Abstract
Objectives To develop cross-validated prediction models for severe outcomes in COVID-19 using blood biomarker and demographic data; Demonstrate best practices for clinical data curation and statistical modelling decisions, with an emphasis on Bayesian methods.
Design Retrospective observational cohort study.
Setting Multicentre across National Health Service (NHS) trusts in Southwest region, England, UK.
Participants Hospitalised adult patients with a positive SARS-CoV 2 by PCR during the first wave (March – October 2020). 843 COVID-19 patients (mean age 71, 45% female, 32% died or needed ICU stay) split into training (n=590) and validation groups (n=253) along with observations on demographics, co-infections, and 30 laboratory blood biomarkers.
Primary outcome measures ICU admission or death within 28-days of admission to hospital for COVID-19 or a positive PCR result if already admitted.
Results Predictive regression models were fit to predict primary outcomes using demographic data and initial results from biomarker tests collected within 3 days of admission or testing positive if already admitted. Using all variables, a standard logistic regression yielded an internal validation median AUC of 0.7 (95% Interval [0.64,0.81]), and an external validation AUC of 0.67 [0.61, 0.71], a Bayesian logistic regression using a horseshoe prior yielded an internal validation median AUC of 0.78 [0.71, 0.85], and an external validation median AUC of 0.70 [0.68, 0.71]. Variable selection performed using Bayesian predictive projection determined a four variable model using Age, Urea, Prothrombin time and Neutrophil-Lymphocyte ratio, with a median AUC of 0.74 [0.67, 0.82], and external validation AUC of 0.70 [0.69, 0.71].
Conclusions Our study reiterates the predictive value of previously identified biomarkers for COVID-19 severity assessment. Given the small data set, the full and reduced models have decent performance, but would require improved external validation for clinical application. The study highlights a variety of challenges present in complex medical data sets while maintaining best statistical practices with an emphasis on showcasing recent Bayesian methods.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work is funded by Health Data Research UK via the Better Care Partnership Southwest (HDR CF0129), Medical Research Council Research Grant MR/T005408/1, and the Elizabeth Blackwell Institute for Health Research, University of Bristol and the Wellcome Trust Institutional Strategic Support Fund.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study [IRAS project ID: 283439] underwent a rigorous ethical and regulatory approval process, and a favourable opinion was gained from Research Ethics Service, Wales REC 7, c/o Public Health Wales, Building 1, Jobswell Road, St Davids Park, SA31 3HB on 11/09/2020.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Several figures corrected for axes and captions
Data Availability
Due to NHS data governance, all data produced in the present study are unavailable directly through the authors, but reasonable requests for data to Southwest England NHS can be arranged via the authors.
