophilia A. Nat Med. 1999 Sep;5(9):1044–7.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/12483&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10470082&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F09%2F08%2F2022.12.19.22283685.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000082337200039&link_type=ISI) 

28. 28.Ponomarenko NA, Durova OM, Vorobiev, II, Belogurov AA, Jr., Kurkova IN, Petrenko AG, Telegin GB, Suchkov SV, Kiselev SL, Lagarkova MA, Govorun VM, Serebryakova MV, Avalle B, Tornatore P, Karavanov A, Morse HC, 3rd, Thomas D, Friboulet A, Gabibov AG. Autoantibodies to myelin basic protein catalyze site-specific degradation of their antigen. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jan 10;103(2):281–6. pmcid:PMC1324791
    
    

29. 29.Ponomarenko NA, Vorobiev,  II, Alexandrova ES, Reshetnyak AV, Telegin GB, Khaidukov SV, Avalle B, Karavanov A, Morse HC, 3rd, Thomas D, Friboulet A, Gabibov AG. Induction of a protein-targeted catalytic response in autoimmune prone mice: antibody-mediated cleavage of HIV-1 glycoprotein GP120. Biochemistry. 2006 Jan 10;45(1):324–30.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1021/bi050675k&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=16388609&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F09%2F08%2F2022.12.19.22283685.atom) 

30. 30.Avalle B, Mistro D, Thomas D, Friboulet A. Polyclonal catalytic anti-idiotypic antibodies with a beta-lactamase activity. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1996 Oct 12;799:172–5.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/j.1749-6632.1996.tb33195.x&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=8958088&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F09%2F08%2F2022.12.19.22283685.atom) 

31. 31.Friboulet A, Izadyar L, Avalle B, Roseto A, Thomas D. Abzyme generation using an anti-idiotypic antibody as the “internal image” of an enzyme active site. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 1994 May-Jun;47(2-3):229–37; discussion 37-9.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/BF02787937&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=7944340&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F09%2F08%2F2022.12.19.22283685.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1994PA91100011&link_type=ISI) 

32. 32.Izadyar L, Friboulet A, Remy MH, Roseto A, Thomas D. Monoclonal anti-idiotypic antibodies as functional internal images of enzyme active sites: production of a catalytic antibody with a cholinesterase activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Oct 1;90(19):8876–80. pmcid:PMC47463
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NDoicG5hcyI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czoxMDoiOTAvMTkvODg3NiI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDIzLzA5LzA4LzIwMjIuMTIuMTkuMjIyODM2ODUuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 

33. 33.Friboulet A, Izadyar L, Avalle B, Roseto A, Thomas D. Antiidiotypic antibodies as functional internal images of enzyme-active sites. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1995 Mar 31;750:265–70.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/j.1749-6632.1995.tb19963.x&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=7785852&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F09%2F08%2F2022.12.19.22283685.atom) 

34. 34.Ponomarenko NA, Pillet D, Paon M, Vorobiev, II, Smirnov IV, Adenier H, Avalle B, Kolesnikov AV, Kozyr AV, Thomas D, Gabibov AG, Friboulet A. Anti-idiotypic antibody mimics proteolytic function of parent antigen. Biochemistry. 2007 Dec 18;46(50):14598–609.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1021/bi7013954&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=18020454&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F09%2F08%2F2022.12.19.22283685.atom) 

35. 35.Brooks B, Tancredi C, Song Y, Mogus AT, Huang M-LW, Zhu H, Phan TL, Zhu H, Kadl A, Woodfolk J. Epstein–Barr Virus and Human Herpesvirus-6 Reactivation in Acute COVID-19 Patients. Viruses. 2022;14(9):1872.
    
    

36. 36.García-Escobar A, Vera-Vera S, Jurado-Román A, Jiménez-Valero S, Galeote G, Moreno R. Calcium Signaling Pathway Is Involved in the Shedding of ACE2 Catalytic Ectodomain: New Insights for Clinical and Therapeutic Applications of ACE2 for COVID-19. Biomolecules. 2022 Jan 5;12(1). pmcid:PMC8774087
    
    

37. 37.Arthur JM, Forrest JC, Boehme KW, Kennedy JL, Owens S, Herzog C, Liu J, Harville TO. Development of ACE2 autoantibodies after SARS-CoV-2 infection. PLoS One. 2021;16(9):e0257016. pmcid:PMC8415618
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1371/journal.pone.0257016&link_type=DOI) 

38. 38.Tanna A, Guarino L, Tam FWK, Rodriquez-Cubillo B, Levy JB, Cairns TD, Griffith M, Tarzi RM, Caplin B, Salama AD, Cook T, Pusey CD. Long-term outcome of anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibody-associated glomerulonephritis: evaluation of the international histological classification and other prognostic factors. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. 2014;30(7):1185–92.
    
    

39. 39.Xiao F, Burns KD. Measurement of angiotensin converting enzyme 2 activity in biological fluid (ACE2). Hypertension: Springer; 2017. p. 101–15.
    
    

40. 40.Keshavarz B, Wiencek JR, Workman LJ, Straesser MD, Muehling LM, Canderan G, Drago F, Bonham CA, Sturek JM, Ramani C, McNamara CA, Woodfolk JA, Kadl A, Platts-Mills TAE, Wilson JM. Quantitative Measurement of IgG to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 Proteins Using ImmunoCAP. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2021;182(5):417–24. pmcid:PMC8018212
    
    

41. 41.McConnell SA, Sachithanandham J, Mudrak NJ, Zhu X, Farhang PA, Cordero RJB, Wear MP, Shapiro JR, Park HS, Klein SL, Tobian AAR, Bloch EM, Sullivan DJ, Pekosz A, Casadevall A. Spike-protein proteolytic antibodies in COVID-19 convalescent plasma contribute to SARS-CoV-2 neutralization. Cell Chem Biol. 2023 Jul 20;30(7):726–38.e4. pmcid:PMC10288624