Abstract
Background Digital interventions integrating gamification features hold promise to promote daily steps. However, results regarding the effectiveness of this type of intervention are heterogeneous and not yet confirmed in real-life contexts.
Objective This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of a gamified intervention and its potential moderators in a large sample using real-world data. Specifically, we tested (1) whether a gamified intervention enhanced daily steps during the intervention and follow-up periods compared to baseline, (2) whether this enhancement was higher in participants to the intervention than in nonparticipants, and (3) what participants’ characteristics or intervention parameters moderated the effect of the program.
Methods Data from 4819 individuals who registered for a mHealth Kiplin program between 2019 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. In this intervention, participants could take part in one or several games where their daily step count was tracked, allowing individuals to play with their overall activity. Nonparticipants are people who registered to the program but did not take part in the intervention and were considered as a control group. Daily step counts were measured via accelerometers embedded in either commercial wearables or smartphones of the participants. Exposure to the intervention, the intervention content, and participants’ characteristics were included in multilevel models to test the study objectives.
Results Participants in the intervention group demonstrated a significantly greater increase in mean daily steps from baseline compared to nonparticipants (p<.0001). However, intervention effectiveness depended on participants’ initial physical activity. Whereas the daily steps of participants with <7500 baseline daily steps significantly improved from baseline both during the Kiplin intervention (+3291 daily steps) and during follow-up periods (+945 daily steps), participants with a higher baseline had no improvement or significant decreases in daily steps after the intervention. Age (p<.0001) and exposure (p<.0001) positively moderated the intervention effect.
Conclusions In real-world settings and among a large sample, the Kiplin intervention was significantly effective to increase the daily steps of participants from baseline, during intervention and follow-up periods, compared to nonparticipants. Interestingly, responses to the intervention differed based on participant’ initial steps with the existence of a plateau effect. Drawing on the insights of the self-determination theory, we can assume that the effect of gamification could depend of the initial motivation and activity of participants.
Competing Interest Statement
AC, CF, and MD declare that they have no competing in- terests. AM PhD grant is funded by the French National Association for Research and Technology (ANRT) and Kiplin. GH is employed by Kiplin.
Funding Statement
The work of AM is supported by an ANRT grant (Cifre PhD Thesis) and by the company Kiplin. The funders had no input in the design of the study and no influence on the interpretation or publication of the study results.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved by local Ethics Committee (IRB00013412, CHU de Clermont Ferrand IRB #1, IRB number 2022-CF063) with compliance to the French policy of individual data protection.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Data, code & supplemental materials: https://osf.io/scnu7/
The description of the theoretical model (i.e., self-determination theory) and the intervention (i.e., Kiplin app) have been strengthened. The results section now includes a test of the differences between participants and non-participants baseline characteristics and a comparison of participants using their smartphone to collect their number of steps compared with those using a wearable.
Data Availability
The data and code for the statistical analyses used in the present study are available on Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/scnu7/).
