Understanding Inequalities in Mental Health by Family Structure during COVID-19 Lockdowns: Evidence from the UK Household Longitudinal Study

Background The COVID-19 pandemic increased psychiatric distress and impacts differed by family structure. We aimed to identify mechanisms contributing to these inequalities.

Methods Survey data were from the UK Household Longitudinal Study. Psychiatric distress (GHQ-12) was measured in April 2020 (first UK lockdown; n=10,516), and January 2021 (lockdown re-introduced following eased restrictions; n=6,893). Pre-lockdown family structure comprised partner status and presence of children (<16 years). Mediating mechanisms included: active employment, financial strain, childcare/home-schooling, caring, and loneliness. Monte Carlo g-computation simulations were used to adjust for confounding and estimate total effects and decompositions into: controlled direct effects (effects if the mediator was absent), and portions eliminated (PE; representing differential exposure and vulnerability to the mediator).

Results In January 2021, after adjustment, we estimated increased risk of distress among couples with children compared to couples with no children (RR: 1.48; 95% CI: 1.15-1.82), largely because of childcare/home-schooling (PE RR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.00-1.64). Single respondents without children also had increased risk of distress compared to couples with no children (RR: 1.55; 95% CI: 1.27-1.83), and the largest PE was for loneliness (RR: 1.16; 95% CI: 1.05-1.27), though financial strain contributed (RR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.99-1.12). Single parents demonstrated the highest levels of distress, but confounder adjustment suggested uncertain effects with wide confidence intervals. Findings were similar in April 2020 and when stratified by sex.

Conclusions Access to childcare/schooling, financial security and social connection are important mechanisms that need addressing to avoid widening mental health inequalities during public health crises.

Key Messages

• Couples with young children compared to those without, had raised risk of psychiatric distress during UK lockdowns. Effect decompositions suggested this was largely due to a combination of differential exposure and vulnerability to childcare and home-schooling.

• Among those without young children, being single compared to in a couple was associated with raised risk of psychiatric distress during UK lockdowns, with differential exposure to financial strain and loneliness both contributing to this inequality.

• There was not sufficient evidence to indicate that being single with young children increased risk of psychiatric distress relative to couples with young children or singles without.