Abstract
Background Social-economic factors and health behaviours may be driving variation in ethnic health inequalities in multimorbidity including among distinct ethnic groups.
Methods Using the cross-sectional nationally-representative Health Surveys for England 2011-2018 (N=54,438, aged 16+), we carried out multivariable logistic regression on the odds of having general multimorbidity (≥2 longstanding conditions) by ethnicity (British White (reference group), White Irish, Other White, Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, Chinese, African, Caribbean, White Mixed, Other Mixed, Other), adjusting for age, sex, education, area-deprivation, smoking status, and survey year. This was repeated for cardiovascular multimorbidity (N=37,148, aged 40+: having ≥2 of the following: doctor-diagnosed diabetes or hypertension, heart attack or stroke) and multiple cardiometabolic risk biomarkers (HbA1c ≥6.5%, raised blood pressure, total cholesterol ≥5mmol/L).
Results 20% of adults had general multimorbidity. In fully-adjusted models, compared with the White British majority, Other White (Odds Ratio (OR)=0.63 (95% confidence interval=(0.53-0.74)), Chinese (OR=0.58 (0.36-0.93)), and African adults (OR=0.54 (0.42-0.69)), had lower odds of general multimorbidity. Among adults aged 40+, Pakistani (OR=1.27 (0.97-1.66) p=0.080) and Bangladeshi (OR=1.75 (1.16-2.65)) had increased odds, and African adults had decreased odds (OR=0.63 (0.47-0.83)) of general multimorbidity. Risk of cardiovascular multimorbidity was higher among Indian (OR=3.31 (2.56-4.28)), Pakistani (OR=3.48 (2.52-4.80)), Bangladeshi (OR=3.67 (1.98-6.78)), African (OR=1.61 (1.05-2.47)), Caribbean (OR=2.18 (1.59-2.99)) and White Mixed (OR=1.98 (1.14-3.44)) adults. Indian adults were also at risk of having multiple cardiometabolic risk biomarkers.
Conclusion Ethnic inequalities in multimorbidity are independent of socioeconomic factors. Ethnic minority groups are particularly at risk of cardiovascular multimorbidity, which may be exacerbated by poorer management of cardiometabolic risk factors.
What is already known on this topic
Studies have found ethnic inequalities in multimorbidity among broad ethnic groups; however, it is not known whether lower socioeconomic status or health behaviours are driving this inequality in England, nor whether there are differences between distinct ethnic groups.
What this study adds
Ethnic inequalities in multimorbidity in a nationally-representative sample in England vary between older and younger adults, distinct ethnic groups, and are independent of socioeconomic status, smoking and obesity.
African, Caribbean, Bangladeshi, Indian, Pakistani and White mixed adults aged 40 and over had higher risk of self-reported cardiovascular multimorbidity compared with British White adults. Indian adults were also at risk of multiple uncontrolled cardiometabolic risk biomarkers.
African, Chinese, Other White and Indian adults (<40 years) had lower risk of general multimorbidity compared with the British White majority, suggesting a healthy migrant effect or differences in interpretation of chronic conditions.
How this study might affect research, practice or policy
Further research is needed to explore whether underdiagnosis and/or poorer management of cardiometabolic risk factors among ethnic groups may be driving factors behind inequalities in self-reported cardiovascular multimorbidity.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The HSE is funded by NHS Digital. The authors are funded to produce HSE reports but this study received no specific funding. NHS Digital had no role in study design, interpretation or production of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval was obtained from the following Research Ethics Committees (REC): HSE 2011 and 2012: Oxford A REC: 10/H0604/56; HSE 2013 and 2014: Oxford A REC: 12/sc/0317; HSE 2015: West London NRES Committee: 14/LO/0862; HSE 2016: Nottingham REC: 15/EE/0299, HSE 2017: East of England Research Ethics Committee (Reference no 15/EE/0229),HSE 2018: East Midlands Nottingham 2 Research Ethics Committee (Reference no. 15/EM/0254).. Ethical approval was obtained ahead of data collection, no further ethical approval is needed for secondary analyses. This study utilised a dataset used for the Health Survey for England report on Ethnicity, which the authors were funded to produce.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The Health Survey for England is available to UK Academic Institutions from the UK Data Archive subject to their end-user license. This study utilised a dataset used for the Health Survey for England report on Ethnicity, which the authors were funded to produce.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-7260-1
http://dx.doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-7480-1
http://dx.doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-7649-1
http://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-7919-2
http://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-8280-1
http://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-8334-3