The effect of 18 months lifestyle intervention on brain age assessed with resting-state functional connectivity
===============================================================================================================

* Gidon Levakov
* Alon Kaplan
* Anat Yaskolka Meir
* Ehud Rinott
* Gal Tsaban
* Hila Zelicha
* Matthias Blüher
* Uta Ceglarek
* Michael Stumvoll
* Ilan Shelef
* Galia Avidan
* Iris Shai

## Abstract

Obesity negatively impacts multiple bodily systems, including the central nervous system. Retrospective studies that estimated chronological age from neuroimaging have found accelerated brain aging in obesity, but it is unclear how this estimation would be affected by lifestyle intervention. In a sub-study of 102 participants of the DIRECT-PLUS (dietary-intervention-randomized-controlled-trial polyphenol-unprocessed) trial, we tested the effect of 18 months of lifestyle intervention on predicted brain age, based on MRI-assessed resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC). We further examined how dynamics in multiple health factors, including anthropometric measurements, blood biomarkers, and fat deposition, can account for changes in brain age. To establish our method, we first demonstrated that our model could successfully predict chronological age from RSFC in three cohorts (n=291;358;102). We then found that among the DIRECT-PLUS participants, 1% of body weight loss resulted in an 8.9 months attenuation of brain age. Attenuation of brain age was significantly associated with improved liver biomarkers, decreased liver fat, and visceral and deep subcutaneous adipose tissues after 18m of intervention. Finally, we showed that lower consumption of processed food, sweets, and beverages were associated with attenuated brain age. These results suggest that lifestyle intervention has beneficial effects on the trajectory of brain aging.

Keywords
*   Lifestyle intervention
*   Functional connectivity
*   Brain age
*   MRI
*   Obesity
*   Mediterranean diet
*   Physical activity

## 1. Introduction

Brain aging is a complex, multifaceted process with various manifestations in different periods of the human lifespan, brain regions, and imaging modalities1,2. Nevertheless, reducing this complex process to a single scalar, the predicted brain age, may capture multiple conditions and risk factors associated with deviation from the normal aging trajectory3. Brain age estimation is typically done by predicting chronological age from neuroimaging data in a healthy training group of subjects and applying the fitted model to a new, unseen individual. This procedure enables estimating a measure of brain age independent of the individual’s chronological age. Over-estimation of brain age, in relation to chronological age, is observed in several neurological conditions such as mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer’s disease (AD), schizophrenia, and depression4–6, and is associated with an increase in mortality rate7. Similarly, over-estimation of brain age was also found in obesity8–10, suggesting that the brain age framework may provide a powerful tool for assessing accelerated brain aging due to excessive weight. Critically, it is unclear whether dietary lifestyle interventions may have a beneficial, attenuative effect on the brain aging process.

Obesity is associated with multiple adverse health impacts also observed in normal aging11,12. These comorbidities of obesity and typical aging include the risk of cardiovascular disease13, inflammation14, type 2 diabetes15, DNA damage16,17, and neurodegenerative processes18. The link between excessive weight and neuronal damage is likely mediated by adiposity, metabolic dysfunction, and alteration in the gut microbiome19,20. These, in turn, promote inflammatory metabolic processes in the central nervous system21. Accordingly, reduction in gray and white matter volume22,23, changes in brain connectivity24,25, cognitive impairment26, and the prevalence of dementia27 were all associated with midlife obesity. These anatomical2, functional28, and behavioral29 findings are also observed during normal aging. An increase in life expectancy30 along with a sharp growth in obesity rates31 elicit the need to characterize, treat and perhaps prevent obesity-related brain aging.

We previously found that weight loss, glycemic control and lowering of blood pressure, as well as increment in polyphenols rich food, were associated with an attenuation in brain atrophy 32. Here, as a sub-study of the Dietary Intervention Randomized Controlled Trial Polyphenols Unprocessed Study (DIRECT PLUS33), we examined the effect of 18 months of lifestyle intervention on brain aging attenuation (Fig. 1). We assessed brain age based on resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) taken before and after the intervention. Brain aging attenuation was quantified as the difference between the expected and observed brain age after the intervention. We trained and validated the age prediction model using two separate cohorts (n=29134, 35835,36), then applied it to our group of participants from the DIRECT-PLUS (n=102). We hypothesized that a successful reduction in anthropometric measurements following the intervention would attenuate brain aging. We then examined how multiple clinical outcomes, including liver, glycemic, lipids, and MRI fat deposition markers, would be related to attenuated brain aging. Finally, we report the correlation between brain age attenuation and changes in reported food consumption. To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the first studies that examined the beneficial effect of lifestyle interventions on the brain aging trajectory in humans, assessed by resting-state fMRI.

![Fig. 1](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2022/09/21/2022.09.21.22280182/F1.medium.gif)

[Fig. 1](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/09/21/2022.09.21.22280182/F1)

Fig. 1 
Study design and workflow. The DIRECT-PLUS trial examined the effect of an 18-month lifestyle intervention on adiposity, cardiometabolic, and brain health across intervention groups. (a) Participants in the functional connectivity sub-study (N=132) completed the baseline measurements at T0. They were randomly assigned to three intervention groups: healthy dietary guidelines (HDG), an active control group, Mediterranean diet (MED), and green-MED. All groups were combined with physical activity (PA). Eighteen months following intervention onset, all measurements were retaken (T18). (b) Measurements included anthropometric measurements, blood biomarkers, fat deposition, and structural and functional brain imaging. (c) Functional brain imaging was conducted while subjects were at rest and was used to estimate resting state functional connectivity (RSFC). RSFC measures the correlation between the time series of pairs of brain regions. (d) We fitted a linear support vector regression to predict chronological age from all pairwise correlations. We fitted the model on the NKI data set, then tested and applied it to the Cam-CAN and the DIRECT-PLUS data. (e, left scatter plot) Based on the T0 data, we first computed the expected aging trajectory as the linear relation between the chronological and predicted age of all subjects. The fitted line represents the increase in the predicted age in relation to chronological age in the absence of an intervention. (e, right scatter plot) The fitted line was used to estimate the expected brain age at T18, given each participant’s T0 brain age and the time passed between the T0 and T18 MRI scans. We computed the observed brain age by applying the brain age model to the T18 scans. Brain age attenuation was calculated as the expected brain age minus the observed at T18.

## 2. Results

### 2.1 Brain age estimation

To estimate chronological age from RSFC, we utilized data from 649 participants from two separate cohorts for the brain age model training, validation, and testing. We predicted chronological age from functional connectivity among the 100 nodes of the Schaefer brain atlas3 (4950 edges) using a linear support vector regression model. The model was first trained and validated on 291 participants from the Nathan Kline Institute dataset (NKI34; n=291) using 5-fold cross-validation. As expected, a positive correlation was found between the predicted and observed age (r=0.439, p<0.001; MAE=8.544, p<0.001). Next, we retrained the model on the entire sample and tested it in an independent sample from the Cambridge Centre for Ageing Neuroscience dataset (Cam-CAN35; n=358) again, yielding a positive correlation between the predicted and observed age (r=0.290, p<0.001; MAE=11.402, p=0.005). Finally, we used the fitted model to estimate the brain age within the DIRECT-PLUS cohort. Of the 132 subjects that participated in the fMRI sub-study, 102 were included in all analyses after exclusions due to excessive in-scanner motion (23% omitted; Methods 4.5). The predicted brain age and observed chronological age were correlated (r=0.244, p=0.013; MAE=8.337, p<0.001; Fig. 2), reproducing the results found within the two other datasets. An analysis of the contribution of individual nodes to brain age prediction is provided in the supplementary information (SI) section 10.1.

![Fig. 2](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2022/09/21/2022.09.21.22280182/F2.medium.gif)

[Fig. 2](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/09/21/2022.09.21.22280182/F2)

Fig. 2 
Prediction accuracy within the validation and test cohorts. The scatter plots depict the data points and regression line between the predicted (y-axis) and observed (x-axis) age. The predicted-observed correlation is presented for the validation data (left), the Can-CAN test data (middle), and the DIRECT-PLUS data at baseline. The shaded area around the regression lines represents a 95% confidence interval estimated using bootstrapping. Pearson’s correlation, MAE (mean absolute error), and corresponding p values are shown at the bottom of each plot.

### 2.2 Baseline characteristics

Baseline characteristics among the 102 participants with valid RSFC MRI scans are presented in **Table 1** (see SI Table 1 for additional measures). The mean participant age was 51.5±10.5 years (median=50.6, range 33.9-81.9), and 91.2% were men. The mean body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) were 30.1±2.5 kg/m2 and 107.1±6.6 cm, respectively. The mean baseline predicted brain age by RSFC was 52.8±4 years. At baseline, predicted brain age was associated with chronological age (r=0.24, p=0.013), chemerin (r=0.25, p=0.012), fibroblast growth factor 21 [(FGF21), r=0.21, p=0.034] and with obesity-associated measurements obtained by MRI including visceral abdominal tissue (VAT): r=0.33, p<0.001 and superficial subcutaneous fat (SSC): r=-0.28, p=0.005). Predicted brain age at baseline was also associated with decreased hippocampal occupancy score (HOC), an anatomical measurement of brain atrophy (r=-0.255, p=0.010).

View this table:
[Table 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/09/21/2022.09.21.22280182/T1)

Table 1. Baseline characteristics according to the baseline predicted brain age tertiles

### 2.3 The relation between successful lifestyle intervention and attenuation of functional brain aging

Our primary hypothesis was that success in lifestyle intervention, as assessed by anthropometric measurements, will attenuate functional brain aging. Brain aging attenuation was quantified as the difference between the expected and observed brain age at T18 (Fig. 1e). Following 18 months of lifestyle intervention, participants showed a reduction of 0.76 (±1.86) units in BMI on average, 2.31 (±5.61) kg reduction in weight, and 5.39 (±5.89) cm reduction in waist circumference. These constitute a -6.45% ±(5.60%) and -4.35% ±(5.86%) percent reduction from baseline for waist circumference and BMI and weight, respectively. Additionally, at T18, the observed age was lower than expected in 56.8% of the subjects, while the opposite was found in 43.1% of the subjects (X2=1.922, p=0.166; see Fig. 3, top). Importantly, we found a correlation between ΔBMI and brain age attenuation such that participants that showed a decrease in BMI also exhibited attenuated brain aging (r=.319, p<0.001; Fig. 3, bottom). Specifically, one percent of BMI or weight loss resulted in an .9 months attenuation of brain age. Similar results were found with Δ bodyweight (r=.319, p<0.001) and Δ waist circumference (r=.198, p=0.046; Fig. 4). The correlations to ΔBMI and Δweight were significant after correcting for age and baseline brain age (p<0.05 for all), while the correlation to waist circumference showed only a trend (r>.171, ps <0.079 for all).

![Fig. 3](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2022/09/21/2022.09.21.22280182/F3.medium.gif)

[Fig. 3](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/09/21/2022.09.21.22280182/F3)

Fig. 3 
Observed compared to expected brain age at T18. The upper panel depicts the chronological age (x-axis) and the observed (empty circles) and expected (full circles) brain age (y-axis) of each subject. The dashed line represents the expected brain age trajectory fitted based on the T0 data (see regression line in Fig. 1e, left). Arrows point from the expected to the observed age of a single individual, corresponding to brain age attenuation. Arrows’ colors correspond to the extent of brain age attenuation (blue shades indicate attenuation, red shades indicate an acceleration in brain age). The observed age was lower than expected in 56.8% of the subjects, while the opposite was found in 43.1% (X2=1.922, p=0.166). In the lower panel, arrows were reordered by subjects’ BMI change over the 18 months of intervention. A significant correlation was found between the BMI and brain age change (r=.319, p<0.001). This is evident in the graph, such that most of the blue arrows are located on the left side of the x-axis (negative values), and most of the red arrows appear on the right side (positive values).

![Fig. 4](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2022/09/21/2022.09.21.22280182/F4.medium.gif)

[Fig. 4](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/09/21/2022.09.21.22280182/F4)

Fig. 4 
Brain age attenuation association with clinical measurements. The scatter plots depict the data points and regression line between brain age attenuation (y-axis) and each clinical measurement (x-axis). Clinical measurements include anthropometry (blue), liver markers (orange), glycemic markers (brown), lipid profile (red), and fat deposition measured using MRI (green). The shaded area around the regression line represents a 95% confidence interval estimated using bootstrapping. Pearson’s correlation and the corresponding p-value are shown at the bottom of each plot. Significant associations following FDR correction are marked in bold (*=p<0.05, **=p<0.01).

### 2.4 The relation between brain age attenuation and clinical measurements

To examine the clinical outcomes associated with attenuated brain aging, we further tested the correlation of brain age attenuation with liver, glycemic, lipids, and MRI-assessed fat deposition biomarkers (Fig. 4). Except of deep subcutaneous changes, all fat deposition measurements, superficial subcutaneous, visceral, and liver fat changes (e.g loss) were significantly and directly associated with brain age attenuation (p<0.05, FDR corrected), i.e., the more the individual succeeded in diet-induced fat depots loss, the more brain age attenuation has been achieved. We then tested the association between brain age attenuation and liver and glycemic biomarkers. Out of all examined liver biomarkers, a decrease in alanine transaminase (ALT), Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT), alkaline phosphatase, and serum chemerin were significantly associated with attenuation in brain age (p<0.05 for all, FDR corrected). Of all examined lipid profile markers, only an increase in ΔHDL-C was significantly correlated with brain age attenuation (r=-.273, p=0.005). Finally, a decrease in HOC was significantly correlated with brain age attenuation (r=-.296, p=0.003). All results were reproduced after controlling for baseline age and predicted age at T0. However, after further correction for changes in BMI, only Δ alkaline phosphatase, Δ chemerin and Δ HOC were associated with brain age attenuation (all p’s<0.018), with no significant associations with all other biomarkers (p>0.05, for all; SI Table 2).

### 2.5 Relation between brain age attenuation and food consumption

We examined whether food consumption, as reported using a Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ), could be associated with functional brain aging attenuation. Associations were tested using Kendall’s rank correlation. We began with categories that could negatively affect brain aging attenuation. In line with our hypothesis, we found that decreased consumption of processed food (t=3.131, p=.002) and sweets and beverages (τ=-0.231, p=.002) was associated with more attenuation in brain age. An increase in green tea and walnut consumption, for which we hypothesized an attenuation effect on brain aging due to their high polyphenol content, did not result in a significant correlation (all τ’s <0.081, p’s>.121).

## 3. Discussion

Considerable evidence implies that excessive weight accelerates normal aging11,12, a process that is also manifested in brain aging38. In the current study, we examined for the first time, as far as we can say, whether a lifestyle dietary intervention may attenuate the effect of obesity on the brain aging trajectory. We hypothesized that reducing anthropometric measurements following a lifestyle intervention would be associated with attenuated brain aging. We first demonstrated, across two separate cohorts, that age could be estimated from RSFC, as done in previous work39. We then applied the fitted age prediction model to the participants of the DIRECT-PLUS. We found that 1% of body weight loss results in an 8.9 months attenuation of brain age (SI Fig. 2). Attenuated brain aging was further correlated with a decrease in WC, MRI assessed fat deposition, liver biomarkers, and HDL-C. Finally, reduced reported consumption of processed food, sweets and beverages were also related to attenuated brain aging.

Accumulated evidence points to the potential of lifestyle intervention to reverse the negative impact of excess weight on brain structure, function, and cognition. Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies found that reported adherence to a Mediterranean diet was linked to increased gray matter volume in multiple regions40, including the hippocampus41. Adherence to healthy dietary patterns was also associated with reduced cognitive decline42. Importantly, randomized clinical trials can support a causal relationship between lifestyle intervention and the brain aging process. Such studies from our group32 and others43,44 revealed that subjects enrolled in a PA + dietary intervention exhibit lower hippocampal atrophy and smaller ventricles. A similar beneficial effect on cognitive functioning in middle age was also found45, along with functional connectivity alteration in the default mode and executive control networks46,47. To date, a single study in rats has tested the effect of a dietary intervention using the brain age framework and found a reduction in brain aging rate48. Hence, the current work provides the first evidence that such a beneficial effect on brain age can also be found in humans.

The brain age framework reduces the multifaceted aging process captured in a given imaging modality to a single scalar. This scalar, the predicted brain age, is well-defined in the sense that it minimizes the prediction error within the training data set. Moreover, the clinical relevance of functional brain age is shown, for example, in predicting Alzheimer’s onset49 and symptoms severity in depression50. This reductionist approach raises several challenges. The first is the ability to interpret the features used by the machine learning model51 (see SI 1). A second challenge is understanding the physiological factors that may affect its predictions52, which we address in the current work. Here we report how a set of clinical measures are associated with changes in brain aging. Importantly, lifestyle and other interventions can affect these measures to attenuate the brain aging process. We suggest that such mapping of changes in clinical outcomes to months or years of attenuated brain aging has important scientific, clinical, and even educational value.

We found that clinical outcomes that include anthropometric, liver, and lipid biomarkers were associated with attenuated brain age. Specifically, two main factors were linked to changes in brain age, changes in anthropometry measures, and liver status. The first factor included BMI, weight, WC, and superficial subcutaneous and visceral fat. The second factor included liver fat, ALT, GGT, alkaline phosphatase, and serum chemerin. Alkaline phosphatase and chemerin were also associated with changes in brain age after controlling for changes in BMI. The negative impact of elevated liver enzymes and liver fat on brain health is seen, for example, in the case of AD53–55. This link is thought to be mediated by oxidative stress, vascular damage, and inflammation56. Chemerin, produced in the liver, is an adipokine linked to energy homeostasis, adipogenesis, and excessive weight56. Chemerin is correlated with age57and BMI58 and was found to be reduced following lifestyle intervention59,60. The relation between serum chemerin and brain aging is still unclear, but possible linking mechanisms are hypertension61 and inflammation58. Besides these two factors, HDL-C was the only variable whose increase was correlated to brain aging attenuation. This is in line with evidence of the protective role of HDL-C in cognitive decline and dementia62. Finally, of all the reported food consumption items, only reduced consumption of processed food, sweets and beverages were linked to attenuated brain aging. Although these results are based on self-reports, they may be helpful for developing neuroprotective dietary guidelines63.

It is important to consider several limitations and strengths of the current study. The first limitation was gender imbalance (F: 93, M: 9; F:8.8%, M: 91.2%), which reflected the workplace profile from which participants were recruited64–67. This distribution misrepresents the proportion of obese women within the general population (F: 51%, M: 49%; CDC, 2018). Hence these results should be further corroborated in a gender-balanced sample. Additionally, participants were recruited based on excess adiposity or dyslipidemia, therefore, they represented a restricted range of the normal population. This design allows to maximize the intervention effects but restricts our ability to detect correlation at baseline. The strengths of the study included the wealth of health biomarkers that included anthropometric, blood, and imaging measures. The relatively large sample for similar intervention trials, the tight on-site monitoring over the dietary compliance, and the long intervention duration. Finally, the use of three distinct datasets for training and validation, testing, and inference supports the generalization of our model.

To conclude, in the current work, we examined how changes in multiple health factors, including anthropometric measurements, blood biomarkers, and fat deposition, can account for brain aging attenuation. We reveal that the two factors with the strongest association with brain aging were changes in anthropometry measures and liver biomarkers. These findings complement the growing interest in bodily aging indicated, for example, by DNA methylation68 as health biomarkers and interventions that may affect them. These exciting results may advance our knowledge of factors related to healthy brain aging and guide future neuroprotective interventions.

## 4. Methods

### 4.1 Dataset used for training and validating the brain age model

Training, validation, and testing of the brain age model were conducted on data from two cohorts that included functional and structural brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The training was conducted on the enhanced Nathan Kline Institute-Rockland Sample (NKI34) and testing on the Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience dataset (Cam-CAN35,36). The NKI dataset is composed of 291 subjects (226 females, 65 males) recruited from Rockland County, USA. All participants provided informed consent and the study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the Nathan Kline Institute (#226781 and #239708) and Montclair State University (#000983 A and #000983B). The Cam-CAN dataset includes 358 (193 females, 165 males) subjects roughly uniformly distributed from Cambridge City, UK. All participants provided informed consent, and the study was approved by the local ethics committee, Cambridgeshire 2 Research Ethics Committee (reference: 10/H0308/50). In both datasets, we included only subjects within the DIRECT-PLUS age range (34-82 years). Exclusion criteria included unsuccessful completion of the preprocessing and quality control stages (see 4.5).

### 4.2 Study design

This work was based on a sub-study of the DIREC-PLUS trial ([clinicaltrials.gov](http://clinicaltrials.gov) ID: [NCT03020186](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT03020186&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F09%2F21%2F2022.09.21.22280182.atom)). The primary aims of the DIRECT-PLUS trial were 18-month changes in visceral abdominal tissue, intrahepatic fat, and adiposity across intervention groups. The results for the primary outcomes were presented in separate publications33. The DIRECT-PLUS was launched in May 2017 and conducted in an isolated workplace in Israel (Nuclear Research Center Negev, Dimona, Israel). Most clinical and medical measurements, including anthropometric measurements, blood drawing, and lifestyle intervention sessions, were performed on-site. Among 378 volunteers, 294 met age (30+ years of age) and abdominal obesity inclusion criteria [waist circumference (WC): men>102 cm, women>88 cm] or dyslipidemia [TG>150 mg/dL and high-density-lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-c) ≤40 mg/dL for men, ≤50 mg/dL for women]. Exclusion criteria were inability to perform physical activity; serum creatinine ≥2 mg/dL; serum alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase more than three times above the upper limit of normal; a major illness that might require hospitalization; pregnancy or lactation; active cancer, or chemotherapy treatment in the last three years; warfarin treatment; pacemaker or platinum implantation; and participation in a different trial. Among 294 eligible participants, 132 participants were randomly assigned to participate in the fMRI sub-study. The Soroka Medical Center Medical Ethics Board and Institutional Review Board provided ethics approval. All participants provided written consent and received no financial compensation.

### 4.3 Randomization and intervention

All participants completed the baseline measurements and were randomized, using a computer-basd program, in a 1:1:1 ratio, stratified by sex and work status (to ensure equal workplace-related lifestyle features between groups), into one of the three intervention groups: healthy dietary guidelines (HDG) as an active control group, Mediterranean diet (MED), green-MED, all combined with physical activity (PA). Interventions lasted for 18 months and were contemporaneous, and participants were not blind to group assignment (open-label protocol). Each participant received complete dietary guidance (based on the specific intervention group) and a free and fully available clinical dietitians consult. Furthermore, all participants received free gym membership, including educational sessions encouraging moderate-intensity PA. A detailed description of the intervention outline is available in **SI Table 3**.

### 4.4 MRI acquisition

MRI scans were conducted at the Soroka University Medical Center (SUMC), Beer Sheva. Participants were scanned in a 3T Philips Ingenia scanner (Amsterdam, The Netherlands) equipped with a standard head coil. Subjects were instructed to refrain from food and non-water beverages two hours before the MRI sessions. Each of the two sessions at T0 and T18 included 2 RS-fMRI runs of 7 minutes each and a 3D T1-weighted anatomical scan to allow registration of the functional data. Before each RS session, participants were instructed to remain awake with their eyes open and lie still. fMRI BOLD contrast was acquired using the gradient-echo echo-planner imaging sequence with parallel acquisition (SENSE: factor 2.2). Scanning parameters were as follows: whole-brain coverage 41 slices (3 × 3 × 3 mm3), transverse orientation, 3 mm thickness, no gap, TR = 2200 ms, TE = 30 ms, flip angle=90°, FOV = 200 × 222 (RL x AP) and matrix size 68 × 71 (RL x AP). High-resolution anatomical volumes were acquired with a T1-weighted 3D pulse sequence (1 × 1 × 1 mm3, 150 slices). A detailed description of liver and abdominal fat MRI is available in SI section 10.2.

### 4.5 MRI preprocessing

The preprocessing pipelines used in this work were extensively described in a previous publication69. T1w scans were preprocessed through FreeSurfer’s70 (version 6.0) recon-all processing. FreeSurfer’s cortical segmentation and spherical warp were used to transfer the Schaefer 100-node cortical parcellation37 to each subject’s volumetric anatomical space. Functional images of the NKI dataset were preprocessed with fMRIPrep (version 1.1.8;71 and images of the DIRECT-PLUS and Cam-CAN datasets were preprocessed with the Configurable Pipeline for the Analysis of Connectomes (C-PAC72 version 1.6.2). Briefly, both pipelines included the following steps: slice-timing correction, motion correction, skull stripping, estimation of motion parameters, and other nuisance signal time series. For the NKI dataset, functional scans were bandpass filtered (0.008 – 0.08Hz) and confound regressed in a manner orthogonal to the temporal filters. Confounds included six motion estimates, the mean time series derived in CSF, WM, and whole-brain masks, the derivatives of these nine regressors, and the squares of these 18 terms. Spike regressors were added for each frame with framewise displacement above 0.5mm. Data were linearly detrended and standardized. Nuisance regression in the DIRECT-PLUS and Cam-CAN fMRI dataset included the first five principal components of the signal from white matter and CSF73, six motion parameters, and linear and quadratic trends, global signal regression, followed by temporal filtering between 0.1 and 0.01 Hz and. Finally, a scrubbing threshold of 0.5mm frame-wise displacement was applied74 (removal of 1 TR before and 2 TR after excessive movement). The time series of the two functional scans in the DIRECT-PLUS were concatenated to a single T0 and T18 scans. The exclusion criterion for excessive movements was determined a priori to less than 70% (9 min and 48 sec) of the resting-state session after the scrubbing procedure (23% omitted; 102 subjects left). In all datasets, functional connectivity was defined as the Pearson correlation among pairs of ROIs’ time series followed by Fisher’s r-to-z transformation.

### 4.6 Clinical measurement and blood biomarkers

All parameters were measured at baseline and after 18 months of intervention. Waist circumference was measured to the nearest millimeter halfway between the last rib and the iliac crest using an anthropometric measuring tape. Blood and urine samples were collected at 8:00 AM after a 12-hour fast. Blood samples were centrifuged and stored at -80°C. Hippocampal occupancy score (HOC) was calculated as the hippocampal volume divided by [hippocampal volume + inferior lateral ventricle volume] in each hemisphere, then averaged across hemispheres 32,75.

### 4.7 Nutritional assessment

Assessment of nutritional intake and lifestyle habits was self-reported online using validated food frequency questionnaires76 including green tea, walnuts, and *Wolffia globose* intake evaluation. The questionnaires were administered at baseline, after six months, and at the end of the trial. The closed workplace enabled monitoring of the freely provided lunch and the intense dietary and PA sessions, which were provided simultaneously to all three groups.

### 4.8 Brain age estimation

Subjects’ chronological age was predicted from the lower triangle of the functional connectivity matrix depicting all unique edges (4950 edges). We used a support vector regression model77 implemented using Scikit-learn78 with a linear kernel and all the default parameters. Model accuracy was quantified as the Pearson correlation between the observed and predicted age. We additionally report the mean absolute error (MAE) in years, along with a p-value based on a non-parametric permutation test created by shuffling the data labels 1,000 times79.

### 4.9 Statistical analysis

The primary outcome of the current work was brain age attenuation quantified as the difference between the expected and observed brain age at T18. The expected brain age at T18 was calculated by first producing brain age prediction for all participants at T0. Then, a linear regression was used to estimate brain age from the chronological age at T0. The fitted regression formula, representing the expected aging trajectory in the absence of intervention, was used to estimate the expected brain age at T18 given each participant’s T0 brain age and the time passed between the T0 and T18 MRI scans. The observed brain age was produced by applying the brain age model to the T18 scans. Association between brain age attenuation and change in clinical measures following the intervention were reported using Pearson’s correlation. Correction for multiple comparisons was conducted within each biomarker category using the Benjamini– Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR80) with an alpha of 0.05. Associations to food consumption reports were reported using Kendall’s tau correlation for ordinal data. Processed food at T18 had only two levels, “same consumption” and “less consumption”, thus relation to brain age attenuation was tested with independent t-test. Change in clinical measurements were computed as a delta (Δ), the value at T0 minus the value at T18. We quantified change in reported food consumption as the change between the T0 and T18 questionnaires for food groups (i.e., processed food, sweets, and beverages) and as total consumption for polyphenols-provided foods (i.e., Mankai, green tea, walnuts). To control for the possible effect of age or gender, we used partial regression by regressing out the linear effect of age and gender from both brain age attenuation and the clinical measures. This was done by predicting each clinical measure, with the covariate as a predictor, keeping only the residual.

## Data Availability

The data are not publicly available due to ethical and privacy restrictions.

## 5. Author contributions

G.L.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Software, Visualization, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. A.K.: Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Software, Project administration, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. A.Y.M.: Investigation, Project administration. E.R.: Investigation, Project administration. G.T.: Investigation, Project administration. H.Z.: Investigation, Project administration. I.S.: Resources, Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - review & editing. G.A.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing, Supervision. I.S.: Resources, Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing - review & editing; PI of the DIRECT-PLUS. The ordering among co–first authors was determined by their relative contributions to the study.

## 10. Supplemental material

### 10.1 Brain age prediction accuracy of individual nodes

To examine the contribution of different nodes for age prediction, we reiterated the model training procedure for each of the nodes separately. We extracted the row of each node in the RSFC, matrix which represents all the nodes’ connections with the rest of the brain, or its ‘connectivity fingerprint’81. As in the original model, we used a linear support vector regression fitted on the NKI data set, then tested it on the Cam-CAN data set. We report the prediction accuracy of each node on the test set as the Pearson correlation between the predicted brain age and the chronological age. We plot the results on the brain surface and using a box plot where nodes are arranged according to their resting-state network affiliations (SI fig. 1).

![SI Fig.1.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2022/09/21/2022.09.21.22280182/F5.medium.gif)

[SI Fig.1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/09/21/2022.09.21.22280182/F5)

SI Fig.1. 
Brain age prediction accuracy of individual nodes. Prediction accuracy was quantified as the correlation between chronological age and predicted age. (a) Prediction accuracy was depicted on the brain surface on a lateral (top) and medial (bottom) view. (b) Box plot showing the prediction accuracy (y-axis) in each of the seven canonical resting-state networks 82. Each dot represents a single node.

View this table:
[SI Table 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/09/21/2022.09.21.22280182/T2)

SI Table 1. 
Baseline characteristics according to the baseline predicted brain age tertiles

![SI Fig. 2.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2022/09/21/2022.09.21.22280182/F6.medium.gif)

[SI Fig. 2.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/09/21/2022.09.21.22280182/F6)

SI Fig. 2. 
Brain age attenuation compared to percent weight reduction from baseline. A scatter plot depicting the linear relationship between percent weight reduction from baseline (x-axis) and years of brain age attenuation (y-axis). Also shown on the graph are the correlation coefficient and the parameters of the linear relation between the two variables. One percent of body weight loss corresponded to an. months attenuation of brain age.

View this table:
[SI Table 2](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/09/21/2022.09.21.22280182/T3)

SI Table 2 Correlation and partial correlation of brain age attenuation and biomarkers

View this table:
[SI Table 3](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/09/21/2022.09.21.22280182/T4)

SI Table 3 Intervention outline by group

### 10.2 Liver and visceral fat imaging protocols

To quantify and follow IHF% changes, we used H-MRS, a reliable tool for liver fat quantification ([https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25903702/](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25903702/)). Localized, single-voxel proton spectra were acquired using a 3.0T magnetic resonance scanner (Philips Ingenia, Best, The Netherlands). The measurements were taken from the right frontal lobe of the liver, with a location determined individually for each subject using a surface, receive-only phased-array coil. Spectra with and without water suppression were acquired using the single-voxel stimulated echo acquisition mode (STEAM) with the following parameters: TR=4000msec, TE=9.0msec and TM=16.0msec. The receiver bandwidth was 2000Hz and the number of data points was 1024. Second-order shimming was used. Four averages were taken in a single breath hold for an acquisition time of 16 sec. The voxel size varied somewhat according to anatomy, but was approximately 50(AP) × 45(RL) × 54(FH) mm. Water suppression was achieved using the MOIST (Multiple Optimizations Insensitive Suppression Train) sequence consisting of four phase-modulated T1 and B1 insensitive pulses with a 50Hz window. Data were analyzed using Mnova software (Mestrelab Research, Santiago de Compostela, Spain) by an experienced physicist blinded to the intervention groups, who also performed visual quality control of fitted spectra. The total image hepatic fat fraction was determined as the ratio between the sum of the area under all fat divided by the sum of area under all fat and water peaks (Cite: [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19834463/](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19834463/)). Inter-class reliability was tested between two different technicians and resulted in an average measure of r=0.99 (p<0.001). Intra-class reliability was tested among all baseline scans and resulted in an average measure of r=0.96 (p<0.001). Liver fat color images were produced using PRIDE software (by Philips).

Abdominal fat depots were assessed at baseline and 18-months thereafter using 3-Tesla MRI scans (Ingenia 3.0T, Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands). The scanner utilized a 3D modified DIXON (mDIXON) imaging technique without gaps (2 mm thickness and 2 mm of spacing), fast-low-angle shot (FLASH) sequence with a multi-echo two excitation pulse sequence for phase-sensitive encoding of fat and water signals (TR, 3.6ms; TE1,1.19ms; TE2, 2.3ms; FOV 520×440×80mm; 2×1.4×1mm voxel size). Four images of phantoms were generated: in-phase, out-phase, fat, and water phase 83. Participants were instructed to hold their breath to avoid motion artifacts when their abdomen was scanned. We quantified abdominal fat using MATLAB-based semiautomatic software and blinded to intervention group. A continuous line over the fascia superficialis was drawn to differentiate deep-SAT from superficial-SAT and calculated mean VAT, deep-SAT, and superficial-SAT along two axial slices: L5-S1 and L4-L5. We quantified fat mass regions as area and relative proportion of each fat subtype (percentage).

## 6. Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from: the German Research Foundation (DFG), German Research Foundation - project number 209933838 - SFB 1052; B11), Israel Ministry of Health grant 87472511 (to I Shai); Israel Ministry of Science and Technology grant 3-13604 (to I Shai); and the California Walnuts Commission (to I Shai).

## Footnotes

*   * Authorship note: G. Levakov and A. Kaplan share first authorship and G. Avidan & I. Shai share senior authorship

*   Received September 21, 2022.
*   Revision received September 21, 2022.
*   Accepted September 21, 2022.


*   © 2022, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

This pre-print is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International), CC BY-NC 4.0, as described at [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)

## 7. References

1.  1.Jack CR, Wiste HJ, Weigand SD, et al. Defining imaging biomarker cut points for brain aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2017;13(3). doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2016.08.005
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.jalz.2016.08.005&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=27697430&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F09%2F21%2F2022.09.21.22280182.atom) 

2.  2.Bethlehem RAI, Seidlitz J, White SR, et al. Brain charts for the human lifespan. Nat 2022. Published online April 6, 2022:1–11. doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04554-y
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41586-022-04554-y&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=35388223&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F09%2F21%2F2022.09.21.22280182.atom) 

3.  3.Cole JH, Franke K. Predicting Age Using Neuroimaging: Innovative Brain Ageing Biomarkers. Trends Neurosci. 2017;40(12):681–690. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2017.10.001
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.tins.2017.10.001&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=29074032&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F09%2F21%2F2022.09.21.22280182.atom) 

4.  4.Liem F, Varoquaux G, Kynast J, et al. Predicting brain-age from multimodal imaging data captures cognitive impairment. Neuroimage. 2016;148:179–188. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.005
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.005&link_type=DOI) 

5.  5.Koutsouleris N, Davatzikos C, Borgwardt S, et al. Accelerated brain aging in schizophrenia and beyond: A neuroanatomical marker of psychiatric disorders. Schizophr Bull. 2014;40(5). doi:10.1093/schbul/sbt142
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/schbul/sbt142&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24126515&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F09%2F21%2F2022.09.21.22280182.atom) 

6.  6.Bashyam VM, Erus G, Doshi J, et al. MRI signatures of brain age and disease over the lifespan based on a deep brain network and 14 468 individuals worldwide. Brain. 2020;143(7). doi:10.1093/brain/awaa160
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/brain/awaa160&link_type=DOI) 

7.  7.Cole JH, Ritchie SJ, Bastin ME, et al. Brain age predicts mortality. Mol Psychiatry. 2018;23(5):1385–1392. doi:10.1038/mp.2017.62
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/mp.2017.62&link_type=DOI) 

8.  8.Franke K, Ristow M, Gaser C. Gender-specific impact of personal health parameters on individual brain aging in cognitively unimpaired elderly subjects. Front Aging Neurosci. 2014;6(MAY). doi:10.3389/fnagi.2014.00094
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3389/fnagi.2014.00094&link_type=DOI) 

9.  9.Kolenic M, Franke K, Hlinka J, et al. Obesity, dyslipidemia and brain age in first-episode psychosis. J Psychiatr Res. 2018;99. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.02.012
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.02.012&link_type=DOI) 

10. 10.Ronan L, Alexander-Bloch AF, Wagstyl K, et al. Obesity associated with increased brain age from midlife. Neurobiol Aging. 2016;47:63–70. doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.07.010
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.07.010&link_type=DOI) 

11. 11.Salvestrini V, Sell C, Lorenzini A. Obesity may accelerate the aging process. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019;10(MAY). doi:10.3389/fendo.2019.00266
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3389/fendo.2019.00266&link_type=DOI) 

12. 12.Tam BT, Morais JA, Santosa S. Obesity and ageing: Two sides of the same coin. Obes Rev. 2020;21(4). doi:10.1111/obr.12991
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/obr.12991&link_type=DOI) 

13. 13.Park MH, Sovio U, Viner RM, Hardy RJ, Kinra S. Overweight in Childhood, Adolescence and Adulthood and Cardiovascular Risk in Later Life: Pooled Analysis of Three British Birth Cohorts. PLoS One. 2013;8(7). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0070684
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1371/journal.pone.0070684&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23894679&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F09%2F21%2F2022.09.21.22280182.atom) 

14. 14.Frasca D, Blomberg BB, Paganelli R. Aging, obesity, and inflammatory age-related diseases. Front Immunol. 2017;8(DEC). doi:10.3389/fimmu.2017.01745
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3389/fimmu.2017.01745&link_type=DOI) 

15. 15.Ahima RS. Connecting obesity, aging and diabetes. Nat Med. 2009;15(9). doi:10.1038/nm0909-996
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/nm0909-996&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19734871&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F09%2F21%2F2022.09.21.22280182.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000269979200015&link_type=ISI) 

16. 16.Niedernhofer LJ, Gurkar AU, Wang Y, Vijg J, Hoeijmakers JHJ, Robbins PD. Nuclear Genomic Instability and Aging. Annu Rev Biochem. 2018;87. doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-062917-012239
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1146/annurev-biochem-062917-012239&link_type=DOI) 

17. 17.Shimizu I, Yoshida Y, Suda M, Minamino T. DNA damage response and metabolic disease. Cell Metab. 2014;20(6). doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2014.10.008
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.cmet.2014.10.008&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25456739&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F09%2F21%2F2022.09.21.22280182.atom) 

18. 18.Pugazhenthi S, Qin L, Reddy PH. Common neurodegenerative pathways in obesity, diabetes, and Alzheimer’s disease. Biochim Biophys Acta - Mol Basis Dis. 2017;1863(5). doi:10.1016/j.bbadis.2016.04.017
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.bbadis.2016.04.017&link_type=DOI) 

19. 19.Gupta A, Osadchiy V, Mayer EA. Brain–gut–microbiome interactions in obesity and food addiction. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;17(11). doi:10.1038/s41575-020-0341-5
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41575-020-0341-5&link_type=DOI) 

20. 20.Farruggia MC, Small DM. Effects of adiposity and metabolic dysfunction on cognition: A review. Physiol Behav. 2019;208. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.112578
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.112578&link_type=DOI) 

21. 21.Leigh SJ, Morris MJ. Diet, inflammation and the gut microbiome: Mechanisms for obesity-associated cognitive impairment. Biochim Biophys Acta - Mol Basis Dis. 2020;1866(6). doi:10.1016/j.bbadis.2020.165767
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.bbadis.2020.165767&link_type=DOI) 

22. 22.Kullmann S, Schweizer F, Veit R, Fritsche A, Preissl H. Compromised white matter integrity in obesity. Obes Rev. 2015;16(4). doi:10.1111/obr.12248
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/obr.12248&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25676886&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F09%2F21%2F2022.09.21.22280182.atom) 

23. 23.García-García I, Michaud A, Dadar M, et al. Neuroanatomical differences in obesity: meta-analytic findings and their validation in an independent dataset. Int J Obes. 2019;43(5). doi:10.1038/s41366-018-0164-4
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41366-018-0164-4&link_type=DOI) 

24. 24.Parsons N, Steward T, Clohesy R, Almgren H, Duehlmeyer L. A systematic review of resting-state functional connectivity in obesity: Refining current neurobiological frameworks and methodological considerations moving forward. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. Published online 2021. doi:10.1007/s11154-021-09665-x
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s11154-021-09665-x&link_type=DOI) 

25. 25.Daoust J, Schaffer J, Zeighami Y, Dagher A, García-García I, Michaud A. White matter integrity differences in obesity: A meta-analysis of diffusion tensor imaging studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021;129. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.07.020
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.07.020&link_type=DOI) 

26. 26.Yang Y, Shields GS, Guo C, Liu Y. Executive function performance in obesity and overweight individuals: A meta-analysis and review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018;84. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.11.020
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.11.020&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F09%2F21%2F2022.09.21.22280182.atom) 

27. 27.Pedditizi E, Peters R, Beckett N. The risk of overweight/obesity in mid-life and late life for the development of dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Age Ageing. 2016;45(1). doi:10.1093/ageing/afv151
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/ageing/afv151&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=26764391&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F09%2F21%2F2022.09.21.22280182.atom) 

28. 28.Sala-Llonch R, Bartrés-Faz D, Junqué C. Reorganization of brain networks in aging: a review of functional connectivity studies. Front Psychol. 2015;6. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00663
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00663&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=26052298&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F09%2F21%2F2022.09.21.22280182.atom) 

29. 29.Fjell AM, Sneve MH, Grydeland H, Storsve AB, Walhovd KB. The disconnected brain and executive function decline in aging. Cereb Cortex. 2017;27(3). doi:10.1093/cercor/bhw082
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/cercor/bhw082&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=27073220&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F09%2F21%2F2022.09.21.22280182.atom) 

30. 30.Chang AY, Skirbekk VF, Tyrovolas S, Kassebaum NJ, Dieleman JL. Measuring population ageing: an analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Public Heal. 2019;4(3). doi:10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30019-2
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30019-2&link_type=DOI) 

31. 31.Bentham J, Di Cesare M, Bilano V, et al. Worldwide trends in body-mass index, underweight, overweight, and obesity from 1975 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 2416 population-based measurement studies in 128·9 million children, adolescents, and adults. Lancet. 2017;390(10113). doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32129-3
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32129-3&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=29029897&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F09%2F21%2F2022.09.21.22280182.atom) 

32. 32.Kaplan A, Zelicha H, Yaskolka Meir A, et al. The effect of a high-polyphenol Mediterranean diet (Green-MED) combined with physical activity on age-related brain atrophy: the Dietary Intervention Randomized Controlled Trial Polyphenols Unprocessed Study (DIRECT PLUS). Am J Clin Nutr. Published online January 11, 2022. doi:10.1093/AJCN/NQAC001
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/AJCN/NQAC001&link_type=DOI) 

33. 33.Meir AY, Rinott E, Tsaban G, et al. Effect of green-Mediterranean diet on intrahepatic fat: the DIRECT PLUS randomised controlled trial. Gut. 2021;70(11):2085–2095. doi:10.1136/GUTJNL-2020-323106
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NjoiZ3V0am5sIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEwOiI3MC8xMS8yMDg1IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjIvMDkvMjEvMjAyMi4wOS4yMS4yMjI4MDE4Mi5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

34. 34.Nooner KB, Colcombe SJ, Tobe RH, et al. The NKI-Rockland Sample: A Model for Accelerating the Pace of Discovery Science in Psychiatry. Front Neurosci. 2012;6:152. doi:10.3389/fnins.2012.00152
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3389/fnins.2012.00152&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23087608&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F09%2F21%2F2022.09.21.22280182.atom) 

35. 35.Shafto MA, Tyler LK, Dixon M, et al. The Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience (Cam-CAN) study protocol: a cross-sectional, lifespan, multidisciplinary examination of healthy cognitive ageing. BMC Neurol. 2014;14(1):204. doi:10.1186/s12883-014-0204-1
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/s12883-014-0204-1&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25412575&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F09%2F21%2F2022.09.21.22280182.atom) 

36. 36.Taylor JR, Williams N, Cusack R, et al. The Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience (Cam-CAN) data repository: Structural and functional MRI, MEG, and cognitive data from a cross-sectional adult lifespan sample. NeuroImage. [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811915008150](http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811915008150). Published 2015. Accessed March 6, 2017.
    
    

37. 37.Schaefer A, Kong R, Gordon EM, et al. Local-Global Parcellation of the Human Cerebral Cortex from Intrinsic Functional Connectivity MRI. Cereb Cortex. 2018;28(9):3095–3114. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhx179
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/cercor/bhx179&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=28981612&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F09%2F21%2F2022.09.21.22280182.atom) 

38. 38.Beck D, de Lange AMG, Alnæs D, et al. Adipose tissue distribution from body MRI is associated with cross-sectional and longitudinal brain age in adults. NeuroImage Clin. 2022;33:102949. doi:10.1016/J.NICL.2022.102949
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/J.NICL.2022.102949&link_type=DOI) 

39. 39.Dosenbach NUF, Nardos B, Cohen AL, et al. Prediction of Individual Brain Maturity Using fMRI. Science (80-). 2010;329(5997):1358–1361. doi:10.1126/science.1194144.Prediction
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6Mzoic2NpIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEzOiIzMjkvNTk5Ny8xMzU4IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjIvMDkvMjEvMjAyMi4wOS4yMS4yMjI4MDE4Mi5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

40. 40.Staubo SC, Aakre JA, Vemuri P, et al. Mediterranean diet, micronutrients and macronutrients, and MRI measures of cortical thickness. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2017;13(2):168–177. doi:10.1016/J.JALZ.2016.06.2359
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/J.JALZ.2016.06.2359&link_type=DOI) 

41. 41.Ballarini T, Melo van Lent D, Brunner J, et al. Mediterranean Diet, Alzheimer Disease Biomarkers, and Brain Atrophy in Old Age. Neurology. 2021;96(24):e2920–e2932. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000012067
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1212/WNL.0000000000012067&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F09%2F21%2F2022.09.21.22280182.atom) 

42. 42.Gardener SL, Rainey-Smith SR. The Role of Nutrition in Cognitive Function and Brain Ageing in the Elderly. Curr Nutr Rep. 2018;7(3):139–149. doi:10.1007/S13668-018-0229-Y/TABLES/1
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/S13668-018-0229-Y/TABLES/1&link_type=DOI) 

43. 43.Erickson KI, Voss MW, Prakash RS, et al. Exercise training increases size of hippocampus and improves memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(7):3017–3022. doi:10.1073/PNAS.1015950108/SUPPL_FILE/PNAS.201015950SI.PDF
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NDoicG5hcyI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czoxMDoiMTA4LzcvMzAxNyI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDIyLzA5LzIxLzIwMjIuMDkuMjEuMjIyODAxODIuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 

44. 44.Espeland MA, Erickson K, Neiberg RH, et al. Brain and White Matter Hyperintensity Volumes After 10 Years of Random Assignment to Lifestyle Intervention. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(5):764–771. doi:10.2337/DC15-2230
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NzoiZGlhY2FyZSI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czo4OiIzOS81Lzc2NCI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDIyLzA5LzIxLzIwMjIuMDkuMjEuMjIyODAxODIuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 

45. 45.Valls-Pedret C, Sala-Vila A, Serra-Mir M, et al. Mediterranean Diet and Age-Related Cognitive Decline: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(7):1094–1103. doi:10.1001/JAMAINTERNMED.2015.1668
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/JAMAINTERNMED.2015.1668&link_type=DOI) 

46. 46.Voss MW, Prakash RS, Erickson KI, et al. Plasticity of brain networks in a randomized intervention trial of exercise training in older adults. Front Aging Neurosci. 2010;2:32. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2010.00032
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3389/fnagi.2010.00032&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20890449&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F09%2F21%2F2022.09.21.22280182.atom) 

47. 47.García-Casares N, Bernal-López MR, Roé-Vellvé N, et al. Brain Functional Connectivity Is Modified by a Hypocaloric Mediterranean Diet and Physical Activity in Obese Women. Nutr 2017, Vol 9, Page 685. 2017;9(7):685. doi:10.3390/NU9070685
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3390/NU9070685&link_type=DOI) 

48. 48.Brusini I, MacNicol E, Kim E, et al. MRI-derived brain age as a biomarker of ageing in rats: validation using a healthy lifestyle intervention. Neurobiol Aging. 2022;109:204–215. doi:10.1016/J.NEUROBIOLAGING.2021.10.004
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/J.NEUROBIOLAGING.2021.10.004&link_type=DOI) 

49. 49.Gonneaud J, Baria AT, Pichet Binette A, et al. Accelerated functional brain aging in pre-clinical familial Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Commun 2021 121. 2021;12(1):1–17. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-25492-9
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41467-020-20241-w&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F09%2F21%2F2022.09.21.22280182.atom) 

50. 50.Dunlop K, Victoria LW, Downar J, Gunning FM, Liston C. Accelerated brain aging predicts impulsivity and symptom severity in depression. Neuropsychopharmacol 2021 465. 2021;46(5):911–919. doi:10.1038/s41386-021-00967-x
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41386-021-00967-x&link_type=DOI) 

51. 51.Levakov G, Rosenthal G, Shelef I, Raviv TR, Avidan G. From a deep learning model back to the brain—Identifying regional predictors and their relation to aging. Hum Brain Mapp. 2020;41(12):3235–3252. doi:10.1002/hbm.25011
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/hbm.25011&link_type=DOI) 

52. 52.Mora F. Successful brain aging: plasticity, environmental enrichment, and lifestyle. [https://doi.org/1031887/DCNS2013151/fmora](https://doi.org/1031887/DCNS2013151/fmora). 2022;15(1):45-52. doi:10.31887/DCNS.2013.15.1/FMORA
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.31887/DCNS.2013.15.1/FMORA&link_type=DOI) 

53. 53.Nho K, Kueider-Paisley A, Ahmad S, et al. Association of Altered Liver Enzymes With Alzheimer Disease Diagnosis, Cognition, Neuroimaging Measures, and Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(7). doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.7978
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.7978&link_type=DOI) 

54. 54.Labenz C, Kostev K, Kaps L, Galle PR, Schattenberg JM. Incident Dementia in Elderly Patients with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Germany. Dig Dis Sci. 2021;66(9). doi:10.1007/s10620-020-06644-1
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s10620-020-06644-1&link_type=DOI) 

55. 55.Ghareeb DA, Hafez HS, Hussien HM, Kabapy NF. Non-alcoholic fatty liver induces insulin resistance and metabolic disorders with development of brain damage and dysfunction. Metab Brain Dis. 2011;26(4). doi:10.1007/s11011-011-9261-y
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s11011-011-9261-y&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21881966&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F09%2F21%2F2022.09.21.22280182.atom) 

56. 56.Helfer G, Wu QF. Chemerin: A multifaceted adipokine involved in metabolic disorders. J Endocrinol. 2018;238(2). doi:10.1530/JOE-18-0174
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6Mzoiam9lIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjk6IjIzOC8yL1I3OSI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDIyLzA5LzIxLzIwMjIuMDkuMjEuMjIyODAxODIuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 

57. 57.Aronis KN, Sahin-Efe A, Chamberland JP, Spiro A, Vokonas P, Mantzoros CS. Chemerin levels as predictor of acute coronary events: A case-control study nested within the veterans affairs normative aging study. Metabolism. 2014;63(6). doi:10.1016/j.metabol.2014.02.013
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.metabol.2014.02.013&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24684821&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F09%2F21%2F2022.09.21.22280182.atom) 

58. 58.Ernst MC, Sinal CJ. Chemerin: At the crossroads of inflammation and obesity. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2010;21(11). doi:10.1016/j.tem.2010.08.001
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.tem.2010.08.001&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20817486&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F09%2F21%2F2022.09.21.22280182.atom) 

59. 59.Blüher M, Rudich A, Klöting N, et al. Two patterns of adipokine and other biomarker dynamics in a long-term weight loss intervention. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(2). doi:10.2337/dc11-1267
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NzoiZGlhY2FyZSI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czo4OiIzNS8yLzM0MiI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDIyLzA5LzIxLzIwMjIuMDkuMjEuMjIyODAxODIuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 

60. 60.Ashtary-Larky D, Kashkooli S, Bagheri R, et al. The effect of exercise training on serum concentrations of chemerin in patients with metabolic diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Physiol Biochem. Published online 2021. doi:10.1080/13813455.2021.1892149
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1080/13813455.2021.1892149&link_type=DOI) 

61. 61.Ferland DJ, Mullick AE, Watts SW. Chemerin as a driver of hypertension: A consideration. Am J Hypertens. 2020;33(11). doi:10.1093/ajh/hpaa084
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/ajh/hpaa084&link_type=DOI) 

62. 62.Hottman DA, Chernick D, Cheng S, Wang Z, Li L. HDL and cognition in neurodegenerative disorders. Neurobiol Dis. 2014;72(Part A). doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2014.07.015
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.nbd.2014.07.015&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25131449&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F09%2F21%2F2022.09.21.22280182.atom) 

63. 63.Smith PJ, Blumenthal JA, Babyak MA, et al. Effects of the dietary approaches to stop hypertension diet, exercise, and caloric restriction on neurocognition in overweight adults with high blood pressure. Hypertension. 2010;55(6). doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.146795
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.146795&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20305128&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F09%2F21%2F2022.09.21.22280182.atom) 

64. 64.Yaskolka Meir A, Tsaban G, Zelicha H, et al. A Green-Mediterranean Diet, Supplemented with Mankai Duckweed, Preserves Iron-Homeostasis in Humans and Is Efficient in Reversal of Anemia in Rats. J Nutr. 2019;149(6):1004–1011. doi:10.1093/jn/nxy321
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/jn/nxy321&link_type=DOI) 

65. 65.Tsaban G, Yaskolka Meir A, Rinott E, et al. The effect of green Mediterranean diet on cardiometabolic risk; a randomised controlled trial. Heart. 2021;107(13):1054–1061. doi:10.1136/HEARTJNL-2020-317802
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6ODoiaGVhcnRqbmwiO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6MTE6IjEwNy8xMy8xMDU0IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjIvMDkvMjEvMjAyMi4wOS4yMS4yMjI4MDE4Mi5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

66. 66.Rinott E, Youngster I, Yaskolka Meir A, et al. Effects of Diet-Modulated Autologous Fecal Microbiota Transplantation on Weight Regain. Gastroenterology. 2021;160(1):158-173.e10. doi:10.1053/J.GASTRO.2020.08.041
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1053/J.GASTRO.2020.08.041&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F09%2F21%2F2022.09.21.22280182.atom) 

67. 67.Zelicha H, Kaplan A, Meir AY, et al. The Effect of Wolffia globosa Mankai, a Green Aquatic Plant, on Postprandial Glycemic Response: A Randomized Crossover Controlled Trial. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(7):1162–1169. doi:10.2337/DC18-2319
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NzoiZGlhY2FyZSI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czo5OiI0Mi83LzExNjIiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo1MDoiL21lZHJ4aXYvZWFybHkvMjAyMi8wOS8yMS8yMDIyLjA5LjIxLjIyMjgwMTgyLmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 

68. 68.Yaskolka Meir A, Keller M, Bernhart SH, et al. Lifestyle weight-loss intervention may attenuate methylation aging: the CENTRAL MRI randomized controlled trial. Clin Epigenetics. 2021;13(1). doi:10.1186/s13148-021-01038-0
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/s13148-021-01038-0&link_type=DOI) 

69. 69.Levakov G, Faskowitz J, Avidan G, Sporns O. Mapping individual differences across brain network structure to function and behavior with connectome embedding. Neuroimage. Published online August 11, 2021:118469. doi:10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2021.118469
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2021.118469&link_type=DOI) 

70. 70.Fischl B, Sereno MI, Dale AM. Cortical surface-based analysis: II. Inflation, flattening, and a surface-based coordinate system. Neuroimage. 1999;9(2):195–207. doi:10.1006/nimg.1998.0396
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1006/nimg.1998.0396&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=9931269&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F09%2F21%2F2022.09.21.22280182.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000078608900002&link_type=ISI) 

71. 71.Esteban O, Markiewicz CJ, Blair RW, et al. fMRIPrep: a robust preprocessing pipeline for functional MRI. Nat Methods. 2019;16(1):111–116. doi:10.1038/s41592-018-0235-4
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41592-018-0235-4&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=30532080&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F09%2F21%2F2022.09.21.22280182.atom) 

72. 72.Cameron C, Sharad S, Brian C, et al. Towards Automated Analysis of Connectomes: The Configurable Pipeline for the Analysis of Connectomes (C-PAC). In: Neuroinformatics. Vol 7. ; 2013. doi:10.3389/conf.fninf.2013.09.00042
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3389/conf.fninf.2013.09.00042&link_type=DOI) 

73. 73.Behzadi Y, Restom K, Liau J, Liu TT. A component based noise correction method (CompCor) for BOLD and perfusion based fMRI. Neuroimage. 2007;37(1):90–101. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.042
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.042&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=17560126&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F09%2F21%2F2022.09.21.22280182.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000248526700010&link_type=ISI) 

74. 74.Power JD, Mitra A, Laumann TO, Snyder AZ, Schlaggar BL, Petersen SE. Methods to detect, characterize, and remove motion artifact in resting state fMRI. Neuroimage. 2014;84:320–341. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.048
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.048&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23994314&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F09%2F21%2F2022.09.21.22280182.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000328868600030&link_type=ISI) 

75. 75.Heister D, Brewer JB, Magda S, Blennow K, McEvoy LK. Predicting MCI outcome with clinically available MRI and CSF biomarkers. Neurology. 2011;77(17):1619–1628. doi:10.1212/WNL.0B013E3182343314
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6OToibmV1cm9sb2d5IjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEwOiI3Ny8xNy8xNjE5IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjIvMDkvMjEvMjAyMi4wOS4yMS4yMjI4MDE4Mi5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

76. 76.Shai I, Rosner BA, Shahar DR, et al. Dietary Evaluation and Attenuation of Relative Risk: Multiple Comparisons between Blood and Urinary Biomarkers, Food Frequency, and 24-Hour Recall Questionnaires: the DEARR Study. J Nutr. 2005;135(3):573–579. doi:10.1093/JN/135.3.573
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6OToibnV0cml0aW9uIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjk6IjEzNS8zLzU3MyI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDIyLzA5LzIxLzIwMjIuMDkuMjEuMjIyODAxODIuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 

77. 77.Platt JC. Probabilistic Outputs for Support Vector Machines and Comparisons to Regularized Likelihood Methods. In: ADVANCES IN LARGE MARGIN CLASSIFIERS. MIT Press; 1999:61–74.
    
    

78. 78. Pedregosa Fabian, Michel V,  Grisel Olivier, et al. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. J Mach Learn Res. 2011;12(Oct):2825–2830. doi:10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=27181339&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F09%2F21%2F2022.09.21.22280182.atom) 

79. 79.Hilger K, Winter NR, Leenings R, et al. Predicting intelligence from brain gray matter volume. Brain Struct Funct. 2020;225(7):2111–2129. doi:10.1007/s00429-020-02113-7
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s00429-020-02113-7&link_type=DOI) 

80. 80.Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B. 1995;57(1):289–300. doi:10.1111/J.2517-6161.1995.TB02031.X
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/J.2517-6161.1995.TB02031.X&link_type=DOI) 

81. 81.Passingham RE, Stephan KE, Kötter R. The anatomical basis of functional localization in the cortex. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002;3(8):606–616. doi:10.1038/nrn893
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/nrn893&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=12154362&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F09%2F21%2F2022.09.21.22280182.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000177447800012&link_type=ISI) 

82. 82.Yeo BTT, Krienen FM, Sepulcre J, et al. The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J Neurophysiol. 2011;106(3):1125–1165. doi:10.1152/jn.00338.2011
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1152/jn.00338.2011&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21653723&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F09%2F21%2F2022.09.21.22280182.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000294775500007&link_type=ISI) 

83. 83.Thomas EL, Fitzpatrick JA, Malik SJ, Taylor-Robinson SD, Bell JD. Whole body fat: Content and distribution. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc. 2013;73:56–80. doi:10.1016/J.PNMRS.2013.04.001
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/J.PNMRS.2013.04.001&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23962884&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2022%2F09%2F21%2F2022.09.21.22280182.atom)